Estimation of failure probability in higher-dimensional spaces - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Estimation of failure probability in higher-dimensional spaces

Description:

Estimation of failure probability in higher-dimensional spaces Ana Ferreira, UTL, Lisbon, Portugal Laurens de Haan, UL, Lisbon Portugal and EUR, Rotterdam, NL – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:28
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: Fatima2c
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Estimation of failure probability in higher-dimensional spaces


1
Estimation of failure probability in
higher-dimensional spaces
  • Ana Ferreira, UTL, Lisbon, Portugal
  • Laurens de Haan, UL, Lisbon Portugal
    and EUR, Rotterdam, NL
  • Tao Lin, Xiamen University, China

Research partially supported by
Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian
FCT/POCTI/FEDER ERAS
project
2
A simple example
  • Take r.v.s (R, ?), independent,
  • and (X,Y) (R cos ?, R sin ?) .
  • Take a Borel set A ? with positive distance
    to the origin.
  • Write a A a x x ? A.
  • Clearly

3
  • Suppose probability distribution of ? unknown.
  • We have i.i.d. observations (X1,Y1), ... (Xn,Yn),
    and a failure set A away from the observations
    in the NE corner.
  • To estimate PA we may use
  • a a A
  • where is the empirical measure.
  • This is the main idea of estimation of failure
    set probability.

4
(No Transcript)
5
The problem
  • Some device can fail under the combined influence
    of extreme behaviour of two random forces X and
    Y. For example rain and wind.
  • Failure set C if (X, Y) falls into C, then
    failure takes place.
  • Extreme failure set none of the observations
    we have from the past falls into C. There has
    never been a failure.
  • Estimate the probability of extreme failure

6
(No Transcript)
7
A bit more formal
  • Suppose we have n i.i.d. observations (X1,Y1),
    (X2,Y2), ... (Xn,Yn), with distribution function
    F and a failure set C.
  • The fact none of the n observations is in C
    can be reflected in the theoretical assumption
  • P(C) lt 1 / n .
  • Hence C can not be fixed, we have
  • C Cn
  • and P(Cn) O (1/n) as n ? 8 .
  • i.e. when n increases the set C moves, say,
    to the NE corner.

8
Domain of attraction condition EVT
  • There exist
  • Functions a1, a2 gt0, b1, b2 real
  • Parameters ?1 and ?2
  • A measure ? on the positive quadrant
  • 0, 8 2 \ (0,0) with
  • ? (a A) a-1 ? (A) ?
  • for each Borel set A, such that

for each Borel set A? with positive
distance to the origin.
9
Remark
Relation ? is as in the example. But here we have
the marginal transformations
on top of that.
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
Hence two steps
  • Transformation of marginal distributions
  • Use of homogeneity property of ?
  • when pulling back the failure set.

14
Conditions
  • 1) Domain of attraction

2) We need estimators with
for i 1,2 with k ? k(n)?8 , k/n ? 0, n?8 .
15
  • 3) Cn is open and there exists (vn , wn) ? ? Cn
    such that (x , y) ? Cn ? x gt vn or y gt wn .
  • 4) (stability condition on Cn ) The set

?
in does not depend on n where
16
  • Further S has positive distance from the
    origin.

17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
Before we go on, we simplify notation
Notation
  • Note that

20
With this notation we can write
  • Cond. 1'
  • Cond. 4'

21
Then
  • Condition 5 Sharpening of cond.1

Condition 6 ?1 , ?2 gt 1 / 2 and
for i 1,2 where
22
The Estimator Note that

Hence we propose the estimator
and we shall prove
Then
23
More formally
  • Write pn ? P Cn. Our estimator is
  • Where

24
Theorem
  • Under our conditions

as n?8 provided ? (S) gt 0.
25
For the proof note that by Cond. 5
  • and

Hence it is sufficient to prove
and
For both we need the following fundamental Lemma.
26
Lemma
  • For all real ? and x gt 0 , if ?n ? ? (n?8 )
    and cn cgt0,

provided
27
Proposition
  • Proof Recall

and
Combining the two we get
28
The Lemma gives
  • Similarly

Hence
?
29
Finally we need to prove
  • We do this in 3 steps.

Proposition 1 Define
We have
30
Proof
  • Just calculate the characteristic function and
    apply Condition 1.

Proposition 2 Define
we have
Proof
By the Lemma ? identity.
Next apply Lebesgues dominated convergence
Theorem.
31
Proposition 3
Proof The left hand side is
By the Lemma ?
identity.
  • The result follows by using statement and proof
    of Proposition 2

end of finite-dimensional case
32
Similar result in function space
  • Example During surgery the blood pressure of
    the patient is monitored continuously. It should
    not go below a certain level and it has never
    been in previous similar operations in the past.
    What is the probability that it happens during
    surgery of this kind?

33
EVT in C 0,1
  • 1. Definition of maximum Let X1, X2, ... be
    i.i.d. in C 0,1. We consider
  • as an element of C 0,1.

2. Domain of attraction. For each Borel set
A ? C 0,1 with
we have
34
where for 0 s 1 we define
  • and ? is a homogeneous measure of degree 1.

35
Conditions
  • Cond. 1. Domain of attraction.
  • Cond. 2. Need estimators
  • such that

Cond. 3. Failure set Cn is open in C0,1 and
there exists hn ? ?Cn such that
36
Cond. 4
  • with

a fixed set (does not depend on n) and
Further
37
Cond. 5

Cond. 6

and
38
Now the estimator for pn? PCn
  • where

and
39
Theorem
  • Under our conditions

as n?8 provided ? (S) gt 0.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com