Social Policy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Social Policy

Description:

Social Policy Paula Barrenechea, Kaitlyn Bregman, Samantha Rodriguez, and Lee Ryan – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:141
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 105
Provided by: jstedmanT
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Social Policy


1
Social Policy
  • Paula Barrenechea, Kaitlyn Bregman, Samantha
    Rodriguez, and Lee Ryan

2
What is Social Policy?
  • Social policies are distributive or
    redistributive policies that seek to improve the
    quality of citizens lives
  • Deal with quality of life and standards of living
  • The poverty threshold is the income level below
    which a family is legally considered poor.
  • Calculated by the Census Bureau

3
Social Policy Overview, contd.
  • Means-tested programs social programs whose
    beneficiaries qualify by demonstrating need
  • Social insurance programs programs that offer
    benefits in exchange for contributions

4
It all comes down to
5
Social Security
6
History
  • Created in the 1930s as part of FDRs New Deal
    programs
  • Intended to implement social insurance for
    elderly during the Great Depression
  • Initial selling point would decrease
    unemployment during the 30s by encouraging older
    workers to retire, opening up job opportunities
    for younger people

7
Funding
  • Social Security is paid for by a payroll tax
    money deducted from annual income
  • In 1939 the Social Security Act was amended to
    create a trust fund for any surplus funds
  • Benefits are funded by taxes imposed on wages of
    employees and the self-employed
  • The employer and employee are responsible for
    half of the Social Security tax self-employed
    people are responsible for all of it

8
(No Transcript)
9
Reform?
  • Democrats dont want to see anything changed
  • Republicans consider Social Security the ultimate
    Big Government program, but learned its
    popularity with voters makes it untouchable
  • However, considering current demographic trends,
    the Social Security trust fund will not be able
    to meet obligations
  • Politicians are (reluctantly) begin considering
    reform

10
Current Options
  • Raise the retirement age
  • Reduce the amount of each Social Security check
  • Privatization
  • One idea calls for the system to invest some of
    its money in the financial markets instead of in
    relatively listless government bonds

11
Role in Policy Implementation
  • Throughout a workers career, the Social Security
    Administration keeps track of his/her earnings
  • Amount of monthly benefit the worker is entitled
    to depends on the earning record and the age at
    which the retiree chooses to begin receiving
    benefits
  • From its inception, Social Security benefits have
    been paid almost entirely by using revenue from
    payroll taxes

12
Court Cases
  • Steward Machine Company v. Davis (5-4)
  • Arguments opposed to the SSA held the act went
    beyond the powers that were granted to the
    federal government in the Constitution
  • The federal government was forcing each state to
    establish an unemployment-compensation fund that
    would meets its criteria, but it did not have the
    power to enact such a program
  • Helvering vs. Davis
  • Decdied on same day as the Steward case
  • Essentially, the Social Security Tax was
    constitutional as a mere exercise of Congresss
    general taxation powers

13
Related Congressional Committees, Bureaucratic
Departments, and Interest Groups
  • AARP CEO A. Barry Rand and President W. Lee
    Hammond
  • The Urban League President and CEO Marc. H
    Morial
  • Department of Health and Human Services
    Secretary Kathleen Sebelius
  • House Education and the Workforce Committee
    Chairman John Kline
  • Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and
    Pensions Chairman Phil Roe
  • Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and
    Pensions Chairman Tom Harkin
  • Subcommittee on Retirement and Aging

14
Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Who pays for it?
  • Everyone.
  • Who benefits?
  • The retired, elderly, widowed, and disabled
  • An example of majoritarian politics
  • Because we all get old eventually.

15
Head-On Collision?
16
Welfare
17
Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC)
  • Passed as part of the Social Security Act of 1935
  • Previously, states had put the duty of caring for
    needy children and families on local governments
    using money from local property taxes
  • Used until TANF passed in 1996
  • Originally called Aid to Dependent Children
  • Did not originally give aid to parent/family, but
    did say that the child had to be living with a
    parent or family in order to be eligible for aid
  • Caretakers of dependent children did not begin
    receiving federal aid until 1950

18
AFDC
  • Federal provisions provided to states in order to
    help children
  • State participation completely voluntary
  • State would submit a plan to be approved by
    federal administrators
  • Had to meet certain minimal conditions to receive
    funds
  • Most states proposed a plan due to the Depression
  • No fixed amount authorized reimbursement of a
    portion of state spending without a limit on
    total amount

