The recombinant library: portals and people Improved access to library collections University of Oklahoma Libraries March 6-7 Lorcan Dempsey, OCLC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The recombinant library: portals and people Improved access to library collections University of Oklahoma Libraries March 6-7 Lorcan Dempsey, OCLC

Description:

Title: Retreat Objectives Author: Authorized OCLC User Last modified by: Authorized OCLC User Created Date: 9/4/2002 1:47:45 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:402
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: Authorize9
Learn more at: https://www.oclc.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The recombinant library: portals and people Improved access to library collections University of Oklahoma Libraries March 6-7 Lorcan Dempsey, OCLC


1
The recombinant library portals and
peopleImproved access to library collections
University of Oklahoma LibrariesMarch
6-7Lorcan Dempsey, OCLC
2
Overview
  • Part one
  • Part two
  • Part three

3
Portal
4
Portal
How the library mediates the engagement of users
and resources in a network environment
A density of resources and services on the
network. A bag or portfolio.
  • All vogue words tend to share a similar fate
    the more experiences they pretend to make
    transparent, the more they themselves become
    opaque. Zygmunt Bauman

5
(No Transcript)
6
Creative knowledge you can put in your pocket
7
Library?
8
5 laws
  • Resources are for use
  • Needs to be easier!
  • A part of research, learning, cultural engagement
  • Each user his or her resource
  • Each resource its user
  • Release the value of resources in creative use
  • Save the time of the user
  • An obstacle course!
  • attention
  • The library is a growing organism
  • Extensible, flexible, ..

9
Some aims
  • Provide a web environment
  • Saves time for research, learning and personal
    fulfillment
  • Surfaces potentially valuable resources which
    otherwise might be overlooked in the trees
  • Allows users and library to focus on collections
    rather than mechanics of interaction
  • Will increasingly need to interact with other
    environments
  • Learning management, institutional portal
    frameworks,
  • Library portal transitional

10
On the discrimination of portals
11
Portal
  • End user needs to
  • Know what is available
  • Learn multiple interfaces
  • Manually fuse results

12
Library portal approach
Provide intermediate layers between user and
resources. Manage multiple collections.
Resources
13
A portal grid!
Static
Dynamic
Deep (Mediation/Presentation)
Flat (Presentation)
14
Institutionalrepository
Commercialresource
Communityrepository
Resource 2
Resource 4
Record fusion enrichment
Delivery
Request
Configuration
Harvesting data
Terminology services
V. Ref
Rightsmanagement
Distributed query
Resolution
Syndication
Identity management
Annotation
Notification
Presentation

15
Mediation
16
Query Harvest Request reference
17
Applications
  • Search
  • Custom
  • Distributed query (Z39.50, SRW/SRU)
  • Harvest (OAI)
  • Crawl
  • Link
  • OpenURL
  • Alert
  • RSS
  • Distributed request
  • ILL
  • Reference

18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
Thoughts
  • Mediation expensive
  • Best examples hidden licensed resources
  • We make little use of data
  • Confusion between local node and whole digital
    environment
  • One stop shop one shop stop
  • Not webby enough
  • Business, service and technical architectures
    unclear
  • E.g. at what level to do utility services

22
Mediating the engagement between libraries and
users
  • Some random issues

23
user environments
library
resource environment
24
Collections grid!
stewardship
high
low
low
uniqueness
high
25
Within and across institutions
  • Streamline access to licensed resources (within
    institution)
  • Federate cultural heritage, research and learning
    materials (across institutions)

26
(No Transcript)
27
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Library
- Champaign, IL - 499,440 2002 National
Leadership Grants for Libraries - Research
Demonstration In this three-year research
project, the Library of the University of
Illinois at Urbana-Champaign will create a
collection-level registry of digital collections
created with IMLS funding from 1998 to 2005 and
will research, design and implement a prototype
item-level metadata repository service
based on the Open Archives Initiative Metadata
Harvesting Protocol.
28
Institutional realities
  • Portal envy
  • Learning management system
  • Campus portal
  • Aggregators
  • Proliferation of portals
  • Pitiful portal pretensions
  • A node in a network of services

29
Dynamic presentation
30
Research and learning
31
Service on demand threads/channels
  • Do a comprehensive literature search
  • Find 20 most heavily used resources on ..
  • Generate a reading list
  • What general material can I get this afternoon on
  • Can you answer this question
  • Can you recommend some starting points for ..
  • Find commentaries on
  • Can I comment on this resource
  • Can I create a reading list
  • I need images of x which I can use for this
    purpose
  • Who are the most cited authors on the web in x
  • Can I look for engineering drawings, previous
    experimental design,

32
(No Transcript)
33
Portals
  • Recombinant library
  • Different modes of aggregation within and between
    institutions
  • Institutional proliferation of portals
  • Integration Weave services into research and
    learning
  • Surface appropriate services when needed

34
So
  • How do we effectively manifest library services
    on the network?
  • Services may be fine-grained or grouped in
    portfolios
  • It may (or may not) be sensible to bring services
    together in a library portal
  • and in a learning management system, and in a
    reading list, and .

35
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com