Title: Recent Trends at the Patent Office: Strategies for Improving Your Outcome
1Recent Trends at the Patent OfficeStrategies
for Improving Your Outcome
Edwin V. Merkel Carissa R. Childs Ph.D.
- LeClairRyan
- 290 Linden Oaks, Suite 310
- Rochester, NY 14625 US
- 585.270.2100
- W W W . L E C L A I R R Y A N . C O M
2Overview
- Purpose of obtaining a patent
- Anatomy of a patent application
- Requirements of patentability
- What to expect during patent prosecution and
strategies for successfully obtaining
a patent
3Purpose of Obtaining a Patent
- Patent system designed to incentivize innovation
- Patent grants rights to inventor exclude, but
not use - Bayh-Dole encourages technology commercialization
of government funded inventions - Provide a means to commercialize inventions, i.e.
bridge the transition from bench-to-bedside - Why is this relevant?
- Not all good science is patentable
- The value of a patent depends on its commercial
utility
4Anatomy of a Patent Application
- U.S. patents are obtained by filing a written
application which includes the following
components - Specification
- Background of the invention
- Summary of the invention
- Detailed description of invention
- Claims
- Drawings, if any
5Patentable Subject Matter
- A process or method
- e.g. Method of treating or diagnosing cancer
6Patentable Subject Matter
7Patentable Subject Matter
- A process or method
- e.g. method of treating or diagnosing cancer
- A machine
- e.g. devices, gadgets
- An article of manufacture
- e.g. gene array, antibodies, genetically altered
cell line
8Patentable Subject Matter
9Patentable Subject Matter
- A process or method
- e.g. method of treating or diagnosing cancer
- A machine
- e.g. devices, gadgets
- An article of manufacture
- e.g. gene array, antibodies, genetically altered
cell line - Composition of matter
- e.g. pharmaceutical composition, chemical
compound
10Requirements for Patentability
- Utility specific substantial utility must be
credible - Novel no public knowledge or use that predates
your date of invention - Non-Obvious the invention as a whole cannot be
obvious to one of skill in the art at the time it
was made - Complete description of the invention
- Enables one of skill in the art to make and use
the invention - Written Description that shows the applicant is
in possession of the full scope of the claimed
subject matter - Best Mode for carrying out the invention
11Requirements of Patentability
- Claims
- Define the scope of the invention
- Broadly cover all commercial embodiments
- Focus of examination for patentability
- Example
- Your invention discover protein X is
overexpressed in cancer cells and inhibition of X
inhibits cell proliferation survival - Method of treating a patient having cancer
comprising - Method of diagnosing cancer
- Pharmaceutical composition for treating cancer
comprising.
12The Patent Process
- Filing the application is submitted to the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office (PTO), along with a
fee and an oath executed by the inventor stating
certain required facts
13The Patent Process (cont.)
- Examination
- The application is reviewed by a patent examiner
- The examiner searches prior art patents and
publications and decides either to allow claims
or to reject them - Written rejections are mailed out to the
applicant - Responses are filed by applicant
14The Patent Process (cont.)
- Issuance of a patent
- An allowed application issues as a patent once an
issue fee is paid - Maintenance fees must be paid during the fourth,
eighth, and twelfth years of the patent term
15Strategies for Success
Prevent Public Disclosure
- Public disclosure of invention prior to filing
patent application jeopardizes patent rights - Most foreign countries absolute novelty
- U.S. one year grace period
- Abstracts and manuscripts
- Be aware of early online publications
- Be conscientious of future-aim statements when
discussing the implications of research findings - TIP Contact Tech Transfer Office before you
publish, preferably before you submit a
manuscript for publication
16Strategies for SuccessDisclose Invention to OTT
Early
- Invention disclosure should contain
- Complete description of the invention including
various embodiments - Experimental data and figures
- Expected dates of public disclosure
- Late disclosure ? last minute filing ?may impact
rights - Lose benefit of filing date - provisional
application may fail to support claimed
invention, prior art references published during
the pendency of provisional application can be
prior art
17Example 1 Intervening Art
- Timeline
- Rush provisional filed in U.S. with minimal
disclosure (covering use of ?-aminobutyric acid
(GABA) analogs in treating hot flashes two
compounds disclosed) - Publication occurs after provisional filing date
- One year later, file formal applications in U.S.
and PCT - Intervening publication not problematic in U.S.
- One year grace period in U.S.
- Method of treating hot flashes in a patient by
administering a compound which binds an a2d
subunit of a voltage-gated calcium channel
(VGCC).
18Example 1 Intervening Art (cont.)
- Intervening publication problematic in Europe
- Intervening publication was cited against all
claims that were not supported in the provisional
(or immediately derivable therefrom) - Use of a compound that is structurally related to
GABA in the manufacture of a medicament for
treating hot flashes.
19Strategies for Success
Review, Disclose, and Distinguish
Prior Art
- Perform a search of patent literature
- USPTO - http//patft.uspto.gov/
- WIPO - http//www.wipo.int/ipdl/en
- Novelty and non-obviousness
- Allows for drafting claims of appropriate scope
- Ensures that distinguishing characteristics are
emphasized - Identify problems or deficiencies in prior art
- Duty to disclose references materially relevant
to the patentability of invention - TIP Disclose to OTT all references that are even
closely related to invention
20Strategies for Success
Overcoming Inherent Anticipation
Rejection
- Inherent anticipation is often seen in context of
pursuing method of treatment claims for a known
class of compounds - Requires that the prior disclosure necessarily
would have involved practicing the claimed
subject matter - Ways to overcome
- Define patient population
- Define mode, timing, or frequency of
administration
21Example 2 Inherent Anticipation
- Claims directed to a method of treating or
preventing atherosclerosis using Growth Hormone
Releasing Peptides (GHRPs) - Prior Art taught single administration of
hexarelin (a GHRP) during by-pass surgery - PTO asserted same class of patients, same class
of drug, would inherently have treated
atherosclerosis - Overcame by specifying frequency of use (daily)
in one set of claims and extent of use (for six
or more weeks) in another set of claims
22Strategies for SuccessOvercoming an Obviousness
Rejection
- An invention is not patentable even if it is not
identically disclosed or described in a prior art
reference, if the differences between the
invention to be patented and the prior art are
such that the invention as a whole would have
been obvious at the time the invention was made
to a person having ordinary skill in the art - Assessed based on number of factors
23Strategies for SuccessOvercoming an Obviousness
Rejection (cont.)
