E-mail: nfhuang@cs.nthu.edu.tw - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 59
About This Presentation
Title:

E-mail: nfhuang@cs.nthu.edu.tw

Description:

/ E-mail: nfhuang_at_cs.nthu.edu.tw – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 60
Provided by: totoroCs3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: E-mail: nfhuang@cs.nthu.edu.tw


1
????????????????
????? ??????? ??????????/??????? E-mail
nfhuang_at_cs.nthu.edu.tw
2
Agenda
  • Introduction of Network Security
  • Content Inspection Technologies
  • Pattern Matching Algorithms
  • Flow Classification by Stateful Mechanism
  • Open Issues

3
-- ?????? --
  • 2000/3????DDos???????,??Yahoo?Amazon?CNN?eBay
    ???????
  • 2001/7Amazon.com ??? Bibliofind ?????????????
  • 2002 ??????
  • 2003/1 SQL Slammer ??
  • 2003/4 ??????????
  • 2003/8 Blaster ??????
  • 2003/9 SoBig ??????
  • 2003/9 ??????
  • 2004/3 Netsky ??????
  • 2004/4 Sasser ??????
  • 2005/5 ?????????????
  • 2005/6 ????????????????????

4
???????
  • ??????????,????????,??????,??????,???????
  • ?????????????,??????????????????
  • ???????????????????????????????
  • ????????????????
  • ???????????????

5
????????
6
??????
  • Denial of Service (DoS), Distributed Denial of
    Service (DDoS)
  • Network Invasion
  • Network Scanning
  • Network Sniffing
  • Torjan Horse and Backdoors
  • Worm

7
P2P/IM ????
  • P2P (Peer-to-Peer) ????
  • IM (Instant Messenger) ???
  • Spyware ????
  • Adware ????
  • Tunneling ????

8
P2P A new paradigm
  • Bottleneck of Server
  • Powerful PC
  • Flexible, efficient information sharing
  • P2P changes the way of Web (Internet)

 
 
9
P2P???????????
  • P2P ???????????,??????????,?? SoftEther ?
    Skype??????,????,????,?????????
  • P2P ????????,??
  • ??????????
  • ?????????
  • ??????
  • ?????
  • ????????
  • ??????????
  • ??????,?????

10
Famous P2P Examples
  • BitTorrent
  • eZpeer
  • Kuro
  • eDonkey
  • eMule
  • MLdonkey
  • Gnutella
  • Kazaa/Morpheus
  • Shareaza
  • Direct-connect
  • Gnutella
  • Soulseek
  • Opennap
  • Worklink
  • Opennext
  • Jelawat
  • PP???
  • SoftEther
  • iMESH
  • MIB
  • WinMix
  • WinMule
  • Skype

11
Instant Messenger (IM)
  • MSN
  • Yahoo Messenger
  • ICQ
  • YamQQ
  • AIM (AOL IM)

12
??????????
  • IDP/IPS (Layer-7)
  • Application Firewall (Layer-7)
  • Network Access Control (NAC)
  • Defense-in-Depth/Security Switch

13
A Generic Layer-7 Engine
  • Packet Normalizer
  • Makes sure the integrity of incoming packets
  • Eliminates the ambiguity
  • Decodes URI strings if necessary
  • Pattern-Matching Engine
  • Policy Engine
  • Gather information from pattern-matching engine
    and issue the verdict to allow/drop the packets

14
Packet Normalizer
  • Integrity Checking
  • IP Fragment Reassemble
  • TCP Segment Reassemble
  • TCP Segments may come out-of-order
  • SEQ out of window size
  • Segment Overlapping
  • URI Decode
  • URI hex code obfuscation (a 61)
  • URI unicode/UTF-8 obfuscation
  • self-referential directories obfuscation
    (/././././ /)
  • directories obfuscation (/abc/a/../a/../a/
    /abc/a)

15
Pattern-Matching Engine
  • The most computation-intensive task in packet
    processing. Normally the PM engine needs to
    process every single byte in packet payload.
  • In Snort, the PM routine accounts for 31 of the
    total execution time

16
Pattern Matching is Expensive!
  • 50 Instructions/ 1500 Byte packet
  • 30 Instructions/ Byte. 45K Instructions/1500
    Byte packet

Source Intel Corp.
17
Content Inspection Technologies
  • Pattern-Matching Algorithms
  • Software Based
  • Boyer-Moore
  • Aho-Corasick (AC)
  • Wu-Manber
  • Hardware Based
  • Bloom-Filter
  • Reconfigure Hardware (FSM)
  • TCAM-based

18
Pattern Matching Problem Definition
  • Given an input text T t0, t1, , tn ,and a
    finite set of strings P P1, P2, , Pr, the
    string matching problem involves locating and
    identifying the substring of T which is identical
    to Pj , 1? j? r, where
  • tsi , 0? i? m-1. And this equation can
    be also denoted as
  • tstsm-1

Text
G C A T C G C A G A G A G T A T A C A G T A A G
G C A G A G A G
19
Aho-Corasick (AC) Algorithm
  • AC is a classic solution to exact set matching.
    It works in time O(n m z) where z is number
    of patterns occurrences in T.
  • AC is based on a refinement of a keyword tree.
  • AC is a deterministic algorithm. That is, the
    performance is independent of the number of
    patterns.

