LD: Lincoln-Douglas Debate - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

LD: Lincoln-Douglas Debate

Description:

LD: Lincoln-Douglas Debate History: 1858 - Illinois senatorial debates between Abraham Lincoln & Stephen Douglas 1980 - Became high school competitive event – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:468
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: Hum117
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: LD: Lincoln-Douglas Debate


1
LD Lincoln-Douglas Debate
  • History
  • 1858 - Illinois senatorial debates between
    Abraham Lincoln Stephen Douglas
  • 1980 - Became high school competitive event

2
Types of propositions
  • LD uses propositions of value good or bad, right
    or wrong, useful or useless
  • Different from CX which uses propositions of
    policy what should be done about a problem, what
    changes should be made

3
LD Format time limits
  • 6 AFF constructive
  • 3 NEG CX
  • 7 NEG constructive
  • 3 AFF CX
  • 4 AFF Rebuttal
  • 6 NEG Rebuttal
  • 3 AFF Rebuttal
  • Also 4 minutes of prep. time allowed

4
LD Format
  • AFF speaks more than NEG- AFF has burden of proof
  • Times are equal for both AFF NEG

5
LD Speaker Responsibilities
  • AFF constructive 6 min. Present AFF case
    including definitions
  • NEG constructive 7 min. Present NEG case
    (approx. 5 min.), present arguments that clash w/
    AFF positions in 1st speech (approx. 2 min. to
    attack AFF) will not be able to introduce new
    arguments in rebuttal (only new evidence,
    reasoning, or responses to arguments already
    stated), so set up arguments now
  • For each case- have at least one quote per
    argument use philosophers for support

6
LD Speaker Responsibilities
  • 1st AFF Rebuttal 4 min. Respond to NEG case,
    reestablish AFF issues by comparing them to NEGs
    issues, proving AFF to be better position
  • NEG Rebuttal 6 min. Challenge comparisons
    established by AFF, extend arguments denying
    AFFs case w/ evidence reasoning, reinforce NEG
    positions, summarize debate to NEGs advantage
  • 2nd AFF Rebuttal 3 min. Reestablish comparisons
    of value, proving AFF position to be strongest,
    summarize debate to AFFs advantage
  • ALL Include voting issues- why you should win!

7
Case Construction
  • Topic analysis
  • Case needs to include
  • Intro.
  • Statement of resolution
  • Definition of terms
  • Value to be defended
  • Criteria for evaluating debate
  • Outline of issues to be debated w/ evidence
    reasoning to support issues
  • Justification of issues or values as key elements

8
LD Values
  • Values- something so prized by society it becomes
    a goal in life (liberty, security, safety,
    equality, justice, progress, etc.)
  • Types
  • Moral- ethical means
  • Political- constitutional principles, power
  • Utilitarian- efficiency of means usefulness or
    effectiveness of behavior

9
Maslows Hierarchy of Needs
  • Physical- survival (food, water, shelter)
  • Security- protection from threats
  • Belonging- love
  • Self-esteem- status, respect
  • Self-actualization- fulfillment, being all we can
    be!

10
LD Criteria
  • Needs to relate to value!
  • How to judge if value is met
  • Keep value criterion upheld throughout debate

11
Cross examination
  • Prepare questions ahead of time
  • Set up arguments to be used in your rebuttal
  • Avoid open-ended questions unless getting
    opponent to explain how or why
  • Be polite direct
  • When being examined
  • If you dont understand, have them clarify
  • Try to give direct answers
  • Dont fall into a trap!

12
Steps of Effective Refutation
  • State opponents argument as close as you can
  • Provide brief summary of what they said
  • Indicate what they left out
  • Give your arguments
  • Summarize move on (For each argument)

13
Rebuttals
  • Where you win the debate!
  • Be organized
  • Dont just summarize speech
  • Answer every point on the flow
  • Signpost- tell judge which point you are refuting

14
Making evidence cards
  • Get articles
  • Bracket evidence in articles (put brackets around
    2-3 sentences you chose as evidence)
  • Cut out the evidence
  • Tape or glue the evidence to paper
  • Source cite the evidence (Author, qualifications,
    date, book/mag./etc. name page number right
    before each piece of evidence)
  • Tag the evidence (Write a 4-9 word complete
    sentence that accurately persuasively states
    the main point of the evidence
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com