- Scope and content of the prior art
- Level of ordinary skill in the art
- Differences between the claimed invention and the
prior art - Objective evidence of non-obviousness
- commercial success
- long-felt but unsolved needs and
- failure of others
- Explain in application itself why the invention
would not have been obvious (unexpected results
failure of others, if aware)
24PTO GuidelinesRationale for Finding of
Obviousness
- There is a teaching, suggestion, or motivation to
combine prior art elements - Combining prior art elements to yield predictable
results - Simple substitution of one known element for
another to obtain predictable results - Use of a known technique to improve similar
devices, methods, products in the same way
25PTO GuidelinesRationale for Finding of
Obviousness
- Obvious to try choosing from a finite number of
identified, predictable solutions, with a
reasonable expectation of success - Known work in one field of endeavor may prompt
variation of it for use in either the same field
or a different one based on design incentives or
other market forces
26Example 3 - Obviousness
- Claims directed to method of analyzing blood/bone
marrow using flow cytometry and three reagents to
identify subpopulation - Obvious in view of the combination of
- First reference, same purpose as claimed method,
but only using two reagents - Second reference, taught use of third reagent to
identify specific population of cells - PTO asserted combining prior art elements to
yield predictable results
27Example 3 Obviousness (cont.)
- Rebuttal
- References provided no reason to modify method of
1st reference, there was no recognized problem to
be solved - Persons of skill would have expected that there
would have been no problem in absence of third
reagent - Incorporating the third reagent provided
unexpected improvements over the prior method - Presented evidence of commercial success
28Strategies for Success Providing a Sufficient
Written Description
- What constitutes a complete written description
- Patent law requires that the specification shall
contain a written description of the invention,
and of the manner and process of making and using
it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact
terms, as to enable any person skilled in the art
to which it pertains . . . to make and use the
same . . . - How is the adequacy of written description
determined?
29Strategies for Success Providing a Sufficient
Written Description
- Determine scope of the claimed invention
- Determine whether claim scope is supported by
application - Detailed description of the invention
- Sets forth all possible embodiments of claimed
invention - Different classes of agents to be used
(therapeutic/diagnostic) - Different uses (indications/diagnostics)
- Examples
- Experimental data supporting claimed invention
- Biological deposits (ATCC) for cell lines,
hybridomas
30Example 4 Written Description
- Claims directed to method of enhancing plant
growth using class of plant pathogen proteins
that cause a particular plant response
(designated as hypersensitive response elicitor
proteins). - Specification identified four specific proteins
and indicated that others were known to exist
(they just had not been isolated and sequenced). - PTO asserted that the four specific proteins and
demonstrated results with only two of them did
not show that applicants were in possession of
the full scope of claimed subject matter.
31Example 4 Written Description (cont.)
- Overcame rejection by presenting evidence that
persons of skill in the art appreciated that the
protein elicitors were recognized in the
artbefore the filing dateas having structural
diversity at the amino acid level, but sharing
conserved structural features and properties - Isolated from bacterial plant pathogen
- Contain structural domains that share some
homology even though overall homology may be low - High glycine content, low (or no) cysteine
content - Heat stable
- Induces same plant response
32The Enablement Requirement
- Purpose allow one of skill in the art to make
and use the invention - Test of Enablement whether undue
experimentation is required for one of skill in
the art to make use the invention - Biotechnology patents particularly prone to
enablement rejections because of the gap between
experimental data and claimed invention
33Example 5 - Enablement
- Claims directed to a method of treating a
condition mediated by a deficiency or loss of
myelin involving the administration of
oligonucleotide progenitor cells - Specification showed myelination of dysmyelinated
axons in the hypomyelinated shiverer mouse model
upon intraventricular administration of
progenitor cells - PTO asserted that remyelination alone was not
indicative of therapeutic benefit
34Example 5 Enablement (cont.)
- To overcome the rejection submitted evidence
showing that progenitor cell transplantation into
the hypomyelinated shiverer mice achieved not
only whole neuroaxis myelination, but also
prolonged the survival of the mice and resolved
their neurological deficits - Strategy
- To the extent possible
- Validate initial in vitro findings in vivo
- Consider using different classes of therapeutic
agents (RNAi, small molecules, antibodies, etc.)
when designing experiments - Submission of post-filing evidence
- Inventors own work or work by others
35Strategies for Success Participate in Patent
Application Preparation
- Read drafts of application for accuracy and
thoroughness - New material cannot be added to specification
After formal filing - Do not hesitate to provide comments
- Ask questions
36Strategies for Success Summary
- When designing experiments, keep in mind the need
to support the breadth of the invention - Preferably obtain some in vivo data during your
initial experimental work - Consider using different classes of reagents in
parallel - Keep good records we may need them
- Contact OTT before you disclose and keep them
updated - Conduct your own literature and patent searches
- Be involved in the claim and application drafting
processes
37Thank You