Title: Metropolitan King County Council
1Report to the
Metropolitan King County Council February 14,
2005 Dean C. Logan, Director King County
Records, Elections and Licensing Services Division
2It is the policy of the State of Washington to
encourage every eligible person to register to
vote and to participate fully in all
elections, and to protect the integrity of
the electoral process by providing equal access
to the process while guarding against
discrimination and fraud. Chapter 29A.04.205
Revised Code of Washington
3Elections Timeline 2003-2006
July 2003 King County Council forms the Citizens
Election Oversight Committee (CEOC) to improve
performance and accountability of
elections September 2003 Primary reviewed by
CEOC no serious errors reported Dean Logan
appointed Director Records, Elections and
Licensing Services Division 9th U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals finds Washingtons blanket
primary unconstitutional November 2003 General
Election reviewed by CEOC no serious errors
reported Bill Huennekens appointed
Superintendent of Elections, EMVR Project
Approved in 2004 Adopted Budget
December 2003 Legislature cancels the March 2004
Presidential Preference Primary February 2004
Special Election Legislature adopts new top-two
primary system March 2004 Special
Election April 2004 Special Election Governor
vetoes top-two primary, signs in to law a
Montana-style partisan primary May 2004
Special Election CEOC Report submitted to King
County Council Mock Elections conducted using
new Election Management and Voter Registration
system prior to final conversion
4Elections Timeline continued
June 2004 Elections converts to new Election
Management and Voter Registration system July
2004 Labor, Operations and Technology Committee
reviews CEOC report on elections countywide list
maintenance and voter education mailing Seattle
Monorail petition received and signatures
verified Candidate Filing for fall
Elections September 2004 New and complex primary
replaces the blanket primary record turnout
Council reviews CEOC report and passes motion in
support of recommendations
October 2004 Record number of new registrations
processed by King County Elections November 2004
General Elections is held record turnout,
record number of absentees issued and counted
Manual recount conducted for office of Governor
Disability Accessible Voting Equipment (DAVE)
Project approved in 2005 Adopted Budget
December 2004 Manual recount conducted in
Governors race close to 900,000 ballots hand
counted
5Elections Timeline continued
January 2005 King County Council redistricting
plan adopted Election contest filed in close
gubernatorial race Tens of thousands of
documents provided in response to 30 public
disclosure requests February 2005 Special
Election date April 2005 Special Election date
May 2005 Special Election date June 2005 Voter
registration mailing with new Council District
designations September 2005 New top-two
primary to be implemented
November 2005 General Election January 2006 New
Help America Vote Act election administration
requirements must be implemented
62004 Record Volumes - Historic Outcomes
- Record setting voter registration
- Record setting absentee ballots issued
- Record number of absentee ballots cast
- Record number of ballots counted on Election
Day - Record voter turnout
- Historic new primary
- Historic close election
- First countywide manual recount
We have done many things right. We have many
more things to do better. We need to persevere,
stay the course and not adopt radical measures
when reasonable ones will make the most
difference.
7The county needs to acquire or build a voter
registration system designed for a jurisdiction
of their size. The large number of transactions
and absentee ballots issued requires a system
with more capacity and the ability to handle
their volume and more efficient capture and
storage of voter signature images.
Election Management and Voter Registration System
Excerpt from review conducted by the Office of
the Secretary of State (February 2003)
8Election Management and Voter Registration System
- New election management and voter registration
system installed and implemented in June 2004 - New system replaces outdated legacy mainframe
system that lacked ability to manage growing
voter registration transactions and absentee
voters - Project completed on time and under budget
savings re-appropriated for HAVA implementation
project - 2004 primary and General Election administered
using the updated technology and work flow
systems - Project plan and management serve as models in
countys technology governance structure
9Voting Rights Act Minority Language Compliance
King County Elections Web site is recognized as
one of the first bilingual elections Web sites in
the country. Since 2002, the number of voters
requesting and using Chinese language ballots and
voting materials has progressively increased.
- King County Elections Minority Language
Coordinator is chosen to participate in U.S.
Department of State teleconference to provide
leaders in China with expertise in their
developing electoral processes. - External oversight provided by Section 203
Coalition, Organization of Chinese Americans.
