Title: Surprising Victories Against Old Foes: New Hope for Prevention and Control of Healthcare-Associated MRSA Infections
1Surprising Victories Against Old Foes New Hope
for Prevention and Control of Healthcare-Associate
d MRSA Infections
- John A. Jernigan, MD, MS
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Atlanta, Georgia
2What is the Preventable Fraction of Healthcare
Associated Infections?
3What is the Preventable Fraction of Healthcare
Associated Infections?
- SENIC study results
- others
4What is the Preventable Fraction of Healthcare
Associated Infections?
- Some may have interpreted these data to mean that
most healthcare associated infections are
inevitable - What impact has this had on the Psychology of
prevention? - How has this impacted how infection control
programs operate?
5Eliminating catheter-related bloodstream
infections in the intensive care unit
Berenholtz, S et al. Critical Care Medicine.
32(10)2014-2020, October 2004.
6(No Transcript)
7Maybe the Preventable Fraction is Much Larger
than we Thought?
- Healthcare Epidemiologists have been afraid of
using the E word (elimination) with regard to
healthcare-associated infections, but recent
successes suggest that perhaps we should have
been using it more.
8Are such goals appropriate for the problem of
antimicrobial resistance, with MRSA as a starting
point?
9Emerging Prevalence of Methicillin-Resistance
Among S. aureus in U.S. Intensive Care Units
National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance
(NNIS) System
10Rationale for Efforts to Prevent and Control
Resistant Gram-positive Bacteria
- Emerging as dominant pathogens in
healthcare-associated infections - for example
- Between 1992-2002, among infections following
CABG, cholecystectomy, colectomy, and total hip
replacement, S. aureus 16.6 -30.9 - S. aureus infections attributable to MRSA
increased from 9.2 to 49.3 - Treatment options are limited and less effective,
may result in higher morbidity and mortality - Gonzalez Clin Infect Dis 1999291171
- Lucas Clin Infect Dis 1998261127
- Abramson ICHE 1999 20408-411
- Cheng et al J Hospital Infect 19881291-101
- Stosor et al. Arch Intern Med 1998 158522-527
11Summary of Unadjusted Results of Studies
Comparing Mortality of MRSA and MSSA Bacteremia
Cosgrove et al. Clinical Infectious Diseases
20033653-59
12Rationale for Efforts to Prevent and Control
Resistant Gram-positive Bacteria
- Prevalence of resistance leads to unfavorable
antibiotic prescribing, and leads to more
resistance - prevalent MRSA more glycopeptide use
more glycopeptide resistance -
13MRSA infections add to the total S. aureus
infection rate
- Stamm Am J Infect Control 19932170
- Boyce J Infect Dis 1993148763
- Chaix JAMA 1999 2821745-1751
- Jernigan ICHE 199516686
- Harbarth J Hosp Infect 20004643
- Therefore, preventing MRSA infections should
result in decreased S. aureus infection rates
14Okay, so MRSA and antimicrobial resistance in
general are important problems, but they are
different from bloodstream infections. Its okay
to set bold goals for preventing bloodstream
infections, but we could never hope to be so
successful against MRSA infection! Could we?
15Emerging Prevalence of Methicillin-Resistance
Among S. aureus in U.S. Intensive Care Units
16Emerging Prevalence of Methicillin-Resistance
Among S. aureus in U.S. Intensive Care Units
17Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in
Europe, 19992002Tiemersma et. al. Emerg Infect
Dis 2004101627-34
18Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in
Europe, 19992002Tiemersma et. al. Emerg Infect
Dis 2004101627-34
19Can the experience in other countries be
reproduced here?
20Overall Rates Pre-intervention 1.48
infections/1,000 pt days Post-intervention
0.68 infections/1,000 pt days
54 reduction, p.04
21Overall Rates Pre-intervention 3.82
infections/1,000 pt days Post-intervention
1.62 infections/1,000 pt days
58 reduction, plt.01
22Huang, S. IDSA 2005
23There are a growing number of studies suggesting
that US healthcare facilities can successfully
prevent MRSA infections
24(No Transcript)
25- A regional collaborative approach may be a good
way to approach the MRSA problem - Sharing of MRSA-carriers between facilities
- Success at the community level may be more
readily accepted as generalizable - Need to agree on common system for measuring
outcome, but there is room for alternative
approaches to prevention. One size may not fit
all. - Successes can be shared and spread across the
community
26Summary
- We (healthcare epidemiologists) may have badly
underestimated the preventable fraction of
healthcare-associated infections - Regional/community collaboratives have been
effective in achieving major reductions in
healthcare-associated infections - MRSA is an important patient safety issue that
needs addressing.
27Summary (continued)
- MRSA infections can be prevented, even in endemic
settings - Regional collaboration on MRSA prevention may
have particular advantages. - Successful MRSA prevention across a region would
represent a major advance for infection control,
and would have implications for control of other
antimicrobial resistant infections