- PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: Mimi Mark Created Date: 1/15/2006 6:20:54 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show Other titles: Times New Roman Arial ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: Mimi2
Category:
Tags: heron

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title:


1
Big Ideas in Building Student Academic Skills
Jim Wrightwww.interventioncentral.org
2
None of us is as smart as all of us.--Anonymous
3
Any darn mule can kick a barn down, but it takes
a carpenter to build one.--Lyndon Johnson
4
Curriculum Train
5
Difficult-To-Teach Students
  • Experience greater difficulty with learning and
    retention of information
  • May also have behavioral problems
  • Fall along a continuum, with some students
    showing more severe needs than others

6
Difficult-To-Teach StudentsThe Numbers
  • One in ten children in schools is classified as
    Special Education
  • 3-5 of students may qualify for ADHD
  • In 1998, about 40 of 4th grade youngsters fell
    below grade-level on a national reading test

7
Difficult-To-Teach Students
  • An increasing body of evidence supports the
    need for students with disabilities to be
    directly taught the processes and concepts that
    nondisabled children tend to learn naturally
    through experiences.
  • --Office of Special Education Programs
  • 21st Annual Report to Congress (1999)

8
Difficult-To-Teach StudentsWhat Works (OSEP,
1999)
  • Provide the student with
  • Adequate range of examples to exemplify a concept
    or problem-solving strategy
  • Models of proficient performancee.g.,
    step-by-step strategies
  • Experiences where students explain how and why
    they make decisions

9
Difficult-To-Teach StudentsWhat Works (Cont.)
  • Provide the student with
  • Frequent feedback on quality of performance and
    support so the student persists in activities
  • Adequate practice and activities that are
    interesting and engaging

10
Teacher Circle of Accountability
  • Identify students who need additional support
  • Use research-based interventions to assist
    students
  • Monitor these students progress on ongoing basis

11
Building Blocks of Effective Instruction
12
Learning Interaction Between Student and Setting
  • It would be hard to imagine a model of academic
    achievement that failed to recognize that
    learning involves interaction between students
    and their environment. Certainly one function of
    formal schooling is to organize the environment
    so that learning can occur effectively. p. 346

Source Lentz, F. E. Shapiro, E. S. (1986).
Functional assessment of the academic
environment. School Psychology Review, 15,
346-357.
13
Big Ideas as an Academic Intervention
14
Big Ideas As an Academic Intervention(Carnine,
1994)
  • The notion of big ideas is roughly comparable
    to important ideas,knowledge, and concepts.
    Specifically, instead of teaching for coverage
    (i.e., exposing students to all the objectives of
    a lesson), only a few big ideas would be taught,
    but more thoroughly. It is better to do a few
    robust things well than lots of things
    poorlyp.346
  • Example Fractions, decimals, ratios, percents
    all represent the concept of proportion.

15
Identifying the Driver(s) or Cause(s) of
Student Academic Concerns
16
Identifying the Cause of the Students Academic
Deficit
  • Possible Explanations
  • Skill Deficit Student needs to be taught the
    skills
  • Fragile Skill Student possesses the skill but
    has not yet mastered to automaticity
  • Performance Deficit Student can do the skill but
    lacks incentive to perform it (motivation issue)

17
Instructional Hierarchy(Haring, et al, 1978)
18
(No Transcript)
19
Instructional Hierarchy Four Stages of Learning
  • Acquisition
  • Fluency
  • Generalization
  • Adaptation