10The New Primary
Voting in the new Primary easy as 1-2-3
- Primary implemented in just 100 days
- Public engagement
- Outreach and education
- Stakeholder involvement
- Regional coordination
- Record turnout
11Voter Outreach and Education
Vote Mobile partnership with the League of
Women Voters brings voter registration to
communities across King County Speakers Bureau
more than 100 presentations reach out to 78,000
people Transit and Cable Advertising saturates
King County in primary and General
Election Minority Community Outreach
multi-lingual presentations educate first-time
voters
12Record Setting Voter Registration and Absentees
Leading up to the 2004 General Election, King
County processed a record-breaking 138,729 new
registrations, a 40 percent increase for the same
10-month period leading up to the 2000 election.
13Record Setting Voter Registration and
Absentees
- The numbers of absentee ballots issued in the
General Election set a new record at 646,468
issued. 160,000 more than in any previous
election. - Record breaking firsts include
- the number of absentee ballots processed and
tabulated on Election Day -- 233,254 - the number of provisional ballots issued -- more
than 31,000 - the number of provisional ballots validated and
included in the final returns -- more than
28,000 and - an overall voter turnout of 83 percent
14Manual Recount Procedures
- Nearly 900,000 ballots hand counted in King
County in 16 days - New, temporary facility set up to accommodate
400 bipartisan workers and observers - Eighty recount boards organized into teams of
three one designee from the Democratic party,
one designee from the Republican party and a
third member recruited from Elections seasonal
work registry - Multiple observer areas ensure open, fair and
transparent proceedings - Precinct counts are compared to the original and
machine recount totals and recounted until two
independent counts matched
It is hard to imagine a fairer and more
meaningful opportunity to observe. The procedure
proposed by King County Records complies with the
WAC requirement.
Washington State Republican Party petition in
McDonald v. Secretary of State (76321-6, December
7, 2004)
15Military and Overseas Ballots
- Military and overseas citizens ballots were
mailed on time by Oct. 8, 2004. - Once King County mails absentee ballots, the
responsibility shifts to the Post Office and
Department of Defense. - The U.S. Department of Defense, Federal Voting
Assistance - Program coordinates with all branches of the
armed services to assist military and overseas
voters in obtaining ballots and voting. - Voted ballots returned from outside the U.S. are
valid and counted as long as they are signed by
the date of the election and received prior to
certification (15 days following a General
Election).
16Reports of deceased voters casting ballots
The Washington State Department of Health,
Office of Vital Statistics is required to provide
death notifications to the counties on a regular
basis to assist in removing deceased voters from
the rolls. By state law, voter registration
files are closed 30 days prior to an election for
new registrations sent by mail, cancellations and
transfers. In 2004, 4,305 registrations were
canceled in King County based on notification
that the voter was deceased. Forms for
cancellation of a deceased voter are available at
all polling locations on Election Day for voters
to complete if they are aware of the death of
another voter.
17Reports of felons voting
Election officials cannot remove a convicted
felon from the voter registration files without
notification from the courts. State and
federal laws compel election officials to add a
new voter to the registration files when a
registration application is received and includes
the minimum required information and a signature
attesting to their qualifications to become a
registered voter. More than 600 registrations
were canceled in 2004 based on court notification
of a felony conviction. The oath on the voter
registration application, which must be signed,
includes the statement that the applicant is not
currently denied their civil rights as a result
of a felony conviction.
18Ballot Duplication and Enhancement
Ballot duplications and enhancements are
conducted by at least two people in the presence
of political party observers.
A log is maintained of all duplications and
enhancements to ensure full accountability of all
ballot handling.
In the 2004 General Election, 4,902 ballots
were duplicated and 55,177 ballots were enhanced
out of nearly 900,000 ballots cast.
19Canvassing Board review of ballots
- The King County Canvassing Board reviewed more
than 1,600 ballots to determine voter intent. - More than 95 of these decisions were unanimous.
- Determination was made in public meetings, on
the record and in the presence of political party
observers.
Washington is a voter intent state. Election
laws give deference to voter intent where it can
be determined over following instructions on how
to mark a ballot.
20Variance between ballots cast and voters credited
The most common reasons people who voted may not
appear on the list of credited voters is they
cast a federal write-in ballot in accordance with
provisions of the Federal Voting Assistance
Program (which includes non-registered service
personnel and overseas voters) they are
participants in the states Address
Confidentiality Program (victims of domestic
violence and stalking whose information is
secured from public record) or human error
during the crediting process or when voters sign
the poll books.
