Government Regulation and Intervention Part 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Government Regulation and Intervention Part 1

Description:

Title: Tools for Health Policy Author: Vivian Hamilton Last modified by: Economics Department Created Date: 7/23/1998 7:27:28 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:156
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: VivianH8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Government Regulation and Intervention Part 1


1
Government Regulation and InterventionPart 1
  • Vivian Ho
  • Health Economics

This material draws heavily from Santerre Neun,
Health Economics, Theories, Insights, and
Industry Studies, Dryden Press.
2
Introduction
  • Causes and consequences of government
    intervention in health care.
  • Types of government intervention.
  • Case studies
  • Cigarette taxes.
  • Price ceilings on health care services.
  • Hospital antitrust litigation.

3
Why Government Intervention?
  • Perfectly competitive markets lead to efficient
    outcomes. Why?
  • Recall that the demand curve for any given
    product has a negative slope.
  • If consumers are visiting the doctor 2 times per
    year when the price of a visit is 100, the price
    must fall below 100 in order to encourage
    consumers to see the doctor more often.

4
Why Government Intervention?
  • Thus, the demand curve reflects the consumers
    marginal benefit from consumption.
  • The marginal utility from the third visit to the
    doctor is lower than the marginal benefit from
    the second visit.
  • Similarly, we can define a demand curve for
    societys preferences as a whole, which reflects
    the marginal social benefit of medical services.

5
Why Government Intervention?
Price
MSB
Quantity of medical services
6
Why Government Intervention?
  • Recall that the supply curve for any given
    product slopes upwards.
  • If a pharmacy is being paid 30 per prescription
    to fill 300 prescriptions per day, it must be
    paid more than 30 per unit to fill 400 orders
    per day.
  • This reflects the fact that the marginal costs of
    production usually rise as output increases.

7
Why Government Intervention?
  • At the societal level, the marginal social costs
    of providing services will also rise as output
    increases.
  • e.g. The marginal cost of achieving an infant
    mortality rate of 20 per 100,000 live births may
    be fairly low, but the marginal cost of reducing
    the rate to 5 per 100,000 will be much higher.

8
Why Government Intervention?
Price
MSC
Quantity of medical services
9
Why Government Intervention?
  • Equilibrium is reached where MSBMSC

Price
MSC
P0
MSB
Q0
Quantity
10
Why Government Intervention?
  • In equilibrium, all services are exchanged at the
    price P0.
  • But for all services less than Q0 (e.g. the 1st
    and 2nd physician visit), the marginal social
    benefit exceeds P0.
  • The difference between marginal social benefit
    and the equilibrium price is called consumer
    surplus.

11
Why Government Intervention?
Price
MSC
Consumer Surplus
P0
MSB
Q0
Quantity
12
Why Government Intervention?
  • For all services less than Q0, the marginal
    social cost is lower than P0.
  • The difference between marginal social cost and
    the equilibrium price is called producer surplus.

13
Why Government Intervention?
Price
MSC
P0
Producer Surplus
MSB
Q0
Quantity
14
Why Government Intervention?
  • Perfect competition is considered efficient,
    because it maximizes social welfare consumer
    surplus producer surplus.

Price
S
Consumer Surplus
Producer Surplus
D
Quantity
15
Criteria for perfect competition
  • All firms and consumers are price takers.
  • Consumers and firms have perfect information.
  • All firms produce an identical product.
  • Firms can freely enter an exit an industry.

16
Market imperfections may lead to inefficient or
inequitable distribution of resources.
  • Imperfect consumer information
  • Monopoly
  • Externalities
  • Government intervenes to restore efficiency
    and/or equity.
  • Public interest theory.

17
An opposing theory The amount and types of
government intervention are determined by supply
and demand.
  • Vote-maximizing politicians supply legislation.
  • Wealth maximizing special interest groups are the
    buyers.
  • Successful politicians stay in office by
    satisfying special interest groups.

18
Special interest group theoryExamples
  • Extended patent protection for brand name drugs.
  • Rejection of national health insurance in favor
    of private insurance companies.

19
Special interest group theory claims that special
interest groups gain at the expense of the
general public.
  • Consumers are diverse, fragmented, more costly
    for them to organize.
  • Inefficient, inequitable resource allocation by
    government.
  • Which theory do you believe?
  • C-B analysis is needed to identify winners and
    losers.

20
Types of Government Intervention
  • Provide public goods.
  • Correct for externalities
  • Impose regulations.
  • Enforce antitrust laws.
  • Sponsor redistribution programs.
  • Operate public enterprises.
  • Fund medical research.
  • Tax cigarettes, pollution.
  • FDA
  • Bar hospital mergers.
  • Medicare and Medicaid.
  • VA hospitals

21
Public Goods
  • gt1 individual simultaneously receives benefits
    from the good.
  • i.e., no rivalry in consumption.
  • Costly to exclude nonpayers from consumption of
    the good.
  • Private firms unwilling to produce and sell
    public goods.
  • Are most medical services public goods?