19
Total, Federal, and State Expenditures
20
Trends in Federal Expenditures
21
Welfare and Low-Income Health Care Assistance
Jumps
22
AFDC
  • Federal government eventually made the following
    mandatory
  • benefits to second parents in families with
    incapacitated/unemployed parents, effective 1984
  • benefits to families of incapacitated/unemployed
    parents, effective 1990

23
AFDC Supreme Court Cases
  • King v. Smith (1968)
  • The real issue before the court was if states
    could decide how to enforce a federal program.
  • The Court ruled that AFDC could not be withheld
    from a family due to the presence of a
    substitute father.

24
AFDC Supreme Court Cases cont.
  • Goldberg v. Kelly (1970)
  • NYC residents currently receiving AFDC appealed
    to the Supreme Court, alleging that officials
    administering aid terminated it without notice or
    hearing
  • The Court held that
  • Due process is applicable to termination of
    welfare benefits
  • The benefits of providing welfare outweigh the
    benefits of cutting it
  • A pre-termination evidentiary hearing is
    necessary
  • Counsel is not necessary but must be allowed
  • The decision maker must be impartial.

25
AFDC
  • Beliefs that influence its creation
  • Need to help less fortunate children and by
    extension, their families
  • Civic duty
  • Individual responsibility
  • Entitlements

26
AFDC Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Who pays for it?
  • Everyone.
  • Who benefits?
  • Families with dependent children.
  • An example of client politics.

27
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)
  • Created August 1996 to replace AFDC, Job
    Opportunities and Basic Skills Training (JOBS),
    and Emergency Assistance (EA)
  • Individualized block grant that help its
    recipients find work and make the need for aid
    temporary
  • Instead of the federal government reimbursing
    states for the aid they give, it gives states
    block grants for this specific purpose

28
TANF
  • Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 reauthorized TANF
    through 2010, focusing on work, integrity, and
    making families stronger by promoting marriage
    and responsible fathers
  • In February 2009, President Obama signed the
    American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which
    established the Emergency Contingency Fund for
    state TANF programs

29
Goals of TANF
  • Help needy families so that children can grow up
    in their own homes
  • Reduce the neediness of parents of these families
    by helping with job preparation, work, and
    marriage
  • Prevent pregnancies outside of marriage
  • Encourage families with two parents

30
TANF Work Requirements
  • Those receiving TANF must work as soon as they
    are ready for a job and no later than two years
    after they begin receiving assistance
  • If parents dont work, benefits can be
    reduced/cut off entirely
  • States cannot penalize single parents with a
    child under 6 for failing to meet work
    requirements if they cannot find acceptable child
    care
  • States must have a certain proportion of all
    families working or be slapped with a financial
    penalty 50 overall, 90 two parent families

31
TANF Work Activities
  • Unsubsidized/subsidized employment
  • Work experience
  • On-the-job training
  • Job search/readiness assistance
  • Community service
  • Vocational education training (no more than a
    year)
  • Vocational education training (no more than a
    year)
  • Job skills training that is work-related
  • Education directly related to work
  • Satisfactory secondary school attendance
  • Providing child care to individuals participating
    in community service

32
TANF
  • Limit for assistance is five years (not
    necessarily consecutive)
  • State can choose to extend the period for 1/5 of
    its caseload, or by using their own funds or
    Social Services block grant funds

33
TANF Penalties
  • Failure to reduce recipient grants if recipient
    rejects work without good cause
  • Severing assistance to single parents with a
    child under 6 who cannot afford child care
  • Using funds inappropriately
  • Not establishing/maintaining work verification
    procedures
  • Failure to meet work requirements
  • Failure to comply with five-year limit
  • Failure to meet maintenance requirement
  • Not submitting data reports
  • Failure to participate in the Income and
    Eligibility Verification System

34
Federal Funding for TANF
  • In FY 2009, the following Federal funding is
    available for TANF
  • TANF Block Grant - 16.5 billion is available to
    States, Territories, and Tribes through the TANF
    block grant.
  • Supplemental Grants - 319 million is available
    to 17 States that experienced increases in their
    populations and/or had low levels of welfare
    spending per capita. A state qualified for a
    grant in years after FY 1998 only if it qualified
    in FY 1998.

