Policies and measures to formalize the informal economy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

Policies and measures to formalize the informal economy

Description:

... A Blessing or a Curse for the Official Economy? ... (internet, and mobile technologies, which allow individuals to work from their homes, or from a distance; ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:126
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: lll77
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Policies and measures to formalize the informal economy


1
Policies and measures to formalize the informal
economy
  • Presentation for the ILO-ITC seminar on
    Employment and Informal Economy
  • March, 2009
  • Prof. Krastyo Petkov-Bulgaria
  • Kr.petkov_at_wnwe.eu

2
CLASIFFICATION AND FACTORS
  • 1. Definitions different criteria and concepts
  • /black, shadow, underground, hidden economy/
  • 2. Three sectors of the hidden economy
  • Informal /legal/
  • Grey /semi legal /
  • Black / I legal /
  • 3. Segmentation of the labour market in the IE
  • 4.Factors for the IE growth
  • Global
  • Intraregional
  • National
  • Neo liberal reforms

3
First part
  • INTRODUCTION

4
Evolution of meanings
  • Important massage
  • Informal Economy /IE/ is not a temporary,
    transitional phenomenon , as it used to be
    described in the theory and practice

5
Past significance
  • Initial considerations of Informal Economy /IE/
    were related to imaging it, as just an adjunct to
    the official economy.
  • Gradually IE marked a certain growth. It
    involved c branches and regions, thus, engaging
    numerous in figures and sustainable in time,
    labor and business groups.
  • It transformed from a safe-way for unemployed
    and low-income groups, into a factor, adding to
    the overall economic growth.

6
Present importance
  • Today, informal work parallels labor, applied in
    the formal economy and thus, informal employment
    turns into a significant source of primary and/or
    secondary (marginal) incomes for individuals.
    This process happens, primarily in the developing
    countries.
  • National economies, especially in times of
    crisis, evolve to new economic equilibria and
    dynamics, rooted at two inter-dependent economic
    sectors the formal and informal one.

7
Second part
  • STATISTICS

8
IE size in the transition countries
  • The share of informal sector in Central Europe is
    estimated at 15-20 of the total number of
    employed. Percentage levels of this share in the
    Baltic Region, Bulgaria, Romania, and Croatia
    vary in between 20 and 35. However, in two
    territorially distant regions, flourishing of
    informal economic activity is observed. For
    instance, in the states of ex-Yugoslavia, this
    percentage range is 40-50, and in the Asian
    teritiries of the ex-USSR, this is a range of 50
    to 80 of all employed.

9
IE in 21 OECD countries
10
(No Transcript)
11
Factors for the IE growth
  • -Global /including financial and economic
    crisis/
  • - Intraregional /common past, present links/
  • - National /traditions, regulations/
  • -Neo liberal reforms deregulation paradigm/

12
Third part
  • DEFINITIONS

13
General definitions
  • Mixed criteria-many definitions
  • IE is a market-based production of goods and
    services, whether legal or illegal, that escapes
    detection in the official estimates of GDP.
  • Or to put it in another way, one of the broadest
    definitions of IE includes
  • those economic activities and the income
    derived from them that circumvent or otherwise
    avoid government regulation, taxation or
    observation.

14
Concrete definition
  • I
  • The Informal Economy includes all market-based
    legal production of goods and services that are
    deliberately concealed from governments for the
    following reasons
  • 1. to avoid payment of income, value added or
    other taxes,
  • 2. to avoid payment of social security
    contributions,
  • 3. to avoid having to meet certain legal labour
    market standards, such as minimum wages,
  • maximum working hours, safety standards, etc.,
  • 4. to avoid complying with certain
    administrative procedures, such as completing
    statistical questionnaires or other
    administrative forms.
  • -------------
  • Source
  • The Shadow Economy in Germany A Blessing or a
  • Curse for the Official Economy?
  • Friedrich Schneider
  • ECONOMIC ANALYSIS POLICY, VOL. 38 NO. 1, MARCH
    2008

15
PERC project typology
  • In general, there are two types of underground
    economic activities illicit employment and the
    production of goods and services consumed within
    the household. PERC methodology focuses on the
    former type and excludes illegal activities such
    as drug production, crime and human trafficking.
  • The latter type includes the production of goods
    and services, consumed within the household or
    childcare and is not part of this analysis
    either.
  • Thus, PERC analysis only focuses on economic
    activities that would normally be included in
    national accounts but which due to tax or
    regulatory burden remain underground.

