Analysis of Primates - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Analysis of Primates

Description:

Analysis of Primates Comparisons of Human, Ape, and Australopithecine – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:164
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: Janic98
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Analysis of Primates


1
Analysis of Primates
  • Comparisons of Human, Ape, and Australopithecine

2
Characteristics of Primates
3
Hominids
  • Bones of more than 500 early hominids have been
    found
  • From these bones, we have gained a broad
    understanding of these related species
  • By 3mya most hominids were bipedal
  • These hominids had a pelvis similar to humans

4
Comparison of Pelvis and Foot Bones
  • Hominid pelvis (like human pelvis) became shorter
    and bowl-shaped
  • This made the pelvis more stable for upright
    walking
  • Early hominid leg and foot bones also more
    similar to humans

5
Hominid Locomotion
  • Bipedal locomotion is an adaptation for living in
    open grasslands
  • Bipedal adaptation was selected for because it
    was easier to see far and move farther
  • Upright posture also gets rid of excess body heat
  • Over many years hominid legs became stronger
  • Over many years hominid feet developed arches for
    efficient support of their body weight
  • Over many years hominid hands became better at
    manipulating objects such as food and tools

6
Hominid Head
  • Early hominid heads were very different than ours
    (evolutionary forces were slower in making
    changes to heads)
  • Adult brain was 1/3 size of ours
  • The widest part of skull was below the brain case

7
Hominid Skulls
  • Australopithecus boisei Modern
    Human
  • Early hominids had big teeth, large jaws, large
    zygomatic arches
  • Early hominids had a sagittal crest (jaw muscle
    attachment area)
  • (In modern humans, jaw muscles are smaller and
    attach to skull in temple region)

8
Comparisons of Skulls
  • Modern humans have large cranial capacity,
    relatively small teeth, less prominent brow
    ridges, small zygomatic arches, small jaw, no
    sagittal crest

9
Comparisons of Skulls
  • As a transitional species, (intermediate between
    modern humans and apes) Australopithecines had
    less cranial capacity, larger teeth, prominent
    brow ridges, larger zygomatic arches, larger jaw,
    sagittal crest
  • Below is an Australopithecine afarensis skull
    (like Lucy)

10
Comparisons of Skulls
  • Skulls of Apes (see above gorilla skulls) had
    small cranial capacity, large teeth, prominent
    brow ridges, large zygomatic arches, large jaw,
    sagittal crest

11
Comparison of Spinal Cords
  • Ape spinal cord exits the rear of the skull
  • Australopithecus, lower left, spinal cord (like
    human) exits the bottom of skull

12
Skeletal Comparisons
13
Dental Comparisons
  • Gorilla lower jaw is parallel, and canine teeth
    are very pointed
  • Australopithecus lower jaw is more angled
  • Modern human lower jaw is even more angled

14
Dental Comparisons
  • Australopithecus afarensis (4.0-2.9 mya) (Lucy)
    canine teeth were relatively large and pointed,
    similar to apes
  • Australopithecus africanus (3.3-2.3 mya) canine
    teeth did not project outteeth more like humans
    than afarensis

15
Branches of the Hominid Evolutionary Tree
16
Hominid Species in Order of Appearance in Fossil
Record(oldest to newest)
  • Ardipithecus ramidus
  • Australopithecus anamensis
  • Australopithecus afarensis (Lucy)
  • Australopithecus africanus
  • Australopithecus aethiopicus
  • Australopithecus robustus
  • Australopithecus boisei
  • Homo habilis
  • Homo erectus
  • Homo sapien (archaic)
  • Homo sapien neanderthalensis
  • Homo sapien sapien (modern)

17
  • For tomorrow, below and review
  • Big Neanderthal debate
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com