35
TANF Funding, contd.
  • TANF Contingency Fund - 1.3 billion is available
    to States that have increased unemployment or
    Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
    caseloads as defined in the Social Security Act.
  • TANF Emergency Fund - 5 billion is available
    States, Territories, and Tribes in fiscal year
    (FY) 2009 and FY 2010 that have an increase in
    assistance caseloads and basic assistance
    expenditures, or in expenditures related to
    short-term benefits or subsidized employment.

36
TANF Performance
37
TANF Supreme Court Case
  • Legal Services Corp. v. Velazquez (2001)
  • Carmen Velazquez lost welfare benefits under
    TANF she wanted an LSC attorney to represent
    her in challenging the provision of TANF that
    disqualified her for welfare
  • Congress passed the Omnibus Consolidated
    Rescissions and Appropriations Act of 1996 which
    did not allow LSC attorneys to represent welfare
    recipients in trying to amend welfare policies
  • Possible violation of the First Amendment
  • Court ruled that it violated the First Amendment
    by regulating private speech and trying to
    protect and federal law from legitimate judicial
    challenges

38
Problems and Solutions
  • Difficult to identify problems- run slightly
    differently in every state due to block grants
  • Some states have very work-training focused
    programs- help parents get back on their feet
  • Others simply throw money at parents until they
    are no longer eligible
  • Solution
  • Attach more requirements to block grants so that
    federal government has more control over exactly
    how states run TANF programs

39
TANF
  • Beliefs that influenced its creation
  • Civic duty
  • Individual responsibility
  • Responsibility to take care of the less fortunate
  • entitlements

40
Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Who pays for it?
  • Everyone funded by taxes
  • Who benefits?
  • Families in need
  • An example of client politics
  • Everyone pays, only the needy families benefit.

41
Related Congressional Committees, Bureaucratic
Departments, and Interest Groups
  • National Organization for Women President Terry
    ONeill
  • Department of Health and Human Services
    Secretary Kathleen Sebelius
  • House Education and the Workforce Committee
    Chairman John Kline
  • Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and
    Pensions Chairman Phil Roe
  • Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and
    Pensions Chairman Tom Harkin
  • Subcommittee on Children and Families

42
HEALTH CARE
43
Current Policy
  • Under current health care policies, American
    citizens purchase health insurance from private
    companies or are given health insurance as part
    of their work benefits.
  • Health insurance is a bit of a betting game. The
    insurance company is betting that you will pay
    more in fees and premiums than theyll have to
    pay in your medical bills youre paying the fees
    and premiums just in case something happens.
  • Because of this, those with pre-existing
    conditions often face higher fees or are denied
    coverage entirely.

44
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
  • Would require most Americans to have health
    insurance
  • Would add 16 mill people to Medicaid rolls
  • Would subsidize health coverage for low and
    middle class
  • Projected cost 938 bil over 10 years, according
    to CBO

45
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
  • Immediate Changes
  • Those who were denied coverage for a pre-existing
    condition will be offered insurance subsidized by
    the federal government
  • Wont allow insurance companies to drop people
    who get sick or increase rates dramatically for
    those with pre-existing conditions
  • Extends coverage for children under parents plan
  • Closes Medicaid donut hole
  • Gives tax credits to small businesses so they can
    afford to offer insurance to their employees

46
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
  • Short-Term Changes
  • Free annual check-ups for those on Medicare
  • Reforms Medicaid
  • Long-Term Changes
  • All Americans must have health insurance or pay a
    fine
  • Big companies must provide health insurance with
    benefits
  • Gives tax-credits to poor families
  • Establish state-based insurance market exchanges

47
Because were tired of talking
  • heres a video.

48
Court Cases
  • State of Florida et al v. US Department of Health
    and Human Services et al (US District Court,
    Northern District of Florida) (2011)
  • Second US judge to declare the reform law
    unconstitutional
  • Said that the individual mandate crossed the
    line by requiring Americans to buy health
    insurance by 2014 or pay a fine
  • Because it is integral to the bill, the whole
    bill must be declared null and void
  • Judges in 26 other states (mostly Republican)
    have taken similar stances on the issue
  • Will most likely end up in Supreme Court

