Recent Trends at the Patent Office: Strategies for Improving Your Outcome - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Recent Trends at the Patent Office: Strategies for Improving Your Outcome

Description:

Title: Success at the Patent Office: Strategies to Consider Before Filing a Patent Application Author: Janie D Osterhaus – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:72
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: JanieDOs
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Recent Trends at the Patent Office: Strategies for Improving Your Outcome


1
Recent Trends at the Patent OfficeStrategies
for Improving Your Outcome
Edwin V. Merkel Carissa R. Childs Ph.D.
  • LeClairRyan
  • 290 Linden Oaks, Suite 310
  • Rochester, NY 14625 US
  • 585.270.2100
  • W W W . L E C L A I R R Y A N . C O M

2
Overview
  • Purpose of obtaining a patent
  • Anatomy of a patent application
  • Requirements of patentability
  • What to expect during patent prosecution and
    strategies for successfully obtaining
    a patent

3
Purpose of Obtaining a Patent
  • Patent system designed to incentivize innovation
  • Patent grants rights to inventor exclude, but
    not use
  • Bayh-Dole encourages technology commercialization
    of government funded inventions
  • Provide a means to commercialize inventions, i.e.
    bridge the transition from bench-to-bedside
  • Why is this relevant?
  • Not all good science is patentable
  • The value of a patent depends on its commercial
    utility

4
Anatomy of a Patent Application
  • U.S. patents are obtained by filing a written
    application which includes the following
    components
  • Specification 
  • Background of the invention
  • Summary of the invention
  • Detailed description of invention
  • Claims
  • Drawings, if any

5
Patentable Subject Matter
  • A process or method
  • e.g. Method of treating or diagnosing cancer

6
Patentable Subject Matter
7
Patentable Subject Matter
  • A process or method
  • e.g. method of treating or diagnosing cancer
  • A machine
  • e.g. devices, gadgets
  • An article of manufacture
  • e.g. gene array, antibodies, genetically altered
    cell line

8
Patentable Subject Matter
9
Patentable Subject Matter
  • A process or method
  • e.g. method of treating or diagnosing cancer
  • A machine
  • e.g. devices, gadgets
  • An article of manufacture
  • e.g. gene array, antibodies, genetically altered
    cell line
  • Composition of matter
  • e.g. pharmaceutical composition, chemical
    compound

10
Requirements for Patentability
  • Utility specific substantial utility must be
    credible
  • Novel no public knowledge or use that predates
    your date of invention
  • Non-Obvious the invention as a whole cannot be
    obvious to one of skill in the art at the time it
    was made
  • Complete description of the invention
  • Enables one of skill in the art to make and use
    the invention
  • Written Description that shows the applicant is
    in possession of the full scope of the claimed
    subject matter
  • Best Mode for carrying out the invention

11
Requirements of Patentability
  • Claims
  • Define the scope of the invention
  • Broadly cover all commercial embodiments
  • Focus of examination for patentability
  • Example
  • Your invention discover protein X is
    overexpressed in cancer cells and inhibition of X
    inhibits cell proliferation survival
  • Method of treating a patient having cancer
    comprising
  • Method of diagnosing cancer
  • Pharmaceutical composition for treating cancer
    comprising.

12
The Patent Process
  • Filing  the application is submitted to the U.S.
    Patent and Trademark Office (PTO), along with a
    fee and an oath executed by the inventor stating
    certain required facts

13
The Patent Process (cont.)
  • Examination
  • The application is reviewed by a patent examiner
  • The examiner searches prior art patents and
    publications and decides either to allow claims
    or to reject them
  • Written rejections are mailed out to the
    applicant
  • Responses are filed by applicant

14
The Patent Process (cont.)
  • Issuance of a patent
  • An allowed application issues as a patent once an
    issue fee is paid
  • Maintenance fees must be paid during the fourth,
    eighth, and twelfth years of the patent term

15
Strategies for Success
Prevent Public Disclosure
  • Public disclosure of invention prior to filing
    patent application jeopardizes patent rights
  • Most foreign countries absolute novelty
  • U.S. one year grace period
  • Abstracts and manuscripts
  • Be aware of early online publications
  • Be conscientious of future-aim statements when
    discussing the implications of research findings
  • TIP Contact Tech Transfer Office before you
    publish, preferably before you submit a
    manuscript for publication

