Title: Surface Ship Maintenance Program brief for Virginia Ship Repair Association
1Surface Ship Maintenance Programbrief for
Virginia Ship Repair Association
UNCLASS
- CAPT Mike Stanton
- USFF N431
- 22 APR 2009
2Overview
- USFF Fleet Maintenance Directorate
- Program objectives
- Planned Service Life view of Maintenance
- Areas of responsibility
- Strategic Maintenance Process
- Requirements programming
- Maintenance execution planning
- Maintenance execution
3USFF N43 Maintenance Directorate
- N43 Fleet Maint Officer RADM(s) Joe Campbell
- (prospective) FMO RADM(s) Clark Orzalli (May)
- N43B Deputy FMO Mr. Bob Butler
- N431 Surface Ship Maint Prog Mgr CAPT Mike
Stanton - (prospective) CAPT Stephanie Douglas
- N432 Submarine Maint Prog Mgr CDR Greg Burton
- N433 Aviation Maint Prog Mgr CAPT Dave Seaton
- N434 Technical Process Prog Mgr Mr. Dale
Hirschman - N435 Financial Industrial Mgt Mr. Glenn Hottel
- N436 C5I Branch Head CDR Drew Lambley (IA)
- N437 Maint Information Sys Mgt Mrs. Maureen
Ransom - N438 CVN Maint Prog Mgr CAPT Lloyd Jones
4Surface Ship Maintenance Program Focus on
Achieving Service Life
- Requirement ensure material condition of ships
supports Ao, presence requirements achieves
planned service life. - 157 Surface Ships, 11 classes
- 11 CSG, 10 ESG, various SNGs surge reqts
- Support current and future readiness
- Ao,overall Ao,FRP Ao,Lifecycle
- Priorities
- 313 ship Navy must achieve planned service life
for ships in inventory - 49 of surface force service life has been
consumed - Stabilizing refining maintenance requirements
- Developing deploying sound maintenance
practices, processes strategies
Significant Congressional interest in the
readiness of the Surface Force
5N431 Areas of Responsibility
- Current Readiness
- Availability execution in support of FRP
- Ships with marginal material condition
- Hi-interest INSURVs
- New Construction readiness (LPD 17, LCS)
- Future Readiness
- Breadth technical rigor of lifecycle maint
reqts - Programming strategies and risk decisions
- Availability risk assessment and mitigation
- New Construction readiness
- Maint Acquisition Mgt
- MSMO Program
- Acqn Strat IPT
- AFEBs
- Maint Contracting Strategies
- Maintenance execution strategies and policies
- Industry Relations
- JINII, VSRA, JASRA
FMBoD locked-in on Surface Ship Maintenance
Program
6Strategic Maintenance Process
Execution (RMC MSMO)
Planning (RMC MSMO)
Requirements Development (TYCOM, FFC)
Programming Budgeting (FFC, OPNAV)
Appropriation Apportionment (Congress, FMB)
Variation
Process stage
Targeted strategies
- MSMO Spiral 2
- SHIPMAIN
- - Assessments
- - Level-loading
- MSMO stabilization
- Contracts Governance
- Depot work integration
- - RMC standardization
- Risk decisions
- toward PSL
- Industrial base
- preservation
- Reqts Realism MRS
- - ICMP development
7Strategic Maintenance Process
Execution (RMC MSMO)
Planning (RMC MSMO)
Requirements Development (TYCOM, FFC)
Programming Budgeting (FFC, OPNAV)
Appropriation Apportionment (Congress, FMB)
Variation
Process stage
Targeted strategies
- MSMO Spiral 2
- SHIPMAIN
- - Assessments
- - Level-loading
- MSMO stabilization
- Contracts Governance
- Depot work integration
- - RMC standardization
- Risk decisions
- toward PSL
- Industrial base
- preservation
- Reqts Realism MRS
- - ICMP development
8Requirements Improvement
- January 2009 Surface Ship Maint Strategic Offsite
- Must strengthen requirements determination
process for ships - CLASSRON focus on lifecycle maintenance to feed
programming - Actions
- Maintenance Requirements System (MRS) Alliance
- Availability notionals tailoring projects
- Modified docking cycles
- Aged notionals
- Parametric analysis
- Surface Ship Life Cycle Management Activity
(SSLCM) - ICMP improvement
- Standardized availability work packages
- ABS Hull-life Surveys (NAVSEA 05)
9Maint Requirements Adjustments
- Aged Notionals
- Automobile maint concept older assets require
increasing maint - Gradually increase the notionals as the vessel
consumes service life - Basis for CVN Maint Op-cycle Mgt availability
resourcing levels - Easily understood by Pentagon programmers
Under study
10Strategic Maintenance Process
Execution (RMC MSMO)
Planning (RMC MSMO)
Requirements Development (TYCOM, FFC)
Programming Budgeting (FFC, OPNAV)
Appropriation Apportionment (Congress, FMB)
Variation
Process stage
Targeted strategies
- MSMO Spiral 2
- SHIPMAIN
- - Assessments
- - Level-loading
- MSMO stabilization
- Contracts Governance
- Depot work integration
- - RMC standardization
- Risk decisions
- toward PSL
- Industrial base
- preservation
- Reqts Realism MRS
- - ICMP development
11Programming Considerations
- Meeting maintenance requirements since 2003 with
baseline funding plus supplemental appropriations - How to transition out of supplementals yet still
secure needed funding(?) - Fiscal policies of new administration.
