VA Requirements for Vulnerable Subjects - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

VA Requirements for Vulnerable Subjects

Description:

VA Requirements for Vulnerable Subjects Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst Program for Research Integrity Development and Education (PRIDE) – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:113
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: KevinNel3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: VA Requirements for Vulnerable Subjects


1
VA Requirements for Vulnerable Subjects
  • Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.)Program
    Analyst
  • Program for Research Integrity Development and
    Education (PRIDE)

2
Overview
  • Vulnerable Subjects
  • Populations Considered Categorically Vulnerable
  • Pregnant Women
  • Prisoners
  • Children
  • Persons Who Lack Decision-Making Capacity
  • Surrogate Consent

2
3
Vulnerable Subjects
  • Common Rule
  • When some or all of the subjects are likely to
    be vulnerable to coercion or undue influence,
    such as children, prisoners, pregnant women,
    mentally disabled persons, or economically or
    educationally disadvantaged persons, additional
    safeguards have been included in the study to
    protect the rights and welfare of these
  • 38 CFR 16.111(b)

3
4
IRB Must Document Deliberations
  • Reasons why IRB considers population or
    individual to be vulnerable
  • That adequate safeguards protect the rights and
    welfare of subjects likely to be vulnerable
  • That the VA criteria are met to approve inclusion
    of individuals who lack decision-making capacity

4
5
Individuals or Populations Which May Be
Temporarily or Permanently Vulnerable
  • Those who are susceptible to coercion or undue
    influence (e.g., homeless, students, patients
    with limited treatment options, socially or
    economically disadvantaged)
  • Those who lack comprehension of research or
    potential risks (e.g., educationally
    disadvantaged, dementia, schizophrenia,
    depression)

5
6
Individuals or Populations Which May Be
Temporarily or Permanently Vulnerable
  • Those who have increased susceptibility to harm
    (e.g., individuals answering questions about
    traumatic events such as sexual assault, or
    combat experiences)
  • Those who are at risk for physical,
    psychological, economic, social, legal
    consequences (e.g., Individuals answering
    questions about drug use or HIV status)

6
7
Research Involving Pregnant WomenVA Requirements
  • Adequate provisions has been made to monitor risk
    to subject and fetus
  • Women of child bearing potential may not be
    entered into studies involving Category D or X
    drugs without a waiver from the Chief Research
    and Development Officer (CRADO)

7
8
Research Involving Pregnant Women45 CFR 46,
Subpart B Requirements
  • Prior studies must assess potential risks to
    pregnant women and fetuses (preclinical studies,
    clinical studies, studies on pregnant animals,
    studies on non-pregnant women), when
    scientifically appropriate
  • 45 CFR 46.204(a)

8
9
Research Involving Pregnant Women45 CFR 46,
Subpart B Requirements
  • Risk to the fetus is caused solely by
    interventions or procedures that hold out the
    prospect of direct benefit for the woman or the
    fetus or,
  • If there is no such prospect of benefit
  • the risk to the fetus is not greater than
    minimal, and
  • the purpose of the research is the development of
    important biomedical knowledge which cannot be
    obtained by any other means 45 CFR
    46.204(b)

9
10
Research Involving Pregnant Women45 CFR 46,
Subpart B Requirements
  • Any risk is the least possible for achieving the
    objectives of the research 45 CFR
    46.204(c)
  • If the research holds out the prospect of direct
    benefit to the pregnant woman, the prospect of a
    direct benefit both to the pregnant woman and the
    fetus, or no prospect of benefit for the woman
    nor the fetus when risk to the fetus is not
    greater than minimal and the purpose of the
    research is the development of important
    biomedical knowledge that cannot be obtained by
    any other means, the pregnant womans informed
    consent is obtained in accord with the informed
    consent provisions of 38 CFR 16.116 45 CFR
    204(d)

10
11
Research Involving Pregnant Women45 CFR 46,
Subpart B Requirements
  • Subject is fully informed regarding the
    reasonably foreseeable impact of the research on
    the fetus
  • 45 CFR 46.204(f)

11
12
Research Involving Pregnant Women45 CFR 46,
Subpart B Requirements
  • No inducements, monetary or otherwise, are to be
    offered to terminate a pregnancy 45 CFR 46.204
    (h)
  • Individuals engaged in the research have no part
    in
  • any decisions as to the timing, method, or
    procedures used to terminate a pregnancy 45 CFR
    46.204(i)
  • determining the viability of a fetus 45 CFR
    46.204 (j)

12
13
Research Involving Prisoners
  • IRB Approval Must Comply 45 CFR 46, Subpart C
  • Waiver from Chief of Research and Development
    Officer (CRADO)
  • OHRP FAQs http//www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/populati
    ons/index.html

13
14
Research Involving PrisonersIncarceration During
Study
  • Investigators must notify the IRB as soon as they
    become aware that the subject has been
    incarcerated
  • Investigator determines whether or not it is the
    best interests of the subject to remain in the
    study, or if the subject can be safely withdrawn
    from the study
  • Continued participation is contingent on the
    IRBs reviewing and approving such participation
  • Waiver must be obtained from the CRADO
  • Follow all requirements (court, penal system,
    local VA, Federal)