16
Strategies for SuccessDisclose Invention to OTT
Early
  • Invention disclosure should contain
  • Complete description of the invention including
    various embodiments
  • Experimental data and figures
  • Expected dates of public disclosure
  • Late disclosure ? last minute filing ?may impact
    rights
  • Lose benefit of filing date - provisional
    application may fail to support claimed
    invention, prior art references published during
    the pendency of provisional application can be
    prior art

17
Example 1 Intervening Art
  • Timeline
  • Rush provisional filed in U.S. with minimal
    disclosure (covering use of ?-aminobutyric acid
    (GABA) analogs in treating hot flashes two
    compounds disclosed)
  • Publication occurs after provisional filing date
  • One year later, file formal applications in U.S.
    and PCT
  • Intervening publication not problematic in U.S.
  • One year grace period in U.S.
  • Method of treating hot flashes in a patient by
    administering a compound which binds an a2d
    subunit of a voltage-gated calcium channel
    (VGCC).

18
Example 1 Intervening Art (cont.)
  • Intervening publication problematic in Europe
  • Intervening publication was cited against all
    claims that were not supported in the provisional
    (or immediately derivable therefrom)
  • Use of a compound that is structurally related to
    GABA in the manufacture of a medicament for
    treating hot flashes.

19
Strategies for Success
Review, Disclose, and Distinguish
Prior Art
  • Perform a search of patent literature
  • USPTO - http//patft.uspto.gov/
  • WIPO - http//www.wipo.int/ipdl/en
  • Novelty and non-obviousness
  • Allows for drafting claims of appropriate scope
  • Ensures that distinguishing characteristics are
    emphasized
  • Identify problems or deficiencies in prior art
  • Duty to disclose references materially relevant
    to the patentability of invention
  • TIP Disclose to OTT all references that are even
    closely related to invention

20
Strategies for Success
Overcoming Inherent Anticipation
Rejection
  • Inherent anticipation is often seen in context of
    pursuing method of treatment claims for a known
    class of compounds
  • Requires that the prior disclosure necessarily
    would have involved practicing the claimed
    subject matter
  • Ways to overcome
  • Define patient population
  • Define mode, timing, or frequency of
    administration

21
Example 2 Inherent Anticipation
  • Claims directed to a method of treating or
    preventing atherosclerosis using Growth Hormone
    Releasing Peptides (GHRPs)
  • Prior Art taught single administration of
    hexarelin (a GHRP) during by-pass surgery
  • PTO asserted same class of patients, same class
    of drug, would inherently have treated
    atherosclerosis
  • Overcame by specifying frequency of use (daily)
    in one set of claims and extent of use (for six
    or more weeks) in another set of claims

22
Strategies for SuccessOvercoming an Obviousness
Rejection
  • An invention is not patentable even if it is not
    identically disclosed or described in a prior art
    reference, if the differences between the
    invention to be patented and the prior art are
    such that the invention as a whole would have
    been obvious at the time the invention was made
    to a person having ordinary skill in the art
  • Assessed based on number of factors

23
Strategies for SuccessOvercoming an Obviousness
Rejection (cont.)
  • Scope and content of the prior art
  • Level of ordinary skill in the art
  • Differences between the claimed invention and the
    prior art
  • Objective evidence of non-obviousness
  • commercial success
  • long-felt but unsolved needs and
  • failure of others
  • Explain in application itself why the invention
    would not have been obvious (unexpected results
    failure of others, if aware)

24
PTO GuidelinesRationale for Finding of
Obviousness
  • There is a teaching, suggestion, or motivation to
    combine prior art elements
  • Combining prior art elements to yield predictable
    results
  • Simple substitution of one known element for
    another to obtain predictable results
  • Use of a known technique to improve similar
    devices, methods, products in the same way

25
PTO GuidelinesRationale for Finding of
Obviousness
  • Obvious to try choosing from a finite number of
    identified, predictable solutions, with a
    reasonable expectation of success
  • Known work in one field of endeavor may prompt
    variation of it for use in either the same field
    or a different one based on design incentives or
    other market forces

