The dialectic of textual enlightenment: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The dialectic of textual enlightenment:

Description:

Improving reading ability in advanced English learners Peter McDowell School of Education Charles Darwin University peter.mcdowell_at_cdu.edu.au Current reading research ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:109
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: vnseameoO9
Learn more at: http://www.vnseameo.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The dialectic of textual enlightenment:


1
  • The dialectic of textual enlightenment
  • Improving reading ability in advanced English
    learners
  • Peter McDowell
  • School of Education
  • Charles Darwin University
  • peter.mcdowell_at_cdu.edu.au

2
Current reading research is ...
  • Tending to focus on beginning (functional)
    reading over capabilities to properly process
    whole texts
  • Generally giving more attention, earlier on, to
    bottom-up skills over top-down skills
  • Similar situation for both L1 and L2 research
    (L1emphasis on children, L2 on adults)
  • Advanced reading slipping through the cracks

3
State of the art ...
little published evidence exists about the
learners who do reach fluency in the reading and
processing of sophisticated text we know even
less about how to bring readers to sophisticated,
advanced uses of literacy in a second
language Elizabeth Bernhardt
Bernhardt, E. B. (2011). Understanding advanced
second-language reading. New York, NY Routledge.
4
Problems with the research
  • Reading ability is underdeveloped as a concept
  • Reading competency is often conceived as a
    synonym (or symptom) of reading ability
  • Top-down approaches are undermined by
    restricted notions of text, textual structure,
    and intertextuality
  • Widespread essentialism and psychologism

5
Our research questions
  • How can we improve reading ability in advanced
    EAL learners?
  • How can we develop the concept of reading ability
    to better account for advanced reading?
  • To what extent do answers to these questions
    depend on learners studying their own literacies?

6
Teaching context
  • Pre-service teachers (graduate entrants)
  • Large blended-mode unit (single cohort)
  • Curriculum, multiliteracies, digital literacies
  • Graduate destinations are varied
  • Many will become mother-tongue (L1) teachers
  • Significant proportion of EAL learners

7
More on the EAL learners
  • At entry IELTS overall score of 6.5 (in theory)
  • Score of at least 6.0 in reading (academic
    module)
  • Competent user, generally effective command
  • At exit IELTS overall score of 7.5 needed for
    teacher registration, 7.0 in reading
  • Good user, operational command

8
Bridging the gap ...
  • Making the shift from fairly complex language
    to complex language and detailed reasoning
  • From familiar situations to situations in
    general
  • From general misunderstandings to
    misunderstandings in some situations
  • Moving beyond IELTS to the workplace (schools)

9
Teaching strategies (0)
  • Students enter with a default approach to
    reading
  • Generally, students read and process texts, one
    at a time, sequentially, usually linearly, often
    slowly
  • How do we know this?
  • Through students responses to teaching
    activities designed to stretch and strain this
    default approach (they discuss their
    experiences online)

10
Teaching strategies (1)
  • Vary the structure of the texts so that the
    default approach no longer works
  • By setting single texts with multiple voices
  • By setting longer texts with contrasting
    perspectives
  • The default approach breaks down when students
    are required to defend a position (why?)

11
Teaching strategies (2)
  • Multiple voices invite students to read the text
    in several places at once
  • Same with contrasting perspectives
  • But the default reading strategy hinders this
  • Leads to simplification, caricature, reduction
  • Students need help to assimilate the complexity
    of the situation

12
Teaching strategies (3)
  • Set collaborative tasks beyond the capability of
    a single reader (whether related to approach or
    not)
  • Introduce texts that analyse the multiple voices
    and the contrasting perspectives
  • Urge students to debate the issues
  • Contestation lies at the heart of the relevant
    literature (requires constant cross-referencing)

13
Teaching strategies (4)
  • Once students realise the advantage in reading
    across and between texts, the next step is ...
  • Introduce alternative paradigms (at least one)
  • This sets up additional world-views that repeat,
    in their own way, the multiple voices,
    contestation, etc., that shaped students entry
    into the field
  • Alternative paradigms expand the notion of text

