Washington County - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Washington County

Description:

apps.co.marion.or.us – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:80
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: GregCl6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Washington County


1
Washington County
  • Chip Seal Program Review
  • Fall, 2011

2
  • Meeting Format 11/17/11
  • Office (1000 to 1100)
  • Problem Description
  • Chip Seal Program
  • Suspected Problem Causes
  • Field Trip (1100 to 230)
  • Dorland/Moreland/Solberger Rds.
  • Lunch
  • Reiling/Chalmers/Wilkesboro Rds.
  • Riedweg/Dober Rds.
  • Wrap up discussion

3
  • Problem Description
  • Possible premature alligatoring on chip seals
    constructed since 2008 (3 years).
  • Apparent premature raveling (loss of top course)
    in these chip seals.
  • In limited areas, but these problems appear to be
    more prevalent on relatively new projects.

4
Moreland Road
5
Moreland Road
6
  • Chip Seal Program
  • Single Shot Bituminous surface treatments over
    paved or chip seal roads (1x BST) about 30
    miles per year (1x BSTs are not a problem).
  • Three Shot Bituminous Surface Treatments over
    prepared aggregate base (3x BST) about four miles
    per year. Also called gravel road upgrades or
    GRUs.
  • 33 miles (40 roads) have been upgraded, mostly
    with 3x BSTs since 2004.

7
  • Chip Seal Information
  • Oil furnished by Albina Oil.
  • Base and Chip Seal Aggregate furnished by Baker
    Rock and Westside Rock (2011 only).
  • Construction by Washington County Department of
    Land Use and Transportation, Operations and
    Maintenance Division --- Road Crew.
  • No formal thickness design. We look for a
    minimum of 6 base rock. Most projects are
    successful.

8
  • Chip Seal Components
  • First shot 0.5 gal/sy prime coat. HFMS or MC-250
    (prior to 2008). ½-1/4 crushed agg. at 35
    lb/sy.
  • Second Shot HFE 901s at 0.55 gal/sy. ½-1/4 at
    28 lb/sy.
  • Third Shot HFE 901s at 0.45 gal/sy. 3/8-10 at
    28 lb/sy.

9
  • Possible Causes
  • Change from MC-250 to HFMS
  • Base rock too clean.
  • Base rock too dirty.
  • Too much traffic.
  • Too little base thickness.
  • Isolated drainage issues.
  • Top course of chip seal rock dirty?
  • Improper mix design same size agg. in layers 1
    and 2?
  • Combinations?
  • Other issues?

10
Roads completed since 2004. Roads to be visited
on field trip are shaded and bolded.
11
  • Testing Program
  • Duval Engineering
  • Lab tests by Carlson Testing
  • Eight roads, four tests per road. Two from good
    areas, two from distressed areas. 34 total
    testing locations.
  • Sand patch test to check surface texture. Rut
    depth measured.
  • --- Continued ---

12
  • Testing Program
  • Photo log.
  • 8 core taken, plug retrieved and measured.
  • Extraction test to determine ac and rock
    gradation.
  • Thickness measured.
  • Prime coat penetration observed.
  • --- Continued ---

13
  • Testing Program
  • Base rock depth measured. Sample retrieved
    (gradation).
  • Visual characterization of sugrade observed.
  • Subgrade DCP test.
  • Subgrade Atterberg Limits test.

14
Field Trip Sites
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com