Surface Ship Maintenance Program brief for Virginia Ship Repair Association - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Surface Ship Maintenance Program brief for Virginia Ship Repair Association

Description:

Title: FFC Standard Template - JAN08 Author: administrator Created Date: 2/17/2005 1:34:37 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show Company – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:126
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: virgini163
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Surface Ship Maintenance Program brief for Virginia Ship Repair Association


1
Surface Ship Maintenance Programbrief for
Virginia Ship Repair Association
UNCLASS
  • CAPT Mike Stanton
  • USFF N431
  • 22 APR 2009

2
Overview
  • USFF Fleet Maintenance Directorate
  • Program objectives
  • Planned Service Life view of Maintenance
  • Areas of responsibility
  • Strategic Maintenance Process
  • Requirements programming
  • Maintenance execution planning
  • Maintenance execution

3
USFF N43 Maintenance Directorate
  • N43 Fleet Maint Officer RADM(s) Joe Campbell
  • (prospective) FMO RADM(s) Clark Orzalli (May)
  • N43B Deputy FMO Mr. Bob Butler
  • N431 Surface Ship Maint Prog Mgr CAPT Mike
    Stanton
  • (prospective) CAPT Stephanie Douglas
  • N432 Submarine Maint Prog Mgr CDR Greg Burton
  • N433 Aviation Maint Prog Mgr CAPT Dave Seaton
  • N434 Technical Process Prog Mgr Mr. Dale
    Hirschman
  • N435 Financial Industrial Mgt Mr. Glenn Hottel
  • N436 C5I Branch Head CDR Drew Lambley (IA)
  • N437 Maint Information Sys Mgt Mrs. Maureen
    Ransom
  • N438 CVN Maint Prog Mgr CAPT Lloyd Jones

4
Surface Ship Maintenance Program Focus on
Achieving Service Life
  • Requirement ensure material condition of ships
    supports Ao, presence requirements achieves
    planned service life.
  • 157 Surface Ships, 11 classes
  • 11 CSG, 10 ESG, various SNGs surge reqts
  • Support current and future readiness
  • Ao,overall Ao,FRP Ao,Lifecycle
  • Priorities
  • 313 ship Navy must achieve planned service life
    for ships in inventory
  • 49 of surface force service life has been
    consumed
  • Stabilizing refining maintenance requirements
  • Developing deploying sound maintenance
    practices, processes strategies

Significant Congressional interest in the
readiness of the Surface Force
5
N431 Areas of Responsibility
  • Current Readiness
  • Availability execution in support of FRP
  • Ships with marginal material condition
  • Hi-interest INSURVs
  • New Construction readiness (LPD 17, LCS)
  • Future Readiness
  • Breadth technical rigor of lifecycle maint
    reqts
  • Programming strategies and risk decisions
  • Availability risk assessment and mitigation
  • New Construction readiness
  • Maint Acquisition Mgt
  • MSMO Program
  • Acqn Strat IPT
  • AFEBs
  • Maint Contracting Strategies
  • Maintenance execution strategies and policies
  • Industry Relations
  • JINII, VSRA, JASRA

FMBoD locked-in on Surface Ship Maintenance
Program
6
Strategic Maintenance Process
Execution (RMC MSMO)
Planning (RMC MSMO)
Requirements Development (TYCOM, FFC)
Programming Budgeting (FFC, OPNAV)
Appropriation Apportionment (Congress, FMB)
Variation
Process stage
Targeted strategies
  • MSMO Spiral 2
  • SHIPMAIN
  • - Assessments
  • - Level-loading
  • MSMO stabilization
  • Contracts Governance
  • Depot work integration
  • - RMC standardization
  • Risk decisions
  • toward PSL
  • Industrial base
  • preservation
  • Reqts Realism MRS
  • - ICMP development

