Continuous Ambient Particulate Monitors A Review of Current Technologies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Continuous Ambient Particulate Monitors A Review of Current Technologies

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: Mark Dreese 2003 Thermo Electron Corporation Last modified by: Michael Corvese Created Date: 1/8/2003 2:56:37 PM – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:87
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: MarkD110
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Continuous Ambient Particulate Monitors A Review of Current Technologies


1
Continuous Ambient Particulate MonitorsA Review
of Current Technologies
  • by
  • Michael Corvese, Product Manager
  • Thermo Electron Corporation
  • Air Quality Instruments

2
Aerosol Monitoring
  • Aerosol Characteristics
  • Health effects
  • Regulatory Background
  • Sampling Analysis
  • Regulatory Developments

3
Aerosol Characteristics
DEFINITION Aerosol small solid or liquid
particles suspended in gas
  • Dust from nature, wind, human activity
    (pollen, road dust fly ash)
  • Fog from heating/cooling
    (clouds and fog)
  • Mist from atomization and nebulizer
    (sulfuric acid mist)
  • Spray from ultrasonics
    (insecticide spray)
  • Smoke from combustion or flame
    (cigarette, soot, diesel)
  • Smog from photochemicals (Urban Smog)

4
Aerosol Characteristics
Physical characteristics Size distribution
Shape Refractive Index Concentration (mass
or number) Chemical characteristics Composition
(chemical or elemental) Acidity/alkalinity
Temporal characteristics Chemical and physical
characteristics changing with time Spatial
characteristics Characteristics changing with
location
5
Physical Characteristics
SIZE, SHAPE, and REFRACTIVE INDEX
  • 0.002-100µm aerosol research
  • 0.1-100µm common sampling (0.1-10 mm)
  • Size
  • Shape
  • Refractive Index
  • Many irregular shapes
  • aerodynamic diameter emphasized
  • Wide range
  • most consistent below 2.5mm

6
Physical Characteristics
Hair cross section (60 mm)
Human Hair (60 mm diameter)
7
Chemical Characteristics
8
Health Effects
  • Health effects are significant
  • Body of evidence is substantial

9
Health Effects
Increased hospital admissions and emergency room
visits during high PM conditions
  • Aggravated asthma
  • Chronic bronchitis
  • Increase in respiratory symptoms
  • Decreased lung function
  • Premature death

10
Health Effects
11
Regulatory Background
  • 1971Promulgation of National Ambient Air
    Quality Standards (NAAQS) for SO2, NO2, O3, CO,
    and total suspended particulates (TSP)
  • 1978Promulgation of particulate Pb standard
  • 1987Promulgation of PM10 standard
  • 1997Promulgation of revised PM10 standard and
  • introduction of PM2.5 standard (also a revision
    of
  • the O3 standard)

12
Regulatory Background
U.S. National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS)
13
Sampling and Analysis
Common Gravimetric Ambient Aerosol Sampling
Techniques (Gross - Tare) / Air Volume mg/m3
  • High volume methods TSP, PM10, PM2.5, Air
    Toxics Sampler (PUF)
  • Low volume methods (PM10, PM2.5, PMCoarse)

14
Sampling and Analysis
  • High Volume Methods TSP and PM10 Samplers

15
Sampling and Analysis
  • Low Volume Methods
  • PM10/PM2.5 FRM PMc/PM2.5 Dichotomous Sampler

16
Sampling and Analysis
Common Gravimetric Ambient Aerosol Sampling
Techniques (Gross - Tare) / Air Volume mg/m3
  • Advantages Recognized reference method, low
    capital cost
  • Disadvantages Limited time resolution (typically
    24-hr), long turnaround times, labor intensive,
    and gravimetric lab maintenance/cost

17
Sampling and Analysis
Common Continuous Ambient Aerosol Sampling
Techniques (Dm / Dt) / (DV / Dt) mg/m3
  • Light Scattering, Absorption, and Extinction
  • Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance
  • Beta (Electron) Attenuation
  • Hybrid Methods

18
Sampling and Analysis
Impaction Separation
Cyclone Separation
Cut Point
100
Eficiency
50
0
PM100
PM10
PM1.0
19
Sampling and Analysis
Common Continuous Ambient Aerosol Sampling
Techniques (Dm / Dt) / (DV / Dt) mg/m3
  • Advantages Low operational cost, better time
    resolution, increased statistical database,
    instantaneous turnaround (index reporting,
    increased knowledge of air shed characteristics)
  • Disadvantages 2-3x capital cost, limited
    reference capabilities (pending USEPA CASAC
    Guidelines)

