Title: An Evaluation of the UWNMS Treatment of Water Vapor Transport and Cirrus Formation in the UT/LS
1An Evaluation of the UWNMS Treatment of Water
Vapor Transport and Cirrus Formation in the UT/LS
- Monica Harkey, UW-Madison
- Matthew Hitchman, Marcus Buker
2Hypothesis and method
- Changes in tropical cirrus microphysics caused by
emissions from biomass burning may (partly)
explain moistening of the lower stratosphere - UWNMS model runs with control and perturbed ice
microphysics will show first-order effects on the
distribution of water vapor in the UT/LS
3The volumes of interest
4The volumes of interest
Jensen et al., 2001
5Where the cirrus areSAGE
Wang et al., 1996
6Where the cirrus areLITE
Winker and Trepte, 1998
7How tropical cirrus form
- wave motions
- from convective influences (anvils, pileus)
- large-scale, slow uplifting
8How clouds affect water vapor in the UT/LS
Rosenfield et al. (1998)
9The knowns
- Water vapor in the lower stratosphere is
increasing (Rosenlof et al., 2001) - Cirrus near the tropopause affect water vapor
transport into the lower stratosphere - Cirrus occur near tropical tropopause frequently
10Tropical biomass burningAfrica
Image taken by Bob Yokelson during SAFARI
campaign, southern Africa in 2000
11Tropical biomass burningSouth America
MODIS image from 22 July 2003, showing fires
surrounding Xingu National Park (and indigenous
peoples reserve), Brazil
12Where biomass burning products were measured
13How do we know biomass burning was really the
source?
14Where did the material go?
15What are some properties of biomass-burning
plumes?
16What are some properties of biomass-burning
plumes?
Kojima et al., 2004
17How can combustion materials affect ice clouds?
- Kojima et al. (2004) found organics abundant in
upper troposphere, many sulfate aerosols embedded
with organics - Measurement techniques can destroy molecules
(Cziczo et al., 2004) - Cziczo et al. also noted organics appear to be
inefficient IN
18The knowns
- Water vapor in the lower stratosphere seems to be
increasing - Cirrus near the tropopause affect water vapor
transport into the lower stratosphere - Cirrus occur near tropical tropopause frequently
19the UWNMS
- Arbitrary resolutionused 400 m in the vertical,
30 km in the horizontal - Non-hydrostatic model especially needed in region
of study
For more information on this model, written by
Prof.Greg Tripoli, visit http//mocha.meteor.wisc
.edu/
20 the UWNMS
- ECMWF 12-hour, 2.5 x 2.5 degree winds,
temperature, and moisture up to 200 hPa - HALOE latitude-binned and pressure-averaged water
vapor at and above 200 hPa - Explicit microphysics predict concentration of
pristine crystals, aggregates - convective parameterization using Kuo scheme
21 the UWNMS and idealized IN
- Control run
- pristine crystals initialized at 1 µm (6.4 x
10-12 grams for hexagonal plate) - Perturbed run
- crystals initialized at 0.45 µm (9.1 x 10-13
grams)
22Pristine crystal concentration at 13.5 km 24
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
23Pristine crystal concentration at 13.5 km 30
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
24Pristine crystal concentration at 13.5 km 36
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
25Pristine crystal concentration at 13.5 km 42
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
26Pristine crystal concentration at 13.5 km 48
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
27Pristine crystal concentration at 14.5 km24
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
28Pristine crystal concentration at 14.5 km30
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
29Pristine crystal concentration at 14.5 km36
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
30Pristine crystal concentration at 14.5 km42
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
31Pristine crystal concentration at 14.5 km48
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
32Pristine crystal concentration at 15.5 km24
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
33Pristine crystal concentration at 15.5 km30
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
34Pristine crystal concentration at 15.5 km36
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
35Pristine crystal concentration at 15.5 km42
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
36Pristine crystal concentration at 15.5 km48
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
37What does this mean, in bulk?
38Water vapor difference at 13.5 km
39Water vapor difference at 14.5 km
40Water vapor difference at 15.5 km
41The difference in water vapor between control and
perturbed runs
42Summary
- As expected,
- crystal mixing ratios higher in perturbed run,
with smaller (0.45 micron) initial size - cloud extent between control, perturbed runs
varies - ice initialized with a smaller crystal size
results in an increase of water vapor mixing
ratio within and above clouds
43Direction for the future
- Fashion idealized gunkbiomass burning derived
INto be activated at a specific T, q and
interact with water vapor in the UWNMS - Conduct sensitivity studies with varying
concentrationshow do cloud properties, water
vapor distribution change?