20
An Example of AC Algorithm
  • Example P ab, ba, babb, bb

21
An example of AC Algorithm
!h,s
he
h
e
Patterns hers his she
h
r
s
1
0
2
8
9
hers
i
his
s
s
6
7
he, she
h
e
3
4
5
s
sh
Dashed fail transitions those not shown leads
to the root
22
An example of AC Algorithm
i
h
e
s
Got a Match!
h
i
s
Text h e i s h i s
23
Reconfigure Hardware (FSM)
  • Implement the AC FSM in configurable Logic
    Elements (LEs) of FPGA.
  • Achieve multiple gigabit performance. (Depends on
    the FPGA model)
  • A powerful FPGA is necessary to accommodate
    thousands of patterns, so that its not practical
    and visible in commercial market.

24
FPGA-based pattern matching
  • FPGA-based

25
Bloom Filter
  • Given a string X, the Bloom filter computes k
    hash functions on it producing k hash values
    ranging from 1 to m. The same procedure is
    repeated for all the members of the pattern set.
  • The input text is verified by generating k hash
    values in the same way. If at least one of these
    k bits is found not set then the string is
    declared to be impossible to match.
  • Patterns in Length n are grouped into Bn.

26
Bloom Filter (Cont.)
  • False positive
  • Mim f (0.5)K, while m (k x n) / Ln2
  • So, total space, sum(Bi) m x (w - 1)
  • if k 1, n 2048, m 3072 bits
  • k 1, n 3072, m 4608 bits
  • if k 4, f 0.0625
  • k 5, f 0.0313
  • k 6, f 0.0156

K Hash functions H1, H2, , Hk
27
TCAM fundamental
  • TCAM stores data with three logic values 0,
    1, X (dont care)
  • Multiple match modes are needed.

28
Policy Engine
  • Collect the matching events from Pattern-Matching
    Engine.
  • Clarify the relationship between matched
    patterns
  • Ordered A policy may consists more than one
    pattern and should be matched in order.
  • Offset, Depth The matched position should be
    within a certain range or location.
  • Distance, Within The distance between two
    matched patterns should be taken into
    consideration also.
  • Trace Application States
  • Some applications are difficult to identify by
    using only one signature (e.g. P2P). Policy
    Engine needs to track the connection state like
    the following diagram

Msg Exchange
Data Exchange
Request File
S1
S0
S2
S3
29
Content Inspection Technologies
  • Our Pattern Matching Algorithms
  • Hierarchical Matching Algorithm (HMA) for
    Intrusion Detection Systems (IEEE Globecom2005)
  • A Time and Memory Efficient String Matching
    Algorithm for Intrusion Detection Systems (IEEE
    Globecom2006)
  • A Pattern Matching Coprocessor for Deep and Large
    Signature Set in Network Security System (IEEE
    Globecom2005)
  • A Fast Pre-filtering Algorithm for Pattern
    Matching (IEEE Globecom2006)
  • Flow Classification by Stateful Methods
  • IM/P2P Classification

30
Hierarchical Matching Algorithm (HMA) for
Intrusion Detection Systems
  • HMA is a two-tier and cluster-wise matching
    algorithm
  • Reduce the amount of external memory access
  • Reduce the access delay
  • Reduce the required processing cycle time
  • Improve the performance of IDS
  • Low memory requirement
  • 1.763 times better than the state-of-the-art
    algorithms
  • Enable an efficient and cost-effective real-time
    IDS

