Lotic vs. Lentic Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Lotic vs. Lentic Systems

Description:

Title: Fish in Lakes Author: Neal Mundahl Last modified by: Joe Whetstone Created Date: 11/20/2005 11:09:25 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:3937
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: NealMu3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lotic vs. Lentic Systems


1
Lotic vs. Lentic Systems
2
Comparisons
  • Surface area - 1/18th that of lakes
  • Age - most stream channels ancient compared to
    most lakes
  • Flow - the most influence on making stream
    environments different than lakes

3
Flow
  • Produces structure of river, bed, influences
    biota
  • Currents vary seasonally, longitudinally,
    vertically

4
Flow
  • Generally lt3 m/sec (up to 8 m/sec)
  • Maximal during greatest runoff (wetter season)

5
Flow
  • Current speed decreases as depth increases
  • Decrease from mid-channel to edges (frictional
    forces between water, substrate - produce
    boundary layer)

6
Flow
  • Average velocity at 0.6 depth for shallow streams
    (or average of readings at 0.2 and 0.8 depth in
    deeper streams or rivers)

7
Flow
  • Velocity generally decreases from headwaters to
    mouth
  • Headwaters - erosional - larger substrates
  • Near mouth - depositional - smaller substrates

8
Flow
  • General pattern not always present
  • Velocity may be constant, or may increase

9
Alternating Habitats
  • Riffles and pools
  • Faster currents in riffles
  • Regular spacing - riffles 5-7 stream widths apart

10
Water Temperatures
  • More rapid changes than in lentic waters
  • Daily cycles up to 6º C in summer
  • Average temperatures tend to increase downstream

11
Water Temperatures
  • Little stratification because of flows
  • Warmer temps alter viscosity
  • Faster flow
  • Carry less silt
  • Reduces boundary layer

12
Water Temperatures
  • Winter - entire stream declines to 0º C before
    ice forms
  • Ice formation at any layer
  • Frazil or anchor ice

13
Light Penetration
  • Less in moving vs. standing waters
  • Increased turbidity
  • Increased shading by riparian vegetation

14
Chemistry
  • Dependent on drainage basin
  • General inverse relation between discharge and
    concentrations of dissolved materials

15
Chemistry
  • Little zonation of dissolved materials or gasses
  • Turbulent flow, gasses at saturation for temp.,
    pressure
  • Significant changes by activities of living
    organisms

16
Biota
  • Phytoplankton in streams relatively meager
  • Few planktonic forms
  • Mostly benthic forms

17
Biota
  • In larger streams, plankton always present
  • Planktonic diatoms dominate
  • Selective elimination of other types?

18
Biota
  • Most primary production in small streams from
    periphyton growing on bottom
  • Unusually productive because of nutrient delivery

19
Biota
  • Zooplankton numerous only in larger systems
  • Dominated by rotifers
  • Few crustacean zooplankters

20
Biota
  • Benthic invertebrates diverse (especially
    insects)
  • Substrate is major controlling factor

21
Biota
  • Soft substrate types found in both flowing,
    standing waters
  • Hard substrate types often unique
  • Adaptations to cope with flowing water
    (flattening, hooks, suckers, secretions, ballast)

22
Biota
  • Longitudinal rather than depth zonation
  • Changes in response to temp., current, food
    availability

23
Biota
  • Fish exhibit distinct habitat, longitudinal
    differences
  • Those in pools or downstream zones also found in
    lakes

24
Biota
  • Those in headwaters adapted for life in moving
    water
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com