The Challenge of Climate Change: Implications for Energy Security - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

The Challenge of Climate Change: Implications for Energy Security

Description:

The Challenge of Climate Change: Implications for Energy Security Accenture Energy Advisory Board Vice Admiral Conrad C. Lautenbacher Jr., USN (Ret.) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:214
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: GregPen1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Challenge of Climate Change: Implications for Energy Security


1
The Challenge of Climate Change Implications for
Energy Security
Accenture Energy Advisory Board
  • Vice Admiral Conrad C. Lautenbacher Jr., USN
    (Ret.)
  • Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and
    Atmosphere
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • October 16, 2007
  • Calgary, Alberta

2
Menu
  • U.S. Climate Science, Technology, and Policy
  • State of the Science
  • U.S. Climate Initiatives
  • 20 in 10 Plan
  • Climate Change Technology Program
  • Energy Policy Act of 2005
  • Advanced Energy Initiative
  • 110th Congress
  • Post-Kyoto Framework New International
    Directions
  • Major Economies Meeting
  • UNFCCC and the Montreal Protocol
  • Technology Transfer
  • Adaptation Strategies
  • GEOSS

3
State of the Science
  • Bottom Line there is general scientific
    agreement that anthropogenic activities are
    increasing atmospheric greenhouse gas
    concentrations and driving climate change.
  • Areas of Uncertainty
  • Sensitivity of global systems to increased GHG
    emissions
  • Impacts of identified regional climate changes
  • Timing of impacts and rate of changes
  • Magnitude of changes and impacts at specific
    scales
  • Research research is crucial to understanding
    the impacts of climate change and guiding public
    policy.
  • Climate Change Science ProgramWorlds largest
    climate science research Program. Funded at
    approximately 1.7 billion/year (10.7 Billion
    2002-2006).

4
U.S. Climate Initiatives
  • 20 in 10
  • Reduce U.S. gasoline consumption by 20 in 10
    years
  • Promote alternative fuels
  • Increase CAFE standards
  • Climate Change Technology Program
  • Multi-agency research and development program
    funded at approximately 3 billion/year
  • Goals include
  • Reducing emissions from energy use and supply
  • Capturing and sequestering CO2
  • Improving capability to measure monitor GHG
  • Energy Policy Act of 2005
  • 10 billion in clean technology tax incentives
  • Requires use of 7.5 billion gallons of renewable
    fuel (ethanol and biodiesel) to be used in
    gasoline by 2012
  • Provides 30 tax credit for installation of
    alternative fuel stations (up to 30,000/year).
  • Federal Energy Management Plan
  • Federal Government is the largest energy consumer
    in U.S.
  • Plan promotes energy efficiency and use of
    renewable energy resources at federal sites.

5
U.S. Climate InitiativesAdvanced Energy
Initiative
Two pronged approach (1) change the way vehicles
are fueled and (2) change the way homes and
businesses are powered.
  • Fueling Vehicles
  • Develop advanced battery technology for plug-in
    electric hybrid vehicles (40 mile range solely on
    battery charge)
  • Make cellulosic ethanol competitive with
    corn-based ethanol by 2012
  • Make hydrogen fuel cell vehicles widely available
    by 2020.
  • Powering Homes Businesses
  • Clean coal technology
  • FutureGen public-private partnership to develop
    technologies for coal-fired power plants that
    capture and store CO2, rather than release it
    into the atmosphere
  • Develop a Global Nuclear Energy Partnership, and
    improve the domestic regulatory process
  • Reduce the cost of solar and other renewable
    energy sources.
  • Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion
  • Hydrokinetic
  • Offshore wind