21Variance between ballots cast and voters credited
- Variance from preliminary report 3,539
- Further reconciliation efforts (1,018)
- Address Confidentiality Program ballots (69)
- Federal write-in ballots (251)
- Provisional ballots deposited in AccuVotes
(348) - Remaining variance attributed to administrative
error 1,853 - 1,853 variance / 899,199 .002 x 100 0.2
- 99.8 percent of all voters who cast ballots were
credited - Past Year Variances Other Counties Variance
- 2003 606 (99.84) Clark 225 (99.86)
- 2002 2,809 (99.5) Spokane 77 (99.97)
- 2000 1,230 (99.85)
22Managing through Challenges
...there is every indication that the King
County Records, Elections and Licensing Services
Division acted professionally and intended to act
in the publics best interest under immense
pressure and under intense public scrutiny.
Armies of lawyers and poll watchers examine
King Countys every move, threatening litigation
and more. Under the circumstances, King Countys
prudence is understandable.
Excerpt from King County Superior Court Opinion
in Washington State Republican Party v.
Washington State Democratic Central Committee v.
King County Records, Elections and Licensing
Services Division. (Case No. 04-2-36048-0 SEA
Nov.16, 2004)
23Managing through Challenges
- Absentee Ballots
- Duplicate Ballots
- Postal Handling Errors
- Print Quality Issues
- No Signature on File Ballots
- Ballots returned from the polls
- Provisional Ballots
- 348 identified deposited in AccuVotes
- 252 later validated and credited
- Legal Challenges
- Superior Court in King County Democratic Party
- Superior Court in Pierce County Republican
Party - State Supreme Court Democratic Republican
Parties
24Proposed Election Reform
We need meaningful, reasonable election reform
that includes
- Moving the date of the primary support
- Reimbursing counties for the state share of
even-year election costs support - Extending the time provided for certification of
election results support
25 Proposed Election Reform continued
- Conducting certain elections entirely by mail
support - Canvassing and ballot processing procedures
support - Requiring absentee ballots to be returned by
Election Day oppose
262005 Action Plan
Seizing the Moment and Moving Ahead
- STATE-OF-THE-ART FACILITY
- single, secure location for all election
activities and services - capacity to conduct countywide vote-by-mail
elections
- comprehensive training facility
- fully functional communications center
- ballot tracking and accountability systems
- laboratory setting for developing technology
- public viewing areas
King County should reorganize and consolidate
key parts of its elections operations in order to
reduce the potential for errors and to gain
efficiencies.
Excerpt from the Citizens Election Oversight
Committee Report (May 2004)
27Action Plan
Seizing the Moment and Moving Ahead
- ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
AND CULTURAL CHANGE - formalized staff training
- organizational accountability with benchmarks
and production standards - improve work flow which includes updated and
documented procedures and policies - analysis of reducing the number of precincts and
consolidating polling locations - implementation of a revised Information
Technology support model with technical support
directly in the Elections Section
28Action Plan
Seizing the Moment and Moving Ahead
IMPLEMENT REMAINING PROVISIONS HELP AMERICA
VOTE ACT (HAVA)
- Disability Access Voting Equipment (DAVE)
- Needs Assessment
- Demonstrations
- Implementation
- Development and implementation of the statewide
voter registration database
The Elections Section should create a formal
training plan and commit the resources necessary
to implement it. The Election Sections training
must ensure there is sufficient cross-training of
workers to ensure smooth operations and better
teamwork.
Excerpt from the Citizens Election Oversight
Committee Report (May 2004)
29Action Plan
Seizing the Moment and Moving Ahead
- MAINTAIN ENGAGEMENT WITH THE PUBLIC
- Conduct focus groups to assess voter education,
election reform and security - Re-establish speakers bureau to address
concerns related to the 2004 General Election - Expand Web-based resources to enhance election
transparency - Continue external oversight Citizens Election
Oversight Committee and coordination with other
jurisdictions
30Summary Conclusion
- New and recurring challenges ahead
- Compliance with new federal laws calling for
disability access voting equipment in all polling
locations - Administration of another new primary system
- Implementation of the new council district
redistricting plan - Responding to changing public dynamics
- Implementing statewide election reform measures
this report should remain an active document
one which we refer back to often to measure
progress and as a reality check on its relevance.
31Summary Conclusion
The citizens of King County have a right to
expect high quality performance in the conduct of
our elections. We cannot demand perfection we
know that there will be breakdowns and errors in
the future. But we can insist that the Elections
Section operate on a standard of professionalism,
expertise, accountability and continuous
improvement, and by the same token must insist
that our elected officials provide the resources
and organization required to achieve that
standard.
AFTERWARD, King County Citizens Election
Oversight Committee Report (May 2004)
32 For more information, contact King County
Elections at elections_at_metrokc.gov (206)
296-1540