Toward a Theory of Property Rights Harold Demsetz, (1967) American Economic Review, 57 (May): 347-359 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Toward a Theory of Property Rights Harold Demsetz, (1967) American Economic Review, 57 (May): 347-359

Description:

Toward a Theory of Property Rights Harold Demsetz, (1967) American Economic Review, 57 (May): 347-359 John Mawdsley: BADM 545 wk4 13th Sept 09 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:78
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: Clar2150
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Toward a Theory of Property Rights Harold Demsetz, (1967) American Economic Review, 57 (May): 347-359


1
Toward a Theory of Property RightsHarold
Demsetz, (1967) American Economic Review, 57
(May) 347-359
  • John Mawdsley BADM 545 wk4 13th Sept 09

2
Property Rights
  • Property rights are an instrument of Society
  • Help individuals form expectations which they can
    reasonably hold in dealings with others
  • Property rights specify how persons may be
    benefited and harmed
  • Determine who must pay whom to modify actions
    between persons.

3
Role of Property Rights
  • Primary role of property rights is that of
    guiding incentives to achieve greater
    internalisation of externalities.
  • Property rights arise when it becomes economic
    for those affected by externalities to
    internalize benefits and costs.
  • Allocation of property rights are a pre-condition
    for the efficient functioning of markets

4
How does it happen?
  • ve change in the value of PR's

Internalization (Transaction costs)?
Externalities
Benefit / Harm
5
Increased internalization
  • Changes in knowledge lead to new techniques,
    which provides new ways of doing the same thing.
  • New and emerging property rights will be in
    response to changes in technology and relative
    prices.
  • Long-term viability depends upon how well Society
    modifies behaviour to accommodate externalities.

6
Internalization A persons right to freedom
  • If a person is a 'freeman', then the cost to the
    firm of paying for the use of labor is considered
    in the decision of the firm.
  • If a person is a slave, then the slave-owner will
    take into account the sum of money the slave is
    willing to pay for their freedom.
  • Hence, these costs become internalized

7
Example Development of Property Rights

in land among American Indians
  • Quebec Development of fur trade gt value of
    furs to Indians up gt increased scale of hunting gt
    development of private, allotted hunting
    territories and animal husbandry.
  • So, property rights system changed in response to
    the economic effects of fur trade and the
    increased importance of externalities.
  • SW Territory Animals graze over large areas of
    land gt value of establishing boundaries reduced
    by high costs of preventing animals crossing
    boundaries.
  • Therefore the importance of the externalities not
    sufficient enough to warrant changes.

8
Forms of property rights ownership
  • Communal Property Rights
  • Rights are exercised by the 'community'.
  • The State or an individual cannot deny right a
    person the right to exercise community owned
    property rights.
  • Costs of any abuse to communal rights are borne
    by each member of the community.
  • Negotiating costs can be high difficult to
    reach mutual agreement with a large group. Plus
    likelihood of future re-negotiations.
  • High policing costs.
  • Cannot have a pay-to-use / pay-not-to-use system.

9
Forms of property rights ownership
  • Private Ownership
  • Owner can exclude the community from exercising
    owner's private property rights
  • Seek to maximize value of property by taking
    account of alternative streams of benefits and
    costs
  • But...may not take into account the effects upon
    others.
  • Can have a pay-to-use / pay-not-to-use system.

10
Coalescence Ownership of Property RightsLand
Ownership Example
Communal Ownership Private Ownership
Over hunt and overwork land because some of the costs are borne by others Attempts to maximize present value by taking into account alternative future time streams of benefits and costs
Negotiation cost high, many people Negotiation cost low, one owner
Not possible to bring full expected benefits costs of future generations to bear on current users Acts as a broker whose wealth depends on how well he takes into account the competing claims of present and future
Great number of externalities Internalizes many of external costs associated with communal
11
Communal land ownership
12
Private land ownership
13
Publicly-owned companies ?
  • Legal modifications to Partnership Law effect
    on property rights
  • Executive management become de facto owners of
    company
  • Reduces negotiation costs / expedites decision
    making
  • Limited liability for shareholders
  • Protects shareholders financially from the
    external effects brought upon the de facto
    management
  • Reduces transaction costs of trading shares

14
Property Rights for 'inventions'
  • If communal rights apply to 'new ideas' then
    incentives to develop new ideas are lacking as
    benefits will not be concentrated on the
    inventor.
  • By patenting, PR rights become private, and
    therefore new ideas will be rapidly forthcoming.

15
But.......
  • New idea makes an old one obsolete (-ve) but
    sometimes another old one more valuable (ve)?
  • Can bring about market negotiations or legal
    cases.

16
Recap
  • Demsetz (1967) sees property rights as a
    mechanism towards economic efficiency.
  • Close relationship between property rights and
    externalities.
  • Changing of property rights can have beneficial
    and harmful effects.
  • Society must adapt to changes.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com