49
Influential Beliefs and Opponents
  • What beliefs influence the creation of this
    policy?
  • Both Republicans and Democrats believe the
    healthcare system has been in serious need of
    reform.
  • The Democratic plan operates on the premise that
    access to health insurance is a fundamental
    right, and seeks to make it more widely available
    to the uninsured and underinsured.
  • Who are their chief opponents or advocates for
    reform?
  • Republicans oppose it their alternative is
    focused on reducing the costs of health insurance
  • Have made a failed attempt to repeal it better
    solution would be to amend parts of the bill

50
Costs and Benefits
  • Costs
  • Will cost 940 billion
  • Money will be provided by new taxes, fees on
    industries involved in health care, and cuts in
    projected spending growth for existing government
    health efforts, primarily Medicare.
  • Benefits
  • CBO estimates that enacting will produce a net
    reduction in federal deficits of 143 bil from
    2010-2019
  • Will help the underinsunred and uninsured

51
Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Who pays for it?
  • Everyone partially paid for by taxes
  • Insurance companies lose competitive edge
  • Who benefits?
  • Those who cannot afford health insurance,
    especially those with pre-exisiting conditions
    uninsured and underinsured
  • An example of client politics.

52
Obamas Thought Process
53
Medicare
  • 1965- President Lyndon B. Johnson amended the
    Social Security Act
  • Originally, workers intended to pay a small
    payroll tax deduction for it
  • Those who receive it pay a monthly premium for
    doctor visits, outpatient services, ER visits,
    etc.
  • Fourth most costly program mandatory spending
  • 2003- Bush enacted Medicare Modernization Act,
    which extended prescription drug coverage

54
Medicare
  • Federal health insurance program for those 65 and
    over, those with permanent kidney failure, and
    some disabled below 65
  • Means-tested program
  • Managed by states, funded by both state and
    federal governments
  • Covers hospital insurance, inpatient hospital
    care, skilled nursing facility care, home health
    care, hospice care, medical insurance (Part B)

55
Court Cases
  • Papciak v. Sebelius
  • A federal district court in Pittsburgh rejected
    termination of skilled rehabilitation services
    after 5 wks to an 81 yr old nursing home resident
    after hip replacement surgery
  • Court said that skilled services can be provided
    if beneficiarys conditions is likely to improve
    materially in a reasonable or generally
    predictable period of time or if services are
    necessary for the establishment of a safe and
    effective maintenance program
  • Anderson v. Sebelius
  • Secretary utilized informal, unlawful standard
    resulting in denial of services because recipient
    was believed to be medically stable
  • Court said services can be covered even when
    recipients condition is stable and unlikely to
    change elibility must be based on unique
    circumstances

56
Opponents and Advocates
  • Opponents
  • Some argue that its development marked a shift
    away from personal responsibility and toward a
    view that health care is an entitlement that
    others should pay for.
  • Conservatives oppose it under belief that it may
    lead America to socialism
  • Advocates
  • Not generally an unearned entitlement
  • Entitlement is most commonly based on a record of
    contributions to the Medicare fund
  • Form of social insurance, which makes it
    reasonable for people to pay for insurance for
    sickness when they are older while they are young
    and able to work
  • Some will pay in more than they get back and
    other will get back more that they paid, but that
    is just how it is

57
Influential Beliefs
  • Prior to 1965, most elderly people had no health
    insurance if they did, it was usually inadequate
  • Wanted more access to insurance coverage of
    healthcare leading to increased benefits for
    elderly
  • Has also led to higher life expectancy and a
    decrease in the poverty rate of eldery

58
Costs and Benefits
  • Costs
  • Medicare taxes apply to payments of wages,
    regardless of citizenship of either the employee
    or employer
  • Medicare Benefits by Service in 2010 510.2
    billion
  • Benefits
  • Help elderly pay for medical services they paid
    for Medicare when they were younger and working

59
Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Who pays for it?
  • Everyone paid for by taxes
  • Who benefits?
  • All the elderly who cannot afford health
    insurance.
  • An example of client politics.

