Assessing Cancer Registry Systems: Challenges and Opportunities for Improving Outreach in Rhode Island Minority Populations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Assessing Cancer Registry Systems: Challenges and Opportunities for Improving Outreach in Rhode Island Minority Populations

Description:

Assessing Cancer Registry Systems: Challenges and Opportunities for Improving Outreach in Rhode Island Minority Populations The Rhode Island Latino Cancer – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:255
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 53
Provided by: Alva52
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Assessing Cancer Registry Systems: Challenges and Opportunities for Improving Outreach in Rhode Island Minority Populations


1
Assessing Cancer Registry Systems
Challenges and Opportunities for Improving
Outreach in Rhode Island Minority Populations
  • The Rhode Island Latino Cancer
  • Control Task Force (LCCTF)
  • Bridging the Health Care Divide Research
  • and Programs to Eliminate Cancer Disparities

American Cancer Society Conference New Orleans,
Louisiana April 18-20, 2007
2
Building a Coalition
  • 2000 General Assembly urges Rhode Island cities
    and towns to create municipal Cancer Control Task
    Forces.
  • Established partnership among American Cancer
    Society, RIDOH, RICAN
  • 13 coalitions were formed.

3
Building a Coalition
  • Neither one focused on dispair populations.
  • Hispanic/Latinos are the majority of the minority
    groups in RI, representing almost 12 of the
    overall population.
  • Among the Hispanic/Latino population, Cancer was
    the leading cost of death during the period of
    1999-2004 in the State of Rhode Island.

4
Building a Coalition
  • The Formation of the Latino Cancer Control
  • Task Force will help
  • to determine the nature of cancer challenge in
    our community,
  • to examine its causes, and
  • to identify resources, gaps and opportunities, in
    order to develop prioritized strategies that will
    diminish the cancer deaths among the Latino
    community in our state.

5
Building a Coalition
  • October 20, 2005,
  • The Latino Cancer Control Task Force (LCCTF) was
    created as a
  • volunteer-based Community group formed in
    response to the need to reduce the leading causes
    of cancer morbidity and mortality among
    Hispanic/Latinos in Rhode Island.

6
The Latino Cancer Control Task Force Mission
Statement
  • The Latino Cancer Control Task Force aims to
    reduce the impact of cancer in the Latino
    community in Rhode Island
  • by facilitating cancer prevention through
    outreach, public education, awareness, early
    detection, access to care and advocacy,
  • and improving care and quality of life for cancer
    patients, their families, and caregivers.

7
The Latino Cancer Control Task ForceGoals and
Objectives
  • Advocacy. Being vigorous advocates for cancer
    control, supporting public policy initiatives and
    research, and developing strategic alliances with
    governmental agencies, hospitals, nongovernmental
    health promotion organizations, health
    professionals, the community, and the media.
  • Outreach. Providing outreach targeting the
    different populations, institutions, providers,
    policy makers, advocates, community leaders and
    organizations to increase knowledge and awareness
    of cancer issues affecting Latinos.

8
The Latino Cancer Control Task Force Goals and
Objectives
  • Education. Preventing cancer by increasing
    knowledge and awareness of cancer and by
    encouraging healthier behaviors.
  • Services. Promoting the early detection of
    cancer through public education and access to
    screenings and treatment.
  • Quality of life. Improving patients' quality of
    life and minimizing their suffering through
    education, support, and palliative care.

9
The Latino Cancer Control Structure
10
LCCTF Projects
  • Conduct an assessment on what resources are
    available to the Hispanic/Latino population.
  • Assess how data is collected and interpreted by
    regulatory offices.
  • Bring together Latino health professionals to
    educate and create community awareness on the
    issues of cancer prevention and early detection.
  • Trough our Advocacy workgroup support American
    Cancer Society Legislative Policy Priorities.
  • Ensure fair access to screenings and treatment.

11
LCCTF Accomplishments
  • Membership LCCTF membership represents the vast
    diversity of Latinos in RI.
  • Data Analysis Data Analysis workgroup conducted
    a survey to all RI Hospitals.
  • 1st. Annual Conference Mujeres Hablemos Claro!
    La Salud del Seno 183 registered, 126 attended,
    60 new volunteers, 13 De Amiga a Amiga
    volunteers trained.
  • Legislation Introduced by one of LCCTF members
    Senator Juan Pichardo, asking to increase the
    funds for the WCSP.