16
Forth part
  • WHY I E GROWS?

17
Main Causes of IE growth-1
  • 1. Tax and Social Security Contribution Burdens
  • Since taxes affect labour-leisure choices, and
    also stimulate labour supply in the shadow
    economy, the distortion of the overall tax burden
    is a major concern for economists. The bigger the
    difference between the total cost of labour in
    the official economy and the after-tax earnings
    (from work), the greater is the incentive to
    avoid this difference and to work in the shadow
    economy
  • 2. Intensity of Regulations
  • Increased intensity of regulations is another
    important factor which reduces the freedom (of
    choice) for individuals engaged in the official
    economy / labour market regulations, trade
    barriers, and labour restrictions for
    foreigners./

18
Main causes of IE growth-2
  • 3. Public Sector Services
  • An increase of the shadow economy can lead to
    reduced state revenues which in turn reduce the
    quality and quantity of publicly provided goods
    and services.
  • Ultimately, this can lead to an increase in the
    tax rates for firms and individuals in the
    official sector, quite often combined with a
    deterioration in the quality of the public goods
    (such as the public infrastructure) and of the
    administration, with the consequence of even
    stronger incentives to participate in the shadow
    economy.
  • Important note Countries with more general
    regulation of their economies tend to have a
    higher share of the unofficial economy in total
    GDP, is found in their empirical analysis.

19
Some Intermediate Conclusions
  • 1.Smaller shadow economies appear in countries
    with higher tax revenues if achieved by lower tax
    rates, fewer laws and regulations and less
    bribery facing enterprises. Countries with a
    better rule of law, which is financed by tax
    revenues, also have smaller shadow economies.
  • 2. Transition countries have higher levels of
    regulation leading to a significantly higher
    incidence of bribery, higher effective taxes on
    official activities and a large discretionary
    framework of regulations and consequently a
    higher shadow economy.

20
Intermediate Conclusions-2
  • The overall conclusion is that wealthier
    countries of the OECD, as well as some in Eastern
    Europe, find themselves in the good equilibrium
    of relatively low tax and regulatory burden,
    sizeable revenue mobilization, good rule of law
    and corruption control, and a relatively small
    unofficial economy.
  • By contrast, a number of countries in Latin
    America and the former Soviet Union exhibit
    characteristics consistent with a bad
    equilibrium tax and regulatory discretion and
    burden on the firm are high, the rule of law is
    weak, and there is a high incidence of bribery
    and a relatively high share of activities in the
    unofficial economy.

21
Fifth part
  • IE in the CEE/SEE regions

22
Informal Economy Stages
23
What is behind this trajectory?/Some arguments
from PERC analysis/
  • Informal employment appeared simultaneously with
    the political changes in the 80s, which period of
    time is known as the perestroika. During the
    totalitarian period of time, each informal
    activity (excluding home-centered activities),
    was considered, as a rule, to be illegal and was
    penalized by official authorities. Another
    exception to this generalization are the small
    segments of agricultural activities in the field
    of land cultivation, mutual service exchanges
    among house-holds, where there is relatively no
    direct state intervention in labor market
    relations of private/family nature (Poland,
    Hungary, Bulgaria, and others).
  • Since 1989 a period of forced and chaotic
    informalization came, due to the neoliberal
    economic reforms, imposed in the 90s within the
    whole vast region of the Central and Eastern
    European Countries. The boom of unregulated
    employment is a result of the specific and
    compressed in time processes of privatization and
    economic restructuring of the big state-owned and
    state-managed companies in a large scale. These
    processes were coupled with mass liberalization
    of labor force without applying adequate measures
    for support of the emerging labor markets. Some
    of these measures, which were never applied as
    economic tools are requalification of
    individuals, labor market brokerage, labor market
    funneling of the labor force, stimulation of
    self-employment and other tools.
  • The next, third wave, which occurred during the
    first decade of the 21st century, is a period of
    time, when most of the national economies of the
    Eastern and South-East Europe were modified into
    a test-field to apply the principles and policies
    of the Washington Consensus and its relevant
    tools for imposing shock therapies.
  •  

24
How it happened in the CEE / PERC Project/
  • Countries from the first round/circle, included
    in the ITUC/PERC project /SEEformer Yugoslavia/
    and in the second circle /NIS-ex-USSR/ conducted
    two interlinked changes
  • -Transformation One it was typical for the
    ex-Soviet area and transition from state-planned
    to market-driven economy was completed
  • -Transformation Two represents transition
    from one-party governance to political and trade
    unionist pluralism
  • National Mapping Reports show that both
    transformations were conducted in parallel, and
    there were times, where they were discontinued
    every now and then by economic cycle crises or
    corrections in the models for reforms /Ukraine,
    Serbia, Georgia/ by political crisis and more
    specifically, by local destabilization /including
    ethnic-based conflicts/ and by external
    inter-state tensions and collision /typical to
    all countries, included in the project/.

