Jon Christopherson - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Jon Christopherson

Description:

The USGS QA Plan for Digital Aerial Imagery Jon Christopherson SGT, Inc. at USGS EROS Sioux Falls, SD jonchris_at_usgs.gov Work performed under contract: 08HQCN0005 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: JonBC
Learn more at: http://www.asprs.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Jon Christopherson


1
The USGS QA Plan for Digital Aerial Imagery
Jon Christopherson SGT, Inc. at USGS EROS
Sioux Falls, SD jonchris_at_usgs.gov Work
performed under contract 08HQCN0005
2
Outline
  • Background/History
  • The USGS QA Plan A Four Part Plan
  • Progress to Date the Future
  • Additional Efforts Thoughts

3
Background History
  • 2000 - ASPRS study asks USGS to work with digital
  • 2005 Formed Inter-Agency Digital Imagery
    Working Group (IADIWG)
  • 2005 First presentations of the four-part QA
    Plan
  • 2005 Held workshop w/ industry to get feedback
  • 2007 Began Sensor Type Certifications
  • 2008 Completed first four sensor certifications

4
Four Parts to the Plan
  • Four Major Parts of the Plan
  • Contracting Guidelines
  • Properly specifying the data you want
  • Sensor Type Certification
  • Ensure that a metric camera/sensor will be used
  • Data Provider Certification
  • Ensure that the vendor can do this kind of work
  • Data Quality Assessment
  • Ensure that you got what you asked for initially

5
Progress Sensor Type Certification
  • Sensor Type Certification initiated first
  • Certified seven camera/sensors to date
  • Applanix DSS-322, DSS-422, DSS-439
  • Intergraph DMC
  • Leica ADS-40 w/ SH40, SH50, SH52 heads
  • Microsoft Vexcel UltraCam-D and UltraCam-X
  • Three additional vendors have systems in process
  • More in discussion
  • Working with EuroSDR to harmonize efforts

6
Progress Data Provider Certification
  • Process finally outlined
  • Much discussion deliberation
  • Reduced from original scope
  • Final Plan centers around Product Validation
  • USGS to assess accuracy orthoimagery products
  • Approved ranges to be built across US
  • Sioux Falls range nearing completion
  • In discussion with next two ranges
  • Goal is 6 or more ranges
  • Accuracy assessment tools to be developed
  • Removes human error, better results

7
Range Locations
Sioux Falls
?
?
Pueblo, CO
Rolla, MO
?
8
Sioux Falls Range
  • 34 mi (54.7 km) E-W
  • 53 miles (85.3 km) N-S
  • Complete 12 (30cm) Orthoimagery cover
  • Sioux Falls city _at_ 6 (15cm)
  • City core at 3 (7.5cm)
  • Complete lidar coverage at gt1m posting
  • 80 signalized control points
  • Much more non-signalized to be added

9
S.F. Range
  • 1st range
  • Prototype
  • Aerial satellite
  • Additional ranges may vary in size

10
12-inch (30cm) Imagery
11
6-inch (15cm) Imagery
12
3-inch (7.5cm) Imagery
13
Progress Specification and Quality Assessment
  • Addresses 1st and 4th part of QA Plan
  • 1) How to properly specify data
  • 4) How to assess that product meets those specs
  • The Spec Check Tool now under development
  • Web based
  • Help generate contract-ready specification
    language
  • Follow with line-by-line checklist for products
  • Helps to standardize inputs to industry
  • And standardize expectations!
  • Initially for use by USGS Liaisons (and partners)
  • Strongly User-Focused
  • Beta fielded by Sep.09

14
Prototype Screen
15
Spec Check Tool
  • Three Main Parts
  • Specification generator
  • Assessment methods and tracking
  • Education!
  • The Educational / Tutorial section is critical!
  • Referred to throughout both halves of tool
  • Good for general education also
  • Continuous revision and improvement
  • Grows as our industry grows
  • Got any good ideas for this?
  • Good ideas, references, sources, partnerships
    always welcome!

16
Additional Efforts Thoughts
  • USGS EROS continues research into camera
    calibration
  • Being approached more people, more varieties
  • USGS Operates two large labs

17
Additional Efforts Thoughts
  • Some consumer cameras can be calibrated used
  • Smaller cameras can be calibrated easier
  • Use smaller targets
  • Software improvements make calibration quicker
    easier
  • Chip densities growing, detector pitch shrinking
  • Calibrate more often?
  • Opportunities for calibration services?
  • Operators/flyers do their own calibrations?
  • Where will it all go?
  • What are future sensors, platforms, and
    operations?

18
Final Thoughts
  • The industry continues to advance
  • Technology not slowing down!
  • The USGS trying to keep up ( keep abreast)
  • More work needed
  • More research needed
  • And more collaboration, communication, and
    cooperation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com