60
Sure, blame them
61
Medicaid
  • 1965- LBJ amends the Social Security Act
  • Gives free healthcare to the poor
  • Is funded by national and state governments
  • Was originally directly linked with welfare
  • Regulated by states more than federal government

62
Medicaid
  • One can be retroactively eligible up to three
    months prior to date of application, if one
    would have been eligible then
  • Coverage stops when individual rises above
    poverty level
  • Most states have their own state programs for
    those who do not qualify for Medicaid
  • Hopeful recipients are tested for low income and
    poor assets and resources

63
State and Federal Roles
  • The states
  • Receive federal funds in proportion to how much
    they spend
  • May choose to expand eligibility and benefits
    past minimum federal requirements
  • May reduce provider payments and access to
    prescription drugs
  • May restrict eligibility and benefits
  • Repair shortfalls in spending by increasing taxes
  • The federal government
  • Makes and open-ended commitment to match spending
    of state Medicaid programs

64
Funding
  • Federal government spent 295 billion in 2010
  • States will spend 7.4 more than last year- more
    due to recession
  • American Recovery and Reinvestment Act provided
    87 billion to states for Medicaid

65
Solutions
  • Block grants- would not offer an undeclared
    amount of funds as it does not, but would reduce
    unnecessary costs
  • Health Savings Accounts and Vouchers- vouchers
    used to buy private health insurance
  • Withdrawing assistance from those who are
    eligible for Medicaid but can afford insurance

66
Opponents and Advocates
  • Advocates
  • Liberals want more welfare programs for the poor
    believe that it is the duty of the government to
    provide for them
  • Opponents
  • Conservatives believe in less regulation of
    businesses and healthcare

67
Supreme Court Cases
  • California Assistance of Rural Health Clinics v.
    Maxwell-Jolly
  • Challenged a law enacted last year that
    eliminated coverage for certain services provided
    by Rural Health clinics
  • Court affirmed that health care providers have a
    right to challenge state laws that conflict with
    or violate federal Medicaid requirements

68
Influential Beliefs
  • Government should continue to help poor pay for
    health insurance number that need help
    increasing
  • Need for health insurance increased as elderly
    population keeps on growing
  • Medical costs rising sharply
  • Advocacy groups encouraging government action

69
Costs and Benefits
  • Costs
  • Discourages self-help
  • Either overuse of medical care or can mean that
    they receive poorer quality care
  • Second largest expenditure in most states
  • Benefits
  • Helps the poor get much needed medical care

70
Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Who pays for it?
  • Everyone paid for by taxes
  • Who benefits?
  • Poor mothers and children, disabled and elderly,
    and those needing long-term care.
  • An example of client politics.

71
Related Congressional Committees, Bureaucratic
Departments, and Interest Groups
  • AARP CEO A. Barry Rand, President W. Lee Hammond
  • The Urban League President and CEO Marc H.
    Morial
  • AMA Chair of Board of Trustees Dr. Ardis Dee
    Hoven
  • Department of Health and Human Services
    Secretary Kathleen Sebelius
  • House Education and the Workforce Committee
    Chairman John Kline
  • Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and
    Pensions Chairman Phil Roe
  • Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and
    Pensions Chairman Tom Harkin
  • Subcommittee on Retirement and Aging

72
Social Policy in the Workplace
73
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
  • Passed July 26, 1990 by George H.W. Bush
  • Belief that works with workers with disabilities
    have a right to be treated equally
  • Services provided Accessibility.
  • Change in designing curb cuts on streets, ramps,
    lifts, and other designs of products in
    buildings, public spaces, and roads

74
ADA How It Works
  • Employers must provide reasonable accommodations
    for disabled employees, unless the accommodations
    pose an undue hardship on the employer.
  • Undue hardship an action that causes much
    difficulty and/or expenses when compared to the
    employers size, resources, and operation.
  • Examples buying or modifying equipment,
    adjusting modifying exams, training programs, and
    providing interpreters, etc.

75
ADA
  • States role is described in five titles
  • Title I
  • Prohibits employers, including cities and towns,
    from discriminating against qualified job
    applicants and workers who are or who become
    disabled
  • Title II
  • Prohibits state and local governments from
    discriminating against disabled persons in their
    programs and activities

76
ADA
  • Title III
  • Prohibits private enterprises who provide public
    accommodations and services (e.g., hotels,
    restaurants, and transit systems) from denying
    goods, services and programs to people based on
    their disabilities
  • Title IV
  • Makes available telecommunications devices and
    services for the hearing and speech impaired
  • Title V
  • Miscellaneous provisions that relate to the
    construction and application of the ADA,
    including alternative dispute resolution.