7
Strategic Maintenance Process
Execution (RMC MSMO)
Planning (RMC MSMO)
Requirements Development (TYCOM, FFC)
Programming Budgeting (FFC, OPNAV)
Appropriation Apportionment (Congress, FMB)
Variation
Process stage
Targeted strategies
  • MSMO Spiral 2
  • SHIPMAIN
  • - Assessments
  • - Level-loading
  • MSMO stabilization
  • Contracts Governance
  • Depot work integration
  • - RMC standardization
  • Risk decisions
  • toward PSL
  • Industrial base
  • preservation
  • Reqts Realism MRS
  • - ICMP development

8
Requirements Improvement
  • January 2009 Surface Ship Maint Strategic Offsite
  • Must strengthen requirements determination
    process for ships
  • CLASSRON focus on lifecycle maintenance to feed
    programming
  • Actions
  • Maintenance Requirements System (MRS) Alliance
  • Availability notionals tailoring projects
  • Modified docking cycles
  • Aged notionals
  • Parametric analysis
  • Surface Ship Life Cycle Management Activity
    (SSLCM)
  • ICMP improvement
  • Standardized availability work packages
  • ABS Hull-life Surveys (NAVSEA 05)

9
Maint Requirements Adjustments
  • Aged Notionals
  • Automobile maint concept older assets require
    increasing maint
  • Gradually increase the notionals as the vessel
    consumes service life
  • Basis for CVN Maint Op-cycle Mgt availability
    resourcing levels
  • Easily understood by Pentagon programmers

Under study
10
Strategic Maintenance Process
Execution (RMC MSMO)
Planning (RMC MSMO)
Requirements Development (TYCOM, FFC)
Programming Budgeting (FFC, OPNAV)
Appropriation Apportionment (Congress, FMB)
Variation
Process stage
Targeted strategies
  • MSMO Spiral 2
  • SHIPMAIN
  • - Assessments
  • - Level-loading
  • MSMO stabilization
  • Contracts Governance
  • Depot work integration
  • - RMC standardization
  • Risk decisions
  • toward PSL
  • Industrial base
  • preservation
  • Reqts Realism MRS
  • - ICMP development

11
Programming Considerations
  • Meeting maintenance requirements since 2003 with
    baseline funding plus supplemental appropriations
  • How to transition out of supplementals yet still
    secure needed funding(?)
  • Fiscal policies of new administration.
  • How is risk managed against shortfalls
  • Preserve industrial base vs. service life risk?
  • Phasing with major modernization programs
  • Full funding vs. timing of funding
  • Measurements tricky
  • Near term effects and long-term effects

12
Strategic Maintenance Process
Execution (RMC MSMO)
Planning (RMC MSMO)
Requirements Development (TYCOM, FFC)
Programming Budgeting (FFC, OPNAV)
Appropriation Apportionment (Congress, FMB)
Variation
Process stage
Targeted strategies
  • MSMO Spiral 2
  • SHIPMAIN
  • - Assessments
  • - Level-loading
  • MSMO stabilization
  • Contracts Governance
  • Depot work integration
  • - RMC standardization
  • Risk decisions
  • toward PSL
  • Industrial base
  • preservation
  • Reqts Realism MRS
  • - ICMP development

13
Execution Planning
  • Incremental improvements in MSMO Spiral 2
  • MCIT replaces SHIPMAIN
  • Focused on avail planning execution performance
  • What of assessments?
  • Re-institute shipboard assessments to facilitate
    avail planning
  • SSLCM ICMP deploying BAWPs AWPs
  • Expanding role of MFOM
  • Valuating lifecycle maintenance actions
  • Port-loading considerations (source of variation)
  • Technical requirements clarification
    stabilization

