Effective Theory of Low Energy Gravity - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Effective Theory of Low Energy Gravity

Description:

Effective Theory of Low Energy Gravity Macroscopic Effects of the Trace Anomaly & Dynamical Vacuum Energy E. Mottola, LANL Recent Review: w. R. Vaulin, Phys. Rev. D ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:93
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: Emil1164
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Effective Theory of Low Energy Gravity


1
Effective Theory of Low Energy Gravity
  • Macroscopic Effects of the Trace Anomaly
  • Dynamical Vacuum Energy
  • E. Mottola, LANL
  • Recent Review
  • w. R. Vaulin, Phys. Rev. D 74, 064004 (2006)
  • w. P. Anderson R. Vaulin, Phys. Rev. D 76,
    024018 (2007)
  • Review Article w. I. Antoniadis Mazur, N.
    Jour. Phys. 9, 11 (2007)
  • w. M. Giannotti, Phys. Rev. D 79, 045014 (2009)
  • w. P. Anderson C. Molina-Paris, Phys. Rev. D
    80, 084005 (2009)
  • w. P. O. Mazur,
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101, 9545 (2004)

arXiv 1008.5006
2
Outline
  • Effective Field Theory Anomalies
  • Massless Scalar Poles in Anomaly Amplitudes
  • Effective Theory of Low Energy Gravity
  • New Scalar Degrees of Freedom from the Trace
    Anomaly
  • Conformal Phase Transition RG Running of ?
  • IR Conformal Fixed Point Scaling Exponents
  • Horizon Effects Gravitational Condensate Stars
  • Cosmological Dark Energy as Macroscopic
    Dynamical Condensate

3
Effective Field Theory Quantum Anomalies
  • EFT Expansion of Effective Action in Local
    Invariants
  • Assumes Decoupling of Short (UV) from Long
    Distance (IR)
  • But Massless Modes do not decouple
  • Massless Chiral, Conformal Symmetries are
    Anomalous
  • Macroscopic Effects of Short Distance physics
  • Special Non-Local Terms Must be Added to Low
    Energy EFT
  • IR Sensitivity to UV degrees of freedom
  • Important on horizons because of large
    blueshift/redshift

4
Chiral Anomaly in QCD
  • QCD with Nf massless quarks has an apparent
    U(Nf) Ä Uch(Nf) Symmetry
  • But Uch(1) Symmetry is Anomalous
  • Effective Lagrangian in Chiral Limit has Nf 2 -
    1 (not Nf2 ) massless pions at low energies
  • Low Energy p0 2 g dominated by the anomaly
  • p0 ?5 q q ?? j ?5 e2 Nc
    F?? F ??/16?2
  • q
  • No Local Action in chiral limit in terms of F??
    but Non-local IR Relevant Operator that
    violates naïve decoupling of UV
  • Measured decay rate verifies Nc 3 in QCD
  • Anomaly Matching of IR ? UV

5
(No Transcript)
6
2D Anomaly Action
  • Integrating the anomaly linear in ? gives
  • ?WZ (c/24?) ?d2x ?g (-??? R?)
  • This is local but non-covariant. Note kinetic
    term for ?
  • By solving for ? the WZ action can be also
    written
  • ?WZ Sanomg Sanomg
  • Polyakov form of the action is covariant but
    non-local
  • Sanomg (-c/96?) ?d2x?gx ?d2y?gy
    Rx(?-1)xyRy
  • A covariant and local form requires an auxiliary
    dynamical field ?
  • Sanomg ? (-c/96?) ?d2x ?g (??)2
    -2R?

?
?
?
?
?
7
Quantum Effects of 2D Anomaly Action
  • Modification of Classical Theory required by
    Quantum Fluctuations Covariant Conservation
    of ?Tab?
  • Metric conformal factor e2? (was constrained)
    becomes dynamical itself fluctuates freely (c
    - 26 ? c - 25)
  • Gravitational Dressing of critical exponents
    at 2nd order phase transitions -- long distance
    macroscopic physics
  • Non-perturbative/non-classical conformal fixed
  • point of 2D gravity Running of ?
  • Additional non-local Infrared Relevant Operator
    in SEFT

New Massless Scalar Degree of Freedom at low
energies
8
Quantum Trace Anomaly in 4D Flat Space
  • Eg. QED in an External EM Field Aµ
  • Triangle One-Loop Amplitude as in Chiral
    Case
  • ?abcd (p,q) (k2 gab - ka k b) (gcd pq - qc
    pd) F1(k2) (traceless terms)
  • In the limit of massless fermions, F1(k2) must
    have a massless pole

