Different effects of thinning and burning on - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Different effects of thinning and burning on

Description:

Different effects of thinning and burning on Sierran mixed-conifer ecosystems Malcolm North, USFS, Sierra Nevada Research Center, Davis, CA – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Malco73
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Different effects of thinning and burning on


1
Different effects of thinning and burning on
Sierran mixed-conifer ecosystems
Malcolm North, USFS, Sierra Nevada Research
Center, Davis, CA
2
(No Transcript)
3
Teakettle Location, Design, Plot Layout and
Timeline
18 plots, 4 ha each, 3 reps of each of the 6
treatments
  • Burned November 2001, off season, for
    containment air quality

Thinning Level No Burn Understory Burn
None Control Burn Only
25 cm lt thin lt76 cm Thin from below/No Burn Thin from below/Burn
25 cm lt thin leave 22 large t/ha Overstory thin/No Burn Overstory thin/Burn
4
Thinning Effects (using all trees in a 4 ha plot)
Overstory (shelterwood) Thin gt 25 cm leave 22
large tree/ha
Understory 25 cmlt thin lt 76 cm
5
Teakettles Focus Ecosystem Structure,
Composition and Function
6
Collaborators
7
Teakettle Results Focus on 4 Vegetation
Questions Relevant to Developing Thinning and
Burning Prescriptions
  1. What effect do shrubs have on forest succession
    and water dynamics?
  2. Why is mixed conifer so strongly clustered? Are
    trees grouped by age cohorts?
  3. Do significant reductions in canopy cover reduce
    regeneration survival and understory herb cover?
  4. Did the fire and thinning treatments produce a
    desired diameter distribution?

8
1. What effect do shrubs have on forest
succession and water dynamics?
  • Saplings and shrubs compete for shallow water in
    early summer
  • Trees rely on deep water through summer drought
  • Low tree seedling survival in shrubs and
    without root exclosure

From A. Plaemboeck
  • Shrubs become islands that can lock a site
    against seedlings and herbs

9
2. Why is mixed conifer so strongly clustered?
Are trees grouped by age cohorts?
Bonnicksen and Stone (1982) suggested pattern is
due to grouped cohort age structure
clustered
10
  • Are trees grouped by age cohorts?
  • No ages were not spatially autocorrelated
    (variogram not shown)

11
Why is mixed conifer so strongly clustered?
  • One influence may be that tree groups reflect
    the geomorphic template (depth to bedrock)

Note correlation between the grouping of tree
basal area, mostly driven by clusters of large
trees and the depth to bedrock
Depth to bedrock for the a 4 ha area, where
deeper soils are in red. (Determined by seismic
survey)
12
How Might This Explain Current Mortality
Patterns?
  • Mortality episodic associated with La Nina
    droughts
  • Most mortality in areas of high density
  • Significantly higher than expected mortality for
    large trees
  • Are small/intermediate trees depleting deep soil
    water pockets?

Significantly different than expected
(Chi-square)
13
3. Do significant reductions in canopy cover
reduce regeneration survival and understory herb
cover?
Surface temperature by Julian date (y axis) and
hour (x axis) for 3 and 76 canopy cover
Persistent gaps in mixed-conifer without
regeneration and having few herbs
14
Post-treatment Germinant Survivorship
  • Burned treatments had higher pine germinant
    survival
  • Burn and thin treatments (BC and BS) also had the
    lowest white fir and incense-cedar survivorship
  • Herb cover and richness (not shown)
    significantly greater in all burned vs. thinned
    treatments, regardless of canopy cover reduction

15
Increased Micro-site Heterogeneity
Data and slide from Harold Zald and Andy Gray,
PNW Research
  • Increased separation of sugar pine and white
    fir based on light level
  • and soil moisture

Post-Treatment
Pre-Treatment
Light
Light
Soil H2O
Soil H2O
16
4. Did the fire and thinning treatments produce
a desired diameter distribution?
Current diameter distribution
Before fire suppression (1865) recruitment and
mortality was pulsed by fire and El Nino events
17
  • Did the fire and thinning treatments produce a
    desired diameter distribution?
  • No Not enough small and too many intermediate
    size trees taken

VTM is gt2400 vegetation type mapping plots
collected in the early 30s
18
What did we learn at Teakettle?
  • Thinning alone stalls herb development and does
    not favor shade-intolerant regeneration
  • Fires important for reducing shrubs which are
    strong competitors with trees and herbs
  • Group selection doesnt appear to be needed
  • Thinning treatments may need to target small
    trees in high density areas, particularly around
    large, old trees
  • If prescribed fire is applied off season,
    thinning must be aggressive about cutting small
    trees
  • Observation Thinning prescriptions should stay
    focused on trees as fuels rather diameters or
    board feet
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com