Experiments and numerical simulations of laminar viscoelastic flow through sudden expansions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Experiments and numerical simulations of laminar viscoelastic flow through sudden expansions

Description:

Experiments and numerical simulations of laminar viscoelastic flow through sudden expansions M P Escudier1, P J Oliveira2, F T Pinho3, A Afonso3 and R J Poole1 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:134
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: RobP8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Experiments and numerical simulations of laminar viscoelastic flow through sudden expansions


1
Experiments and numerical simulations of laminar
viscoelastic flow through sudden expansions M P
Escudier1, P J Oliveira2, F T Pinho3, A Afonso3
and R J Poole1 1Department of Engineering,
University of Liverpool, UK 2Departmento de
Engenharia Electromecanica, Universidade da Beira
Interior, Portugal 3Departamento de Engenharia
Mecanica, Universidade do Minho, Portugal
Industrial Rheology Conference, Hoole Hall,
Chester, UK. April 5th 7th 2004
2
Outline
  • Introduction
  • Expansion geometry
  • Fluid Rheology
  • (Shear rheology, N1, extensional viscosity)
  • Approach flow (smooth contraction)
  • Downstream flow (sudden expansion)
  • Conclusions

3
Introduction
  • Experimental and numerical investigation of
    laminar viscoelastic fluid flow
  • through a plane sudden expansion of expansion
    ratio (D/d) 1.43 and aspect ratio (w/h) 13.3.
  • Why?
  • Investigate viscoelastic fluid flow in a basic
    geometry which exhibits interesting fluid-dynamic
    behaviour.
  • Extend previous studies (Re lt 1) to higher
    Reynolds numbers where inertia starts to play an
    important role.
  • Are there qualitative changes compared to
    Newtonian fluid flow? Is the flow 2D?
  • Extend previous studies by providing L.D.A
    velocity data for quantitative comparisons with
    numerical simulations.

4
Experimental arrangement
Fully-developed inlet flow through a square duct
80mm x 80 mm (120 DH development length)
Downstream profiles at 0ltx/hlt10 in x-y plane
Upstream spanwise profiles (x-z plane) at
x/h-8.33 and 0
Aspect ratios A1 w/h 13.3 A2 w/d
2.86
d 28mm, h 6mm, D 40mm, w 80mm
Area ratio R d/D 0.7
(area ratio gt 2/3 ? double backward-facing step )
5
Rheology
Fluid Polyacrylamide (PAA) Seperan AP 273 E
0.05, 0.1 0.4 w/w including Carreau-Yasuda
(5-parameter) model fits
6
Rheology
Fluid Polyacrylamide (PAA) Seperan AP 273 E
0.1, 0.4 w/w
7
Extensional rheology
Fluid Polyacrylamide (PAA) Seperan AP 273 E
0.05, 0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 w/w Thermo Haake CaBER
Extensional rheometer
8
Extensional rheology
c () (Pa.s) (mPa.s) (Pa.s)
0.05 0.614 2.82 466 760 165 000
0.1 8.83 4.37 548 63 125 000
0.2 26.6 9.44 1087 41 115 000
0.4 162 9.37 1506 9 160 000
9
Results Flow through smooth contraction
Spanwise variation of streamwise velocity (U/UB)
profiles within smooth contraction 0.05 PAA and
0.1 PAA Re ? 120
10
Results Flow through smooth contraction
Spanwise variation of streamwise velocity (U/UB)
profiles within smooth contraction 0.4 PAA Re ? 5
11
Results Flow downstream of expansion
Streamwise velocity (U/UB) profiles downstream of
expansion for 0.05 PAA Re120
12
Results Flow downstream of expansion
Streamwise velocity (U/UB) profiles downstream of
expansion for 0.05 PAA Re120
13
Results Flow downstream of expansion
Streamwise velocity (U/UB) profiles downstream of
expansion for 0.1 PAA Re120
14
Results Flow downstream of expansion
Streamwise velocity (U/UB) profiles downstream of
expansion for 0.1 PAA Re120
15
Results Flow downstream of expansion
Streamwise velocity (U/UB) profiles downstream of
expansion for 0.4 PAA Re5
16
Results Flow downstream of expansion
Streamwise velocity (U/UB) profiles downstream of
expansion for 0.4 PAA Re5
17
Conclusions
  • Flow through smooth contraction
  • Flow becomes increasingly three-dimensional (but
    symmetrical about x-y centreplane) and complex
    with increasing concentration.
  • Simulations fail to predict velocity overshoot
    near side-walls.
  • Flow over double backward-facing step
  • Flow symmetrical about x-z centreplane.
  • 0.05 PAA flow predicted reasonably well by PTT
    model (consequence of flow being more
    two-dimensional?)
  • 0.1 and 0.4 PAA profiles not predicted well by
    any model (consequence of poor agreement through
    contraction and hence inlet velocity profiles?)
  • PTT model corrects shear-thinning
    over-prediction

18
Latest experimental study
Spanwise variation of streamwise velocity (U/UB)
profiles within smooth contraction 0.05 PAA
(x-z centreplane)
Plane sudden expansion d 10 mm D 40 mm h
15 mm R d/D 0.25 (lt 2/3) A w/h 5.33
(lt10) 0.05 PAA Re ? 200
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com