Complying with Act 141: Renewable Electricity Consumption at State Facilities - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Complying with Act 141: Renewable Electricity Consumption at State Facilities

Description:

Complying with Act 141: Renewable Electricity Consumption at State Facilities Prepared by: Jennifer Blonn, Erik Johnson Hy Matz and Nicholas Sayen – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:82
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: JenB1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Complying with Act 141: Renewable Electricity Consumption at State Facilities


1
Complying with Act 141 Renewable Electricity
Consumption at State Facilities
  • Prepared by
  • Jennifer Blonn, Erik Johnson
  • Hy Matz and Nicholas Sayen 

2
Presentation Outline
  • Act 141
  • Purpose of Project
  • Alternatives
  • Assessment Criteria
  • Analysis
  • Recommendation

3
ACT 141
  • Governor Doyles Task Force on Energy Efficiency
    and Renewables
  • Published on March 31, 2006
  • State facilities must acquire 10 percent
    renewable electricity by December 31, 2007 and 20
    percent by December 31, 2011

4
Purpose
  • To advise the Department of Administration in
    complying with the 2007 renewable electricity
    targets outlined in Wisconsin Act 141

5
Renewable Electricity Generation Background
  • Energy Independence Global Warming
  • 26 States have Renewable Fuel Portfolio Standards
    (RPS) for Utilities
  • 6 States have Standards for State Facilities (as
    of February 2007)
  • Iowa, Maryland, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania,
    Wisconsin

6
Four Policy Alternatives
  • Source Environmental Protection Agency in
    collaboration with the Department of Energy, the
    World Resources Institute and the Center for
    Resource Solutions
  • Alternative One Purchase renewable
    electricity from local utilities that invest in
    IN-STATE resources to meet Act 141s 2007 target

7
Four Policy Alternatives
  • Alternative Two Purchase renewable
    electricity from local utilities that invest in
    OUT-OF-STATE resources to meet Act 141s 2007
    target
  • Alternative Three Generate renewable
    electricity at state facilities
  • Alternative Four Purchase renewable energy
    credits (RECs)

8
Evaluation Criteria
9

Promote a Healthy Natural Environment in
Wisconsin
  • Assumptions
  • Purchasing from Utilities Self-Generation
  • Rated Good
  • Purchasing RECs
  • Rated Poor because decreased conventional
    electricity generation in the region will not
    result

10
Foster a Strong State Economy
  • Alternatives that utilize in-state generation
  • Rated Excellent for reducing Wisconsins
    dependence on out-of-state energy fostering job
    growth in Wisconsin
  • RECs
  • Rated Poor for reducing Wisconsins dependence
    on out-of-state energy fostering job growth in
    Wisconsin
  • Purchasing from utilities with electricity
    generated out-of-state
  • Performs similarly to RECs, but does slightly
    better in fostering job growth in Wisconsin

11
Maximize Feasibility
  • Purchasing from utilities
  • Performs Excellent with respect to minimizing
    DOAs regulatory oversight costs maximizing
    political support based on adoption in other
    states
  • Self-Generation
  • Performs Poor in both feasibility impact
    categories
  • RECs
  • Performs Excellent in minimizing DOAs
    regulatory oversight costs
  • Performs Fair in maximizing political support
    because it has a limited track record of adoption
    in other states

12
Maximize Efficiency
  • Purchasing from utilities with in-state
    generation
  • Excellent in terms of minimizing cost per kWh
    promoting the long-term cost efficiency of
    renewable electricity in Wisconsin
  • Purchasing from utilities with out-of-state
    generation
  • Good in terms of minimizing cost per kWh
    promoting the long-term cost efficiency of
    renewable electricity in Wisconsin

13
Maximize Efficiency
  • Self-Generation
  • Rated Poor in terms of minimizing cost per kWh
  • Rated Fair in terms of promoting the long-term
    cost efficiency of renewable electricity in
    Wisconsin
  • RECs
  • Rated Good in terms of minimizing cost per kWh
  • Performs Poor in terms of promoting the
    long-term cost efficiency of renewable
    electricity in Wisconsin

14
Recommendation
  • Purchase renewable electricity from local
    utilities that invest in IN-STATE resources to
    meet Act 141s 2007 target
  • Promote a Healthy Natural Environment in
    Wisconsin Good
  • Foster a Strong State Economy Excellent
  • Maximize Feasibility Excellent
  • Maximize Efficiency Excellent

15
Recommendation
  • Not mutually exclusive
  • Second Local utilities, out-of-state resources
  • Third RECs
  • Last On-site generation

16
Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com