An Evaluation of the UWNMS Treatment of Water Vapor Transport and Cirrus Formation in the UT/LS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

An Evaluation of the UWNMS Treatment of Water Vapor Transport and Cirrus Formation in the UT/LS

Description:

An Evaluation of the UWNMS Treatment of Water Vapor Transport and Cirrus Formation in the UT/LS Monica Harkey, UW-Madison Matthew Hitchman, Marcus Buker – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:65
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: MattH243
Learn more at: https://www.aos.wisc.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: An Evaluation of the UWNMS Treatment of Water Vapor Transport and Cirrus Formation in the UT/LS


1
An Evaluation of the UWNMS Treatment of Water
Vapor Transport and Cirrus Formation in the UT/LS
  • Monica Harkey, UW-Madison
  • Matthew Hitchman, Marcus Buker

2
Hypothesis and method
  • Changes in tropical cirrus microphysics caused by
    emissions from biomass burning may (partly)
    explain moistening of the lower stratosphere
  • UWNMS model runs with control and perturbed ice
    microphysics will show first-order effects on the
    distribution of water vapor in the UT/LS

3
The volumes of interest
  • in the vertical

4
The volumes of interest
  • in the horizontal

Jensen et al., 2001
5
Where the cirrus areSAGE
Wang et al., 1996
6
Where the cirrus areLITE
Winker and Trepte, 1998
7
How tropical cirrus form
  • wave motions
  • from convective influences (anvils, pileus)
  • large-scale, slow uplifting

8
How clouds affect water vapor in the UT/LS
Rosenfield et al. (1998)
9
The knowns
  • Water vapor in the lower stratosphere is
    increasing (Rosenlof et al., 2001)
  • Cirrus near the tropopause affect water vapor
    transport into the lower stratosphere
  • Cirrus occur near tropical tropopause frequently

10
Tropical biomass burningAfrica
Image taken by Bob Yokelson during SAFARI
campaign, southern Africa in 2000
11
Tropical biomass burningSouth America
MODIS image from 22 July 2003, showing fires
surrounding Xingu National Park (and indigenous
peoples reserve), Brazil
12
Where biomass burning products were measured
13
How do we know biomass burning was really the
source?
14
Where did the material go?
15
What are some properties of biomass-burning
plumes?
16
What are some properties of biomass-burning
plumes?
Kojima et al., 2004
17
How can combustion materials affect ice clouds?
  • Kojima et al. (2004) found organics abundant in
    upper troposphere, many sulfate aerosols embedded
    with organics
  • Measurement techniques can destroy molecules
    (Cziczo et al., 2004)
  • Cziczo et al. also noted organics appear to be
    inefficient IN

18
The knowns
  • Water vapor in the lower stratosphere seems to be
    increasing
  • Cirrus near the tropopause affect water vapor
    transport into the lower stratosphere
  • Cirrus occur near tropical tropopause frequently

19
the UWNMS
  • Arbitrary resolutionused 400 m in the vertical,
    30 km in the horizontal
  • Non-hydrostatic model especially needed in region
    of study

For more information on this model, written by
Prof.Greg Tripoli, visit http//mocha.meteor.wisc
.edu/
20
the UWNMS
  • ECMWF 12-hour, 2.5 x 2.5 degree winds,
    temperature, and moisture up to 200 hPa
  • HALOE latitude-binned and pressure-averaged water
    vapor at and above 200 hPa
  • Explicit microphysics predict concentration of
    pristine crystals, aggregates
  • convective parameterization using Kuo scheme

21
the UWNMS and idealized IN
  • Control run
  • pristine crystals initialized at 1 µm (6.4 x
    10-12 grams for hexagonal plate)
  • Perturbed run
  • crystals initialized at 0.45 µm (9.1 x 10-13
    grams)

22
Pristine crystal concentration at 13.5 km 24
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
23
Pristine crystal concentration at 13.5 km 30
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
24
Pristine crystal concentration at 13.5 km 36
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
25
Pristine crystal concentration at 13.5 km 42
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
26
Pristine crystal concentration at 13.5 km 48
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
27
Pristine crystal concentration at 14.5 km24
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
28
Pristine crystal concentration at 14.5 km30
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
29
Pristine crystal concentration at 14.5 km36
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
30
Pristine crystal concentration at 14.5 km42
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
31
Pristine crystal concentration at 14.5 km48
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
32
Pristine crystal concentration at 15.5 km24
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
33
Pristine crystal concentration at 15.5 km30
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
34
Pristine crystal concentration at 15.5 km36
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
35
Pristine crystal concentration at 15.5 km42
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
36
Pristine crystal concentration at 15.5 km48
hours into run
Control run
Perturbed run
37
What does this mean, in bulk?
38
Water vapor difference at 13.5 km
39
Water vapor difference at 14.5 km
40
Water vapor difference at 15.5 km
41
The difference in water vapor between control and
perturbed runs
42
Summary
  • As expected,
  • crystal mixing ratios higher in perturbed run,
    with smaller (0.45 micron) initial size
  • cloud extent between control, perturbed runs
    varies
  • ice initialized with a smaller crystal size
    results in an increase of water vapor mixing
    ratio within and above clouds

43
Direction for the future
  • Fashion idealized gunkbiomass burning derived
    INto be activated at a specific T, q and
    interact with water vapor in the UWNMS
  • Conduct sensitivity studies with varying
    concentrationshow do cloud properties, water
    vapor distribution change?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com