Title: Experiments and numerical simulations of laminar viscoelastic flow through sudden expansions
1 Experiments and numerical simulations of laminar
viscoelastic flow through sudden expansions M P
Escudier1, P J Oliveira2, F T Pinho3, A Afonso3
and R J Poole1 1Department of Engineering,
University of Liverpool, UK 2Departmento de
Engenharia Electromecanica, Universidade da Beira
Interior, Portugal 3Departamento de Engenharia
Mecanica, Universidade do Minho, Portugal
Industrial Rheology Conference, Hoole Hall,
Chester, UK. April 5th 7th 2004
2Outline
- Introduction
- Expansion geometry
- Fluid Rheology
- (Shear rheology, N1, extensional viscosity)
- Approach flow (smooth contraction)
- Downstream flow (sudden expansion)
- Conclusions
3Introduction
- Experimental and numerical investigation of
laminar viscoelastic fluid flow - through a plane sudden expansion of expansion
ratio (D/d) 1.43 and aspect ratio (w/h) 13.3.
- Why?
- Investigate viscoelastic fluid flow in a basic
geometry which exhibits interesting fluid-dynamic
behaviour.
- Extend previous studies (Re lt 1) to higher
Reynolds numbers where inertia starts to play an
important role.
- Are there qualitative changes compared to
Newtonian fluid flow? Is the flow 2D?
- Extend previous studies by providing L.D.A
velocity data for quantitative comparisons with
numerical simulations.
4Experimental arrangement
Fully-developed inlet flow through a square duct
80mm x 80 mm (120 DH development length)
Downstream profiles at 0ltx/hlt10 in x-y plane
Upstream spanwise profiles (x-z plane) at
x/h-8.33 and 0
Aspect ratios A1 w/h 13.3 A2 w/d
2.86
d 28mm, h 6mm, D 40mm, w 80mm
Area ratio R d/D 0.7
(area ratio gt 2/3 ? double backward-facing step )
5Rheology
Fluid Polyacrylamide (PAA) Seperan AP 273 E
0.05, 0.1 0.4 w/w including Carreau-Yasuda
(5-parameter) model fits
6Rheology
Fluid Polyacrylamide (PAA) Seperan AP 273 E
0.1, 0.4 w/w
7Extensional rheology
Fluid Polyacrylamide (PAA) Seperan AP 273 E
0.05, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 w/w Thermo Haake CaBER
Extensional rheometer
8Extensional rheology
c () (Pa.s) (mPa.s) (Pa.s)
0.05 0.614 2.82 466 760 165 000
0.1 8.83 4.37 548 63 125 000
0.2 26.6 9.44 1087 41 115 000
0.4 162 9.37 1506 9 160 000
9Results Flow through smooth contraction
Spanwise variation of streamwise velocity (U/UB)
profiles within smooth contraction 0.05 PAA and
0.1 PAA Re ? 120
10Results Flow through smooth contraction
Spanwise variation of streamwise velocity (U/UB)
profiles within smooth contraction 0.4 PAA Re ? 5
11Results Flow downstream of expansion
Streamwise velocity (U/UB) profiles downstream of
expansion for 0.05 PAA Re120
12Results Flow downstream of expansion
Streamwise velocity (U/UB) profiles downstream of
expansion for 0.05 PAA Re120
13Results Flow downstream of expansion
Streamwise velocity (U/UB) profiles downstream of
expansion for 0.1 PAA Re120
14Results Flow downstream of expansion
Streamwise velocity (U/UB) profiles downstream of
expansion for 0.1 PAA Re120
15Results Flow downstream of expansion
Streamwise velocity (U/UB) profiles downstream of
expansion for 0.4 PAA Re5
16Results Flow downstream of expansion
Streamwise velocity (U/UB) profiles downstream of
expansion for 0.4 PAA Re5
17Conclusions
- Flow through smooth contraction
- Flow becomes increasingly three-dimensional (but
symmetrical about x-y centreplane) and complex
with increasing concentration. - Simulations fail to predict velocity overshoot
near side-walls.
- Flow over double backward-facing step
- Flow symmetrical about x-z centreplane.
- 0.05 PAA flow predicted reasonably well by PTT
model (consequence of flow being more
two-dimensional?) - 0.1 and 0.4 PAA profiles not predicted well by
any model (consequence of poor agreement through
contraction and hence inlet velocity profiles?) - PTT model corrects shear-thinning
over-prediction
18Latest experimental study
Spanwise variation of streamwise velocity (U/UB)
profiles within smooth contraction 0.05 PAA
(x-z centreplane)
Plane sudden expansion d 10 mm D 40 mm h
15 mm R d/D 0.25 (lt 2/3) A w/h 5.33
(lt10) 0.05 PAA Re ? 200