High Dependency Units Definitions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

High Dependency Units Definitions

Description:

Title: High Dependency Units Definitions Author: vianello Last modified by: azienda ospedaliera padova Created Date: 1/15/2000 7:44:00 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:103
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: Vian1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: High Dependency Units Definitions


1
Insufficienza Respiratoria
Andrea Vianello Fisiopatologia e Terapia
Intensiva Respiratoria Ospedale Università di
Padova
2
Airway narrowing obstruction
Airway Inflammation
? Frictional WOB
Shortened muscles curvature
Auto- PEEP
? Elastic WOB
Gas trapping
? muscle strength
? VT
? VE
  • PaCO2
  • pH
  • PaO2

? VA
3
usa i farmaci e bene !
Airway narrowing obstruction
Airway Inflammation
Steroids
? Frictional WOB
Abx
Shortened muscles curvature
Auto- PEEP
BDs
? Elastic WOB
Gas trapping
Teophylline
? muscle strength
? VT
? VE
  • PaCO2
  • pH
  • PaO2

? VA
4
usa i farmaci e bene !
Airway narrowing obstruction
Airway Inflammation
Steroids
? Frictional WOB
Abx
PEEP
Shortened muscles curvature
Auto- PEEP
BDs
? Elastic WOB
Gas trapping
Teophylline
MV
? muscle strength
? VT
? VE
MV
  • PaCO2
  • pH
  • PaO2

? VA
5
Non-Invasive Ventilation
a form of ventilatory support that avoids airway
invasion
Hill et al Crit Care Med 2007 352402-7
6
NIV VS TRATTAMENTO STANDARD
Keenan S et al
7
NIV VS TRATTAMENTO STANDARD
Keenan S et al
8
NIV - Meta-analysis (n8)
  • NPPV resulted in
  • decreased mortality (RR 0.41 95 CI 0.26,
    0.64),
  • decreased need for ETI (RR 0.42 95CI 0.31,
    0.59)
  • Greater improvements within 1 hour in
  • pH (WMD 0.03 95CI 0.02, 0.04),
  • PaCO2 (WMD -0.40 kPa 95CI -0.78, -0.03),
  • RR (WMD 3.08 bpm 95CI 4.26, -1.89).
  • Complications associated with treatment (RR 0.32
    95CI 0.18, 0.56) and length of hospital stay
    were also reduced with NPPV (WMD 3.24 days
    95CI 4.42, -2.06)

Lightowler, Elliott, Wedzicha Ram BMJ 2003
326185
9
  • 49 pazienti con IRA in BPCO dopo fallimento
    terapia medica, pH 7.2
  • Simili durata di permanenza in ICU, durata VM,
    complicanze generali, mortalità in ICU, e
    mortalità in ospedale
  • con NIV 48 evitano ETI, sopravvivono con
    permanenza in ICU inferiore vs pazienti VM
    invasiva (P0.02)
  • A 1 anno NIV inferiore riospedalizzazione (65
    vs 100 P0.016) e minor frequenza di riutilizzo
    supplemento di ossigeno (0 vs 36)

10
  • Studio caso-controllo 64 paz. con IRA trattati
    con NIV pH 7.18
  • 40/64 (62) fallimento NIV (RR con NIV - 38)
  • Simili mortalità in ICU, e mortalità in ospedale
    durata di permanenza in ICU e post ICU, ma
  • Inferiori complicanze (P0.01) e probabilità di
    rimanenere in VM (P0.056)
  • Se NIV efficace (24/64 38) migliore
    sopravvivenza e ridotta permanenza in ICU vs
    pazienti VM invasiva

11
NIV Change in practice over time
  • 1992-1996 (mean pH 7.25/-0.07) 1997-1999
    (7.20/-0.08 Plt0.001).
  • gt 1997 - risk of failure pH lt7.25 three fold
    lower than in 1992-1996.
  • gt 1997 ARF with a pH gt7.28 were treated in
    Medical Ward (20 vs 60).
  • Daily cost per patient treated with NIV (558/-8
    vs 470/-14,Plt0.01)

Carlucci et al Intensive Care Med 2003 3419-25
12
Epidemiology
  • Rationale evidence supporting use of NIV varies
    widely for different causes of ARF.
  • Population 11,659,668 cases of ARF from the
    Nationwide Inpatient Sample during years 2000 to
    2009
  • Objectives To compare utilization trends and
    outcomes associated with NIV in patients with and
    without COPD.

13
(No Transcript)
14
  • Rationale The patterns and outcomes of NIV use
    in patients hospitalized for AECOPD nationwide
    are unknown.
  • Population 7,511,267 admissions for acute AE
    occurred from 1998 to 2008
  • Objectives To determine the prevalence and
    trends of NIV in AECOPD.

15
Use of NIPPV or IMV as first-line respiratory
support in patients hospitalized with AECOPD
16
Joint BTS/RCP London/Intensive Care Society
Guidelines. NIV in COPD. Oct 2008
17
When to use Non-Invasive Ventilation
18
Goals of NIV can they be reached?
NIV is time consuming, needs proper equipment,
enough staff with sufficient expertise.
time
technical equipment
staff expertise
predict success of NIV
19
Eur Respir J 2002 19 115966
20
Definition of the three levels of care
European Task Force on Respiratory Intermediate
Care Survey Corrado et al, ERJ 2002201343-50
21
Appropriatezza di utilizzo della Ventilazione
Non-Invasiva in ambito pneumologico
nellassistenza ai pazienti con BroncoPneumopatia
Cronica Ostruttiva in fase acuta.
22
  • Rate of NIV failure is extremely different
    according to study design, severity of illness
    and level of monitoring