77
Court Cases
  • Sutton and Hinton v. United Air Lines Inc.
  • Supreme Court re-defined disability. "A
    disability exists only where an impairment
    substantially limits a major life activity, not
    where it might, could, or would be
    substantially limiting if mitigating measures
    were not taken.

78
Court Cases cont.
  • Olmstead v. L.C.
  • The Supreme Court did conclude that, "under Title
    II of the ADA, States are required to place
    persons with mental disabilities in community
    settings rather than in institutions when the
    State's treatment professionals have determined
    that community placement is appropriate, the
    transfer from institutional care to a less
    restrictive setting is not opposed by the
    affected individual, and the placement can be
    reasonably accommodated, taking into account the
    resources available to the State and the needs of
    others with mental disabilities."

79
Efficacy of ADA
  • Because of the ADAs mandating of complimentary
    paratransit services more people can get from one
    place to another buildings have made their
    facilities more accessible to the disabled. Ie,
    touching a button to open door, larger bathroom
    stalls, elevators, etc.
  • In 1990, 70 percent of people with disabilities
    were unemployed, and the figure remains the same
    today. Two problems have been adverse court
    rulings and contradictory federal policies that
    make it difficult for people with disabilities to
    work
  • Percentage of disabled people unemployed has not
    decreased, because employers find it costly to
    provide all the accommodations for a disabled
    employee

80
ADA
  • Usually being disabled limits amount of work that
    can be accomplished
  • Percentage of disabled population that can work
    is 6.7
  • Proposed solution
  • Create Disabled Workers Tax Credit
  • Providing a wage subsidy encouraging them to
    remain in or reenter the workplace after becoming
    disabled
  • Reduce the cost of rehiring and accommodating

81
ADA
  • Some state and local governments have opposed the
    ADA
  • Believe it is unconstitutional to encourage a
    division of social class and to provide more
    benefits to one group of people than to another
  • Private business owners have also been in
    opposition

82
The ADA and the Bureaucracy
  • ADA is enforced by
  • Federal Communications Commission
    telecommunications services regulation
  • Department of Justice regulations regarding
    public accommodations and state and local
    government services
  • Architectural and Transportation Barriers
    Compliance Board issues guidelines to ensure
    that buildings, facilities, and transit vehicles
    are usable by those with disabilities Department
    of Transportation transit regulations
  • Office of Federal Contract Compliance Program
    coordinating authority under the employment
    related provisions of ADA Equal Employment
    Opportunity Commission employment regulations
  • Civil Rights Center enforces Title II of ADA
    (works with state and local governments)

83
The ADA and Interest Groups
  • Media and Disability interest group
  • Major contributors
  • Members and Staff of the National Council on
    Disability
  • Chairperson Marta Bistro
  • Vice Chairperson Kate P. Wolters
  • Executive Director Ethel D. Briggs
  • National Rehabilitation Hospital Research Center
  • Dr. Gerben DeJong Director

84
Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Who pays for it?
  • Everyone.
  • Who benefits?
  • The disabled.
  • An example of client politics.

85
These are tough times
86
Skills For Americas Future
  • Proposed by President Obama in October 2010 to
    improve industry relationships with community
    colleges to ensure that students are acquiring
    skills and knowledge needed to enter the labor
    force
  • Goal 5 mil more community college graduates by
    2020
  • Works through initiative matches of employers
    (Aspen Institute, McDonalds) with community
    colleges in all states in order to create
    programs to prepare students for working life

87
Skills for Americas Future, cont.
  • Efforts in seven main areas
  • Executive agency action
  • State/gubernatorial outreach
  • Workforce investment system outreach
  • Educational outreach
  • Events
  • Media
  • Sponsorships

88
Costs and Benefits
  • Benefits
  • Build career paths with businesses
  • Advance teaching of skills
  • Establish education partnerships
  • Support new online courses
  • Costs
  • Very new policy- public has not seen effects of
    its implementation yet
  • Monetary costs may outweigh the long-term
    benefits
  • May significantly reduce employment in young
    adult work force without college education
    because the competition for jobs is already high
    among community college students

89
Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Who pays for it?
  • Everyone paid for by taxes
  • Who benefits?
  • Those who attend community colleges.
  • An example of client politics.