Jc
p
Tab
?
k p q
q
Jd
Corresponding Imag. Part Spectral Fn. has a ?
fn This is a new massless scalar degree of
freedom in the two-particle correlated
spin-0 state
9
ltTJJgt Triangle Amplitude in QED
  • Determining the Amplitude by Symmetries and
    Its Finite Parts
  • M. Giannotti E. M. Phys. Rev. D 79, 045014
    (2009)
  • ?abcd Mass Dimension 2 Use low
    energy symmetries
  • 2. By current conservation pctiabcd(p,q) 0
    qdtiabcd(p,q)
  • All (but one) of these 13 tensors are dimension
    4, so dim(Fi) -2 so
  • these scalar Fi(k2 p2,q2) are completely UV
    Convergent
  • 1. By Lorentz invariance, can be
  • expanded in a complete set of
  • 13 tensors tiabcd(p,q), i 1, 13
  • ?abcd (p,q) Si Fi tiabcd(p,q)

Jc
p
Tab
?
k p q
q
Jd
10
ltTJJgt Triangle Amplitude in QED
  • Ward Identities
  • 3. By stress tensor conservation Ward Identity
    ?b?Tab?A eFab ?Jb? ?
  • 4. Bose exchange symmetry ?abcd (p,q)
    ?abdc (q,p)
  • Finally all 13 scalar functions Fi(k2 p2, q2)
    can be found in terms of
  • finite (IR) Feynman parameter integrals
    and the polarization,
  • ?ab(p) (p2gab - papb) ?(p2)
  • ?abcd (p,q) (k2 gab - ka k b) (gcd pq -
    qc pd) F1(k2 p2, q2)
  • (12 other terms, 11 traceless, and 1 with zero
    trace when m0)
  • Result
  • with D (p2 x q2 y)(1-x-y) xy k2
    m2
  • UV Regularization Independent

11
ltTJJgt Triangle Amplitude in QED
Spectral Representation and Sum Rule
Numerator Denominator cancel here
Im F1(k2 -s) Non-anomalous,vanishes when m0
obeys a finite sum rule independent of p2, q2, m2
and as p2, q2 , m2 ? 0
Massless scalar intermediate two-particle state
analogous to the pion in chiral limit of QCD
12
Massless Anomaly Pole
  • For p2 q2 0 (both photons on shell) and me
    0 the pole at k2 0 describes a massless e e -
    pair moving at vc collinearly, with opposite
    helicities in a total spin-0 state (relativistic
    Cooper pair in QFT vacuum)
  • ? a massless scalar 0 state which couples
    to gravity
  • Effective vertex
  • h?? (g?? ? - ????)? ? F??F??
  • Effective Action special case
  • of general
  • form

13
Scalar Pole in Gravitational Scattering
  • In Einsteins Theory only transverse, tracefree
    polarized waves (spin-2) are emitted/absorbed
  • and propagate between sources T?? and T??
  • The scalar parts give only non-progagating
  • constrained interaction (like Coulomb field in
    EM)
  • But for me 0 there is a scalar pole in the
  • ?TJJ? triangle amplitude coupling to photons
  • This scalar wave propagates in gravitational
  • scattering between sources T?? and T??
  • Couples to trace T??
  • ?TTT? triangle of massless photons has similar
    pole
  • New scalar degrees of freedom in EFT

14
Constructing the EFT of Gravity
  • Assume Equivalence Principle (Symmetry)
  • Metric Order Parameter Field gab
  • Only two strictly relevant operators (R, ?)
  • Einsteins General Relativity is an EFT
  • But EFT General Relativity Quantum
    Corrections
  • Semi-classical Einstein Eqs. (k ltlt Mpl)
  • Gab ? gab 8p G ? Tab?
  • But there is also a quantum (trace) anomaly
  • ? Taa? b F b' (E - 3 ?R )
    b" ?R
  • Massless Poles ?New (marginally) relevant
    operator(s) needed

2
ERabcdRabcd - 4RabRab R2
FCabcdCabcd
15
(No Transcript)
16
Effective Action for the Trace AnomalyLocal
Auxiliary Field Form
  • Two New Scalar Auxiliary Degrees of Freedom
  • Variation of the action with respect to ?, ? --
    the
  • auxiliary fields -- leads to the equations of
    motion,

17
IR Relevant Term in the Action
The effective action for the trace anomaly scales
logarithmically with distance and therefore
should be included in the low energy
macroscopic EFT description of gravity Not
given in powers of Local Curvature
This is a non-trivial modification of classical
General Relativity required by quantum effects in
the Std. Model
Fluctuations of new scalar degrees of freedom
allow ?eff to vary dynamically, and can generate
a Quantum Conformal Phase of 4D Gravity where
?eff ? 0
18
Dynamical Vacuum Energy
  • Conformal part of the metric, gab e2?
    gab
  • constrained --frozen--by trace of
    Einsteins eq. R4?
  • becomes dynamical and can fluctuate due to
    ?, ?
  • Fluctuations of ?, ? describe a conformally
    invariant phase of gravity in 4D ?
    non-Gaussian statistics of CMB
  • In this conformal phase G-1 and ? flow to zero
    fixed point
  • The Quantum Phase Transition to this phase
    characterized by the melting of the scalar
    condensate ?
  • ? a dynamical state dependent condensate
    generated by SSB of global Conformal Invariance