25
Chronology of the events
  • Emerging of IE is related to increasing
    insecurity and freedoms of movement of people and
    work force.. Transition from regulated
    employment, mainly from occupations in
    state-owned companies to occupations in the
    emerging informal private businesses is a result
    of the spontaneously derived strategy for
    survival in crisis situations.
  • The other impulse for spontaneous informalization
    is due to the prevailed economic chaos, which
    occurred after the elimination of the
    party-state, top-to-bottom control mechanisms
    /that is, elimination of the command-administrativ
    e system/. The embargo regiments, applied in the
    region of the Western Balkans are the other
    generator of unregulated trade, illegal migration
    and proliferation of trans-border informal
    economic networks.
  • In terms of chronological order, ethnic and
    religious conflicts (including armed conflicts in
    the Western Balkans and the Caucasus) were first,
    then transition times came (time of economic
    reforms, imposed by the IFIs and applied by the
    respective national governments, who followed the
    neoliberal doctrine for building free and
    perfect markets).
  • The second period lasted until the economic
    crisis of 2007-2010. However, the EMEs do have
    neither automatic stabilizers, nor buffers, nor
    networks to protect the affected by the crisis
    professional groups and businesses.

26
The Informal Economy Boom
  • All countries without exceptions, in both
    sub-regions, are turning from industrial-agricultu
    ral or mainly agricultural states into economic
    areas with domination of services, retailing and
    dispersed micro-production factories, based on
    sub-contractual relations.
  • This is demonstrated by the branch distribution
    of informal activities in all nine countries,
    subject to the ITUC/PERC project

27
Positive Effects
  • - finding jobs (which diminishes unemployment
    rates) the process of accruing additional
    incomes for individuals (which diminished
    poverty
  • - evolving the way services are provided to the
    market (which was limited by the party-state
    system )
  • - producing demanded goods mainly in the
    processing industry, information industries
    (internet, and mobile technologies, which allow
    individuals to work from their homes, or from a
    distance the e-economy, in general)
  • - greater use of labor potential of households
    and so on

28
Negative effects
  • To the negative effects all national analysts
    relate
  • - at first place, direct and indirect practices
    to circumvent labor and social standards and
    acts.
  • -diminishing tax incomes and social security
    proceedings into national treasury turns into
    financial burden for the state and social burden
    for the individuals.
  • More examples of negative effects may be given
    here, such as non-loyal business competition
    /social dumping/, woman and child labor
    exploitation, criminalization of businesses
    /where shadow and black segments are organically
    inter-mingled/, administrative corruption, and
    others.

29
Sixed part
  • FORMALISATION
  • OR
  • IDENTIFICATION?

30
Evolution of concepts and polices
  • Transformation by economic sectors takes
    comparatively long time /half a century, at
    least/ during this period of time economic
    theories and political views evolve, in terms of
    their relation to informal activities.
  • Although official data for developing countries
    show that even today the share of unregulated
    labor is comparatively low , the phenomenon
    informal economy becomes a focal point for the
    strategic analysts and decision-makers.
  • Processes of the last decade changed
    significantly EUs official position and attitude
    towards the process of informalization of the
    economy. The very accent of the EU policy altered
    the banning norms /restrictive / into curative
    regulations and gradual legalization of some
    segments of the informal employment.
  •  

31
Three Competing Views of the Informal Economy and
Economic Development
  • By definition, informal businesses are hidden
    from the eyes of the state and so most of what we
    have relies on estimations and very micro-level
    studies.An cross-country report that appeared
    in the Brookings Papers on August 2008 aims to
    improve the understanding of the relationship
    between economic development and the informal
    economy.

32
The romantic view
  • According to this view informal firms are
    actually or potentially extremely productive, but
    held back by government taxes and regulations as
    well as by the lack of safe property rights and
    access to finance.
  • If such barriers were lowered, informal
    businesses would register and take advantage of
    the benefits of their formal status. Thus, this
    view assumes that unofficial firms are
    fundamentally similar to official ones.

33
The parasite view
  • The parasite view states that informal firms
    need to stay small to avoid detection.
  • The decision to remain in the informal economy
    is a rational one, because the cost advantage of
    avoiding taxes and regulations allows unofficial
    firms to undercut official firms in prices.
  • Informal firms are thus hurting growth because
    their small scale makes them unproductive and
    because they take away market share from more
    productive, formal competitors. Government policy
    should aim to eradicate informal firms by
    reducing tax evasion and increasing government
    regulation enforcement.

