Internet Assisted Review Review User Group April 22, 2002 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Internet Assisted Review Review User Group April 22, 2002

Description:

Internet Assisted Review Review User Group April 22, 2002 Overview Internet Assisted Review will allow Reviewers to: electronically submit critiques and preliminary ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:277
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: tracys155
Learn more at: https://www.era.nih.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Internet Assisted Review Review User Group April 22, 2002


1
Internet Assisted Review Review User
GroupApril 22, 2002
2
Overview
  • Internet Assisted Review will allow Reviewers to
  • electronically submit critiques and preliminary
    scores prior to the meeting
  • review the critiques submitted by others online
  • permit more efficient and effective use of
    reviewers time at meetings
  • modify their critiques after the meeting

3
Overall Process Flow
  • How does Internet Assisted Review fit into the
    existing Peer Review process?

4
1. SRA Prepares Meeting/ Reviewers for IAR SRA
finalizes meeting assignments, selects meeting
for IAR and specifies critique submission and
other deadlines.
2. Reviewer Registers for IAR Reviewer account
creation and registration via email.
4. Read-Only Phase After submission deadline,
Reviewers may read other Reviewers critiques.
If a reviewer has not submitted, the SRA may
block the Reviewer from reading.
6. Generate Summary Statements draft bodies are
built from critiques.
5. Optional Edit Phase After the meeting,
Reviewers may modify their critiques.
3. Submit Phase Reviewers log in and submit
critiques and preliminary priority scores for
their applications.
5
IAR Focus Group Members
  • Chair, Eileen Bradley (CSR)
  • Roberta Binder (NIAID)
  • Tracey David (CSR)
  • Cynthia Lassnoff (NIAID)
  • Neal Musto (NIDDK)
  • Ev Sinnett (CSR)
  • Roy White (NHLBI)
  • Brian Wojcik (NCI)
  • OER Staff Tracy Soto, Scarlett Gibb, Sherry
    Zucker, Mark Siegert, Sandy Seppala
  • NGIT Staff Daniel Fox, Adam Levy, Andy Greenleaf

6
What have we done?
  • Architecture decision made J2EE and Commons
    database
  • Security evaluation of User Registration and
    Account Management
  • Held seven focus group meetings
  • Group approved overall business flow
  • Reviewed two systems
  • NIAID Electronic Review
  • NCI Clinical Trials Evaluation Program (used for
    both internal and external reviewer evaluation of
    proposed clinical protocols)

7
What have we done?
  • Documented and validated requirements for
  • SRA/GTA Control Center
  • Registration and Account Management
  • Post phase
  • Reviewer view
  • SRA view

8
What do we still need to do?
  • Requirements gathering and validation for
  • Read-only phase
  • Streamlining
  • Edit Phase
  • Summary Statement generation
  • Meeting data purge
  • Define scope of versions to be delivered

9
Deployment
  • Version 1 Pilot tentatively scheduled for Fall
    2002
  • Schedule will be finalized after Focus Group
    finishes requirements gathering and validation
    and defines scope of first version (June 2002)

10
  • This presentation and materials from the IAR
    Focus Group Meetings (minutes, Scope document and
    Presentations) are posted on the eRA site at
    http//era.nih.gov/areas/rev/index.cfm

11
Any questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com