12
LCCTF Data Systems Project
  • Assess how data is collected and
  • interpreted by regulatory offices
  • The Rhode Island Cancer Registry
  • System Study

13
The RICR System Study -Objectives
  • Conduct an assessment of the Rhode Island Cancer
    Registry (RICR) System
  • Determine how race and ethnicity information of
    cancer patients is collected and reported
  • Identify strengths, limitations and opportunities
    for improving CR information quality and data
    utilization for population targeting and outreach

14
Main Questions
  • What are the start and end-points of the
  • RI CR?
  • What is the guideline?
  • Is there compliance with OMB 15?
  • What are the implications of non-uniform
  • reporting?
  • Other study findings
  • Can under-reporting be corrected?

15
Start and End-Points - RICR
COLLECTION
AGGREGATION
LOCAL, REGIONAL AND NATIONAL REPORTING
DATA SYSTEM
Cancer Patients
Cancer Patients/Cancer Families
16
What is the Guideline?
  • The Rhode Island Department of Health requires
    health
  • providers to collect the following demographic
  • information about their patients
  • What is your ethnic background?
  • Hispanic/Latino
  • Not Hispanic/Latino
  • What is your race? (please indicate all
    races that apply)
  • American Indian or Alaskan Native
  • Asian
  • Black or African American
  • Native Hawaiian or other Pacific
    Islander
  • White

17
OMB 15
Is there compliance in the collection and
reporting of race and ethnicity?
18
RICRS Assessment - Methods
  • Hospital Survey
  • 14 acute care hospitals
  • 13 cancer registries
  • hospital cancer registry data not a start or
  • end-point
  • Key Informant Interviews
  • 3 key informants
  • public health, health care industry and
  • national voluntary health organization

19
Hospital Cancer Registry Survey
  • Unit of Analysis hospitals (information
    collected via questionnaire)
  • Population of Interest Rhode Islanders with
  • a diagnosis of primary cancer
  • Main Topics forms used for cancer patient
  • intake, collection of cancer risk factors and
  • race/ethnicity information, content of
    database
  • and access to cancer registry data,
    feasibility of
  • CR and MR linkage, frequency of reports and
  • organizations receiving reports (22 questions)

20
Participating Hospitals (N14)
  • Kent Hospital
  • Landmark Medical Center
  • Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island
  • Miriam Hospital
  • Naval Health Care New England
  • Newport Hospital
  • Rhode Island Hospital
  • Roger Williams Medical Center
  • South County Hospital
  • St. Joseph Hospital
  • Our Lady of Fatima Hospital
  • VA Medical Center
  • Westerly Hospital
  • Women Infants Hospital

21
Key Informant Interviews
  • Unit of Analysis individual expertise in cancer
    data systems (information collected via
    questionnaire)
  • Population of Interest US population with a
    diagnosis of primary cancer
  • Main Topics reporting organizations, types/
    format of information reported, risk factor and
    race/ethnicity information quality, methods for
    adjusting under-reporting, OMB compliance,
    database content and access to cancer registry
    data, feasibility of CR and MR linkage, frequency
    of reports and agencies targeted (26 questions)

22
Key Informants (N3)
  • John Fulton, PhD
  • Director, Rhode Island Cancer Registry
  • Associate Director of Health
  • Rhode Island Department of Health
  • David Rousseau, PhD
  • Director, Cancer Information Systems
  • Hospital Association of Rhode Island
  • Jimmy Parson, PhD
  • Research and Analysis Manager
  • American Cancer Society, NHO

23
Analysis
  • Hospital Survey
  • Since sample size was small, results are
  • presented as frequencies and percents
  • Because some questions asked for more than 1
    response, some figures exceed the total number of
    expected responses
  • Responses were converted into ordinal scales
  • (i.e. all100 most70-99 some40-69
  • a few1-39 none0)
  • Ordinal scales were grouped by topic in order to
    summarize findings

24
Analysis
  • Key Informant Interviews
  • Emphasis set on the qualitative aspects of
  • information
  • Results not presented in frequencies or
  • percents
  • Information used to gain a better insight into
    hospital survey results and inform discussion of
    findings and recommendations to 1) help improve
    the quality of cancer registries and 2) translate
    findings into improved outreach
  • practices

25
Results Hospital Survey
  • Summary
  • 14 Rhode Island hospitals have cancer registries
  • Requested participation of hospital cancer
    registrars
  • Respondents signed consent form
  • 1 initial mailing and two respondent follow-ups
  • 11 hospital cancer registries responded (79
    response rate)
  • Findings presented here exclude non-respondents
  • Respondent follow-up ended 04-16-07
  • 2 hospitals share the same reporting system

