Towards High-Availability for IP Telephony using Virtual Machines - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Towards High-Availability for IP Telephony using Virtual Machines

Description:

Towards High-Availability for IP Telephony using Virtual Machines Devdutt Patnaik, Ashish Bijlani and Vishal K Singh – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:86
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: vishal
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Towards High-Availability for IP Telephony using Virtual Machines


1
Towards High-Availability for IP Telephony using
Virtual Machines
  • Devdutt Patnaik, Ashish Bijlani and Vishal K Singh

2
Outline
  • Virtualization
  • High Availability (HA) in Virtualized Platforms
  • XEN and REMUS (HA solution for XEN)
  • Remus applied to IP Telephony (IPT) applications
  • Scalability and Reliability of IPT applications
    using Virtualization
  • Experimental Results
  • Conclusion

3
Virtualization and its Benefit
  • Abstraction layer (Hypervisor) between the
    physical hardware and the OS.
  • Single physical machine can host multiple virtual
    machines each running a different OS
    application stack
  • VMMs
  • Xen, VMWare, Microsoft HyperV
  • Benefits
  • Server consolidation
  • Green computing
  • Cost savings space and power
  • High Availability
  • Reliability solutions, ease of upgrades with near
    zero down-times

4
Virtualized hosting for IP Telephony
  • Virtualized hosting for IP Telephony already
    available
  • Avaya, Cisco, Asterix etc.
  • IP Telephony in Cloud
  • Scalability ability to elastically add/remove
    additional servers while supporting
    High-Availability for all servers
  • Reliability protection against hardware and
    software failures
  • HA features in virtualization platforms
  • Memory state check pointing

5
Virtualization and High Availability
  • Seamless fail-over, Efficient and transparent
    migration of VM to another physical machine
  • Live Migration with very small down-times
  • Minimal or no impact to client nodes
  • Asynchronous check-pointing
  • Continuously syncs the state between the primary
    and secondary host
  • We use
  • Remus A High Availability Solution for XEN

6
Remus on XEN
  • Remus is a High Availability solution available
    on the Xen VMM
  • Remus uses continuous check-pointing and keeps a
    consistent client view of network state
  • The secondary machine hosts a paused replica of
    the primary VM
  • Uses a heart-beat mechanism
  • Failure to receive periodic heart-beat on
    secondary will un-pause the backup VM
  • Heart beat time-out can be configured

Fig 1
Image http//osnet.cs.nchu.edu.tw/powpoint/semina
r/2008/Remus.pdf
7
Remus on XEN (contd.)
  • Remus modes of operation
  • Net Mode Highly reliable
  • No-Net Mode better performance with negligible
    packet loss in case of failure
  • Tunable for Reliability vs. Performance

Disk writes and Network Writes
Fig. 2
  • Net Mode Buffers outgoing network packets until
    execution state is synced with the back up VM (on
    secondary host).
  • reliability at cost of performance

Image http//osnet.cs.nchu.edu.tw/powpoint/semina
r/2008/Remus.pdf
8
Remus applied to IP Telephony- Scale with
Reliability
  • Our work using HA in XEN extends architecture
    for fail-over and load sharing for IP Telephony
    proposed by Kundan Singh et. al.
  • Challenges
  • Overheads of virtualization on IP Telephony
    performance
  • Co-Hosted/Co-located media server causes
    interference because of heavy I/O workload

9
Reliability and Scalability using Virtual Machines
  • Scalability using load balancer (LB)
  • LB can elastically add more VMs as demand grows
  • Reliability using Remus in XEN

Stateless Load balancer
Reliability Architecture using Virtual machines
  • For every primary Virtual Machine there is a
    back up VM in paused state.
  • Since, backup VM is paused, it allows to place
    other running VMs on the same physical machine
  • Provides N to M elastic/backup model (m back up
    for n primary)

10
Reliability and Scalability using Virtual
Machines (contd.)
  • Reliability
  • Provided by Xen Remus
  • Failure of primary starts the execution of the
    secondary with IP address takeover
  • Clients continue to execute un-affected
  • Signaling and Media Server
  • Co-located on same VM
  • allows better utilization,
  • no overhead of inter-vm communication
  • Placed on different VM
  • elastic scaling of media and signaling VMs

11
Studying Performance Implications
  • Experimental setup
  • Primary /Backup Servers
  • Intel Core 2 Quad Processors, 2.5 Ghz, 8 GB RAM,
    4MB L2 Cache
  • Hypervisor Xen 3.2.1 Remus
  • Default Credit Scheduler configuration
  • Guest OS Para Virtualized Linux 2.6.18
  • IP Telephony Workload
  • Modeled our workload using SIPStone
  • Measured success of registrations during
    failover
  • Used UDP and TCP as transport for registrations
  • Used OpenSIPs as SIP server
  • RTPProxy as Media Server
  • SIPp for generating signaling and media traffic

12
Analysis and Results Signaling
  • Guest VM and Domain 0 both have high CPU
    utilization with tcp_n (new tcp connection for
    each REGISTER)
  • UDP and tcp_1 (1 tcp connection for all
    REGISTER) have similar overhead.

CPU utilization (in guest VM, dom0) Udp means
with udp transport, tcp_1 means same connection
for all call, tcp_n means new connection for
each call
With Remus NET mode, Registration overhead.
13
Analysis and Results Signaling
  • CPU overhead increases with proportionately with
    signaling loads
  • Dom0 has significant overheads due to
    check-pointing overheads.
  • Net Mode gives good results for Signaling
  • With 1400 regs/sec failure was induced
  • with 100 completion of all by failover to the
    back up

14
Analysis and Results Media
  • Media loads with Net Mode gives poor results
  • Media with No-Net gives good performance even
    with 400 streams with 2 losses
  • This can be further reduced by tweaking scheduler
    parameters
  • 100 fail-over of all calls in progress during
    media experiments

Net Mode 100, 200, 400, 600 and 800 streams
No Net Mode 100, 200, 400, 600 and 800
streams
15
Conclusion
  • Using No-Net mode for media streams gives us a
    balance between performance(loss and delay) and
    reliability(failover) while still being able to
    migrate 100 of all calls in progress (using TCP)
    which is a significant result
  • Net Mode for Signaling is a good configuration
    with 100 registration completion with failover
  • No-Net mode for the Media server deployment
    provides significant improvement in performance
    loss and delay reduces significantly
  • While the No-Net configuration performs better
    for media, it may not provide call completion
    guarantees during the fail-over operation for
    signaling
  • Migration of user registration and call setup
    operations was 100 successful

16
Contributions
  • Extended load sharing and failover architecture
    using Virtualization
  • Proposed use of high availability feature in
    virtualized platforms to achieve reliability in
    IP Telephony
  • Proposed placement scheme of signaling and media
    applications for scale(elasticity) and efficiency
    (utilization)
  • Systematic evaluation of overheads involved in
    use of virtualization for IP Telephony
    Applications
  • Demonstrated that High Availability using Virtual
    Machines can be deployed for medium scale IP
    Telephony infrastructure

17
Future Work
  • More detailed analysis of overheads
  • Overhead because of check pointing in
    virtualization platform
  • Overhead because of I/O in Domain 0
  • Propose solutions to improve performance
  • Improve I/O handing in XEN VMM
  • Propose better VM placement algorithm for IP
    Telephony applications
  • Utilizing fine grained overhead measurements for
    resource allocation
  • Considering I/O (media) vs. memory (signaling
    state replication) optimizations
  • Elasticity with co-location of media and
    signaling server on same VM

18
Questions
  • vs2140_at_columbia.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com