Harrison et al. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Harrison et al.

Description:

Harrison et al. Bioethics for Children: Involving Children in Medical Decisions Samantha s case 11 years old with osteosarcoma in left arm Arm amputated ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: ScottSt151
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Harrison et al.


1
Harrison et al.
  • Bioethics for Children Involving Children in
    Medical Decisions

2
Samanthas case
  • 11 years old with osteosarcoma in left arm
  • Arm amputated chemotherapy given
  • Cancer free for 18 months before returning
    metastasizing in her lungs.
  • 20 chance of successful recovery
  • Samantha distrusts the health care workers and is
    angry at them and her parents.
  • Samantha refuses further treatment

3
Ethics and including children
  • Moving away from traditional model where
    physicians and parents made all medical decisions
    of behalf of children to one where children are
    increased involved somehow in the decision.
  • Best to use a family centred approach, which
    considers consequences to all family members.
  • Difficult here because disagreement in the family
    the parents want to continue treatment.

4
Ethics and including children
  • Triadic relationship that involves physicians,
    parents and child.
  • The childs input will depend on their level of
    cognitive and emotional development. The child
    must be worked with, by a variety of health care
    workers, to ensure s/he is made as capable as
    possible in dealing with the situation.

5
Law, children and proxy consent
  • A patient's right to refuse even life saving
    treatment is recognized in Canadian law.
  • mature minor recognizes that some children are
    competent to make medical decisions.
  • When child not competent, the parents typically
    are the proxies but they must make decisions in
    the childs best interets. They cant be as
    idiosyncratic in their decisions e.g., JHs and
    blood transfusions.
  • Restraints

6
Policy, etc.
  • In CAN, no policy on the role of children. In US,
    policy is as above. Proxy but in best interests
    of child.
  • Developmental psychology infants young
    children vs. primary school children vs.
    adolescents.
  • Considerations potential benefits to child
    potential harmful consequences (including
    psychological etc) moral, spiritual and cultural
    values of the childs family.

7
Case
  • Samantha included in decisions, which involves a
    large team.
  • Decide upon palliative care.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com