L2C Learning to Collaborate - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

L2C Learning to Collaborate

Description:

L2C Learning to Collaborate A Description – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:74
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: inseadEdu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: L2C Learning to Collaborate


1
L2CLearning to Collaborate
  • A Description

2
Table of Contents
Project Summary
Project Objectives
Outputs Deliverables
Financial Plan
Budget Resource Distribution
Project Work-plan
Consortium Structure
3
Project Summary
  • Total Expected Funding 3.024.213,75
  • Duration 24 Months
  • Key Action Addressed e-Learning

4
Project Objectives
  • provide a clear understanding of the factors
    inhibiting effective collaboration dynamics and
    leading to the failure of collaboration
    initiatives (Collaboration Traps Challenges),
    and of the interventions required to reduce these
    risks (Collaboration Management Competencies).
  • develop an innovative framework (Advanced
    Collaboration Dynamics and Technologies - ACDT
    Framework) addressing the effective development
    of collaboration competencies.
  • develop a set of widely deployable, advanced,
    interactive and experiential technology-enhanced
    solutions (ACDT Simulation Games) guaranteeing
    the effective understanding and internalization
    of
  • (1) cognitive, motivational and attitudinal
    factors,
  • (2) complexity of knowledge integration processes
    and distributed, ICT-supported teamwork, and
  • (3) management competencies determining the
    success or failure of collaboration dynamics in
    diverse and distributed contexts.

5
Outputs Deliverables
  • In terms of specific outputs, the project will
    produce
  • A comprehensive online Knowledge Base and active
    Virtual Learning Community on Advanced
    Collaboration Dynamics Technologies (ACDT)
  • ACDT Framework An e-Learning Framework to
    address the effective development of
    Collaboration Competencies in the Information
    Society
  • ACDT Simulation Games Prototypes Validated
    computer-enhanced learning Solutions deployable
    in educational and organizational contexts

6
Outputs Deliverables Graphic Overview of
Project Outputs
7
Outputs Deliverables Deliverables List (1)
Del. no. Deliverable name WP no. Leader person-months Nature Dissem. level Delivery date (M)
D7.1 Quality Assurance Plan WP7 INSEAD 10.8 R PU 2
D1.1 ACDT Knowledge Harvesting and Integration Report WP1 UAFM 55,5 R PU 6
D5.1 Dissemination and Exploitation Plan WP5 ALPHA 7 R RE 6
D2.1 ACDT Knowledge Mgt Tools WP2 FVA 25.5 27 RP RE 8
D6.1 Evaluation Plan WP6 UCSC 10 R PU 8
D6.2 Technical and Pedagogical Evaluation Criteria and Metrics WP6 UCSC 9 R PU 8
D3.1 ACDT Framework, Simulation Scenario and Design WP3 OFAI 24 21 R PP 12
D3.2 ACDT Simulation Games Prototype WP3 OFAI 23.5 P RE 12
D6.3 Evaluation Report of the First Prototype WP6 UCSC 7 R PU 12
D4.1A Pilots Report - Round 1 WP4 INSEAD 14 R PU 18
D4.2A ACDT KM Tools Versioning Report - Round 1 WP4 INSEAD 14 R P PU 18
8
Outputs Deliverables Deliverables List (2)
Del. no. Deliverable name WP no. Leader person-months Nature Dissem. level Delivery date (M)
D4.3A ACDT Simulation Games Prototype and Framework Versioning Report - Round 1 WP4 INSEAD 11 R P PU 18
D6.4 Evaluation Report of the Final Prototype WP6 UCSC 7 R PU 18
D4.1B Pilots Report - Round 2 WP4 INSEAD 13 R PU 22
D4.2B ACDT Knowledge Management Tools Versioning Report - Round 2 WP4 INSEAD 12 R P PU 22
D4.3B ACDT Simulation Games Prototype and Framework Versioning Report - Round 2 WP4 INSEAD 12 R P PU 22
D5.2 Dissemination Actions Report WP5 ALPHA 37 R PU 22
D5.3 Final Packaging and Distribution Strategy Report WP5 ALPHA 22 R PU 22
D6.5 Evaluation Report of Simulation Games prototypes WP6 UCSC 7 R PU 22
D6.6 Projects Assessment / Comparative Analysis (Final Report) WP6 UCSC 6.5 R PU 24
TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL 375.25
9
Financial Plan
  • Total project budget 3.024.213,75 .
  • Project coordination managing costs 134.307,75
    .
  • The management cost is within the 7 limit of EC
    contribution.
  • Travel budget less than 6 of total budget
    allocated.
  • Distribution of resources
  • L2C represents a total effort of 375.25
    Person-Months, with a total budget of
    3.024.213,75 corresponding to a funding request
    of 1.999.921,30 .