26
Results Hospital Survey
  • Forms
  • Do hospitals with CRs have intake forms (IF)
    specific for cancer?
  • 5 hospitals (45) have an IF for cancer 5
    hospitals (45) use a general IF
  • Is information on cancer risk factors obtained
    via cancer IF?
  • 3 hospitals (30) collect cancer risk factor
    information on these forms
  • Is other form used to obtain cancer risk factor
    information?
  • 6 hospitals (56) use other sources

27
Results Hospital Survey (cont.)
  • Forms
  • What form is used to determine the race of cancer
  • patients?
  • 10 (1 out of 4 with cancer intake forms) ask for
    race
  • 5 hospitals (50) ask for race thru general
    intake
  • forms
  • 4 hospitals (40) use other forms (medical
    records,
  • physical exam, medical history)

28
Results Hospital Survey (cont.)
  • Forms
  • What form is used to determine the ethnicity of
  • cancer patients?
  • 11 (1 out of 4 with cancer intake forms)
  • 4 hospitals (44) use general intake forms
  • 4 hospitals (44) use other forms
  • 2 hospitals did not respond to this question

29
Results Hospital Survey (cont.)
  • Forms
  • From findings presented so far race (50) and
  • ethnicity (56) are obtained via intake forms by
  • 40 of hospitals with cancer registries
  • How many races can be checked in the intake form?
  • 1 race 1 hospital (9)
  • 2 races 2 hospitals (18)
  • 2 or more races 4 hospitals (36)
  • 4 hospitals (36) do not collect this information
    in the
  • intake form

30
Results Hospital Survey (cont.)
  • Forms
  • What form is used to determine the country of
  • origin of cancer patients?
  • 1 hospital (11) uses the cancer intake form to
  • obtain information on country of origin
  • 8 hospitals (88) reported not collecting
    information
  • on country of origin

31
Results Hospital Survey (cont.)
  • Race/Ethnicity/Country of Origin
  • How is the race of a cancer patient determined?
  • (multiple response question)
  • In 4 hospitals (36) patient self-reports race
  • In 5 hospitals (45) person filling form asks
    patient
  • In 1 hospital (9) person filling form makes a
  • guess
  • In 4 hospitals (36) information obtained from MR
  • 1 hospital (9) uses medical history/physical
    exam
  • 2 hospitals use a combination of methods b and d
  • 1 hospital use a combination of methods b and c

32
Results Hospital Survey (cont.)
  • Race/Ethnicity/Country of Origin
  • How is the ethnicity of a cancer patient
  • determined? (multiple response question)
  • 3 hospitals (27) present the patient with a
  • standard form and the question Are you
    from
  • Hispanic or Latino origin
  • 6 hospitals (56) ask patients about their
  • ethnicity in a non-standard way
  • 2 hospitals (18) reported unknown

33
Results Hospital Survey (cont.)
  • Access to Cancer Data
  • Does the intake form have a number that
  • can be used to link with the patient medical
  • record?
  • All (7 out of 7 hospitals with intake forms) can
    link
  • to MRs
  • Do hospitals aggregate information of cancer
  • cases (from intake and other forms) into a
    database?
  • All (11 out of 11 hospitals)

34
Results Hospital Survey (cont.)
  • Access to Cancer Data
  • Is cancer data available to researchers from
  • academic institutions?
  • 10 hospitals (91) provide access to cancer data
  • Is there an internal procedure to obtain access?
  • 10 hospitals (91) have an IRB process in place

35
Results Hospital Survey (cont.)
  • Reporting
  • To what organizations do you report cancer data?
  • 5 hospitals (45) to NCBD (National CAHPS
  • Benchmarking Database) yearly
  • 1 hospital (9) to CIRF (Cancer Information
    Reference File) yearly
  • 4 hospitals (36) to the National Cancer Database
  • of the American College of Surgeons (ACS)
    yearly
  • All to the Rhode Island Cancer Registry (RICR)
  • monthly
  • All to the Hospital Association of Rhode Island
  • (HARI) monthly

36
Results Hospital Survey (cont.)
  • Reporting
  • Is the data you report linked to medical
  • records?
  • 4 hospitals (37) have MR linkage capacity

