Title: A behavioural finance model of exchange rate expectations within a stock-flow consistent framework
1A behavioural finance model of exchange rate
expectations within a stock-flow consistent
framework
- Gauthier Daigle
- Marc Lavoie
2Outline
- Prolegomena
- Behavioural expectations
- Baseline model, without expectations
- Simulations with expectations
- Conclusion
3Origins of the open-economy model Godley and
Lavoie, 2007, chapter 12
4Main features of the model
- Stock-flow coherence
- Two-country model
- Integration of real and financial variables
- Imperfect asset substitutability (in the
tradition of Tobin, Branson and Henderson,
Blanchard et al. 2005) - Therefore uncovered interest parity does not hold
- Many endogenous variables
- Import prices, export prices, domestic sales
deflator, GDP deflator, exchange rate - Exports, imports, output, consumption, domestic
sales, disposable income - Taxes, interest payments, money stock, holdings
of bills and money (portfolios), wealth - Trade balance, current account balance, capital
account balance
5Behavioural expectations
6Exchange rate expectations
- In the original 2007 model, expectations about
exchange rate changes were set to zero (i.e., the
probability of appreciation and of depreciation
are balanced). - Here we reintroduce expectations, consistent with
the claim by several PK authors that exchange
rate expectations of portfolio holders play a key
role in the determination of exchange rates
(Harvey 2003). - We reject the mainstream introduction of
expectations through the interest parity theorem,
which asserts that the forward exchange rate
represents the expectations of the market
regarding the future value of the spot rate. - We support instead reversed causality the
forward exchange rate is simply the spot rate
plus the interest rate differential
(Coulbois/Prissert 1974, Lavoie 2000, Moosa
2004).
7Behavioural exchange rate expectations
- Based on De Grauwe and Grimaldi (2006)
- Two types of investors/traders fundamentalists
and chartists - The fundamentalists stick to a given exchange
rate value. This value, in general, will not
however be the long-run equilibrium one. - The chartists believe that the trend in the
evolution of the exchange rate will continue. - If the exchange rate is moving upwards, but is
still below its fundamental value, both
chartists and fundamentalists will expect an
increase in the exchange rate.
8The portfolio equations
9Expectations equations
10Baseline model, without expectations
11Baseline simulation
- To study the role of expectations, we first run a
baseline simulation without expectations. - We start off from a full equilibrium (the
baseline case), with the trade, current and
capital accounts all in balance. - We then impose an increase in the propensity to
import of the US economy from the UK economy (US
imports rise)
12The UK trade balance (right axis) is initially in
surplus, then in deficit, and the UK exchange
rate keeps rising until it reaches a steady level
(left axis)
13Why does the price of the UK currency rise from a
portfolio point of view?
- This can be explained by the large increase in
the supply of US bills to the UK. - Higher US imports generate a slowdown in the US
economy, lower tax revenues and hence a US
government deficit, and thus an increase in the
supply of US government bills. - This larger supply cannot all be absorbed by the
domestic US market and must be unloaded on
foreign financial markets, thus generating the
depreciation of the US currency and the
appreciation of the UK currency. - The value of the UK currency moves from 1 to
1.38.
14Simulation with expectations
15Simulation with stable results
- We assume the same increase in the propensity to
import of the US economy. - Fundamentalist investors believe that the
fundamental value of the UK exchange rate
remains at its starting value, 1. - Thus they believe that changes are of a
transitional nature.
16With expectations, the UK exchange rate converges
to a different stationary value, 1.55The UK
trade surplus is turned into a trade deficit
17What happens if the fundamental exchange rate
value is modified?
- When the fundamental value of the exchange rate
is being under-estimated, the economy tends
towards a steady-state value of the exchange rate
that is above its fundamental value without
expectations - Reciprocally, when the fundamental value of the
exchange rate is being over-estimated, the
economy converges towards a steady-state value of
the exchange rate that is below its fundamental
value. - When the exchange rate expectations of the
fundamentalists correspond to the steady state
value of the model without expectations, this
steady state value is realized in the model with
expectations. - Thus, adaptative expectations of the
fundamental exchange rate value would drive
the model towards the stationary state achieved
without expectations.
18What happens if chartists represent a greater
proportion of the exchange rate traders or
investors?The stabilizing effects of trade flows
and asset supplies are beaten by the
destabilizing effects of asset demands
19Conclusion Is there hysteresis with expectations?
- When a shock is reversed, in the stable case, the
economy returns exactly at its starting point.
There is no path-dependence, even though there
are exchange rate expectations and chartists that
act on trends. - But there is persistence. With exchange rate
expectations, the model takes twice as much time
to return to its stationary values compared to
the model without expectations. - In the unstable case, reversing the shock will
not do.