Effects of DNA structure on its micromechanical properties - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Effects of DNA structure on its micromechanical properties

Description:

Effects of DNA structure on its micromechanical properties Yuri Popov University of California, Santa Barbara Alexei Tkachenko University of Michigan, Ann Arbor – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:80
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: YuriP7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Effects of DNA structure on its micromechanical properties


1
Effects of DNA structure on its micromechanical
properties
  • Yuri Popov
  • University of California, Santa Barbara
  • Alexei Tkachenko
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • June 2007

2
Mechanical properties of a single DNA molecule
  • Single DNA stretching experiments Smith et al
    (1992)
  • Marko and Siggia (1995)
  • Elastic properties of a single DNA molecule are
    best described by the wormlike chain model, with
    bending energy

where persistence length lp 53 nm
3
Effects of sequence disorder on DNA looping and
cyclization
  • Phys. Rev. E, in press
  • arXivcond-mat/0510302

4
DNA looping
  • Protein-mediated looping in regulation of gene
    expression (transcription control e.g. by lac
    repressor)
  • DNA packaging into nucleosomes (wrapping around
    histones)
  • Understanding spontaneous looping is a
    prerequisite to understanding protein-mediated one

5
Cyclization probability (J-factor)
DNA
looping
cyclization
  • J-factor

6
Classical theory
  • Theory (Shimada and Yamakawa, 1984)

7
Classical theory vs. experiment
cyclization
  • Theory (Shimada and Yamakawa, 1984)
  • Experiment (Cloutier and Widom, 2004)

For L 94 bp
8
1. Effect of intrinsic curvature
  • Effective energy of a chain with a random
    sequence
  • Here k(s) is the intrinsic curvature for a
    random sequence it is Guassian with zero average

9
1. Effect of intrinsic curvature
  • Exact result for the ensemble-averaged J-factor
  • with renormalized persistence length in the
    original result
  • For consensus-scale data of Gabrielian,
    Vlahovicek, and Pongor (1998) k0lp 0.13

10
1. Effect of intrinsic curvature
11
2. Effect of random bending rigidity
  • Effective energy of a chain with a random
    sequence
  • J-factor for a particular sequence
    instead of

12
2. Effect of random bending rigidity
  • Effective energy of a chain with a random
    sequence
  • J-factor for a particular sequence
    instead of

13
Probability distribution of J
14
2. Effect of random bending rigidity
15
Overall effect of sequence disorder
16
Summary
  • Effect of sequence disorder is strong and always
    present. Sequence disorder gives rise to
    orders-of-magnitude variation in cyclization
    probability for completely random sequences
  • Most importantly, there is no self-averaging in
    DNA looping or cyclization. The J-factor is not
    a well-defined function of the chain length L,
    not even to the first approximation. No
    typical DNA.
  • Effects of random bending rigidity and intrinsic
    curvature provide comparable contribution
  • Boundary conditions may be the key to explaining
    the experimental results

17
Effects of kinks on DNA elasticity
  • Phys. Rev. E 71, 051905 (2005)
  • arXivcond-mat/0410591

18
Model
  • Theoretical study of the effects of localized
    structural singularities on the elastic behavior
    of double- and single-stranded DNA
  • Model wormlike chain with reversible kinks
  • Want to know the elastic response (extension vs.
    force)

19
What systems are described by this model?
  • Protein-induced bending and looping in dsDNA
  • Elastic description of ssDNA/RNA (trans-gauche
    rotations)
  • Need a hybrid model where the finite bond
    elasticity is combined with structural defects
    (i.e. WLC with discrete features)

20
Theoretical approach
  • Chain is stretched by force F in the z direction
  • Effective energy of a chain segment between two
    kinks
  • Here t ?r/?s is tangent vector, si is location
    of kink i, L S(si1-si) is total
    length of the chain
  • Constraint at each kink
  • Here K is opening angle of each kink, ? is
    average line density of kinks without force

21
Analogy with Quantum Rotator
  • Schrodinger-like (diffusion) equation for
    evolution along the chain
  • Here ?(t) is the chain propagator (distribution
    function of chain ends orientations) and H is the
    effective Hamiltonian
  • The lowest eigenvalue determines the free energy

22
Solution
  • Analytical solve the eigenvalue problem by
    variational method with trial function
  • where ? is variational parameter
  • Numerical solve the original evolution problem
    directly

23
Results K135
24
Results K90
25
Results K45
26
Small stretching forces
  • Elastic response is characterized by the
    renormalized persistence length
  • Upon proper geometrical identification, exactly
    reproduces the Flory model for trans-gauche
    rotational isomers in the limit of high bending
    rigidity and rare kinks

27
Large stretching forces
  • Main order pure wormlike chain result
  • Exponential corrections due to the ideal gas of
    kinks

28
Results K45
29
Why the difference between numerical and
analytical results?
  • Inadequate variational trial function ?(t) for
    smaller angles
  • Secondary peak kink pairs
  • Favorable little bending and short
    non-aligned portion

30
Summary
  • Hybrid model, with both the discrete defects and
    bending worm-like rigidity
  • Small forces renormalized persistence length.
    Crossover between WLC and rotational isomer model
  • Large forces WLC with the ideal gas of kinks
  • High rigidity, small kink angle kink pairing

31
THANK YOU
32
References
  • J. F. Marko and E. D. Siggia, Macromolecules, 28,
    8759 (1995)
  • J. Shimada and H. Yamakawa, Macromolecules, 17,
    689 (1984)
  • T. E. Cloutier and J. Widom, Molecular Cell, 14,
    355 (2004)
  • A. Gabrielian, K. Vlahovicek, and S. Pongor, DNA
    tools, http//hydra.icgeb.trieste.it/kristian/dna
    /index.html
  • M. G. Munteanu, K. Vlahovicek, S. Parthasarathy,
    I. Simon, and S. Pongor, TIBS, 23, 341 (1998)
  • P. A. Wiggins, R. Phillips, and P. C. Nelson,
    arXivcond-mat/04092003
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com