14
Teaching strategies (5)
  • Once several paradigms are in play ...
  • Introduce an unanticipated perspective (e.g.
    historically based) that questions the conceptual
    framework underpinning the alternative paradigms
  • In the area of literacy, this could be a critical
    discussion of the rise of the self
  • The individual reader as a historical episode

15
Dialectic of textual enlightenment
Single texts (default)
Multiple voices
Contrasting perspectives
Collaborative views
Contestation
Alternative paradigms
Radical critique
16
Methodological problems
  • Working like this, reflectively, drawing on
    natural language, on concepts in common
    circulation, isnt really adequate
  • The logic of the situation isnt emerging
    properly
  • We need a robust model to help make more sense of
    the broader reading process

17
Theoretical computer science
  • Compilers are special computer programmes
    designed to read and process complex texts (i.e.
    other computer programmes)
  • Optimising compilers process texts in
    sophisticated ways to achieve engineering goals
    (e.g. achieve greater efficiencies when the
    output is run on particular computer hardware)
  • Disclaimer borrowing suggestive terminology

18
A basic processing model
Thread
Thread
Thread
Thread
Stream
Thread
Stream
Stream
19
Peephole reading (the default)
Thread
Stream
Single stream, single thread
(Compare peephole optimisation)
20
Coalescent reading
Thread
Thread
Thread
Stream
Single stream, multiple threads
(Compare coalescing)
21
Pipeline reading
Thread
Thread
Thread
Stream
Stream
Multiple streams, single threads
(Compare pipelines)
22
Fission reading
Thread
Thread
Thread
Stream
Stream
Multiple streams, multiple threads
(Compare fission loops)
23
Dialectic of textual enlightenment
Single texts (default)
1stream 1 thread
Peephole reading
Multiple voices
Contrasting perspectives
Coalescent reading
1 stream N threads
Collaborative views
Contestation
Pipeline reading
N streams 1 thread
Alternative paradigms
Fission reading
N streams N threads
Radical critique
24
Models of reading
  • Most are geared around peephole reading
  • Whole language emphasises coalescent reading
  • Sociocultural models recognise (implicitly) the
    importance of pipeline reading (manifold
    contexts)
  • The dialectic of textual enlightenment can cope
    with all of these plus fission reading
  • Other formulations are possible

25
Our research questions
  • How can we improve reading ability in advanced
    EAL learners?
  • How can we develop the concept of reading ability
    to better account for advanced reading?
  • To what extent do answers to these questions
    depend on learners studying their own literacies?

One way to do this is through a dialectical
approach to reading, with each stage in the
dialectic developing more sophisticated notions
of reading and text
26
Our research questions
  • How can we improve reading ability in advanced
    EAL learners?
  • How can we develop the concept of reading ability
    to better account for advanced reading?
  • To what extent do answers to these questions
    depend on learners studying their own literacies?

A productive way to do this is by drawing on
advances in optimising compilers (computer
science) ways of processing text
algorithmically to gain computational efficiencies
27
Our research questions
  • How can we improve reading ability in advanced
    EAL learners?
  • How can we develop the concept of reading ability
    to better account for advanced reading?
  • To what extent do answers to these questions
    depend on learners studying their own literacies?

Learners own literacies form a pretext and a
resource for understanding the dialectic and more
sophisticated notions of text, textual structure,
and intertextuality
28
Conclusion
  • As a concept reading ability needs development
  • Bottom-up approaches tend to concentrate on the
    immediate text to hand (peephole reading)
  • Top-down approaches tend to concentrate on
    background texts (coalescent reading)
  • Advanced EAL reading embraces other notions of
    intertextuality (pipeline reading, fission
    reading)

Please see the full paper for further details.
29
Coda
In many classes, relatively little actual reading
occurs, with most time devoted to tasks and
activities that assume the reading of the
text.William Grabe
Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language
Moving from theory to practice. New York, NY
Cambridge University Press.
30
Questions and comments?Thank you
  • peter.mcdowell_at_cdu.edu.au

McDowell, P. (2012, August). The dialectic of
textual enlightenment Improving reading ability
in advanced English learners. Paper presented at
3rd International Conference on TESOL, Da Nang
City, Vietnam.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com