34
The dual view
  • Informal and formal firms are operating in
    different markets and have different customers so
    they do not compete against each other.
  • Since informal firms provide livelihoods to
    millions of people, government policies should
    not raise the costs of doing business for them.
  • Instead, the role of government policies should
    be to promote the creation of official firms and
    let the informal ones die as the economy
    develops.

35
Additional arguments for the new identity
  • Since there is such a productivity gap between
    formal and informal firms and considering that
    there is no evidence that informal firms become
    formal as they grow, stimulation of formal firms
    is necessary for economic growth.
  • The evidence points out that a best move would
    be to support the creation of formal firms run by
    educated managers and utilizing modern practices
    to stimulate economic development.

36
IE-Crisis
  • Figures published by the Organization for
    Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) show
    that the world has more people working informally
    than formally.
  • Campaigners emphasize that informal workers are
    not necessarily illegal workers. The OECD says
    that a record 1.8 billion workers are employed in
    underground activities, compared with 1.2 billion
    in the formal sector.
  • During a recession, dismissed workers frequently
    have to move to the first available job, even if
    it is of a lower quality than the one they have
    lost. It says that this will have a profoundly
    negative effect on the United Nations Millennium
    Development Goal to halve the number of people
    who live on less than 1 (69p) a day.

37
IE-Migration
  • Between 4 million and 8 million people reside
    illegally in Europe. Ilegal migration is a top
    priority in European politics for the past few
    years.
  • Illegal migrants come mainly to the Mediterranean
    countries from Africa, Eastern Europe, and the
    Middle East. Most of them also choose to stay
    permanently. Low fertility rates and aging
    populations coupled with a higher level of
    education have led to labor shortages in
    low-paying sectors.
  • Italian sociologist Emilio Reyneri's the IE in
    Southern Europe has a pull-effect on migration.
    The IE has deep social and historical roots and
    has not been caused by immigration. The
    opportunities for informal work, strengthened by
    the fact that there are labor shortages in
    sectors where natives no longer want to work, has
    made these countries attractive for migrants.

38
The end
  • Thanks for the attention!
  • Any questions?

39
  • ??? 14 ? ?????? ????????? ? ????????, ??????
    ????????????? ?? ????? ????
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • ?????? ????????? ? ???????????? ?????? ?? ?
    ????????? ?? ??????? ?? ????? ?? ?????????,
    ???????? Financial Times, ??????? ?? Economynews.
    ??????????? ??????? ?? ???????? ?? ?????????? ??
    "????? ????".
  •  
  •  
  • ?????????? ?? ??????? ?? ???????, ?? ???????????
    ? ???????? ?????????? ?????????, ? ????? ????
    ????????????? ????????, ?????????? ?????????
    ????? ?? ????????? ?? ?????? ?? ?????????
    ??-????? ???????? ? ????????? ? ???????? ??
    ??????????.
  •  
  •  
  • ????????????? ?????????, ?? ???? ????? ????
    ???????? ?? ????????, ? ????? ???? ??? ?????????
    ? ????? ??????????????. ???? ?????? ??????????
    ???????? ??????, ????? ?????????, ?????????? ??
    ??????????? ?????, ?? ??? ? 1 ? ????????? ? 4-??
    ???????? ???? ? ???????? ? ??.
  •  
  •  
  • ?????? ???? ???????, ??????? ? ????????, ????? ??
    ?????? ?? ??????? ???????? ?? ?????? ?????
    ???????? ???? ?? ??????? ??????????? ??????? ??
    ???????.
  •  
  •  
  • ?????? ??, ?? ???-????? ?? ?????????? ??
    ?????????????? ????? ????, ????? ?? ?? ? ????
    ???? ?? ???????????, ? ?????? ??????????.
    ????????????? ?????????, ?? ??????????? ?? ??????
    ????????? ? ??????????? ????? 14,3318 ??
    ????????. ? ?????? ????? ???????? ? ????
    ????????? ???? ???????????? ?? ???? ?? ???-
    ????????? ???????? ?? ????? ?? ???????.
  •  
  •  

40
Re-conceptualization of IE
  • ??????????? ?????? ????? ????????? ? ???????????
    ??????
  • ?? ??????????? ????? ??? ??? ???????????
    /???????????????? ???? ???????? ?????/
  • ?????????? ?? ???????? ?? ???? ?????????
    ???????????? ?/ ? ?????? ?? ???????? /??????? ?
    ?????/ ?/ ? ?????? ?? ?????
  • ????? ?? ??????????? ?? ?? ???? ?? ????????????
    ? ???????????? ????????? ? ??????? ?????

41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com