31
Cluster-wise String Search
Narrow Searching Domain
Pre-filter Fast Search
32
Hierarchical Matching Algorithm (HMA) for
Intrusion Detection Systems
33
Pattern Matching Coprocessor for Deep and Large
Signature Set in Network Security System
System Architecture
34
Pattern Matching Coprocessor for Deep and Large
Signature Set in Network Security System
Central Control Unit
35
Pattern Matching Coprocessor for Deep and Large
Signature Set in Network Security System
Simulation Results
FPGA Implementation Results
Module Resource Usage
Selector 530 LEs ( 1 of total LEs)
PE 150?32 Les ( 26 of total LEs)
Pattern Table 22K bits ( 9 of memory )
I/O Pin 210 ( 50 of total pins)
36
Pre-filter Search Filter Model
  • All the substrings that filtered by the filter
    are clear and impossible to contain any of the
    defined patterns.
  • And those substrings passed to the pattern
    matching algorithm may or may not contain
    pre-defined patterns.
  • Thus, the search filter may generate false
    positive but not false negative.
  • The false positive here refers to the case that a
    substring without any pre-defined patterns is
    falsely detected and accepted as with.
  • An exact string matching mechanism is essential
    for finding out which patterns are included in
    the accepted substring.

37
Pre-filter Search Filter Model
38
Super-Symbol Filter
  • The basic idea of the proposed Super-Symbol
    Filter (SSF) algorithm is to treat two bytes data
    as a super-symbol, and the using of bitmap to
    indicate the occurrence of each super-symbol in
    the pre-defined patterns.

Match Vector Constructing
For example, for the 8-bit ASCII-code, there are
65536 combinations of two bytes data, and a
bitmap vector of 65536 entries is used.
39
Filtering phase in SSF-1 Algorithm
Input String Text ABOD CODING IS FOOD
AB BO OD D? ?C CO OD DI IN NG G? ?I IS S? ?F FO OO OD
Bitmap
AA AB CO DE FO OD OO ZZ
0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
AB BO OD D? ?C CO OD DI IN NG G? ?I IS S? ?F FO OO OD
1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
D
O
C
D
O
O
F
B
A
D
O
40
SSF-2 Algorithm
  • To have better accuracy and less number of false
    positives, the extended SSF-2 algorithm, two
    match vectors are employed.
  • The First Match Vector (FMV) is used for the
    super-symbols being conjugated by the first two
    symbols in each of the patterns.
  • The Rest Match Vector (RMV) is used for the rest
    super-symbols in the patterns except those in the
    FMV.

41
SSF-2 Algorithm
  • The algorithm looks up the FMV and RMV and
    detects whether the corresponding bit of each
    super-symbol is 1.
  • Since AB and OD are not the beginning
    super-symbol of any patterns (by checking FMV),
    the filter algorithm only outputs two substrings
    COD and FOOD. And only one substring COD is
    false positive in this case.

42
Evaluation
  • To evaluate the scalability and flexibility, the
    popular Snort IDS signatures are employed.
  • In case most bits of the bitmap are set as 1,
    we can expect that the SSF filtering performance
    will be impacted dramatically as the hit rate
    will be very high.
  • Fortunately, by tracking the growing paths of
    Snort rule patterns, the percentage of setting
    bits for the MV, FMV, and RMV is still very small
    (less than 5). Thus, the proposed approaches
    have a great chance to adopt the fast growth of
    Snort releases.

Number of Released Patterns SSF-1 MV bitmap SSF-2 FMV bitmap SSF-2 RMV bitmap
Snort-2.0 2066 3213 695 3027
Snort-2.1 2617 3478 813 3296
Snort-2.2 2664 3575 835 3382
Snort-2.3 2679 3611 845 3413
Snort-2.4 2680 3611 845 3413
43
Performance
Parallel Bloom Filter (PBF), Database Processor
(IDP)
Defcon9 Trace Filter-Algorithm Passed by Filter lt bytes gt Filter out percentage Filter cost time lt µs gt AC search cost time ltµsgt Total cost time lt µs gt Throughput ltMbpsgt
Defcon-1 of matched patterns 377,508 times (9,846,572 bytes) PBF 1,173,918 88 gt107 gt107 lt10
Defcon-1 of matched patterns 377,508 times (9,846,572 bytes) IDP 9,782,654 0.7 126,439 550,468 676,907 116
Defcon-1 of matched patterns 377,508 times (9,846,572 bytes) AC 9,846,572 0 0 558,079 558,079 141
Defcon-1 of matched patterns 377,508 times (9,846,572 bytes) SSF-1 2,916,802 70 122,841 212,307 335,148 250
Defcon-1 of matched patterns 377,508 times (9,846,572 bytes) SSF-2 1,917,544 81 130,809 160,872 291,681 270
Defcon-2 of matched patterns 147,843 times (9,849,836 bytes) PBF 492,491 95 gt107 gt107 lt10
Defcon-2 of matched patterns 147,843 times (9,849,836 bytes) IDP 9,777,406 0.8 125,901 529,602 655,503 120
Defcon-2 of matched patterns 147,843 times (9,849,836 bytes) AC 9,849,836 0 0 537,297 537,297 146
Defcon-2 of matched patterns 147,843 times (9,849,836 bytes) SSF-1 1,868,185 81 118,264 119,343 237,607 332
Defcon-2 of matched patterns 147,843 times (9,849,836 bytes) SSF-2 879,353 91 127,651 68,628 196,279 401
Defcon-3 of matched patterns 57,458 times (9,852,342 bytes) PBF 197,046 98 gt107 gt107 lt10
Defcon-3 of matched patterns 57,458 times (9,852,342 bytes) IDP 9,775,924 0.8 125,810 512,169 637,970 123
Defcon-3 of matched patterns 57,458 times (9,852,342 bytes) AC 9,852,342 0 0 513,081 513,081 153
Defcon-3 of matched patterns 57,458 times (9,852,342 bytes) SSF-1 1,350,541 86 117,000 80,374 197,374 400
Defcon-3 of matched patterns 57,458 times (9,852,342 bytes) SSF-2 391,024 96 126,523 29,739 156,262 504
Pentium-4 3.0 GHz personal computer with 1MB
level-2 cache, and installed with Intels VTune
tool
44
Filter Percentage Throughput
  • The filtering effectiveness of IDP scheme is
    pretty bad and is not capable to handle Snorts
    patterns. This is due to the bitmap used in the
    IDP scheme has only 256 entries for one byte
    symbol.
  • And most of the entries of are set as 1 for the
    Snorts patterns.
  • Both PBF and SSF schemes are less sensible to the
    growth of patterns and have a filtering
    percentage around 80-98.

