Title: Gender and Language Variation
1Gender and Language Variation
- Wolfram Schilling-Estes
- Chapter 8
2Why would we expect to find linguistic
differentiation between men and women?
- Social differentiation is reflected in linguistic
differentiation - The phenomenon exists in other languages
3The role of language ideology
- Two clear-cut categories
- Biological sex (cf. race)
- Characteristics grounded in natural features of
two groups - Pitch difference
- Directness
- A caveat research shows that there is always
more variation within each category than across
categories
4gender as social construct/practice
- Not What gender differences will I find?
- Rather What sorts of language features do
people use to present themselves as women vs.
men, or as particular kinds of women of men? - Gender is something that one does rather than
has
5Problems in dealing with gender
- Lack of social separation as with other social
categories - Intersection of class and ethnicity
68.1 Gender-based Patterns of Variation as
Reported in Dialect Surveys
- Principle I For stable sociolinguistic
variables, men use a higher frequency of
nonstandard forms than women. - Principle Ia In change from above the level of
consciousness, women favor the incoming prestige
forms more than men. - Principle II In change from below, women are
most often the innovators. - An apparent contradiction that women are
simultaneously more linguistically conservative
and more innovative?? - sociolinguistic variables involved
- social class of woman
78.2 Explaining General Patterns
- The Prestige-based Approach
- Labov women are more prestige-conscious than
men - Trudgill more on prestige
- Women transmit culture through childrearing
- Womens social position more insecure, so they
attempt to signal social status linguistically - Women judged not by what they do, but by how they
appear (linguistic cosmetic of prestigious
language) - Women avoid vernacular forms associated with
masculinity in symbolic value - PROBLEMS studies that provide contradictory
evidence
88.3 Localized Expressions of Gender Relations
- Eckert because women have little power in most
communities they seek to acquire such power in
symbolic ways - Standard language variants power by association
with the most powerful socioeconomic classes
symbolic capital - Innovative vernacular forms symbolic membership
in important local social groups - COROLLARY those who have the real power dont
need to worry about symbolic power
98.4 Communities of PracticeLinking and Local
and the Global
- How is individual behavior (the local) linked to
larger social structures (the global)? - Qualitative studies based on communities of
practice involve in-depth analysis of the
language use of individuals and small groups - Studies based on large-scale quantitative samples
of language use by social category provide
information on the norms that individuals
orient to - Although people may mix and match various
linguistic features to project individualized or
situationally specific meanings and identities,
they cannot do so randomly, since linguistic
features often derive their social meanings from
association with particular groups, or particular
situations of use. (p. 247)
108.5 Language-Use-based Approaches The Female
Deficit Approach
118.6 The Cultural Difference Approach
- Boys and girls are socialized into different uses
of language
128.7 The Dominance Approach
- Men have the power in the society and exercise it
(consciously or unconsciously) through their use
of language
138.8 Further Implications
- Social roles
- Gender as social construct
- Relation of gender to other social factors
- More focus on mens language
- The idea of meaning as context-dependent (i.e.
certain language forms are not inherently
strong or weak)
148.9 Talking About Men and Women
- 8.9.1 Generic he and man
- 8.9.2 Family names and terms of address
- 8.9.3 Relationships of association
- 8.9.4 Labeling
158.10 The Question of Language Reform
- Alternatives to he or she
- Alternatives to generics
- Avoidance of sexual stereotyping