Role of Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after thrombolytic therapy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Role of Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after thrombolytic therapy

Description:

Role of Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after thrombolytic therapy By Dr. Mohamed Mahros Assistant lecturer of cardiology Benha faculty of medicine – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:108
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 58
Provided by: DrH96
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Role of Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after thrombolytic therapy


1
Role of Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
after thrombolytic therapy
  • ByDr. Mohamed MahrosAssistant lecturer of
    cardiologyBenha faculty of medicine

2
Introduction
  • significant mortality reduction has been
    observed in the last decades in the treatment of
    STEMI mainly due to pharmacological and/or
    mechanical reperfusion therapy (Vandewerf et al
    2003)

3
  • 1ry angioplasty has provided further survival
    benefits when compared with thrombolysis , mainly
    due to a larger proportion of epicardial
    coronary recanalization

4
  • However the advantages of invasive approach over
    fibrinolytic therapy may be blunted by low
    availability
  • of experienced centers offering
  • 24h / 7 days 1ry PCI service and by delay to
    mechanical reperfusion due to prolonged transport
    time.

5
  • Thrombolytic therapy is the most common method of
    reperfusion in our country in acute STEMI.
  • Large number of these patients have coronary
    angiography after thrombolytics.

6
  • Early elective PCI after thrombolytic
    therapy is controversial.
  • In case an invasive route is chosen
  • how early PCI should be performed ?
  • is unknown.

7
  • Reperfusion options for STEMI

8
1- fibrinolysis generally preferred if
  • 1ry PCI not an option
  • -occupied cath lab is not available
  • -vascular access difficulties
  • -no access to skilled PCI center
  • delay to 1ry PCI
  • -prolonged transport
  • -door to balloongt90min
  • very early presentation
  • lt1-2 h from symptoms

9
2- 1ry PCI generally preferred if
  • skilled center available /short delay
  • -operator experience 75 case /yr
  • -team experience
  • -door to balloonlt 90 min
  • high risk from MI
  • -cardiogenic shock (sp. Agelt75y)
  • -killip class 2
  • increased bleeding risk
  • -sp. Intracranial hge.
  • late presentation
  • -gt2-3 hr from symptoms(gt70myocardial
    death)
  • diagnosis is doubt

10
  • The relationship of symptom onset to reperfusion
    time with mortality , which was established in
    thrombolytic therapy was not so clear in early
    studies evaluating 1ry PCI , which suggests that
    superiority of invasive approach over
    fibrinolysis in restoring blood flow in IRA was
    independent of ischemia duration.

11
  • However recent studies have abolished that
    hypothesis as there is definite relationship
    between time delay to treatment and 1 year
    mortality ( De. Luca .et al. 2008)
  • Each 30 min delay associated with relative risk
    ?? by 7.5 mortality at 1 year follow up

12
  • So PCI related delay is an important factor in
    choosing optimal reperfusion strategy, where as
    duration of ischemia is one of the most important
    determinants of outcome for patients with STEMI
  • So





13
(No Transcript)
14
  • the question is whether all patients after
    thrombolytic therapy administration should be
    routinely transferred for invasive treatment ?
  • and if so, when is the optimal time for coronary
    angiography /PCI after lysis ?

15
primary PCI is the preferred reperfusion
method
  • However, it is availability is limited in many
    countries ,alternative strategies is pharmaco
    invasive to
  • -Achieve optimal flow ( residual complex stenosis
    despite successful thrombolysis )
  • -prevent reocclusion.
  • -provide good long term results
  • -early angiographic risk stratification

16
(No Transcript)
17
CAPTIM Study
  • primary PCI versus pre- hospital fibrinolysis

18
(No Transcript)
19
Event rate at 30 days
20
ASSENT- 4 PCI
21
Event rate at 90 days per
22
Conclusion
  • Facilitated PCI was associated with major adverse
    events and can not be recommended

23
GRACIA-1
24
Event rate at 30 days
25
Event rate at 1 year
26
Conclusion
  • Early post thrombolysis coronary
  • angiography reduce the need for
  • unplanned inhospital revascularization ,
  • improve 1 year clinical outcome frequency
  • of major bleeding was equal in both groups

27
SIAM III
28
(No Transcript)
29
Conclusion
  • Early angiography and stenting after fibrinolysis
    for AMI improves clinical and angiographic
    outcome as compared to angiography stenting
    2weeks later without significant difference in
    bleeding risk

30
CAPITAL AMI
31
(No Transcript)
32
  • The incidence of 1ry end point (death,re-MI , U.A
    Stroke) At 6 months was lower in Pt. under
    going PCI (11.6vs 24.4 p0.04) .
  • Also there was no difference in major bleeding
    risk

33
REACT TRIAL
34
(No Transcript)
35
  • Rescue PCI show significant reduction in
    composite 1ry end points than repeated lysis
    conservative .