45
Filter Percentage Throughput
  • The PBF is only suitable for hardware-based
    implementation, the throughput of PBF is less
    than that of AC.
  • We can see that for the Defcon-1, the system
    throughput is around double speed-up (270Mbps vs
    141Mbps) compared to that of original AC
    algorithm, and for Defcon-3, the system
    throughput is even more than three times speed-up
    (504Mbps vs 153Mbps).
  • The proposed SSF schemes consume far less memory
    (cache-resident).

46
The FA Example FTP
Flow Classification Using Stateful Method
47
The FAs of BitTorrent protocols.
48
The FAs of Yahoo Messenger protocol.
49
????????
  • DoS/DDoS
  • Content Inspection Algorithms
  • Zero-day Attacks
  • Web Security
  • Network Access Control (NAC)
  • Wireless Security

50
Zero-day Attacks
MS WMF 0-day exploits
10 Jan, 2006
29 Dec, 2005
28 Dec, 2005
Attack
BroadWeb released pattern update
MS WMF exploit publicly released
Microsoft released patch
Microsoft IE creates TextRange() Vulnerability
11 April, 2006
26 Mar, 2006
24 Mar, 2006
Attack
Vulnerability was publicly unveiled
BroadWeb released pattern update
Microsoft released patch
51
MS06-001 WMF 0-day??
  • 2005.12.28??
  • ??IE????0-day??
  • ?????????Win XP SP2?????
  • ????????WMF?????,????????,??????????
  • Crackz dot ws
  • unionseek dot com
  • www.tfcco dot com
  • Iframeurl dot biz
  • beehappyy dot biz
  • more ...

52
?WMF 0-day??????
53
?WMF 0-day??????
54
?WMF 0-day??????
????????,????????
55
?WMF 0-day??????
?????????,??????????,????????
??IE???0-day?? ????,???????????????????!!
56
Web Security
  • Security Code
  • Buffer Overflow Attack
  • Vulnerability Avoidance

57
Network Access Control (NAC)
  • More than 70 attacks are launched from inside
  • Provide first mile protection
  • Network Access Controller
  • Security Switches
  • Defense-in-Depth

58
Wireless Security Open Issues
  • AAA issues
  • Ad hoc networks (security routing Protocols)
  • Sensor Networks Security
  • WiFi and WiMAX (IEEE 802.16) networks Security
  • Wireless Security Switch

59
Open Issues
  • How to identify and manage encrypted protocols ?
    such as Skype 2.0 and Winny.
  • Not by signatures (no signatures ?)
  • May be by state machines
  • How to design fast content inspection or pattern
    matching algorithms ?
  • Modified AC algorithm or others
  • Using Cache efficiently
  • Pre-filter is good
  • Post Filter is also necessary (Rules are more
    complex)
  • How to design fast content inspection
    co-processor ?
  • Regular Expression is necessary
  • Many commercial products already, such as SafeNet
    4850, Sensory Networks C-2000, IDT, Cavium,
    Netlogic, etc
  • Security Switches provide first mile protection
  • Wireless Security Switch as well
  • Network Access Control (NAC) is a new emerging
    trend.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com