Managing Under a Six-Nation Partnership - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Managing Under a Six-Nation Partnership

Description:

Gemini Observatory soon to be Five Managing Under a Six-Nation Partnership – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: KSILVERM
Learn more at: https://www.nsf.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Managing Under a Six-Nation Partnership


1
Gemini Observatory
soon to be Five
  • Managing Under a Six-Nation Partnership

2
Two telescopes, one observatory
Gemini South Cerro Pachon, Chile
Gemini North Mauna Kea, Hawaii
Gemini Observatory, constructed 1999-2000,
consists of twin 8.1-m infrared-optimized
telescopes with exquisite optics located on two
of the best sites for observing the universe.
Together these telescopes access the entire sky.
3
The Partnership
  • Partner countries and their current shares are
    listed in the table below.
  • The UK have announced their decision to withdraw
    at the end of 2012.
  • As a result, and with changes in Australian and
    Brazilian involvement, revenues will decline and
    shares will transition as ( are OM/Instr, in M)

Partner 2010 ( ) Post-2012
U.S 50.1 15.9M/3.2M 66.3
U.K. 22.7 7.6M/0.4M 0.0
Canada 15.0 4.8M/0.5M 18.9
Australia 6.2 2.0M/0.3M 5.0
Brazil 5.0 0.8M/0.0M 6.6
Argentina 2.4 0.8M/0.3M 3.1
Total 100 31.9M/4.7M 100 24.3M/???
-24
  • The increased share for the U.S. amounts to about
    50 nights/yr for the general astronomical
    community on the two telescopes combined.

4
Gemini Management
NSF serves as the executive agency for the
international partnership
5
Management Roles Responsibilities
  • Partners
  • Funding Agencies
  • Signatories to the Agreement
  • Appoint members to the Board
  • Determine new partners
  • Board
  • Supervisory and regulatory body
    established in
    the Gemini International Agreement
  • Composed of Agency officials and science
    community representatives
  • Sets budget, approves key personnel and major
    contracts, etc.
  • Determines action in event of default or
    withdrawal
  • Chile and Hawaii vote on scientific issues
    relevant to their tenant telescope

6
Management Roles Responsibilities (cont)
  • NSF
  • Executive Agency - on behalf of partner
    agencies
  • Board member Ulvestad Program Officer
    Schmidt (Foltz)
  • Arranges for Managing Organization (currently
    AURA)
  • Handles all fiscal matters
  • Provides technical and managerial oversight in
    consultation with Board
  • Conducts and coordinates reviews
  • Provides Secretariat to the Board (Pentecost)
  • AURA, Inc.
  • Chosen as current Managing Organization by NSF,
    with approval of the Gemini Board.
  • Operates Gemini under separate Cooperative
    Agreement.
  • Negotiates with host countries, employs legal
    counsel, enters into contracts, manages the
    project, assumes fiduciary responsibility
  • Advised by AURA Observatory Council Gemini
    (AOCG)

7
Management Roles Responsibilities (cont)
  • Gemini International Observatory
  • Advised by Gemini Science Committee
  • Operations Working Group, AO Working Group
  • Convenes International Telescope Allocation
    Committee (ITAC)
  • National Gemini Offices (NGOs)
  • National portals to Gemini
  • Provide information to national users process
    proposals convene national TAC etc.
  • Funded by partners
  • The U.S. NGO is the NOAO Gemini Science Center
    (Tucson)
  • Advised by National Science Advisory Committee

8
Highlights The First Directly-Imaged Planet
around a Sun-like Star
  • Gemini AO image of 1RXS J160929.1-210524 and its
    8 Jupiter-mass companion (in red circle).
    Picture is a composite of J-, H, and K-band
    near-IR images. Obtained with the ALTAIR
    laser/natural guide star system and Near-Infrared
    Imager (NIRI) on the Gemini North telescope.
    Note 1 arcsec scale at bottom left.

9
Highlights MCAO Constellation GeMS
50-watt laser (above) is projected as a 5-spot
constellation covering 1 sq. arcmin by GeMS to
illuminate the sodium layer 90 km above Cerro
Pachon, Jan. 22, 2011.
10
The Queue is the Default Operations Mode
  • Successful execution of the Gemini queue
    requires
  • Detailed planning on a variety of timescales
    (months to minutes).
  • Observers adept in the use of all mounted (up to
    5!) instruments.
  • All potential instruments ready and calibrated.
  • Real-time data QA/QC by Gemini staff.
  • The queue provides increased flexibility and
    observing efficiency, albeit at a cost.

11
Delivering on Commitments Observing Efficiency
  • Primary sources of lost time are weather,
    fault, shutdown, engineering, commissioning.

12
Challenges - I
  • Management and governance complexity
  • International partnership demands a more
    active role
    than traditional for NSF
  • Local politics and economies, variation in
    Chilean peso
    exchange rate
  • Transition to reduced budget post-UK withdrawal
  • New AURA proposal for management of Gemini
    Observatory 2012-2015 was submitted Jan. 31, and
    will be reviewed with site visit Mar. 21-24.
  • Essential aspect of transition is 24 budget
    reduction, including 32 FTEs
  • Elements of proposed transition
  • Maintain high-quality instrumentation, queue
    operations, remote observing
  • Improve interface to user community
  • Reduce engineering, limit instrument complement,
    implement software queue, reduce travel, migrate
    queue observing to non-scientific staff.

13
Challenges - II
  • Responding to Astro2010
  • Support from national communities
  • Proposal process
  • Instrumentation
  • Instrumentation
  • First science observations with GNIRS
  • Commissioning of GeMS MCAO system
  • Pre-ship testing of GPI
  • Problems with Flamingos 2
  • Renewing efforts to obtain high-resolution
    optical spectrograph
  • Relationship to NOAO other partner facilities.
    Concepts being considered by international Tiger
    Team of Gemini Board members, being led by AST
    Director J. Ulvestad

14
Supplementary Slides
15
Delivering on Commitments Program Completion
  • Completion rates have increased since 2004
    (grey vs. other colors), but large proposal
    development effort causes continued proposer
    frustration, particularly for Band 3 programs.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com