_
  • I. Antoniadis, E. M., Phys. Rev. D45 (1992) 2013
  • I. Antoniadis, P. O. Mazur, E. M., Phys. Rev. D
    55 (1997) 4756, 4770
  • Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 14 Phys. Lett. B444
    (1998), 284 N. Jour. Phys. 9, 11 (2007)

19
(No Transcript)
20
Stress Tensor of the Anomaly
Variation of the Effective Action with respect to
the metric gives stress-energy tensor
  • Quantum Vacuum Polarization in Terms of
  • (Semi-) Classical Auxiliary potentials
  • ?, ? Depends upon the global topology of
    spacetimes and its boundaries, horizons

21
Schwarzschild Spacetime
  • solves homogeneous D4? 0
  • Timelike Killing field (Non-local
    Invariant)
  • Ka (1, 0, 0, 0)
  • Energy density scales like e-4? f-2
  • Auxiliary Scalar Potentials give Geometric
    (Coordinate Invariant) Meaning to Non-Local
    Quantum correlations becoming Large on Horizon

22
Anomaly Scalars in Schwarzschild Space
  • General solution of ?, ? equations as functions
    of r are easily found in Schwarzschild case
  • q, cH, c? are integration constants, q
    topological charge
  • Similar solution for ? with q', cH, c?
  • Linear time dependence (p, p') can be added
  • Only way to have vanishing ? as r ? ? is c? q
    0
  • But only way to have finiteness on the horizon
    is
  • cH 0, q 2
  • Topological obstruction to finiteness vs.
    falloff of stress tensor
  • Five conditions on 8 integration constants for
    horizon finiteness

23
Stress-Energy Tensor in Boulware Vacuum Radial
Component
Dots Direct Numerical Evaluation of ltTabgt
(Jensen et. al. 1992) Solid Stress Tensor from
the Auxiliary Fields of the Anomaly (E.M. R. V.
2006) Dashed Page, Brown and Ottewill
approximation (1982-1986)
Spin 0 field
Diverges on horizonLarge macroscopic effect
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
26
A Simple Model
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 101, 9545 (2004)
27
Analog to quantum BEC transition near the
classical horizon Can now check with full
EFT of Low Energy Gravity
28
Gravitational Vacuum Condensate StarsGravastars
as Astrophysical Objects
  • Cold, Dark, Compact, Arbitrary M, J
  • Accrete Matter just like a black hole
  • But matter does not disappear down a hole
  • Relativistic Surface Layer can re-emit radiation
  • Can support Electric Currents, Large Magnetic
    Fields
  • Possibly more efficient central engine for Gamma
    Ray Bursters, Jets, UHE Cosmic Rays
  • Formation should be a violent phase transition
    converting gravitational energy and baryons
    into HE leptons and entropy
  • Gravitational Wave Signatures
  • Dark Energy as Condensate Core -- Finite Size
    Casimir effect
  • of boundary conditions at the horizon

29
New Horizons in Gravity
  • Einsteins classical theory receives Quantum
    Corrections relevant at macroscopic Distances
    near Event Horizons
  • These arise from new scalar degrees of freedom in
    the EFT of Gravity required by the
    Conformal/Trace Anomaly
  • EFT of Gravity is fine provided these anomaly
    degrees of freedom are taken into account
  • Their Fluctuations allow ? to flow to zero at an
    IR conformal fixed point (can/should be checked
    by ERG)
  • Their Fluctuations can induce a Quantum Phase
    Transition at the horizon of a black hole
  • ?eff is a dynamical condensate which can change
    in the phase transition remove black hole
    interior singularity

30
  • Gravitational Condensate Stars resolve all
    black hole
  • paradoxes ? Astrophysics of gravastars testable
  • The cosmological dark energy of our Universe may
    be a
  • macroscopic finite size effect whose value
    depends not
  • on microphysics but on the cosmological horizon
    scale

31
Exact Effective Action Wilson Effective Action
  • Integrating out Matter Fields in Fixed
    Gravitational Background gives the Exact Quantum
    Effective Action
  • The possible terms in Sexactg can be classified
    according to their repsonse to local Weyl
    rescalings g ? e2? g
  • Sexactg Slocalg Sanomg
    SWeylg
  • Slocalg (1/16?G) ? d4x ?g (R - 2 ?) ?n4
    MPl4-n S(n)localg
  • Ascending series of higher derivative
    local terms, ngt4 irrelevant
  • Non-local but Weyl-invariant (neutral under
    rescalings)
  • SWeylg SWeyle2?g
  • Sanomg special non-local terms that scale
    linearly with ?, logarithmically with
    distance, representatives of non-trivial
    cohomology under Weyl group
  • Wilson effective action captures all IR physics

Seffg SHEg Sanomg
32
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com