Title: Institutional stream in modern economics: NeoIE versus NewIE
1Institutional stream in modern economics NeoIE
versus NewIE
2NeoIE versus NewIE origins and main
methodological and cognitive differences
- 1. New Institutional Economics (NeoIE)
- Generally, alike the classical institutionalism
(T. Veblen, J. R. Commons, W.C. Mitchell, J. M.
Clark) rejection of basic methodological
assumptions of NCE, and methodological
indiwidualism in particular - Critique of the definition of economics as a
science within the mainstreram economics, and, in
particular ofv broadly understood neoclassical or
neo-neoclassical economics - In general approach, NeoIE,, alike Veblenian
institutionalism, is a critique of the manner in
which the whole process of economic development,
and of development of capitralist economy, is
understood. (rejectiing, however, the sociaal
pesimism of Veblen). According to NeoIE, the
economic development is an evolutionary social
process and not neoclassically interpretred
process of equilibrium grfowth
3NeoIE versus NewIE origins and main
methodological and cognitive differencesNeoinstit
utional Economics
- Rejection of hedonism (as philosophical and
methodological foundation for research on
microeconomic behavior) and the UMH (hypothesis
of micrtoeconomic rationality. Implicitly,
rejection of the homo oeconomicus concept - Adoption of psychology of instincts (Veblen),
and later (NeoIE C.Ayres, J. M. Clark,
Galbraith, Myrdal)) of philsophy of pragmatism
(J. Dewey pragmatic value theory of Ayres,
concept of reasonable values of Mitchell) and
behavioral psychology as foundations for the
epxlanation of microeconomic activities
4NeoIE versus NewIE origins and main
methodological and cognitive differencesNeoinstit
utional Economics
- Specific way of intrpretation of economic
system, as evolutionary process whose main part
is culture - Most important dychotomy of human being (Veblen)
contradiction between the instinct of good work
and the instinct of posession - Subsequent dychotomic contradictions
- Between physical flow (flow of useful goods) and
financial flow - Between world (class) of industry and world
of posession (leisure class)) - Conflict between those two worlds means also
conflict between cultural institutions which
are useful or futile (useless) form the point of
view of social and economic development
5NeoIE versus NewIE origins and main
methodological and cognitive differencesNeoinstit
utional Economics
- Rejection of economic determinism and adoption of
the view that develoment is mostly determined by
science and technology, with inert character of
culture and institutional basis - Rejection of the concept of objective laws or
regularities in socio-economic development one
can speak only of a certain logics of development
(Galbraith, Myrdal). It consist in plausible, but
not necessary, adjustments of culture and
institutions to the imperatives brought about by
permanently developing (changing) science and
technology - Social pesimism of Veblen and its rejection by
his followers - postveblenian economists,
neoinstitutionalists
6NeoIE versus NewIE origins and main
methodological and cognitive differencesNeoinstit
utional Economics
- Rejection of neoclassical way of understanding
the economic equlibrium - Commons equlibrium (reasonable economy) as an
optimal allocation of scarce resources which is
attained not through market competition but as
the outcome of collective actions and control - Galbraith equlibrium as process (and not the
state) resulting from the action of
countervailing powers corporations,trade unions,
the state as intermediary agent
7NeoIE versus NewIE origins and main
methodological and cognitive differences New
Institutional Economics
- Two manners od interpreting NIE
- As an integral part of widely understood
neoclassical economics, as neoclassical theory of
institutions (the so called theoretical
institutionalism, as opposed to postveblenian
one) - As a new paradigm in contemporary economics
- Genesis of NIE (decades of 70. and 80. of XX
century) - External critique of institutional deficit of
NCE - Increasing empirical knowledge on the
significance of institutions both informal and
formal in modern economic and technological
development and subsequent necessity of
theoretical reflection on them
8NeoIE versus NewIE origins and main
methodological and cognitive differences New
Institutional Economics
- Origins and development of theoretical
foundations - Theory of transactions costs (R. Coase as the
founder/precursor and O.E. Williamson as main
follower) - Theory of property rights (main theoreticians H.
Demsetz and A.A. Alchian) - TR and PR theories are two principal
methodological and theoretical foundations within
the main stream economics for investigations on
the role of institutions in modern economies -
9New Institutional Economics basic categories
and assertions
- Property rights (economic approach)
- Entitlements (rights), shaped in the historical
process by law (normative), customs and
morality, which define and confine (with regard
to other persons) the scope of appropriating and
using economic resources and goods (in other
words laws of disposal) - Since most goods are not pure private goods,
there occur many direct (technological) external
effects in the economy and there appears the
necessity of their internalization
10New Institutional Economics basic categories
and assertions
- Property rights (economic approach) cont.
- Internalization requires changes in
legal-institutional arrangements (in the so
called informal institutions).Their analysis
becomes subject to economic analysis - Fundamental function of PR is to create
incentives for increasing the scope of
internalization of external effects
11New Institutional Economics basic categories
and assertions
- Transaction costs (KT) in narrow approach (COASE,
WILLIAMSON) - In broadest interpretation, TC are the costs of
using the price (market) mechanism - Types of transaction costs (Coase)
- TC related to seeking and processing information
which is necessary for shaping market prices of
goods - TC related to negotiations of contracts
(agreements) (producers purchasers, purchasers
- deliverers, etc.) - TC linked to the control of execution of contracts
12New Institutional Economics basic categories
and assertions
- TC in broad approach
- Costst of coordination of various forms of
economic activity (coordination by state versus
coordination by market) - Costs which are necessary for the emergence and
development of markets
13New Institutional Economics basic categories
and assertions
- TC and PR - interdependence
- Inaccurate definition and/or attenuation of
propert rights, and incapability of internalizing
(apprioprating) benefits related to them in
particular, must result in increasing transaction
costs in the economy, weakening of the system
of microeconomic incentives, and this way in
general decline of the level of economic
rationality or efficiency.
14New Institutional Economics basic categories
and assertions
- Reasons for high level and types of TC in the
countries with command-and-control system (the
countries of the so called real socialism) - High TC linked to the central macroeconomic
planning - High TC related to a broad scope of non-market
distribution of public goods - High TC of extensive system of social transfers
- Attenuation of PR as the reason for broad
occurence of rent seeking behavior in the sphere
of functional distribution of social product - Rent seeking as standard (routine) behavior for
menagerial staff of state owned enetrprises and
their employees - High positional and bureaucratic rents (menagers
of SOEs and political nomenclature)
15New Institutional Economics basic categories
and assertions
- Nature of the transformation process from the
point of view of NIE - General definition transition from socialist CC
economy towards a market economy as politically
and economically determined institutional change - Definition based on the TK/PR theories
transition from socialist CC economy towards a
market economy as a gradual transformation of the
system which is characterized by predomination of
rent seeking microeconomic behavior towards the
system within which prevail the efficiency-driven
activities of human beings and social groups