14
Strategic Maintenance Process
Execution (RMC MSMO)
Planning (RMC MSMO)
Requirements Development (TYCOM, FFC)
Programming Budgeting (FFC, OPNAV)
Appropriation Apportionment (Congress, FMB)
Variation
Process stage
Targeted strategies
  • MSMO Spiral 2
  • SHIPMAIN
  • - Assessments
  • - Level-loading
  • MSMO stabilization
  • Contracts Governance
  • Depot work integration
  • - RMC standardization
  • Risk decisions
  • toward PSL
  • Industrial base
  • preservation
  • Reqts Realism MRS
  • - ICMP development

15
Maintenance Execution
  • MSMO
  • Over-arching objective stabilize MSMO
  • Permits contractor focus, commitment, repetition,
    improvement
  • Incremental improvements for MSMO Spiral 2
  • Beneficial to Navy and industry
  • Comprehensive Contracting Strategy
  • Contracts Governance Process
  • Depot Work Integration

16
MSMO Results Readiness vs. Maint Investment
Start MSMO
Navy initiates FRP
Steaming days/yr/ship
CNO Clark buy-down maint backlog (2003)
Large increase in steaming days/yr 2004-2008
(HOA, APS, POA, HADR, etc.)
Increased steaming at same maint investment
levels MSMO enabling FRP
17
MSMO Results Contract Performance
  • Cost rates stable, affordable, and w/i
    programmed levels
  • Cumulative cost performance (thru FY08) 4
    cost under-run, all contracts, all performance
    periods
  • Schedule response to current readiness
    exceptional supports FRP
  • gt200 CNO MSMO availabilities 1 late due to
    contractor performance
  • Incorporation of change scope w/o sked impact
    significant (range 15-30)
  • Technical performance solid improving
  • Govt QA-point reject rate 2
  • Partnership All MSMOs productively engaged
    in many
    Navy initiatives

QA Reject trends
1st-order MSMO program objectives being met
18
MSMO Controls, Oversight, Governance
  • MSMO success due to
  • All contracts issued under proper Navy contract
    technical warrants
  • Contract stability focus, investment, process
    improvement
  • RMC exercising contractual authorities
  • DCAA periodic cost audits
  • Award fee evaluation boards frequent feedback
    accountability
  • Standing MSMO Acqn IPT providing dynamic review
    adjustment
  • Rigorous oversight by ASN(RDA)
  • Balancing competition, performance incentives,
    stability
  • Approved additional contract strengthening in
    MSMO Spiral 2 (FY10-14)
  • Navy submitting report to Congress in FY10 Budget
    Request substantiating rationale for executing
    DDG Modernization w/ MSMO

Many pieces contributing to overall program
strength
19
Update Comprehensive Contracting Depot Work
Integration
  • Policy for Comprehensive Contracting and Depot
    Work Integration
  • Approved by ASN(RDA) 27 March 2009
  • Enabling instructions policies implemented JFMM
    Ch 7A (30 Jun 08)
  • Key elements/enablers
  • All work coincident to depot availabilities shall
    be planned, integrated and coordinated through
    the NSA using the LMA as the planning agent
  • LMAs shall have first opportunity to execute all
    depot work for which they have organic
    capability, capacity and cost reasonableness
  • Programs shall budget for reasonable depot
    installation costs
  • AITs shall execute AIT-unique work, and can
    execute depot installation work if the LMA does
    not meet the aforementioned requirements
  • NSAs shall remain the single authoritative voice
    to equitably resolve availability disputes and
    disruptions amongst all customers

Policy successfully executed on several major CNO
availabilities
20
Comprehensive Contracting Depot Work
IntegrationOverview
Comprehensive Contracting Depot Work Integration
Comprehensive Contracting Strategy
Maint, Modernization AIT Integration
Enablers - SY-AIT SWT 897-04 - 1 June
08 JFMM update - ASN Policy directive
Enablers - 2004 FISC/SUP/Fleet/SEA/MOU -
USFF 201411ZJUL06 - USFF
211431ZJUN07 - USFF 271300ZMAR08
- 30 June 2008 JFMM update
- NAVSEA SEAPORT-e Policy - ASN Policy
directive
21
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com