- How is risk managed against shortfalls
- Preserve industrial base vs. service life risk?
- Phasing with major modernization programs
- Full funding vs. timing of funding
- Measurements tricky
- Near term effects and long-term effects
12Strategic Maintenance Process
Execution (RMC MSMO)
Planning (RMC MSMO)
Requirements Development (TYCOM, FFC)
Programming Budgeting (FFC, OPNAV)
Appropriation Apportionment (Congress, FMB)
Variation
Process stage
Targeted strategies
- MSMO Spiral 2
- SHIPMAIN
- - Assessments
- - Level-loading
- MSMO stabilization
- Contracts Governance
- Depot work integration
- - RMC standardization
- Risk decisions
- toward PSL
- Industrial base
- preservation
- Reqts Realism MRS
- - ICMP development
13Execution Planning
- Incremental improvements in MSMO Spiral 2
- MCIT replaces SHIPMAIN
- Focused on avail planning execution performance
- What of assessments?
- Re-institute shipboard assessments to facilitate
avail planning - SSLCM ICMP deploying BAWPs AWPs
- Expanding role of MFOM
- Valuating lifecycle maintenance actions
- Port-loading considerations (source of variation)
- Technical requirements clarification
stabilization
14Strategic Maintenance Process
Execution (RMC MSMO)
Planning (RMC MSMO)
Requirements Development (TYCOM, FFC)
Programming Budgeting (FFC, OPNAV)
Appropriation Apportionment (Congress, FMB)
Variation
Process stage
Targeted strategies
- MSMO Spiral 2
- SHIPMAIN
- - Assessments
- - Level-loading
- MSMO stabilization
- Contracts Governance
- Depot work integration
- - RMC standardization
- Risk decisions
- toward PSL
- Industrial base
- preservation
- Reqts Realism MRS
- - ICMP development
15Maintenance Execution
- MSMO
- Over-arching objective stabilize MSMO
- Permits contractor focus, commitment, repetition,
improvement - Incremental improvements for MSMO Spiral 2
- Beneficial to Navy and industry
- Comprehensive Contracting Strategy
- Contracts Governance Process
- Depot Work Integration
16MSMO Results Readiness vs. Maint Investment
Start MSMO
Navy initiates FRP
Steaming days/yr/ship
CNO Clark buy-down maint backlog (2003)
Large increase in steaming days/yr 2004-2008
(HOA, APS, POA, HADR, etc.)
Increased steaming at same maint investment
levels MSMO enabling FRP
17MSMO Results Contract Performance
- Cost rates stable, affordable, and w/i
programmed levels - Cumulative cost performance (thru FY08) 4
cost under-run, all contracts, all performance
periods - Schedule response to current readiness
exceptional supports FRP - gt200 CNO MSMO availabilities 1 late due to
contractor performance - Incorporation of change scope w/o sked impact
significant (range 15-30) - Technical performance solid improving
- Govt QA-point reject rate 2
- Partnership All MSMOs productively engaged
in many
Navy initiatives
QA Reject trends
1st-order MSMO program objectives being met
18MSMO Controls, Oversight, Governance
- MSMO success due to
- All contracts issued under proper Navy contract
technical warrants - Contract stability focus, investment, process
improvement - RMC exercising contractual authorities
- DCAA periodic cost audits
- Award fee evaluation boards frequent feedback
accountability - Standing MSMO Acqn IPT providing dynamic review
adjustment - Rigorous oversight by ASN(RDA)
- Balancing competition, performance incentives,
stability - Approved additional contract strengthening in
MSMO Spiral 2 (FY10-14) - Navy submitting report to Congress in FY10 Budget
Request substantiating rationale for executing
DDG Modernization w/ MSMO
Many pieces contributing to overall program
strength
19Update Comprehensive Contracting Depot Work
Integration
- Policy for Comprehensive Contracting and Depot
Work Integration - Approved by ASN(RDA) 27 March 2009
- Enabling instructions policies implemented JFMM
Ch 7A (30 Jun 08) - Key elements/enablers
- All work coincident to depot availabilities shall
be planned, integrated and coordinated through
the NSA using the LMA as the planning agent - LMAs shall have first opportunity to execute all
depot work for which they have organic
capability, capacity and cost reasonableness - Programs shall budget for reasonable depot
installation costs - AITs shall execute AIT-unique work, and can
execute depot installation work if the LMA does
not meet the aforementioned requirements - NSAs shall remain the single authoritative voice
to equitably resolve availability disputes and
disruptions amongst all customers
Policy successfully executed on several major CNO
availabilities
20Comprehensive Contracting Depot Work
IntegrationOverview
Comprehensive Contracting Depot Work Integration
Comprehensive Contracting Strategy
Maint, Modernization AIT Integration
Enablers - SY-AIT SWT 897-04 - 1 June
08 JFMM update - ASN Policy directive
Enablers - 2004 FISC/SUP/Fleet/SEA/MOU -
USFF 201411ZJUL06 - USFF
211431ZJUN07 - USFF 271300ZMAR08
- 30 June 2008 JFMM update
- NAVSEA SEAPORT-e Policy - ASN Policy
directive
21Questions?