Hydrokinetic Generator Kinetic Energy Systems
Offshore Wind FarmNantucket
6
Climate Bills in the 110th Congress
7
Stabilization Triangle
Source Carbon Mitigation Initiative, The
Stabilization Triangle Tackling the Carbon and
Climate Problem With Todays Technologies.
Available at http//www.summits.ncat.org/docs/Wedg
es_Concept_Game_Materials_2005.pdf
8
How Big is a Gigaton?Using Todays Technology,
These Actions Can Cut Emissions by 1 GtC/Year
Todays Technology Actions that Provide 1 Gigaton / Year of Mitigation
Coal-Fired Power Plants Build 1,000 zero-emission 500-MW coal-fired power plants (in lieu of coal-fired plants without CO2 capture and storage)
Geologic Sequestration Install 3,700 sequestration sites like Norways Sliepner project (0.27 MtC/year)
Nuclear Build 500 new nuclear power plants, each 1 GW in size (in lieu of new coal-fired power plants without CO2 capture and storage)
Efficiency Deploy 1 billion new cars at 40 miles per gallon (mpg) instead of 20 mpg
Wind Energy Install capacity to produce 50 times the current global wind generation (in lieu of coal-fired power plants without CO2 capture and storage)
Solar Photovoltaics Install capacity to produce 1,000 times the current global solar PV generation (in lieu of coal-fired power plants without CO2 capture and storage)
Biomass fuels from plantations Convert a barren area about 15 times the size of Iowas farmland (about 30 million acres) to biomass crop production
CO2 Storage in New Forest Convert a barren area about 30 times the size of Iowas farmland to new forest
Giga-Tonnes 109 Metric-Tonnes (1000
Kilograms) See CCTP Strategic Plan p. 38.
8
8
9
The Post-Kyoto FrameworkNew International
Directions
10
The Future of International Climate Policy
  • President Bushs Vision has 3 Components
  • Create post-2012 framework among major economies
    by the end of 2008
  • Strengthen U.N. climate initiatives
  • Advance global adoption of clean energy
    technologies
  • The new direction in climate policy must enhance
    energy security and promote economic development.

11
Post-Kyoto FrameworkMajor Economies Meeting
  • 17 major economies represented, including the
    U.N.
  • Launched process to identify long-term global GHG
    emissions reduction goals (e.g., 2050).
  • Discussed commitments to national mid-term goals
    with binding elements (e.g., 2020,
    2030), according to national circumstances.
  • Each country to establish its own targets, goals,
    and programs that are binding
    domestically.
  • Discussed need to harmonize emission measurement
    and accounting systems.
  • Participants focused on five key areas low
    carbon fossil power generation, transportation,
    land use, market penetration and energy
    efficiency, and finance.

12
Post-Kyoto FrameworkMajor Economies Meeting
  • Key Points for a long-term GHG reduction goal
  • Guided by Article 2 of the UNFCCC
  • Science-based
  • Underpinned by environmentally effective and
    measurable near- and mid-term actions
  • Take into account countries differing
    circumstances and common but differentiated
    responsibilities and capabilities
  • Understand the future availability of key low
    carbon technologies, and the feasibility of
    delivering technologies at different scales and
    time periods
  • Take into account the costs of adaptation in the
    context of broader development strategies.
  • Take into account historical cumulative
    emissions, per capita emissions, and development
    needs of developing countries.
  • Next Steps
  • The participants agreed that there is value in
    convening another meeting of Major Economies
    after the U.N. climate meetings in Bali.

13
Post-Kyoto FrameworkUNFCCC The Montreal
Protocol
  • Conference of the Parties in Bali, December 2007
  • Report outcome of Major Economies Meeting
  • New MEM Framework will Reinforce Existing Work
    Programs in the U.N.
  • Land Use
  • Sustainable forest and agricultural management,
    stop deforestation and illegal logging
  • Adaptation
  • Build on international development principles
  • Technology Sharing and Energy Efficiency
  • Tools to open and accelerate markets for
    technology
  • Montreal Protocol
  • Parties recently agreed to accelerate deadlines
    for phasing out HCFCs.

14
Post-Kyoto FrameworkInternational Partnerships
Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum focused on
CO2 capture storage. International Partnership
for the Hydrogen Economy organizes, coordinates,
and leverages hydrogen RD programs. Generation
IV International Forum devoted to RD on next
generation of nuclear systems. ITER project to
develop fusion as a commercial energy
source. Methane to Markets recovery and use of
methane from landfills, mines, oil and gas
systems, and agriculture. Asia-Pacific
Partnership on Clean Development Climate
accelerates deployment of technologies to address
energy security, air pollution, and climate
change. Global Bioenergy Partnership Italian G8
initiative to support wider, cost effective,
biomass and biofuels deployment, particularly in
developing countries. Global Nuclear Energy
Partnership U.S. initiative to develop worldwide
consensus on enabling expanded use of economical,
carbon-free nuclear energy to meet growing
electricity demand, using a nuclear fuel cycle
that enhances energy security and promotes
non-proliferation.
14
15
Post-Kyoto FrameworkTechnology Transfer
  • Developing Nations Must be Part of the New
    Equation!
  • Develop Transformational Technology
  • Increase global RD funding and cooperation
  • Expand Low-Cost Finance Options
  • Focus existing development resources and private
    resources
  • Consider new low-cost capital sources to finance
    investment in transformational technologies
    (e.g., development banks, OPIC)
  • Transfer Technology Globally
  • Eliminate tariffs and remove non-tariff barriers
    to cleaner energy and environmental technologies
    and services
  • Launch global effort to share government-developed
    and owned technologies at low or no cost