Source Haring, N.G., Lovitt, T.C., Eaton, M.D.,
Hansen, C.L. (1978). The fourth R Research in
the classroom. Columbus, OH Charles E. Merrill
Publishing Co.
20
Instructional Hierarchy Matching Interventions to Student Learning Stage (Haring, et al., 1978) Instructional Hierarchy Matching Interventions to Student Learning Stage (Haring, et al., 1978) Instructional Hierarchy Matching Interventions to Student Learning Stage (Haring, et al., 1978)
Learning Stage Student Look-Fors What strategies are effective
Acquisition Exit Goal The student can perform the skill accurately with little adult support. Is just beginning to learn skill Not yet able to perform learning task reliably or with high level of accuracy Teacher actively demonstrates target skill Teacher uses think-aloud strategy-- especially for thinking skills that are otherwise covert Student has models of correct performance to consult as needed (e.g., correctly completed math problems on board) Student gets feedback about correct performance Student receives praise, encouragement for effort
21
Instructional Hierarchy Matching Interventions to Student Learning Stage (Haring, et al., 1978) Instructional Hierarchy Matching Interventions to Student Learning Stage (Haring, et al., 1978) Instructional Hierarchy Matching Interventions to Student Learning Stage (Haring, et al., 1978)
Learning Stage Student Look-Fors What strategies are effective
Fluency Exit Goals The student (a) has learned skill well enough to retain (b) has learned skill well enough to combine with other skills, (c) is as fluent as peers. Gives accurate responses to learning task Performs learning task slowly, haltingly Teacher structures learning activities to give student opportunity for active (observable) responding Student has frequent opportunities to drill (direct repetition of target skill) and practice (blending target skill with other skills to solve problems) Student gets feedback on fluency and accuracy of performance Student receives praise, encouragement for increased fluency
22
Instructional Hierarchy Matching Interventions to Student Learning Stage (Haring, et al., 1978) Instructional Hierarchy Matching Interventions to Student Learning Stage (Haring, et al., 1978) Instructional Hierarchy Matching Interventions to Student Learning Stage (Haring, et al., 1978)
Learning Stage Student Look-Fors What strategies are effective
Generalization Exit Goals The student (a) uses the skill across settings, situations (b) does not confuse target skill with similar skills Is accurate and fluent in responding May fail to apply skill to new situations, settings May confuse target skill with similar skills (e.g., confusing and x number operation signs) Teacher structures academic tasks to require that the student use the target skill regularly in assignments. Student receives encouragement, praise, reinforcers for using skill in new settings, situations If student confuses target skill with similar skill(s), the student is given practice items that force him/her to correctly discriminate between similar skills Teacher works with parents to identify tasks that the student can do outside of school to practice target skill Student gets periodic opportunities to review, practice target skill to ensure maintenance
23
Instructional Hierarchy Matching Interventions to Student Learning Stage (Haring, et al., 1978) Instructional Hierarchy Matching Interventions to Student Learning Stage (Haring, et al., 1978) Instructional Hierarchy Matching Interventions to Student Learning Stage (Haring, et al., 1978)
Learning Stage Student Look-Fors What strategies are effective
Adaptation Exit Goal The Adaptation phase is continuous and has no exit criteria. Is fluent and accurate in skill Applies skill in novel situations, settings without prompting Does not yet modify skill as needed to fit new situations (e.g., child says Thank you in all situations, does not use modified, equivalent phrases such as I appreciate your help.) Teacher helps student to articulate the big ideas or core element(s) of target skill that the student can modify to face novel tasks, situations (e.g., fractions, ratios, and percentages link to the big idea of the part in relation to the whole Thank you is part of a larger class of polite speech) Train for adaptation Student gets opportunities to practice the target skill with modest modifications in new situations, settings with encouragement, corrective feedback, praise, other reinforcers. Encourage student to set own goals for adapting skill to new and challenging situations.
24
Learn Unit(Heward, 1996)
25
Instructional Building Blocks
  • Learn Unit (Heward, 1996)
  • Academic Opportunity to Respond
  • Active Student Response
  • Performance Feedback

26
Elements of Learn Unit
  • Academic Opportunity to Respond. The student is
    presented with a meaningful opportunity to
    respond to an academic task. A question posed by
    the teacher, a math word problem, and a spelling
    item on an educational computer Word Gobbler
    game could all be considered academic
    opportunities to respond.

27
Elements of Learn Unit
  • Active Student Response. The student answers the
    item, solves the problem presented, or completes
    the academic task. Answering the teachers
    question, computing the answer to a math word
    problem (and showing all work), and typing in the
    correct spelling of an item when playing an
    educational computer game are all examples of
    active student responding.

28
Elements of Learn Unit
  • Performance Feedback. The student receives
    timely feedback about whether his or her response
    is correctoften with praise and encouragement. A
    teacher exclaiming Right! Good job! when a
    student gives an response in class, a student
    using an answer key to check her answer to a math
    word problem, and a computer message that says
    Congratulations! You get 2 points for correctly
    spelling this word! are all examples of
    performance feedback.

29
References
  • Carnine, D. (1994). Diverse learners and
    prevailing, emerging and research-based
    educational approaches and their tools. School
    Psychology Review, 23, 341-350.
  • Heward, W.L. (1996). Three low-tech strategies
    for increasing the frequency of active student
    response during group instruction. In R. Gardner
    III, D. M.Sainato, J.O.Cooper, T.E.Heron,
    W.L.Heward, J.W.Eshleman, T.A.Grossi (Eds.)
    Behavior analysis in education Focus on
    measurably superior instruction (pp.283-320).
    Pacific Grove, CA Brooks/Cole.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com