10
Budget Resource Distribution
Type of Activities Total Budget EC Contribution
Research/innovation activities 93 91
Demonstration Activities 3 2
Consortium management activities 4 7
TOTAL 100 100
11
Research Innovation
PARTNERS INSEAD UCSC UAFM OFAI OU SCIL IF ALBA UC Métis FVA Alpha SU Total
Research Innovation Research Innovation Research Innovation Research Innovation Research Innovation Research Innovation Research Innovation Research Innovation Research Innovation Research Innovation Research Innovation Research Innovation Research Innovation Research Innovation Research Innovation
WP1 Knowledge Harvesting and Integration 10 5 8 5,5 5 2,5 1 4,5 1 2,5 2 3,5 5 55,5
WP2 Knowledge Management Tools Development 6 4 4 2 2 2 2 3 2 6 11,5 5 3 52,5
WP3 ACDT Framework Simulation Games Prototypes Development 16 3 4,5 11 2 4 2 3 2 4 8,5 7,5 1 68,5
WP4 Pilots Prototyping Cycles 19,0 3,5 2,0 3,0 0,0 2,5 4,5 5,0 4,5 11,0 5,0 4,5 0,0 64,5
WP5 Exploitation and Dissemination 12,0 4,0 2,0 2,0 2,5 2,0 3,0 6,0 3,0 15,0 7,5 5,0 1,5 65,5
WP6 Embedded, Contin. Evaluation 6,0 7,5 4,0 3,5 3,0 4,0 2,5 4,0 2,5 4,5 1,0 0,0 4,0 46,5
Total research /innovation 69 27 24,5 27 14,5 17 15 25,5 15 43 35,5 25,5 14,5 353
12
Demonstration Management
PARTNERS INSEAD UCSC UAFM OFAI OU SCIL IF ALBA UC MeTis FVA Alpha SU TOTAL PARTNERS
Demonstration activities Demonstration activities Demonstration activities Demonstration activities Demonstration activities Demonstration activities Demonstration activities Demonstration activities Demonstration activities Demonstration activities Demonstration activities Demonstration activities Demonstration activities Demonstration activities Demonstration activities
WP4 Pilots and Prototyping Cycles 3,0 1,0 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 1,0 1,0 1,0 0,5 1,0 0,5 11,5
Total demonstration 3,0 1,0 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 1,0 1,0 1,0 0,5 1,0 0,5 11,5
Management activities Management activities Management activities Management activities Management activities Management activities Management activities Management activities Management activities Management activities Management activities Management activities Management activities Management activities Management activities
WP7 Project Management 4,0 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,8 0,5 1,0 0,5 0,5 0,5 10,8
Total consortium management 4,0 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,8 0,5 1,0 0,5 0,5 0,5 10,8
TOTAL ACTIVITIES 76,0 28,5 25,5 28 15,5 18,0 16 27,3 16,5 45,0 36,5 27,0 15,5 375,25
13
Total Budget (1)
  Rate Direct mm Cost MMS Personnel Costs Overhead Consumables Travel Other specific cost / Audit EQUIP. SUB CONTARCTING Total costs EC-Contribution
INSEAD 40 6500 76,0 494000 197600 1000 17000 3500 10000 23000 746.100,00 389.405,00
UCSC 20 5000 28,5 142500 31600 1000 13000 2500 0 0 190.600,00 190.600,00
UAFM 20 5000 25,5 127500 28600 1000 13000 2500 0 0 172.600,00 172.600,00
OFAI 20 5000 28,0 140000 31100 1000 13000 2500 0 0 187.600,00 187.600,00
OU 20 5000 15,5 77500 18600 1000 13000 2500 0 0 112.600,00 112.600,00
SCIL 20 5000 18,0 90000 21100 1000 13000 2500 0 0 127.600,00 127.600,00
IF 40 10000 16,0 160000 64000 1000 13000 2500 0 0 240.500,00 124.450,00
14
Total Budget (2)
  Rate Direct mm Cost MMS Personnel Costs Over-head Consumabl. Travel Other specific cost / Audit EQUIP. SUBCONTARCTING Total costs EC-Contribution
ALBA 20 5000 27,3 136250 33550 1000 16000 2500 5000 7000 201.300 104.100,00
UC 40 5000 16,5 82500 33000 1000 13000 2500 0 0 132.000 68.450,00
MeTis 45 4300 45,0 193500 87075 1000 15000 2794,75 4000 9000 312.369,75 160.264,50
FVA 20 5380 36,5 196370 39274 1000 13000 2500 6000 6000 264.144,00 134.951,80
Alpha Labs 50 5000 27,0 135000 67500 1000 13000 2500 5000 0 224.000,00 114.500,00
SU 20 5000 15,5 77500 18800 1000 13000 2500 0 0 112.800,00 112.800,00
TOTAL     375,25 2.052.620 671.799 13.000 178.000 33.794,75 30.000 45.000 3.024.213,75 1.999.921,3
15
Project Work-plan
16
Consortium Composition/Roles
  1. INSEAD-Centre for Advanced Learning Technologies
    - CALT
  2. Università Cattolica, Milano
  3. University of Armed Forces, Munich
  4. Austrian Research Institute for Artificial
    Intelligence (OFAI) Wien
  5. OPEN University
  6. St Gallen University Swiss Center for
    Innovations in Learning (SCIL)
  7. FIAT Isvor
  8. Athens Laboratory of Business Administration
    (ALBA)
  9. UniCredit
  10. MeTis
  11. FVA
  12. Alpha Labs
  13. Strathclyde University