16
Government Energy RD in Selected Industrialized
Countries,1974-2004
Source U.S. Department of Energy, Energy
Information Administration
17
Post-Kyoto FrameworkAdaptation Strategies
  • It may be too late to avoid dangerous climate
    changereducing carbon dioxide emissions is part
    of the solution. Another part is adaptation, but
    we haven't addressed that.
  • Claude Mandil, Former IEA Executive Director
  • The worlds climate will continue to change for
    the next 50 years, regardless of any mitigating
    efforts we make now.
  • The lag in the climate system makes adaptation
    essential, particularly in addressing near-term
    impacts.
  • Sound adaptation policies must rest on sound
    science. We need better data for better decision
    making.

CarbonTracker
El Nino Forecast
18
Global Earth Observation System of Systems
(GEOSS)
  • 71 Member Countries the European Commission
  • 46 International Organizations
  • A distributed system of systems
  • Improves coordination of observation systems
  • Links all platforms in situ, aircraft, and
    satellite networks
  • Identifies gaps in our global capacity
  • Facilitates exchange of data and information
  • Improves decision-makers abilities to address
    pressing policy issues
  • GEONetCast
  • Worldwide information distribution

18
19
Why Earth Observations?
  • Prediction
  • Worldwide agricultural benefits of better El Niño
    forecasts are conservatively estimated at
    450-550 million/year
  • Annual costs of electricity could decrease by 1
    billion if we could improve the accuracy of
    weather forecasts by one degree Fahrenheit.
    (Source USA Today)
  • Prevention
  • More than 90 of natural disaster-related deaths
    occur in developing countries.
  • Preparedness
  • More than 50 of the worlds population lives
    within 60 km of the shoreline this could rise to
    75 by the year 2020.

20
The Path Forward
  • Economic growth, sustainable development, energy
    security, and climate change can and must be
    pursued in an integrated manner. Therefore, we
    need
  • A visionary long-term approach, based on
    innovation, growth, and international
    cooperation
  • Leadership from developed nations and meaningful
    participation from developing nations
  • A variety of near-term actions, augmented by
    financial incentives
  • Increased investment in clean energy technology
    and
  • A recognition that one size wont fit all
    national/regional strategies are needed.

20
21
Questions?
22
Additional Slides
23
World CO2 Emissions2003-2030
Source Energy Information Administration, 2006
International Energy Outlook
24
Energy Market Share by Source
Source Energy Information Administration, at
http//www.eia.doe.gov\basics\energybasics101.html
25
Energy Consumption By Sector
Source Energy Information Administration, at
http//www.eia.doe.gov\basics\energybasics101.html
26
U.S. Energy Trends Through 2030
  • Projected Population Increase 23
  • Projected Energy Consumption Increase 31
  • Biofeuls and other nonhydroelectric renewables
    projected to grow rapidly
  • Sales of alternative vehicle technologies will
    account for nearly 28 of new light duty vehicle
    sales
  • However, oil, coal, and natural gas still
    projected to supply 86 of U.S. energy in 2030
  • Imports of energy will constitute 32 of total
    U.S. energy demand

Source Energy Information Administrations
Annual Energy Outlook 2007 (AEO2007). These
projections are from the reference case, which
assumes that current energy policies impacting
the sector remain unchanged throughout the
analysis period. See http//www.eia.doe.gov/
27
CostPotential 100-Year Reductions
Comparative Analysis of Estimated Cumulative
Costs Over the 21st Century of GHG Mitigation,
With and Without Advanced Technology, Across a
Range of Hypothesized GHG Emissions Constraints
Source Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
(DOE), Climate Change Mitigation An Analysis
of Advanced Technology Scenarios. Available at
http//www.globalchange.umd.edu/data/publications/
CCTP_Final_Report_041007.pdf
27
28
Scale of Biomass Land Area
Land Use Scenario 550 ppmv
From Global Energy Technology Strategy,
Addressing Climate Change Phase 2 Findings from
an International Public-Private Sponsored
Research Program, Battelle Memorial Institute,
2007. Land Use Scenario with 0.5 annual
agricultural activity growth
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com