22
Externalities
  • Definition An unpriced byproduct of production
    or consumption that adversely affects another
    party not directly involved in the market
    transaction.
  • Cigarette smoking
  • Pollution
  • Medical treatment for cyclists who dont wear
    helmets
  • Drunk drivers

23
  • Demand-side externality
  • Marginal Social Benefit ? Marginal Private
    Benefit
  • Supply-side externality
  • Marginal Social Cost ? Marginal Private Cost

24
Cigarette smoking is an example of a (negative)
demand-side externality.
  • Smokers impose work-related costs on nonsmokers.
  • Health insurance, pensions, sick leave,
    disability, group life insurance financed
    collectively by smokers and nonsmokers.
  • But smokers, die earlier, pay less taxes,
    premiums.

25
Smokers also impose health care costs on
nonsmokers.
  • Smokers usually incur higher health care costs.
  • But nonsmokers die prematurely from passive
    smoking, smoking-related fires.
  • The total external costs of cigarette smoking are
    estimated to be 15 per pack.
    (Manning et al., 1991)

26
Keep in mind
  • The problem which calls for government
    intervention is external costs, not internal
    costs.
  • The full extent of external costs must be
    measured using a lifetime approach.

27
Manning et al.s methods
  • Numerator takes into account life expectancy for
    smokers and the costs (savings due to early
    death) incurred each year.

28
External Cost Components
  • Covered medical costs.
  • Covered work loss and disability.
  • Group life insurance.
  • Widows social security bonus.
  • Covered nursing home costs.
  • Pensions.
  • Taxes on earnings.
  • Fires.

29
per pack
SMPCMSC
MSC0
DMPB
MSB0
MSB
Q0
Q1
Cigarette Packs
  • At Q0 MSC0 gt MSB0
  • Cigarettes are being over-consumed.

30
Government can use taxes and subsidies to alter
economic incentives, correct for externalities.
  • Charge a tax on cigarettes that reduces
    consumption to the socially optimal level Q1.
  • Levy a per-unit tax T on cigarette makers equal
    to vertical distance between MPB and MSB at Q1.

31
per pack
MPC0 T
MPC0MSC
P1
P0
P2
DMPB
MSB
Cigarette packs
Q1
Q0
32
With tax
  • Market price of cigarettes P1
  • Cigarette manufacturers receive P2 per pack.
  • Tax burden
  • Consumer pays P1 - P0
  • Seller pays P0 - P2

33
The relative tax burden on consumers vs.
producers depends on price elasticities for
supply and demand.
  • If demand for cigarettes is inelastic, consumers
    bear a larger?/smaller? Share of the tax burden.

34
Further issues
  • The current tax per pack exceeds external costs.
    Is this OK?
  • Should smokers or cigarette companies be
    responsible for the external costs of smoking?
  • Thank you for smoking. Is this moral??

35
Regulations
  • Government can attempt to control price,
    quantity, or quality of health care products.
  • Example Price Ceilings in The Canadian Health
    Care System.
  • Consumers are fully insured by the government.
  • The government fixes the price the physician
    receives for each visit.

36
Regulations
  • Because consumers are fully insured, they will
    demand the number of visits as if the price per
    visit 0.
  • Assume that the government sets a reimbursement
    rate for physician visits equal to PC.

37
Price
S
PC
D
QD
QS
Physician visits
38
  • With full insurance, consumers want QD visits.
  • But the government has fixed the price of visits
    at PC.
  • Only QS visits will be provided.
  • Shortage of physician visits QD - QS.

39
Consequences
  • 1)Physicians may treat patients on 1st-come,
    1st-served basis, regardless of severity/urgency.
  • 2)Patients will have to queue for care/not
    receive care.
  • 3)Unethical doctors may take bribes from patients
    trying to jump the queue.

40
Lesson There is no free lunch under cost
containment. Price ceilings can lead to
  • 1) Shortages.
  • 2) Longer waiting lines.
  • 3) Nonprice rationing.
  • 4) Poorer health outcomes.

41
The FDA and Drug Advertising
  • Fine Print in Drug Ads Sparks a Debate
  • WSJ 4/1/97
  • What does the new advertising of drugs on TV say
    about special interest vs. public interest
    theory?
  • Who are the special interest groups?
  • What is in the publics best interest?
  • Do drug companies all agree?

42
THE NEW YORK TIMES
  • Editorial The Need
  • for Regulation
  • For All of the
  • Nations Imports
  • 9/16/2007
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com