ESA ground antennas and their compatibility with the MORE experiment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

ESA ground antennas and their compatibility with the MORE experiment

Description:

Title: The DSP implementation of the decoder Author: Guido Montorsi Last modified by: rmadde Created Date: 6/17/1995 11:31:02 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:22
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: Guid69
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ESA ground antennas and their compatibility with the MORE experiment


1
ESA ground antennas and their compatibility with
the MORE experiment
R. Maddè, M. Mercolino ESA/ESOC
2
ESA deep space network
  • ESA deep space network consists of two stations
  • New Norcia (NNO) DSA-1, operational since 2001,
    western Australia
  • S- and X- band uplink and downlink capabilities
  • Ka-band downlink optional (not yet taken)
  • Currently supporting Mars Express (MEX) and
    Rosetta
  • Cebreros (CEB) DSA-2, operational since 2005,
    Spain.
  • X- band uplink and downlink, Ka- band downlink
    capabilities
  • Ka-band uplink optional (not yet taken)
  • Currently supporting Venus Express (VEX)
  • Cebreros will be the station supporting
    BepiColombo
  • Future deep space station
  • DSA-3 mat be located in the southern hemisphere
    at American longitudes (Chile or Argentina)
  • X- band uplink and downlink (baseline), Ka- band
    downlink (optional)

3
Cebreros block diagram
4
Detail of the back-end (Rx side only)
  • Ka-band D/C output BW 220 MHz
  • X-band D/C output BW 100 MHz
  • L-band D/C output BW 30 MHz
  • 3L-band D/Cs per station
  • 3 IFMS per station (2 for TTC and 1 for RSI)

5
Back end Receiver (IFMS)
  • IFMS characteristics
  • Input BW 28 MHz (High-speed mode)
  • IF at 70MHz
  • CFE (common front end) samples at 280 Ms/s
  • Open loop capabilities
  • Sampling rate from 1kHz to 4MHz
  • Quantisation levels 1,2,4,8,16 bits
  • Up to 4 channels per each DSP card
  • Ranging capabilities
  • Maximum ranging tone frequency at 1.5 MHz (as per
    ECSS and CCSDS standards)

6
MORE requirements (generals)
  • Unlike most scientific experiments mounted on ESA
    missions, MORE heavily involves both space and
    ground segment
  • Different requirement levels can be defined
  • PI level 1 performance requirements are the
    end-to-end requirements
  • A set of level 2 performance requirements has
    been prepared by the PI, with the intention to
    apportion them to the space and ground segments
  • Some level 2 requirements are related to media
    calibration

7
MORE requirements (level 2)
  • MORE requirements can be split into four main
    areas
  • Requirements on the needed multi-frequency link
  • Requirements on Doppler performance (all links)
  • Ka/Ka link adev (1000 s) lt 610-15
  • Other links sX/X/ sKa/Ka4 sX/Ka/ sKa/Ka10
  • Requirements on media effects
  • Uncalibrated contribution adev (1000 s) lt 110-14
  • (or 310-15 ??) (all media) for antenna
    elevation gt 15 deg
  • Requirements on Ranging performance (all links)
  • Ka/Ka ranging calibration error shall be less
    then than 0.3 ns (1 s, 1-w) over half a day (X/Ka
    and X/X 1.5 ns)
  • Ka/Ka, X/X and X/Ka ranging signals shall be as
    defined in the SGICD (WBRS either with tone or
    PN codes)
  • Question for PI are ageing requirements
    intended for the Ground Segment as well?

8
Current compatibility of MORE requirements with
DSA
  • Need for a multi-frequency link
  • Imply a station Ka-band uplink upgrade (A in the
    next chart)
  • Requirements on Doppler performance (all links)
  • Imply the adev characterisation of the station on
    all links (B)
  • Imply the evaluation of the mechanical noise
    contribution (B)
  • Requirements on media calibration
  • Imply the use of an ad-hoc calibration system
    (which does not exist in ESA stations) (C)
  • Requirements on ranging performance
  • Imply the development, deployment and validation
    of a wide-band ranging processor (D)
  • Imply the development of a proper calibration
    strategy the conduction of related test
    campaign (E)

9
Implementation approach
  • List of needed activities
  • Ka-band transmission implementation
  • Assessment of ADEV performance of the station
  • Media calibration
  • WBRS (Wide band ranging) processor
  • Ranging calibration
  • Ancillary activities
  • F. Check station location accuracy
  • G. Extension of station baseband capabilities

10
Ka-band transmission
  • What has been done
  • High stability Ka-band up- and down-conv. are
    available
  • Ka-band feed, mirrors and dichroic are in
    production
  • Development of a movable mirror, to squint Ka-Tx
    beam respect Ka-Rx beam, on going
  • What needs to be done
  • Development of the transmitter HPA
  • Production and procurement of 2 operational units
  • Installation of all Ka-band uplink elements in
    CEB
  • Test and validation campaign
  • Verification of the Ka-band uplink stability