36
MERLIN TRAIL
37
At 30 days 1 year
38
  • In a meta analysis of Wijeysundern. et al.
    including 1177 pt. from eight trials
  • rescue PCI was associated with no significant
    reduction in all cause mortality but showed
    significant risk reductions in HF Re-MI when
    compared with conservative group.

39
  • The potential risk of performing PCI shortly
    after lytic administration is higher number of
    bleeding complications. sp. minor ( REACT
    Wijeysundera trials )
  • No significant difference in major bleeding. (
    may be over comed by radial approach )

40
  • The meta analysis also demonstrated a significant
    ?? in absolute risk of stroke associated with
    rescue PCI .
  • However the majority of strokes were thrombo
    embolic.

41
  • So , The European society of cardiology PCI
    guidelines showed that
  • rescue PCI after failed thrombolysis
    isrecommended as class I indication with evidence
    B.

42
Routine angiography \ PCI in all patients
  • Based on the result of SAIM III , GRACI
    CAPITAL AMI
  • routine post thrombolysis coronary angiography
  • PCI (if applicable )up to 24 h after
    thrombolysis , independent of angina and /or
    ischemia, are recommended by ESC PCI Guidelines .

43
When to perform early PCI after trombolytics?
  • Recent studies indicated that the time from
    fibrinolysis initiation to angiography can be
    safely shortened even to 2-3 h , If optimal anti
    platelet therapy with early loading dose of
    clopidogrel and /or abciximab is administrated .
  • CARESS in AMI ( Combined Abciximab Reteplase
    stent study in AMI)

44
(No Transcript)
45
  • Decreasing the risk of recurrent ischemia all
    ischemic complications (death, MI recurrent
    ischemia ) (4.4l vs 10. ps004) with no
    significant increase in major bleeding or stroke.

46
Transfer AMI
  • Routine angioplasty and stenting after
    fibrinolysis to enhance reperfusion in acute MI

47
(No Transcript)
48
Conclusion
  • Composite end point of 30 day death, Re-MI , HF,
    sever recurrent ischemia shock occurred in
    16.6 in standard care 10.6 of phormaco
    invasive ( p 0.0013) also observed risk of
    Re-MI recurrent ischemia was lower in patients
    treated with immediate PCI was not associated
    with ?? bleeding risk

49
  • when is the optimal time to perform angiography
    /PCI after lytic therapy administration?
  • Published trials showed different strategy from
    2h in CARESS in AMI to almost 17 h in GRACIA-I

50
  • So,
  • immediate angiography after lysis should be
    apart of patient assessment after lysis
    administration and this allows to decide the
    optimal time of PCI if indicated.

51
which patients ? when?
  • Large infarction (ECG marked sharp CK rise)
    yet preserved LV function
  • Young patient with 1st MI.
  • Hemodynamic and/ or electrical instability
    despite signs of successful thrombolysis
  • within 24h if available

52
Which when ?
  • Successful thrombolysis , low risk preserved
    LVF
  • No comorbidity but risk factors
  • Before discharge

53
Which when
  • The elderly patients with uncomplicated MI
  • Successful thromblysis , impaired renal function
  • Significant comorbidity . poor/ uncertain
    neurologic prognosis
  • Ischemia driven VS conservative approach

54
  • Home message
  • Majority of STEMI patient should be treated with
    1ry PCI ,all efforts should be made to shorten
    transfer delays to ?? 1ry PCI availability
  • In STEMI patient with anticipated delay to 1ry
    PCI more than 90-120min, fibrinolysis is still
    recommended but certainly should not be the end
    of reperfusion therapy in STEMI

55
  • Performing elective PCI early after successful
    thrombolysis is safe with acceptable bleeding
    risk .
  • In hospital death MI seen less in patients
    treated earlier with better long term outcomes.
  • ESC 2008 guidelines mentioned that all patient
    with successful thrombolysis should have routine
    angiography PCI( if applicable) it is safe even
    if done 2-3h after thrombolytic initiation.

56
(No Transcript)
57

Thank YOU
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com