37
Key Informant Results
  • TOPIC HARI RI CR ACS
  • Who reports 13 hospital CR 21 Century 13
    hospital CR 6 state CR Americans for
    Non-Smokers
  • how often? Oncology Services (monthly) pathology
    labs surgical Rights National Breast and
  • centers (monthly) Cervical Cancer Early
  • Detection Program Tobacco Free Kids
    National Committee for Quality Assurance
    (NCQA), Colorectal Screenings in
  • Health Plans UC Berkeley, Smoking
    Cessation for Medicaid Smoke Free
    Grade, American Lung
  • Association Cancer Incidence Rates,
    National Program of Cancer Registries
    Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance
    System (BRFSS) and Youth Risk Factor
    Surveillance System (YRBFS) (all yearly)

38
Key Informant Results (cont.)
  • TOPIC HARI RI CR ACS
  • Data format single format North single format
    (NAACCR) multiple formats (excel,
  • American Association word, pdf and text)
  • of Central Cancer
  • Registries (NAACCR)
  • Database www.naaccr.org www.naaccr.org
    n/a
  • Specifications
  • Cancer risk smoking status and no cancer RF
    data smoking Thompson Medstat
  • Factors (RF) occupation PULSE Survey
  • Screening no screening data no screening
    data breast and colorectal screen.
  • Race/ethnicity yes yes yes
  • of races most report 1 race most report 1 race
    (can most report 1 race
  • Reported report up to six)
  • Information on no some this is a
    variable in no
  • how is race the NCAACCR data set, but
  • determined? HEALTH does not require it

39
Key Informant Results (cont.)
  • TOPIC HARI RI CR ACS
  • Information on no no a few
  • how ethnicity is
  • determined?
  • Do you provide Race and ethnicity treated When
    directed by feds We only look at race/
  • guidance to like all other data items When
    required by state ethnicity data for
  • comply with required by law When requested by
    hospitals screening data and data
  • OMB 15? When required by RI HARI coming from
    CDC
  • Target year for no Its being discussed
    but no response
  • helping partners no date yet
  • achieve OMB 15
  • compliance?
  • Organizations -NAACCR -NAACCR -ACS Divisions
    (monthly)
  • you report data -National Program of
    -CDC -ACS Management (as
  • to? Cancer Registries (CDC) -International
    Association needed)
  • -RI Department of Health of Cancer Registries
    (IACR)
  • -Central Brain Tumor (yearly)

40
Key Informant Results (cont.)
  • TOPIC HARI RI CR ACS
  • Uses Spanish Uses NAACCR algorithm We can do
    this, but as a We dont go into that level
  • surname method (last name place of birth)
    separate variablewe of detail in our
    reporting.
  • to adjust to determine Hispanic dont report
    it to CDC, We rely on external
  • under-reporting? sources
  • How do you 1 race ethnicity (2nd Several
    formats per 1 race ethnicity
  • report data on racial group almost never
    request
  • race/ethnicity? recorded in medical
  • Do you keep yes yes Not to my
    knowledge. We
  • identifiers to link have worked with ACoS
    to
  • cancer registry determine underserved in
  • and MR data? hospitals but it is not
  • possible to link up
  • Is your data yes yes We dot provide
    this data
  • available to IRB approval may be at this
    time
  • researchers? necessary

41
Key Informant Results (cont.)
TOPIC HARI RI CR ACS How many data
blank 6 data inquiries 0 inquiries and
Note research proposals 0 research
are handled by the IRB proposals do
Committee receive per year? Is there an
IRB yes yes blank procedure?
What cancer Contact Dr. John
Fulton -Annual Report -Mission Scorecard
(yearly) reports does your -RI Cancer
Burden -Mission Dashboard (yearly) organization
(annual update) -Best Practices Reports
produce? -Special reports (ongoing)
(ongoing) Do you report yes yes yes
cancer data within your organization?
42
RI CR Assessment Start/End-Points
Hospitals
CRs
Kent H.
1
Colorectal Screenings in Health Plans
Landmark MC
2
NCQA
ALA
Memorial H RI
3
21st Century Oncology Services
Miriam H.
4
BRFSS YBRFS
CDC
Naval HC NE
5
NAACCR
NPCR
HARI
Newport H.
6
CBTRUS
ACS
Rhode Island H.
7
Cancer Patients
CDC
R. Williams MC
8
RI CR
NAACCR
South County H.
9
ACS Divisions
ACS Management
IACR
St .Joseph H.
6 states
10
Our Lady of Fatima
pathology labs, surgical centers
VA MC
11
Westerly H.
12
Cancer Patients/Cancer Families/Communities
Women Infants.
13
43
Compliance with OMB 15?
  • Findings from the hospital cancer registry survey
  • indicated lack of uniform collection of
  • information on race and ethnicity.
  • Only a few hospitals ask patients to self-report
  • their race (27) and ethnicity (27) according
    to
  • the guideline
  • Only a few hospitals (36) collect information on
    2
  • or more races
  • The Key Informant Interview revealed that most
  • cancer data sources only report 1 race
  • There is no target date yet in RI for achieving
  • OMB 15 compliance with cancer data reporting

