Title: The Ethics of Diversity: Race, Ethnicity, and Culture in Moral Theory
1The Ethics of DiversityRace, Ethnicity, and
Culture in Moral Theory
2Introduction
- Increasing interest in diversity in the past two
decades - Fundamental question what place, if any, do
race, ethnicity, and culture have in moral theory?
3Overview
- The Identity Argument
- Minority Rights
- The Virtues Necessary for Living Well in a
Diverse Society
4The Identity Argument
- The basic claim of the identity argument is that
race, ethnicity, and culture are central to moral
identity - The argument has two parts
- Negative The Critique of Impartiality
- Positive The Situatedness of the Moral Agent
5Impartiality and Particularity
- The premise of modern moral theory has been that
the moral agent ought to be impartial - Utilitarianism The Impartial Calculator
- Deontology Acting according to the duty of any
rational agent - See especially Alasdair MacIntyre, How the Moral
Agent Became a Ghost.
6Godwins Choice
- Which to choose to rescue in a burning building?
- The Bishop of Cambray (Fenelon)
- His chambermaid
- Version 2
- The Bishop of Cambray
- Your mother
7Godwins Choice, 2
- Suppose the valet had been my brother, my
father, or my benefactor. This would not alter
the truth of the proposition. The life of Fenelon
would still be more valuable than that of the
valet and justice, pure, unadulterated justice,
would still have preferred that which was most
valuable. Justice would have taught me to save
the life of Fenelon the Bishop of Cambray at
the expense of the other. What magic is there in
the pronoun "my," that should justify us in
overturning the decisions of impartial truth? My
brother or my father may be a fool or a
profligate, malicious, lying or dishonest. If
they be, of what consequence is it that they are
mine? - --Godwin, Enquiry Concerning Political Justice,
Chapter 2
8Two Questions
- Godwins dilemma poses two distinct questions to
us - Behavior What should I do?
- Motivation Why should I do it?
9Moral Motivation and Impartiality
- Sometimes what is morally required in a situation
is acting out of a particular moral motivation - e.g., visiting a sick friend.
- Michael Stocker has argued that modern moral
theory has a kind of schizophrenia, a split
between motivation and justification - Video interview with Michael Stocker on this
topic. - Bernard Williams has pointed out the problem of
one motivation too many
10Impartiality and Behavior
- Considerations of rights establish the boundaries
within which considerations of partiality may
play a role - In acting on the basis of particularity, people
may not violate rights. - Thus, in Godwins example, we should not violate
someones right to be saved.
11Impartiality, Particularity, and Power
- Critics of impartiality often claim that claims
of impartiality often mask power relationships of
dominance - Impartiality is really just the partiality of the
powerful.
12Identity and Transparency
- For the dominant group in a society, their
particular identity is transparent, I.e., not
perceived by them as a specific identity - Supermarket example
- For non-dominant groups, their identity is always
experienced as particular, as specific to them as
members of a group.
13The Identity Argument
- Premise 1 What is morally right depends (at least
in part) on ones identity as a moral agent - Premise 2 Ones race (or ethnicity, or culture)
is central to ones identity as a moral agent - Conclusion Thus, what is morally right depends
(at least in part) on that persons race,
ethnicity, or culture.
14Premise 1
- What is morally right depends (at least in part)
on ones identity as a moral agent. - Kantians would argue that moral identity is
purely rational, and that it does not involve any
elements of particularity. - Supporters of this premise point to special
obligations characteristic of particular cultures
and ethnicities, e.g., placing a high value on
family commitments.
15Premise 2
- Ones race (or ethnicity, or culture) is central
to ones identity as a moral agent. - In order to evaluate this premise, we first must
ask What exactly do we mean by race, ethnicity,
and culture?
16Race, Ethnicity, and Culture
- Race
- Initially appears to be biological
- Eventually is seen as socially constructed
- Ethnicity
- An individuals identification with a particular
cultural group to which they are usually
biologically related - Culture
- Set of beliefs, values and practices that define
a groups identity
17Internalist and Externalist Accounts of Ethnic
Identity
- Externalist accounts
- Ethnic identity is formed by certain external
events, e.g., slavery, persecution,
discrimination - This even fits within utilitarianism
- Internalist accounts
- Ethnic identity is formed by certain shared
experiences, often of oppression, which bind a
people together
18Responses to the Identity Argument
- Separatistseeks to preserve identity by
maintaining a separate existence. - Supremacistseeks power and superiority over all
other groups. - Assimilationist and Integrationist--seeks a
common identity, the melting pot. - Pluralistpreserves particularity in a shared
framework, the crazy quilt.
19Separatism
- May be
- Partial
- Complete
- Examples
- Amish and Mennonites
- Orthodox Jews
- Acoma Pueblo
20Supremacist
- Seeks power and superiority over all other
groups. - See Jim Crow laws in the United States, which
tried to retain white supremacy.
http//www.ferris.edu/news/jimcrow/index.htm.
21Assimilationism
- Predominant American metaphor the melting pot.
- Classic philosophical source Richard
Wasserstrom, On Racism and Sexism. Wasserstrom
argues that race and gender should be no more
significant than eye color.
22Pluralism
- Rejects ideal of impartiality
- Seeks to preserve and strengthen group identity.
- Sources
- Iris Marion Young, Justice and the Politics of
Difference. - Michael Walzer, Spheres of Justice.
23Pluralism and Multiculturalism
- Principle of Understanding
- We seek to understand other cultures before we
pass judgment on them. - Principle of Tolerance
- We recognize that there are important areas in
which intelligent people of good will will in
fact differ. - Principle of Standing Up to Evil
- We recognize that at some points we must stand up
against evil, even when it is outside of our own
borders. - Principle of Fallibility
- We recognize that, even with the best of
intentions, our judgments may be flawed and
mistake.
24Minority Rights
- Kymlicka, Liberalism, Community, and Culture
(1989) and Multicultural Citizenship (1995) - Thesis liberalism entails minority rights
25Kymlickas Argument
- Following Rawls, Kymlicka argues that the ability
to develop and pursue a life plan is a very
important good - Ones own culture is necessary for achieving that
good - Many minority cultures need special protection if
they are to continue to exist - Thus minority cultures must be given special
protection so that all members of society have an
equal opportunity to pursue a life plan.
26Groups
- Indigenous Peoples
- Formerly Enslaved Peoples
- Immigrant Minorities
27The Rights of Indigenous Peoples
- Compensatory Justice
- Backward-looking
- Redress past harms
- Rights of Indigenous Peoples
- Language
- Religion
- Land
- Self-determination
28The Rights of Formerly Enslaved Peoples
- Do we owe a special debt to those who have been
forcibly brought to our shores and enslaved? - To their descendants?
- How is such a debt measured? Repaid?
29Hate Crimes
- One way of providing special protection to groups
that have been the object of persecution is to
provide special legal sanctions against
persecutory acts--in other words, against hate
crimes.
30The Rights of Immigrant Minorities
- What special rights, if any, do immigrant
minorities have if they have freely come to the
United States in search of a better life? - Language
- Support
31The Virtues Necessary for Living Well in a
Diverse Society
- Lawrence Blum indicates there are three virtues
necessary for living wel in a diverse society - Opposition to racism
- Multiculturalism
- Sense of community, connection, or common humanity