Photodetachment of the negative oxygen atom was observed. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

Photodetachment of the negative oxygen atom was observed.

Description:

Photodetachment Spectroscopy at the lowest O- ion threshold Robert Mohr, Davidson College, Davidson, North Carolina Abstract Photodetachment from the negative oxygen ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:24
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: W344
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Photodetachment of the negative oxygen atom was observed.


1
Photodetachment Spectroscopy at the lowest O- ion
threshold
Robert Mohr, Davidson College, Davidson, North
Carolina
Abstract
Photodetachment from the negative oxygen ion in a
magnetic field is a well-studied phenomenon at
the transition known as the electron affinity.
However, the goal of this work is to study the
spectroscopy of the lowest energy detachment
transition, which occurs approximately 20 meV
below the electron affinity. A Penning ion trap
was used to trap the ions and photodetachment was
achieved using a continuous wave tunable diode
laser. High-resolution spectroscopy has allowed
us to resolve the energy of the lowest detachment
threshold.
Background
  • The negative oxygen ion has 2 bound states
    2P3/2 and 2P1/2
  • The ground state of the neutral oxygen atom is
    part of an inverted triplet 3P2 (lowest state),
    3P1, 3P0.

Computer
The electronics used to detect the image current
produced by the oscillating oxygen ion cloud.
848.5 nm
Results
Zeeman Effect
  • In the absence of a magnetic field, the energy
    levels which make up the 2P1/2 and 3P2 states are
    degenerate.
  • In the presence of an external magnetic field the
    2P1/2 and 3P2 states split into levels.
  • Instead of a single transition there are several
    transitions between these states. Which
    transitions are allowed is determined by
    conservation of momentum.

Apparatus
A plot showing the fraction of ions surviving
detachment as a function of photon energy. The
threshold transition can be observed
approximately around a photon energy of 11607.75
cm-1.
  • The ions are held in a Penning ion trap located
    in an ultra high vacuum (UHV) at a pressure of 6
    x 10-8 Torr.
  • A continuous wave tunable diode laser is used to
    provide photons for photodetachment. Light with p
    polarization was used in this investigation.
  • The fraction of ions surviving detachment can be
    measured by using a radio frequency (RF)
    potential to cause the ion ensemble to oscillate
    in the trap. This generates an image current
    which can be measured and compared to the
    pre-detachment current magnitude to find the
    fraction surviving.
  • A photodiode allows the same amount of light of
    to be used for each run.

A second scan showing the fraction of ions
surviving detachment as a function of photon
energy. The threshold transition here can be
observed around a photon energy of 11607.80 cm-1.
Conclusions
  • Photodetachment of the negative oxygen atom was
    observed.
  • Further work will permit a precision measurement
    of the lowest threshold energy.
  • The magnetic Zeeman transitions were, contrary to
    what was predicted, not observed.

References
1 C. Blondel, W. Chaibi, C. Delsart, and C.
Drag, J. Phys. B. 39, 1409 (2006). 2 C.
Blondel, C. Delsart, C. Valli, S. Yiou, M.R.
Godefroid and S. Van Eck, Phys. Rev. A. 64,
052504 (2001). 3 P. R. Bevington, Data
Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical
Sciences (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969). 4 W. A.
M. Blumberg, Laser Photodetachment Spectroscopy
of Negative Ions in a Magnetic Field (PhD
Thesis, Harvard University, 1979). 5 W. A. M.
Blumberg, R. M. Jopson, and D. J. Larson, Phys.
Rev. Lett. 40, 1320 (1978). 6 W. A. M.
Blumberg, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Larson, Phys.
Rev. A. 19, 139 (1979). 7 C. W. Clark, Phys.
Rev. A. 28, 83 (1983). 8 H. G. Dehmelt and F.
L. Walls, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 127 (1968). 9 D.
J. Griffiths, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics
2nd Ed (Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River,
NJ, 2005). 10 C. Heinemann, W. Koch, G. G.
Lindner and D. Reinen, Phys. Rev. A. 52, 1024
(1995). 11 G. Herzberg, Atomic Spectra and
Atomic Structure (Dover Publications, New York,
1945). 12 A. K. Langworthy, D. M. Pendergrast,
and J. N. Yukich, Phys. Rev. A. 69, 025401
(2004). 13 D. J. Larson and R. Stoneman, J. de
Physique. 43, C285 (1982). 14 D. J. Larson and
R. Stoneman, Phys. Rev. A. 31, 2210 (1985). 15
D. M. Pendergrast and J. N. Yukich, Phys. Rev. A.
67, 062721 (2003). 16 B. M. Smirnov, Physics of
Atoms and Ions (Springer, New York, 2003). 17
E. P. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 73, 1002 (1948). 18 J.
N. Yukich, Electron Wave Packets and Ramsey
Interference in a Magnetic Field (PhD Thesis,
University of Virginia, 1996). 19 J. N.
Yukich, C. T. Butler, and D. J. Larson, Phys.
Rev. A. 55, 3303 (1997). 20 J. N. Yukich, T.
Kramer, and C. Bracher, Phys. Rev. A. 68, 033412
(2003).
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Dr. John Yukich and the Davidson
Physics Department
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com