44
Summary of Findings 
  • 1.  Use of Intake Forms (IFs) specific to cancer
  • 2.  Use of IFs (cancer-specific and general)
  • 3.  Use of IFs to obtain cancer risk factor
    (CRF) information
  • 4.  Use of other forms to obtain CRF information
  • 5.  Collection of CRF information from all
    sources
  • 6.  Is reporting of CRF information a RI CR
    requirement?
  • 7.  Race information obtained at point of entry
    (POE)
  • 8.  Race information obtained from other sources
  • 9.  Ethnicity information obtained at POE
  • 10. Ethnicity information obtained from other
    sources
  • 11. RI CR mechanism to monitor OMB 15 compliance?
  • 12. Collection of information on country of
    origin
  • 13. IF/MR linkage
  • 14. RI CR/MR linkage
  • 15. Patient self-reporting of race and ethnicity
  • 16. Collection of information of two or more
    races
  • 17. Reporting of two or more races
  • 18. Target date for OMB 15 compliance?

45
Summary of Findings
  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6. NO
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11. NO
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18. NO

45
91
30
60
90
60
40
56
44
12
100
??
37
27
36
9
91
0 10 20 30 40
50 60 70 80 90
100
Hospital Cancer Registry Survey Key Informant
Interview
46
Implications of Non-Compliance
  • Undercount of multi-racial ethnic groups
  • over count of non multi-racial ethnic groups
  • Underestimates in cancer prevalence,
  • incidence and mortality
  • Problem may not be limited to the RI CRS
  • other RI/national data sets may be affected
  • Difficult targeting and outreach of multi-
  • racial ethnic groups
  • Misdirecting resources for targeting/outreach
  • Potential for unsound public health practice

47
Other Study Conclusions
  • All 100 Most 70-99 Some 40-69 A few
    1-39 None 0
  • The form closest to the information entry point
    is
  • the IF
  • Most hospitals (91) reported use of IFs
  • A few hospitals (30) use IFs to collect
    information on cancer risk factors (RFs)
  • Some hospitals (60) use other forms
  • While some cancer RF information is obtained at
  • the point of entry, the Key Informant Survey
  • revealed no reporting requirement

48
Other Study Conclusions (cont.)
  • All 100 Most 70-99 Some 40-69 A few
    1-39 None 0
  • About half of the information on race and
    ethnicity
  • obtained at the point of entry (IF)
  • Some hospitals (60) obtain race information thru
  • IFs some hospitals (56) use IFs for
    ethnicity
  • A few hospitals (40) use other forms to
    determine
  • race and some (44) for ethnicity
  • The Key Informant Survey determined that
  • There is no mechanism in the RI CR system to
  • monitor OMB 15 compliance
  • No information is reported on how race and
  • ethnicity data are collected

49
Other Study Conclusions (cont.)
  • All 100 Most 70-99 Some 40-69 A few
    1-39 None 0
  • Most hospitals (88) do not collect information
  • on country of origin
  • 1 asks for country of origin
  • 1 asks for main language
  • All hospitals with IFs can link back to MRs
    only
  • a few hospitals (37) can link back to MRs
    data
  • reported to the RI CR
  • However, HARI and the RI CR require a field in
  • reported databases that can be used to link to
    MRs

50
Can the Problem be Fixed?
  • Our recommendations
  • Improve data quality at the point of entry
  • and monitor data quality collection and
  • reporting on key variables including race and
  • ethnicity
  • In the interim, promote use and refinement of
  • the Spanish Surname Algorithm to determine
  • the extent of the undercount of Hispanic
  • cancer cases and institutionalize
    dissemination
  • of more reliable cancer statistics

51
Apply the Guideline Please
52
Contact Information
  • Alvaro M Tinajero, MD, MPH, ScM
  • Alvaro_Tinajero_at_brown.edu
  • Alvaro.Tinajero_at_health.ri.gov
  • Alvaro.Tinajero_at_gmail.com
  • Mercedes (Betty) Bernal
  • Betty.Bernal_at_cancer.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com