17
Participant No Code Country Role Key Contribution
INSEAD Centre for Advanced Learning Technologies (CALT) 1  INSEAD F Co-ord Learning Technology, Simulations Design, Collaboration Dynamics expertise, and Executive Education expertise
Universita Cattolica Milano 2 UCSC I Partner Collaboration Dynamics expertise focus on technological and psychological aspects, and evaluation expertise
University of the Armed Forces Munich 3 UAFM D Partner Collaboration Dynamics expertise focus on knowledge management and integration aspects, and students learning expertise
Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence (OFAI) Wien 4 OFAI A Partner Design and development of agent-based systems, human cognitive and learning processes, and technical evaluation expertise
OPEN University 5 OU UK Partner Collaboration Dynamics expertise all dimensions, and distributed learning expertise
St Gallen University Swiss Center for Innovations in Learning (SCIL) 6 SCIL CH Partner Collaboration Dynamics expertise focus on psychological, sociological and team dynamics aspects, and students learning expertise
Isvor FIAT 7 IF I Partner Corporate Training (industrial and public sector) and Collaboration Practice expertise
Athens Laboratory of Business Administration (ALBA) 8 ALBA Gr Partner SMEs Training expertise
UniCredit 9 UC I Partner Corporate Training (financial services sector) and Collaboration Practice expertise
MeTis 10 MeTis Gr Partner Strategic planning and business analysis of corporate training. Public policy analysis on e-learning. Innovation management and know-how transfer.
FVA 11 FVA I Partner User Interface development and usability evaluation expertise
AlphaLabs 12 Alpha F Partner Simulation games Kernels development, virtual community facilitation and simulation games diffusion expertise
Strathclyde University, Glasgow 13 SU UK Partner Collaboration Dynamics expertise all dimensions, and management learning expertise
18
ltThank Yougt
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com