THE MOON LANDING (REAL OR HOAX) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

THE MOON LANDING (REAL OR HOAX)

Description:

THE MOON LANDING (REAL OR HOAX) Background Information For a long time the thought that the United States landed on the moon in 1969 was thought to be fact. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:197
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: DavidSc159
Category:
Tags: hoax | landing | moon | real | the | shadow

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: THE MOON LANDING (REAL OR HOAX)


1
THE MOON LANDING(REAL OR HOAX)
2
Background Information
  • For a long time the thought that the United
    States landed on the moon in 1969 was thought to
    be fact. But for some time now, skeptics have
    been voicing their opinions on the subject..

3
  • The Moon Landing was Faked

4
Shadows
  • Shadow on suit would be much darker if moon was
    only light source.
  • Background would not fade out in an
    atmosphere-less environment.
  • Small white spec is reflection of some larger
    structure.

5
Stars and Shadows
  • Picture shows no stars in the sky.
  • Flag on LEM is illuminated.

6
Directional Shadows
  • Shadows cast by one light source should go in the
    same direction in parallel lines.

7
Shadow Illumination
  • If the Sun is only light source than how is the
    man in the space suit so illuminated?

8
Scenery
  • Same background looked as though used two
    separate times
  • One has LEM in it and one doesnt

9
Crosshair and Tire-Tracks
  • The crosshairs that are supposedly fixed into the
    camera lens appear to be behind the object on the
    Land Rover.
  • The tracks made by the Land Rover are too
    defined.
  • There is a C carved into the rock.

10
Crosshair Continued
  • Closer inspection of the crosshairs..

11
Final Arguments
  • The United States faked the moon landing so they
    could beat the Russians in the space race.
  • NASA collected billions of dollars in cash that
    wasnt really used for landing on the moon.
  • To take Americans minds off the Vietnam War.

12
  • The Moon Landing Was Real

13
Overview of Shadow Discrepancy
  • The moon is covered with a very fine layer of
    dust several inches thick. This dust is very
    reflective of light, which is why we can see the
    moon so well as the sun shines on it.

14
Shadow Refutation
  • The following arguments were tested by scientist
    Ian Goddard. As you can see in this experiment
    done with a single light source, the white more
    reflective paper reflects the light unlike the
    black paper. You are able to see the detail of
    the front of the space suit of the figurine.

15
Illuminated Shadow Refutation
  • In this picture we can see with a similar
    reflective surface we can see the figure
    illuminated. But when we use a black piece of
    paper you can not.

16
On Earth Too
  • If you viewed this scene from above then the
    shadows would be parallel, however, with a low
    sun angle and the perspective of the camera, the
    shadows appear to be divergent.

17
Slanted Shadows Explanation
  • This picture shows how shadows can also be
    slanted by the landscape. In the picture the
    shadows are curving into the cannons due to the
    slant of the walls.

18
Apennine Front/Hadley Delta
19
Scenery Explanation
  • In the argument saying that the same scenery was
    seen in separate photos with the LEM in it, there
    is an obvious explanation. Despite the lack of
    atmosphere it is obvious that the mountains are
    way off in the distance. By simply moving where
    your taking the picture from, you can still see
    the same reference point on the mountain. The
    first of the two previous pictures was taken on
    the left is Apennine Front and on the right is Mt
    Hadley Delta. The astronauts actually walked on
    Hadley Delta.

20
Scenery Explanation Continued.
21
Crosshair Refutation
  • The picture shows and experiment where a hair was
    placed over the lens of the camera to show how it
    showed up on a dark and light background. It
    almost disappears on the light background and
    sunlight is much brighter in space

22
Blast Crater Explanation
  • No Crater would be made by the Lunar Module.


23
The Blast Crater
  • Skeptics also say that there should have been a
    blast crater where the Lunar Module landed and
    took off from. This is not so. Skeptics argue
    that 3,000 pounds of thrust were used to land and
    take off. But the blast nozzle had a diameter of
    54 inches or an area of 2,300 square inches. Now
    divided out, that only equals about 1.5 pounds
    per square inch of thrust. This is not nearly
    enough to make a large impact crater. Also,
    exhaust in a vacuum spreads out very quickly. On
    the contrary, Earths atmosphere constricts the
    rockets exhaust into a thin column but this
    simply isnt true in a vacuum environment.

24
Radiation
  • To go to the moon astronauts must go through the
    van Allen Belts. But according to William Wheton,
    a scientist, the Astronauts passed through the
    belt very quickly and not long enough to get a
    lethal dose of radiation. He goes on to say that
    the metal hull of the Apollo spacecraft would
    kept out most of the radiation anyway.

25
Edgar Mitchell
  • This reply was sent to a pro-moon landing web
    site from the former Lunar Module Pilot of the
    Apollo 14 Mission.

26
Actual Astronaut Message
  • The Re Moon HoaxEDM Discussion Group
  • From Edgar MitchellCategory CategoryDate 16
    Sep 2002Time 143129
  • Comments
  • Thank you. Your web site looks great and presents
    all the correct points. Sibrel faked his way into
    my home with false History Channel credentials
    for an interview. After about 3-4 minutes, he
    popped the bible question. Realizing who he was,
    I maintained my cool enough to swear on his
    bible, then ended the interview and tossed him
    out of the house, with a boot in his rear. (Did
    same to Buzz Aldrin)

27
Buzz vs Sibrel

28
Buzz Aldrin
  • Lunar Pilot for the Apollo 11 mission
  • Second man to walk on moon
  • Overall cool guy

29
Bart Winfield Sibrel
  • Conspiracy theorist who has been known to harass
    former astronauts about their moon trips.
  • Claims to have been a journalist (although he
    actually was only a part-time editor at a local
    Nashville NBC affiliate for a couple of months,
    and "he has no right whatsoever to claim any
    association with our news organization" according
    to the news director there

30
Buzz vs Sibrel
  • On September 9, 2002, Mr. Sibrel jumped out at
    Mr. Aldrin with the Bible, daring him to swear on
    it. Buzz told Mr. Sibrel to go away repeatedly,
    and even asked for the police. When Mr. Sibrel
    physically blocked his path, Mr. Aldrin (who is
    72, 5'10" and 160 pounds) punched Mr. Sibrel (37,
    6"2" and 250 pounds) in the face.

31
You Decide
  • Overall you have to make the final decision of
    what you believe in. I hope this presentation has
    at least presented you with the facts.

32
Bibliography
  • http//www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
  • http//www.moonmovie.com/
  • http//www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/iangoddard/moon
    01.htm
  • http//www.apollo-hoax.co.uk/strangeshadows.html
  • http//batesmotel.8m.com/

33
The End
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com