11
Assessment of ADEV performances of the station
  • An end-to-end assessment on all the three links
    is required
  • What has been done
  • At station level, a tool has been developed to
    compute the ADEV of the station, given the
    measurements of each of the equipment (X/X link
    only)
  • ADEV characterisation has been performed in both
    NNO and CEB (not taking into account the antenna
    mechanical noise)
  • Development of system able to assess antenna
    mechanical noise (to be deployed and validated in
    a test antenna in Villafranca)
  • What needs to be done
  • Evaluate CEB mechanical noise
  • Evaluate overall adev of X/X link, once
    mechanical noise is known
  • Evaluate overall adev of X/Ka link, once
    mechanical noise is known
  • Evaluate overall adev of the Ka/Ka link, once the
    antenna is upgraded

12
Measured ADEV performances
Measured Ka-band UC ADEV lt 110-16
13
Measured ADEV performances
Measured Ka-band DC ADEV of 110-16
14
Measured ADEV performances (CEB X/X)
The MORE X/X adev requirement is 2.410-14 _at_
1000 s
15
Media calibration
  • The effect of dispersive media will be almost
    totally cancelled by means of the multifrequency
    link
  • Requirements on the level at which troposphere
    effects have to be calibrated have to be frozen
  • The current requirements are not enough to define
    the needed system
  • There is the need to define the system in terms
    of
  • Technical performance
  • Station interfaces
  • Interfaces to the final user
  • What has been done
  • Nothing
  • What needs to be done
  • Study and assessment of technical specification
    of the needed media calibration system
  • Development and procurement of the operational
    system
  • Installation, testing and long term calibration
    of the operational system

16
WBRS processor
  • Both the proposed MORE ranging systems (with tone
    at 20MHz or using PN codes) require the
    development of a new TTC platform
  • This platform shall anyhow be developed due to
    obsolescence of the current IFMS (in operation
    since 2001)
  • What has been done
  • Nothing
  • What needs to be done
  • Study on new wide-band TTC processor
  • New wide-band TTC processor development
  • New wide-band TTC processor procurement
  • Procurement of operational units
  • Installation and test of new TTC processor in CEB

17
Ranging calibrations
  • Requirements on ranging calibration need some
    further clarifications
  • ESA has never faced requirements on ranging
    calibration so stringent. Therefore, ranging
    calibration achievable accuracies have to be
    further characterised
  • What has been done
  • Some preliminary test campaigns on the existing
    links (X/X, X/Ka)
  • What needs to be done
  • Requirement analysis and test with the current
    available equipment
  • Based on the outputs of the characterisation of
    the current ranging calibration system, one may
    consider further activities (if needed i.e.
    On-line ranging calibration)

18
Check station location
  • The ADEV contribution due to the uncertainty of
    the station location is required to be less than
    1.210-15 _at_ 1000 s. This means a sub-centimetre
    accuracy (0.9 cm) in the station location.
  • The declared accuracy of ESA deep space antennas
    is in the order of 1-2 cm over short time
    periods.
  • Over long time periods, the effect of the
    tectonics movement must be taken into account.
  • Too little data available to characterise the
    tectonics movement in CEB.
  • A survey using DDOR/VLBI techniques for
    evaluating the station coordinates may be
    considered. This possibility is at the moment TBD.

19
Extension of station baseband capabilities
  • The advent of a new ranging processor has high
    impact on baseband station integration
  • The number of receiving/transmitting chains (and
    related connectivity to the RF equipment) shall
    be reviewed, depending upon the final mission
    operational requirements
  • Once this is clear, and the new processor
    produced, an upgrade of the baseband
    configuration shall take place

20
Tentative schedule
ITEM Timeline
A. Ka- band Tx implementation Development 2007/08
A. Ka- band Tx implementation Production 2009/10
A. Ka- band Tx implementation Ka- u/l installation in CEB 2011/12
B. Assessment of ADEV - ADEV of mechanical noise 2008
B. Assessment of ADEV - ADEV of CEB in al llinks 2008/2012
C. Media calibration Study 2007/08
C. Media calibration System development 2009/10
C. Media calibration Installation, verfication, calibration 2011/12
D. WBRS Ranging processor architectural study 2008
D. WBRS Ranging processor development 2009/10
D. WBRS Ranging processor procurement 2011
D. WBRS Ranging processor integration 2012
E. Ranging calibration System characterisation 2008
E. Ranging calibration On-line ranging calibration TBD
F. Check of station location 2008
G. Baseband integration 2012
21
Schedule assumptions
  • The main assumption is to have the station ready
    6 months before launch
  • Launch is currently scheduled for August 2013
  • It has to be noted that the station is
    operational, and would require major upgrade
    (i.e. a considerable down-time)
  • ? In order to minimise operational impacts, all
    integration activities shall be grouped in the
    same time period

22
Costs
  • This presentation does not talk about costs
  • It just shows how MORE needs can be mapped in the
    existing ESA infrastructure
  • However, it has to be noted that
  • All that has been mentioned under what has been
    done has been covered by ESA
  • Most of what has been mentioned under needs to
    be done is currently not financed
  • The PI is invited to acknowledge the
    above-presented current status

23
Final remarks
  • ESA CEB station would welcome to host the ground
    segment of the MORE experiments
  • CEB is an operational station, used to support
    several missions. Therefore
  • Station configuration is ruled by ESA
  • Station operation is restricted to ESA
  • Interfacing to experiment data has to be done
    through ESA
  • CEB station will provide in any case routine
    operations to the BC mission
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com