20
Sampling and Analysis
21
Sampling and Analysis
Continuous Methods
  • Light Scattering Excellent time resolution
    limited by refractive index and aerosol
    distribution (particle size)
  • Oscillation Frequency Measurement Good time
    resolution, seasonal regional performance
    issues
  • Beta (Electron) Attenuation Proven technology,
    minimal performance issues, versatile

22
Sampling and Analysis
23
Sampling and Analysis
Other Technologies Oscillation Frequency
Measurement
  • Disadvantages
  • Temperature dependency
  • Affected by vibration
  • Manual filter changes necessary
  • Seasonal and regional dependencies
  • Complex systems require some skill
  • Volatile losses
  • Advantages
  • Continuous method
  • Highly time resolved
  • High resolution

24
Series FH 62 C14Features and Benefits
  • Heating Considerations

Fixed heating w/auto filter changes is an
improvement over long term heating on fixed spot.
Actual and mean VOC
loss (l and l
) due to

m
heated sample area at 50C
0
m
-20
) loss l and l
-40
3
NO
-60
4
l
m
VOC(NH
-80
l
-100
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
t in days

25
b AttenuationPrinciple of Operation
  • Constant flow of aerosol is metered and sampled
    onto a filter stain area.
  • The detection of Beta Attenuation is proportional
    to increased mass.
  • Every 1-24 hrs a new filter area is zeroed and
    introduced.

26
SHARP MonitorPrinciple of Operation
  • Combination nephelometer beta attenuation
  • High sensitivity light scattering photometer is
    continuously calibrated by an integral time
    averaged beta attenuation mass sensor
  • Measured mass concentration remains independent
    of changes in the particle population being
    sampled

27
Sampling and Analysis
b Attenuation Technology
Direct b Attenuation
  • Advantage
  • Truly continuous
  • Non-intrusive
  • Ambient inlet
  • Sensing volume
  • b Source detector
  • Disadvantage
  • No known manufacturers
  • Poor detection limit
  • Requires very high concentrations

28
Sampling and Analysis
b Attenuation Technology
Stepwise b Attenuation
  • Advantage
  • Semi-continuous
  • Sound technology
  • Good hourly precision
  • Ambient Inlet
  • Sensing Volume
  • ß Source detector
  • Filter tape
  • Disadvantage
  • Semi-continuous

29
Sampling and Analysis
b Attenuation Technology
Continuous ß-Attenuation
  • Advantage
  • Continuous
  • Sound technology
  • Significant loading for post-collection analysis
  • Ambient inlet
  • Sensing volume
  • b Source detector
  • Filter tape
  • Disadvantage
  • Potential extended sample loss

30
Sampling and Analysis
Hybrid Technology
Continuous SHARP Monitor
  • Advantage
  • Truly continuous
  • Low detection limits
  • High time resolution
  • Intelligent moisture control
  • Ambient inlet
  • Sensing volume
  • b Source, detector, nephelometer
  • Filter tape
  • Disadvantage
  • None

31
b Attenuation Principle of Operation
32
b Attenuation
  • Refined Mass Measurement via Dual Detector

33
b Attenuation
  • Refined Mass Measurement via Dual Detector
  • A dual (a.k.a. proportional) detector allows
    the daughter nuclides of Radon gas to be measured
    and accounted for as a mass refining step.
  • This allows the C14 BETA to be consistently
    stable at lower ambient concentrations.
  • Important for PM2.5

34
Continuous Particulate MonitorsApplications
  • NAAQS Monitoring
  • AQ Index Reporting
  • Fenceline Monitoring
  • Clean-up Sites

Ambient
In RD
  • Unrivaled short-term detection limits/time
    resolution

35
Continuous Particulate MonitorsApplications
36
Regulatory Developments
  • 1997promulgation of PM2.5 and revision of PM10
  • 1998PM2.5 standard challenged in court
  • 1999US Court of Appeals remanded PM2.5
  • standard back to EPA for revision
  • 2001US Supreme Court decision
  • - EPA has the right to promulgate a PM2.5
    standard
  • - Compliance costs should not be considered
  • - PM Coarse should replace PM10
  • 2005- Proposed revision of PM2.5 expected
  • 2006-Final PM2.5 and proposed PM Coarse
    regulation expected

37
Continuous Particulate Monitors
The End Thank you for your time and attention
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com