23
Sixty-two RCTs including a total of 5870 patients
Overall NIV failure 16.3
24
NIV Real Life
  • Evaluation of all 449 patients receiving NPPV for
    a 1-yr period for acute or acute on chronic RF
  • CPE (n97)
  • AECOPD (n87)
  • non-COPD acute hypercapnic RF (n35)
  • postextubation RF (n95)
  • acute hypoxemic RF (n144)
  • Intubation rate was 18, 24, 38, 40, and 60,
    respectively
  • Hospital mortality for patients with acute
    hypoxemic RF who failed NPPV was 64

Schettino G. Crit Care Med 2008 36441-7
25
  • The percentage of patients transitioned from NIV
    to IMV 5 and did not increase from 1998 to 2008

26
Reasons for low rate of IMV use after NPPV,
compared to clinical trial
  • End of life decision to not accept IMV
  • Patients died before IMV could be started
  • Good selection of appropriate patients

27
  • High mortality rate (30) ? over time
  • OR for death1.63, compared to those initially on
    IMV
  • ?hospital stay

28
  • Nearly one third of patients for whom there is
    the best evidence base for NIV did not receive it
  • Admission pH lt 7.26 66 received NIV compared to
    34 pH 7.26 to 7.34.
  • Similar lowest pH
  • Significant proportion had a metabolic acidosis
  • Hospital mortality was 25 (270/1077) for
    patients receiving NIV but 39 (86/219) for those
    with late onset acidosis
  • The audit raises concerns that challenge the
    respiratory community to lead appropriate
    clinical improvements across the acute sector

29
Reasons for high mortality rate in patients
transitioned to IMV
  • Increased use of NIPPV in patients difficult to
    ventilate?
  • Continuation of NIPPV despite a lack of early
    improvement?

30
Aetiology of NIV failure
  • Failure to adequately ventilate/oxygenate
  • Delayed NIV treatment
  • Inappropriate ventilatory technique
  • Patients clinical condition
  • B. Dependence on non-invasive support
  • Lack of improvement of acute illness
  • C. Complications

31
  • NIV failure is predicted by
  • Advanced age
  • High acuity illness on admission (i.e. SAPS-II
    gt34)
  • Acute respiratory distress syndrome
  • Community-acquired pneumonia with or without
    sepsis
  • Multi-organ system failure

32
(No Transcript)
33
NIV in acute COPD correlates for success
  • Retrospective analysis
  • 59 episodes of ARF in 47 COPD patients
  • NIV success 46
  • NIV failure 13
  • Predictors for NIV failure
  • Higher PaCO2 at admission
  • Worse functional condition
  • Reduced treatment compliance
  • Pneumonia

Ambrosino N, Thorax 199550755-7
34
NIV complications
Complication Incidence ()
Major
Aspiration pneumonia lt5
Haemodinamyc collapse Infrequent
Barotrauma Rare
Minor
Noise 50-10
CO2 rebreathing 50-100
Discomfort 30-50
Claustrophobia 5-20
Nasal skin lesions 2-50
35
Mask selection - a crucial issue!
CO2 rebreathing (50-100)
Noise (50-100)
Leak/Discomfort (30-50)
Claustrophobia (5-20)
Nasal skin lesions (2-50)
36
NIV should not be used in
  • Respiratory arrest
  • Inability to tolerate the device, because of
    claustrophobia, agitation or uncooperativeness
  • Inability to protect the airway, due to
    swallowing impairment
  • Excessive secretions not sufficiently managed by
    clearance techniques
  • Recent upper airway surgery

37
Transition to IMV when is in the interest of a
patient?
  • Hospital mortality 64 (Schettino, 2008)
  • Mortality rate 30 prolonged hospitalization
    (Chandra, 2011)
  • Great hospital mortality (Walkey, 2013)

38
Transition to IMV(personal experience, 2011-2013)
Number of subjects 62
Age (mean SD) , yrs 65.419.3
Gender (males, females) 26, 36
Ineffective NIV, n () Severe hypercapnia Severe hypoxemia 52 (83.8) 25 (42.4) 21 (35.6)
Dependence on NIV, n () 8 (13.3)
NIV complication, n () 2 (3.4)
Tracheotomy, n () 16 (28.8)
Outcome , n () Died during hosp Discharged from hosp 41 (66.1) 21 (33.9)
39
Kaplan-Meier function of overall survival
Median survival 46 days (95 CI, 43 to 162)
40
Kaplan-Meier function of survival according to
baseline condition
Mean survival NM/CW 305.5836.9 COPD
53.907.3 ILD 31.137.8
p0.0176
plt0.0001
41
Kaplan-Meier function of survival for dichotomus
age (?50 and gt50)
Median survival ?50 380.0 d (95CI, 15.0 to
n.c.) gt50 45.0 d (95CI,24.0 to 54.0)
p0.0071
42
Remarks
  • Mortality rate among patients transitioned to IMV
    is very high
  • The outcome of patients with ILD is extremely
    poor.
  • Should IPF/COPD patients be excluded
    from IMV after failing a NIV trial?

43
Use of a novel veno-venous extracorporeal carbon
dioxide removal system as an alternative to
endotracheal intubation in a lung transplant
candidate with acute respiratory failure.
Submitted to Respiratory Care
44
(No Transcript)
45
NIV in AECOPD conclusions
  • Confirm and reinforce the routine use of NIV,
    however
  • Suggest caution with NIV among patients at high
    risk of failure
  • The problem of transitioning from NIV to IMV may
    not be in the interest of patients!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com