Private Capital Flows to Africa: Opportunities, Risks and Way Forward - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Private Capital Flows to Africa: Opportunities, Risks and Way Forward

Description:

Private Capital Flows to Africa: Opportunities, Risks and Way Forward Patrick N. Osakwe UN Economic Commission for Africa – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:77
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: CDup2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Private Capital Flows to Africa: Opportunities, Risks and Way Forward


1
Private Capital Flows to Africa Opportunities,
Risks and Way Forward
  • Patrick N. Osakwe
  • UN Economic Commission for Africa

2
I. Background
  • The most important challenge facing Africa is how
    to eradicate poverty and extreme hunger
  • Africa is still the region with the highest
    percentage of people in extreme poverty and
    deprivation
  • The 2007 MDG Report indicates that it is the only
    region at risk of not meeting any of the MDGs.
  • Mobilization of finance is crucial to reversing
    the current trend and increasing the likelihood
    of African countries meeting the MDGs by the
    target date.

3
  • World leaders recognized the importance of
    finance in meeting the MDGs when they adopted the
    Monterrey Consensus in 2002
  • The mobilization of private capital flows is one
    of the six core areas of the Monterrey Consensus.
  • Mobilization of domestic resources for
    development
  • Mobilization of international financial resources
    (Private Capital Flows)
  • Promoting international trade as an engine of
    development
  • Increasing international financial and technical
    cooperation for development
  • External debt
  • Systemic issues

4
II. Forms of Private Capital Flows
  • Equity Flows
  • FDI (equity stake with control)
  • Portfolio investment (equity stake without
    control)
  • Debt Flows
  • Bank loans
  • Bonds

5
Trends in Private Capital Flows (US billion)
1998 2000 2005
Developing countries 193.4 187 551.4
East Asia the Pacific 6.5 28.8 169.7
Middle East North Africa 9.2 3.9 24.3
Sub-Saharan Africa 13.9 10.2 29.6
6
Private Capital Flows to North Africa (billion )
1990 2005
Net FDI Inflows 0.96 11.2
Portfolio Equity 0.01 0.80
Net Debt Flows -0.52 3.14
Workers Remittances 7.25 13.97
7
III. Theoretical Arguments for Capital Mobility
  • Lifts the constraints on domestic investment
    imposed by low national savings
  • Leads to more efficient allocation of resources
  • Allows countries to smooth consumption over time
  • Borrow during a negative shock and repay during a
    positive shock thereby making consumption less
    volatile than income
  • In practice investors are reluctant to lend to
    developing countries experiencing negative shocks
    (case of Chile in 1998)

8
  • Permits domestic residents to diversify risks
    through holding diversified international
    portfolios
  • Risks are less correlated between countries than
    within countries
  • Provides access to intellectual property
  • Technological know-how
  • Managerial expertise
  • Access to foreign markets
  • It subjects countries to the discipline of the
    international market
  • Fear of capital flow reversal is often a stimulus
    to more responsible economic policies

9
IV. Concerns about Capital Mobility
  • Capital mobility increases macroeconomic
    volatility and this has negative consequences for
    an economy
  • Exposes countries to new shocks (external)
  • Can magnify the effect of domestic shocks
  • It increases vulnerability to large and rapid
    reversals of capital flows (often leading to
    financial crises)
  • These crises are very costly. In the case of East
    Asia it led to losses of more than 10 percent of
    GDP.
  • Large inflows resulting from capital mobility
    also contribute to real exchange rate
    appreciation and loss of competitiveness

10
V. The Evidence
  • The key question here is whether the benefits of
    capital mobility offset the costs? The evidence
    is mixed
  • Several studies found no evidence that capital
    account liberalization leads to faster growth
    (Rodrik 1998 Kraay 1998 Edison 2002 Prasad et
    al 2003)
  • Few studies found that liberalization had a
    positive impact (Quinn 1997)
  • There are several messages from these results
  • If there is a relationship between capital
    mobility and growth, it is neither strong nor
    robust
  • The composition of capital flows as well as
    domestic economic conditions may be important in
    determining whether or not capital mobility has a
    positive impact on an economy.

11
VI. Managing Capital Flows The Way Forward
  • The benefits of capital mobility are not
    automatic.
  • They accrue to countries that have taken
    appropriate steps to exploit them
  • The key policy challenge facing African countries
    is how to maximize the benefits and minimize the
    costs.
  • This requires several actions at the national
    level

12
  • Adopting a gradual approach to capital account
    liberalization. This gives room for
  • Development of financial infrastructure
  • Complementary investments in education and
    physical infrastructure to increase absorptive
    capacity of flows
  • Paying more attention to the composition of
    capital flows and ensuring that they go to
    sectors with high potential for employment
    creation
  • Putting in place policies to limit vulnerability
    to financial crises
  • Sound Macroeconomic Policies
  • Protection of property rights and the rule of law
  • Political stability

13
  • Managing capital flows to avoid risk of real
    exchange rate appreciations that lead to loss of
    competitiveness
  • Adoption of exchange rate regimes that give room
    for dealing with capital flows
  • Use of selective capital controls when necessary

14
THANKYOU
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com