Microenvironment analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Microenvironment analysis

Description:

Microenvironment analysis The Objectives of Competitive Analysis To understand how industry structure drives competition, which determines the level of industry ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:115
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: Magda51
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Microenvironment analysis


1
Microenvironment analysis
2
(No Transcript)
3
Awareness of competitive forces can help a
company stake out a position in its industry
that is less vulnerable to attack.
Michael E. Porter Competitive
Strategy
4
The Objectives of Competitive Analysis
  • To understand how industry structure drives
    competition, which determines the level of
    industry profitability
  • To assess industry attractiveness
  • To use evidence on changes in industry structure
    to forecast future profitability
  • To formulate strategies to change industry
    structure to improve industry profitability
  • To identify Key Success Factors

5
Competitive Forces AssessmentPorters Five Forces
6
Competitive Forces AssessmentPorters Five Forces
7
Who is my competitor?
8
Industry CompetitionRivalry Among Competitors
(2)
  • Industry Growth
  • If the industry is growing, theres more room for
    everybody less pressure on the firm
  • Product Differentiation
  • If products are differentiated, markets are in a
    sense, segmented

9
Strategic Group Analysis
  • Strategic groups is a cluster of companies in an
    industry
  • Groups of companies clustered around prezent a
    similar competitive approach or strategic
    position
  • Companies in a group are similar to each other
    but different from companies in other groups

10
Procedure for Constructing a Strategic Group Map
  • STEP 1 Identify competitive characteristics
    that differentiate firms in an industry from one
    another
  • STEP 2 Plot firms on a two-variable map using
    pairs of these differentiating characteristics
  • STEP 3 Assign firms that fall in about the same
    strategy space to same strategic group
  • STEP 4 Draw circles around each group, making
    circles proportional to size of groups
    respective share of total industry sales

11
(No Transcript)
12
Variables to be used
  • Variables selected as axes should NOT be highly
    correlated
  • Variables chosen as axes should expose BIG
    differences in how rivals compete
  • Variables do NOT have to be either quantitative
    or continuous

13
Video Game Industry
Video arcades, coin-operated machines
Arcade operators
Publishers of games on CD-ROMs
Home PCs
Sony, Sega, Nintendo, several others
Types of Video Game Suppliers/Distribution
Channels
Video game consoles
MSN Gaming Zone, Pogo.com, America Online, HEAT,
Engage, Oceanline, TEN
Online game sites
Low (Coin-operated equipment)
Medium (Video players cost 100-300)
High (Use PC)
Overall Cost to Players of Video Games
14
Interpretation
  • Identify factors that prevent firms in one groups
    from competing with companies in other groups
  • Evaluate the degree of rivalry between groups
  • Recognize groups strengths and weaknesses
  • Identify the strategic group that represents the
    greatest opportunity

15
Identify next step
  • Create a new group
  • Move to a better group
  • Strengthen the existing group
  • Strengthen companys position within existing
    group
  • Move to a new group and make it better

16
Strategic Maps of the United States Airline
Industry
The Late 1970s
The Early 1990s
International
Pan Am
International
Laker
World
North west
Braniff
Eastern
Geographic Scope
National
National
Continental
South- west
Western
Republic
Ozark
USAir
Piedmont
America West
AirCal
Kiwi
Frontier
South- west
Others
PSA
RenoAir
Texas Intl
Regional
Regional
No Frills
No Frills
Full Service
Full Service
Quality of Service
Quality of Service
17
Build a strategic group map based on the data
below
Small independent Zabka Chata Polska Polo Market PSS Spolem Minimal
No of stores Up to 2 More than 10 More than 10 3-10 3-10 Up to 2
Area of average store (m2) up 100 up 100 up 100 100-400 100-400 More than 400
Intensity of marketing activities low medium medium medium medium high
Asortment narrow narrow narrow narrow narrow narrow
Price level medium high high low low low
Market share 53,2 11,2 4,7 5,1 22,0 3,8
18
Competitive Forces AssessmentPorters Five Forces
19
New Entrants Barriers to Entry
  • Economies of Scale
  • To the extent that there are economies of scale,
    it will be difficult for a new firm to come in
    and compete with established firms.
  • Product Differentiation
  • To the extent that the firms products are
    distinct and non-copiable, new firms wont be
    able to come in and take away customers.
  • Brand Identification
  • To the extent that there is brand identification,
    customers will remember the firms product and
    will resist switching.
  • Switching Cost
  • If it is costly for the customer to switch, new
    entrants wont be able to convince them to do so.

20
New Entrants Barriers to Entry
  • Access to Distribution Channels
  • If the firm has preferential or monopolistic
    access to distribution channels, it is more
    resistant to competition.
  • Capital Requirements
  • If capital requirements are high, new
    under-capitalized firms wont be able to enter
    the industry.
  • Access to Latest Technology
  • If technology is important in the industry, new
    firms are less likely to have access to them,
    which is good for established firms.
  • Experience and Learning Effects
  • If experience is necessary for a firm to figure
    out how to operate efficiently, established firms
    have a distinct advantage.

21
Barriers to Entry Examples
  • Regulatory restrictions (e.g. banking license)
  • brand names (e.g. Xerox, McDonalds can develop
    customer loyalty hard to develop and/or imitate)
  • patents (illegal to exploit without ownership
    e.g. new drugs)
  • unique know-how (e.g. WalMarts hot docking
    technique of logistics management)

22
Competitive Forces AssessmentPorters Five Forces
23
  • Number of Important Suppliers
  • The fewer the number of important suppliers, the
    more power they have over the firm.
  • Availability of Substitutes for the Suppliers
    Products
  • This would reduce supplier power
  • Differentiation or Switching Costs of Suppliers
    Products
  • If its difficult for the firm to switch to other
    suppliers, the current suppliers can charge more

24
  • Suppliers Threat of Forward Integration
  • To the extent that suppliers might potentially
    themselves become competitors, they are less
    reliable and need to be looked at strategically
  • Suppliers Contribution to Quality or Service of
    the Industry Products
  • How crucial are suppliers in the maintenance of
    the quality of industry products? If very
    crucial, this will increase supplier power.
  • Importance of the Industry to Suppliers Profits

25
Competitive Forces AssessmentPorters Five Forces
26
  • Number of Important Buyers
  • The greater the number of important buyers, the
    less power does the firm have to manipulate
    prices
  • Availability of Substitutes for the Industry
    Products
  • The impact of this on price elasticity of demand
    for the industrys products is obvious.
  • Buyers Switching Costs
  • This is relevant both in terms of switching to
    competitors products and switching to products
    manufactured by other industries.
  • Buyers Threat of Backward Integration
  • The buyer might choose to integrate backward and
    manufacture his input goods, himself. This means
    that buyers have to be looked at strategically.

27
Competitive Forces AssessmentPorters Five Forces
28
  • Substitutes matter when customers are attracted
    to the products of firms in other industries

Examples
  • Eyeglasses and contact lens v. laser surgery
  • Sugar v. artificial sweeteners
  • Newspapers v. TV v. Internet

29
Threat of substitutes depend on
  • Availability of Close Substitutes
  • Users Switching Costs
  • Substitute Producers Profitability and
    Aggressiveness
  • Where is the substitute product located on the
    Price/Value dimensions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com