Cortical auditory evoked potential correlates of categorical perception of voice-onset time - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Cortical auditory evoked potential correlates of categorical perception of voice-onset time

Description:

Title: Cortical auditory evoked potential correlates of categorical perception of voice-onset time Author: Kim Last modified by: Kim Created Date – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:237
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: Kim1268
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cortical auditory evoked potential correlates of categorical perception of voice-onset time


1
Cortical auditory evoked potential correlates of
categorical perception of voice-onset time
  • By Anu Sharma and
  • Michael F. Dorman

2
Previous research
  • Listeners are better able to discriminate
    between sounds which have been identified as
    belonging to different phonetic categories than
    between sounds which have been identified as
    belonging to the same phonetic category.

3
Previous research
  • Experiments on the encoding of VOT by fibers in
    the auditory nerve on chinchillas have shown that
    the neural encoding of acoustic features was more
    salient in the middle of the VOT continuum.
  • This corresponds to the uncertainty point for
    human listeners.

4
Purpose of present study
  • Examine neural correlates of VOT perception at
    the level of the auditory cortex (in humans).
  • Test how the MMN of listeners will differ across
    and within categories of sound pairs.

5
Behavioral experimentSubjects
  • 16 adults aged between 20-30
  • All were native speakers of English
  • They had no history of speech or hearing
    disorders.

6
Behavioral experimentStimuli
  • A continuum of nine tokens varying from /da/ to
    /ta/.
  • VOT varied from 0 ms to 80 ms (10 ms interval)

7
Behavioral experimentProcedures
  • Identification task classify sounds as /ta/ or
    /da/
  • Participants had an initial practice.
  • After they heard each sounds ten times in a
    random order.

8
Behavioral experimentProcedures
  • AX discrimination task across-category pairs
    (30-50ms) and within-category pairs (60-80ms).
  • 50 pairs of each kind were used.
  • ISI 500 ms
  • Subjects had to answer if the stimuli were same
    or different.
  • Again they had a practice trial.

9
Behavioral experimentResults
10
Behavioral experimentResults
11
Behavioral experimentResults
  • Results of the behavioral experiments are
    consistent with results from previous research.

12
Electrophysiologic experimentSubjects
  • 9 participants (same as for behavioral
    experiment) aged between 22-26.
  • Participants were asked to watch a movie and to
    ignore the stimuli they heard through their right
    ear.

13
Electrophysiologic experimentStimuli (MMN)
  • Same stimuli as for the behavioral experiment.
  • One repetitive stimulus and occasionally one
    target stimulus that is different.
  • Across-category pair
  • 30ms (standard) 50ms (deviant)
  • Within category pair
  • 60ms (standard) 80ms (deviant)

14
MMN
  • MMN is a response to stimulus change and occurs
    only when the deviant stimulus is presented in
    the context of a sequence of standard stimuli.

15
Results
16
Results
17
Results
  • Results from the electrophysiologic experiment
    complement well the results of the discrimination
    task. When participants say they hear different
    sounds, an apparent difference occurs in the
    brain wave.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com