90
Education
91
Title I
  • Signed by Lyndon B. Johnson in April 1965
  • Provides financial assistance through state
    educational agencies (SEAs) to local educational
    agencies (LEAs) and schools with high
    numbers/percentages of poor children to help
    ensure all children meet challenging state
    academic standards based on Census poverty
    ratings and cost of education per state
  • Funds support extra instruction in reading,
    math, preschool programs, after-school programs,
    summer programs
  • Funding
  • appropriations have grown by 60 since 1994 in
    2008, appropriated 13,898,875,000

92
Title I State Involvement
  • Title I standards, curriculum, and instruction
    are tied to those developed within each state for
    all children
  • Evaluations cannot assess the program in
    isolation from state and local reform efforts
  • Developing comprehensive statewide data systems
    allow districts and schools to track student
    achievement over time, link student and teacher
    data, and gather information on school- and
    district-level performance
  • Consulting Resolution would eliminate all federal
    funding for statewide data systems

93
Title I State Involvement, contd.
  • Presidents budget recognizes that strong data
    systems are critically important in order to
    identify strategies

94
No Child Left Behind
  • Proposed by George W. Bush and Senator Ted
    Kennedy (D)
  • Main idea if a child begins to fall behind, any
    measures necessary will be taken to get them at
    least to the standards of the state.
  • Goals
  • Increase the accountability of states, school
    districts, and schools
  • Give more choices to parents and students
  • Provide more flexibility for states and local
    education agencies when using federal education
    grants
  • Put a stronger emphasis on reading, especially
    for younger children

95
Funding
  • Federal government has given states 400 mil per
    year to enforce NCLB
  • Increased Title 1 grants by 59
  • Dept. of Education distributes funding to schools
    and school districts with students from low
    income families
  • Gave more flexibility to the states

96
Problems and Solutions
  • NCLB offers parents to send their children to
    another school if the local school is in need of
    improvement more difficult for rural children
    due to transportation issues
  • Already difficult to find teachers raising
    standards will require more training
  • Pathway to Teaching Careers Program (identifying
    and training noncertified teachers), Teachers of
    Tomorrow (offers salary bonuses to teach in
    shortage areas), Teaching as a Priority
    (incentives to teach in low quality schools)
  • Only grades 5-12 can be offered learning through
    computer programs
  • Those who provide technology for learning do not
    need to provide services to every school district
    in a state this tends to benefit schools in
    cities
  • States work with rural school districts to
    identify technological providers in community to
    provide services

97
Opponents and Advocates
  • Supporters
  • Believe test results will improve the overall
    quality of education
  • Want to democratize US education by setting
    standards and providing resources to schools
  • Opponents
  • Teacher unions
  • Do not agree with standardized testing

98
Court Cases
  • Horne v. Flores (2009)
  • In Jan. 2000, US District Court for Arizona cited
    the state for civil contempt because it failed to
    fund English language learner programs
  • Superintendent of programs argued that increases
    in state funding and NCLB altered the foundations
    of district courts ruling on not funding the
    programs
  • Supreme Court ruled that the lower courts
    standard was too strict and the federal district
    court could examine legal areas to grant relief
    to AZ

99
Costs and Benefits
  • Costs
  • Underfunded at the state level
  • Concentrates on standardized testing
  • Benefits
  • Flexibility encouraged accountability

100
Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Who pays for it?
  • Everyone paid for by taxes
  • Who benefits?
  • Public school students, teachers, staff, and
    parents.
  • An example of client politics.

101
Related Congressional Committees, Bureaucratic
Departments, and Interest Groups
  • House Education and the Workforce Committee
    Chairman John Kline
  • Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and
    Secondary Education Chairman Duncan D. Hunter
  • Subcommittee on Workforce Protection Chairman
    Tim Walberg
  • Subcommittee on Higher Education and Workforce
    Training Chairwoman Virginia Foxx
  • Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and
    Pensions Chairman Phil Roe

102
Related Congressional Committees, Bureaucratic
Departments, and Interest Groups, cont.
  • Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and
    Pensions Chairman Tom Harkin
  • Subcommittee on Children and Families
  • Subcommittee on Employment and Workplace Safety
  • Department of Education Secretary Arne Duncan
  • Department of Labor Secretary Hilda L. Solis
  • AFL-CIO President Richard L. Trumka
  • American Federation of Teachers President Randi
    Weingarten

103
What we really ship to China
104
Bibliography
GET SHEET
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com