14
15
Research Involving ChildrenVA Requirements
  • VA Research must support mission of VA and
    enhance quality of health care delivery to
    veterans
  • CRADO Waiver (see VHA Handbook 1200.05) must be
    obtained to conduct VA research involving
    children
  • Interventions
  • Interactions
  • Data or specimens
  • Meet requirements of 45 CFR 46, Subpart D

15
16
Research Involving Persons Who Lack
Decision-Making Capacity
  • Individual is presumed to have decision-making
    capacity unless
  • Documented by a qualified practitioner in the
    medical record
  • Ruled incompetent by a court of law
  • If there is any question whether a potential
    adult subject has decision-making capacity, the
    investigator must consult with a qualified
    practitioner about the individuals
    decision-making capacity before proceeding with
    the informed consent process
  • May be a qualified member of the research team


17
Research Involving Persons Who Lack
Decision-Making Capacity
  • Individuals at high risk for temporary (e.g.,
    head trauma) or fluctuating (e.g., schizophrenia)
    lack of decision-making capacity must be
    evaluated to determine the ability to provide
    informed consent
  • Evaluation must be performed as described in the
    IRB-approved protocol
  • If individual is deemed to lack decision-making
    capacity, a legally authorized representative
    (LAR) must provide informed consent
  • If subject regains decision-making capacity,
    repeat informed consent process with subject, and
    obtain subjects permission to continue


18
Criteria for Enrolling Persons Who Lack
Decision-Making Capacity
Risk, Harm, Direct Benefit of Proposed Research Additional Requirements
No greater than minimal risk No additional requirements
Some probability of harm Probability of direct benefit must be greater than probability of harm
Greater than minimal risk with no prospect of direct benefit to subject Research is likely to lead to generalizable knowledge about subjects disorder or condition that is of vital importance for understanding or amelioration of subjects disorder or condition
VHA Handbook 1200.05, Paragraph 49(d)(1)(a), or
(b), or (c)

19
Criteria for Enrolling Persons Who Lack
Decision-Making Capacity

Type of Study Additional Requirements Example
Disorder leading to individuals lack of decision-making capacity is being studied whether or not the lack of decision-making itself is being evaluated The study cannot be performed with only persons who have decision-making capability Individual who lacks decision making capacity as the result of stroke can participate in study of cardiovascular effects of stroke
Also need VHA Handbook 1200.05, Paragraph
49(d)(1)(a), or (b), or (c)

20
Criteria for Enrolling Persons Who Lack
Decision-Making Capacity
Type of Study Additional Requirements Example
Study is not directly related to individuals lack of decision-making capacity Compelling argument for including individuals who lack of decision-making capacity Study the transmission of MRSA infection in nursing home where both individuals with, and those without, decision making capacity are affected
Also need VHA Handbook 1200.05, Paragraph
49(d)(1)(a), or (b), or (c)

21
IRB Determinations for Research Involving Persons
Who Lack Decision-Making Capacity
  • Ensure the study includes appropriate procedures
    for respecting dissent
  • Consider whether or not the study needs to
    include procedures for obtaining assent
  • Determine whether any additional safeguards need
    to be used (e.g., consent monitoring)


22
IRB Determinations for Research Involving Persons
Who Lack Decision-Making Capacity
  • IRB must document
  • Reasons why IRB considers subject to be
    vulnerable
  • That adequate safeguards protect subjects
  • VA criteria are met to approve include
    individuals who lack decision-making capacity


23
Surrogate Consent
  • Legally Authorized Representative (LAR)
  • Health care agent
  • Legal or special guardian
  • Next of kin in this order
  • Spouse, child, parent, sibling, grandparent,
    grandchild
  • Close friend
  • LAR is not synonymous with HIPAAs personal
    representative


24
Surrogate Consent
  • If feasible, the investigator must explain the
    proposed research to the prospective research
    subject
  • Some persons may resist participating in a
    research (i.e., dissent)
  • Under no circumstances may a subject be forced or
    coerced to participate in a research study even
    if the LAR has provided consent
  • For subjects with fluctuating decision-making
    capacity or those with decreasing capacity to
    give consent, a re-consenting process with
    surrogate consent may be necessary

24
25
Key Points
  • Understand who is categorically vulnerable
  • Understand which individuals or populations may
    be vulnerable
  • Understand the protections afforded to vulnerable
    subjects in a study

25
26
Key Points
  • IRB must document
  • Reasons why IRB considers to be vulnerable
  • That adequate safeguards protect subjects
  • VA criteria are met to approve include
    individuals who lack decision-making capacity

26
27
Key Points
  • Protecting vulnerable populations is a shared
    responsibility among
  • Investigators
  • IRB
  • Legally Authorized Representative

27
28
QUESTIONS
28
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com