26
Example 3 - Obviousness
  • Claims directed to method of analyzing blood/bone
    marrow using flow cytometry and three reagents to
    identify subpopulation
  • Obvious in view of the combination of
  • First reference, same purpose as claimed method,
    but only using two reagents
  • Second reference, taught use of third reagent to
    identify specific population of cells
  • PTO asserted combining prior art elements to
    yield predictable results

27
Example 3 Obviousness (cont.)
  • Rebuttal
  • References provided no reason to modify method of
    1st reference, there was no recognized problem to
    be solved
  • Persons of skill would have expected that there
    would have been no problem in absence of third
    reagent
  • Incorporating the third reagent provided
    unexpected improvements over the prior method
  • Presented evidence of commercial success

28
Strategies for Success Providing a Sufficient
Written Description
  • What constitutes a complete written description
  • Patent law requires that the specification shall
    contain a written description of the invention,
    and of the manner and process of making and using
    it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact
    terms, as to enable any person skilled in the art
    to which it pertains . . . to make and use the
    same . . .
  • How is the adequacy of written description
    determined?

29
Strategies for Success Providing a Sufficient
Written Description
  • Determine scope of the claimed invention
  • Determine whether claim scope is supported by
    application
  • Detailed description of the invention
  • Sets forth all possible embodiments of claimed
    invention
  • Different classes of agents to be used
    (therapeutic/diagnostic)
  • Different uses (indications/diagnostics)
  • Examples
  • Experimental data supporting claimed invention
  • Biological deposits (ATCC) for cell lines,
    hybridomas

30
Example 4 Written Description
  • Claims directed to method of enhancing plant
    growth using class of plant pathogen proteins
    that cause a particular plant response
    (designated as hypersensitive response elicitor
    proteins).
  • Specification identified four specific proteins
    and indicated that others were known to exist
    (they just had not been isolated and sequenced).
  • PTO asserted that the four specific proteins and
    demonstrated results with only two of them did
    not show that applicants were in possession of
    the full scope of claimed subject matter.

31
Example 4 Written Description (cont.)
  • Overcame rejection by presenting evidence that
    persons of skill in the art appreciated that the
    protein elicitors were recognized in the
    artbefore the filing dateas having structural
    diversity at the amino acid level, but sharing
    conserved structural features and properties
  • Isolated from bacterial plant pathogen
  • Contain structural domains that share some
    homology even though overall homology may be low
  • High glycine content, low (or no) cysteine
    content
  • Heat stable
  • Induces same plant response

32
The Enablement Requirement
  • Purpose allow one of skill in the art to make
    and use the invention
  • Test of Enablement whether undue
    experimentation is required for one of skill in
    the art to make use the invention
  • Biotechnology patents particularly prone to
    enablement rejections because of the gap between
    experimental data and claimed invention

33
Example 5 - Enablement
  • Claims directed to a method of treating a
    condition mediated by a deficiency or loss of
    myelin involving the administration of
    oligonucleotide progenitor cells
  • Specification showed myelination of dysmyelinated
    axons in the hypomyelinated shiverer mouse model
    upon intraventricular administration of
    progenitor cells
  • PTO asserted that remyelination alone was not
    indicative of therapeutic benefit

34
Example 5 Enablement (cont.)
  • To overcome the rejection submitted evidence
    showing that progenitor cell transplantation into
    the hypomyelinated shiverer mice achieved not
    only whole neuroaxis myelination, but also
    prolonged the survival of the mice and resolved
    their neurological deficits
  • Strategy
  • To the extent possible
  • Validate initial in vitro findings in vivo
  • Consider using different classes of therapeutic
    agents (RNAi, small molecules, antibodies, etc.)
    when designing experiments
  • Submission of post-filing evidence
  • Inventors own work or work by others

35
Strategies for Success Participate in Patent
Application Preparation
  • Read drafts of application for accuracy and
    thoroughness
  • New material cannot be added to specification
    After formal filing
  • Do not hesitate to provide comments
  • Ask questions

36
Strategies for Success Summary
  • When designing experiments, keep in mind the need
    to support the breadth of the invention
  • Preferably obtain some in vivo data during your
    initial experimental work
  • Consider using different classes of reagents in
    parallel
  • Keep good records we may need them
  • Contact OTT before you disclose and keep them
    updated
  • Conduct your own literature and patent searches
  • Be involved in the claim and application drafting
    processes

37
Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com