Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Quality of Ambulatory Care for Chronic Physical Health Conditions: The effects of physician and care setting characteristics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Quality of Ambulatory Care for Chronic Physical Health Conditions: The effects of physician and care setting characteristics

Description:

Title: Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Quality of Ambulatory Care for Cardiovascular Disease and Related Risk Factors: The effects of physician and care setting ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:345
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Quality of Ambulatory Care for Chronic Physical Health Conditions: The effects of physician and care setting characteristics


1
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Quality of
Ambulatory Care for Chronic Physical Health
Conditions The effects of physician and care
setting characteristics
  • Sponsored by The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation,
    New Connections Program
  • Academy Health Conference June 2008
  • Rhonda BeLue PhD
  • The Pennsylvania State University

2
Overview
  • Background
  • Rationale
  • Study Objectives
  • Methods
  • Data
  • Measures
  • Analysis
  • Results
  • Conclusions and Implications

3
Background
4
Background Disparities in Health Care Quality
  • Racial/Ethnic inequities in exist in multiple
    domains of quantity and quality of care safety,
    timeliness, effectiveness, efficiency, equity,
    and patient-centeredness
  • (Aaron 2003, Aaron 2003, Kirby 2006, IOM,
    Mayberry 2006, Ma 2005, Weisfeld 2005).

5
Background
  • Disparities exist across a wide variety of
    treatments for multiple conditions including
    treatment for CVD, Heart failure and diabetes
    (IOM, Unequal Treatment).
  • It is believed that poor quality of care for
    ethnic minorities is linked to poor health care
    outcomes. (Lavizzo-Mourey 2005)

6
Background
  • In fact, it has been shown that improvements in
    quality of care for all US consumers are
    necessary (Asch 2006).
  • Wide variation also exists in racial disparities
    across geographic lines and care settings
  • (Baiker 2005, Baiker 2004, Wennberg 2006) Bach
    2004, 2005).

7
Background
  • Despite the documented existence of inequities in
    healthcare quality, more work is needed to
    understand and test strategies to improve the
    quality of healthcare for ethnic minority
    populations (Beach 2006).

8
Background
  • African Americans are more likely to see health
    care providers in facilities with inadequate
    recourses and by providers with lesser
    credentials than facilities where whites receive
    care (Epstein 2004, Bach 2004).
  • African Americans are also likely to have poorer
    continuity of care largely due to lack of regular
    site of care.

9
  • African Americans are more likely to be seen in
    hospital clinics and community health centers
    where the chances of seeing the same provider
    across visits are low (Doescher 2001).

10
Background
  • Peter Bach et al (2004) found that elderly Blacks
    and Whites are treated at racially homogeneous
    facilities that are either largely White or
    African American.

11
Background
  • Elderly blacks receive care at facilities which
  • 1) provided more charity care
  • 2) had higher percentage of revenue from
    Medicaid
  • 3) were more likely to practice in a low-income
    neighborhood and
  • 4) were less likely to be board certified in
    their primary specialty.
  • 5) Physicians treating mostly white patients
    were more likely to indicate that they could
    confidently provide quality care and access to
    referrals, specialty care, and ancillary services

12
Rationale
  • Understanding the characteristics of health care
    facilities can inform interventions and policy
    making related to consumer access to care and
    choice of health care setting, resource
    management and allocation in settings that treat
    racial/ethnic minorities receive care

13
Contribution
  • This study adds to the literature by
    investigating the relationship between
    healthcare setting context and quality of care
    received for chronic conditions in adults ages 18
    and older.
  • Diabetes will be used as an illustration for this
    presentation

14
Objectives
  • Assess
  • 1) racial/ethnic differences in the
    characteristics of the facilities where racial
    and ethnic minorities receive care
  • 2) The relationship between quality of care for
    diabetes and characteristics of the care setting

15
Conceptual Framework The Chronic Care Model
  • Summarizes the basic elements for improving care
    in health systems at the community, organization,
    practice and patient levels.
  • Community characteristics resources and policies
  • Health system characteristics clinical
    information systems, design and delivery system
  • Provider characteristics prepared and proactive
  • Patient characteristics activated patient

16
Methods
17
Data and Sample
  • The 2005 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey
    (NAMCS) were used for this investigation.
  • NAMCS uses a multistage stratified probability
    sample of patient visits in ambulatory care
    settings to enable nationally
  • NAMCS is designed obtain objective information
    about ambulatory medical care services in the
    United States
  • Whites, Blacks, and Hispanics aged 40 and older
    with Diabetes
  • Several other ACS conditions were explored

18
Measurement
19
  • Patients with conditions (diabetes) of interest
    were identified via ICD9 code (as indicated by
    the NAMCS diagnosis variable) and confirmed by
    physician report.
  • First, second and third diagnoses were included
  • Checked against physician report

20
Measures Facility and Physician Characteristics
  • Facility
  • Solo or group practice
  • Ownership
  • Lab Testing available
  • Difficulty with referrals
  • EMR
  • of revenue
  • Claims submitted electronically
  • Physician
  • Employment status
  • Does email consults
  • Telephone consults
  • Hospital visits
  • Time spent with patient

21
Measures Patient Characteristics
  • Demographics age, gender, insurance status
  • Comorbid illnesses bmi, total number of chronic
    conditions, number of medications
  • Number of visits in the past 12 months
  • Number of Medications

22
Measures Dependent Variables
  • Quality measure(s) were derived based on measures
    from
  • The National Quality Measures Clearing House
  • Selected measures relevant to ambulatory care
    settings

23
  • Quality indicators were calculated as the
    percentage of visits in which the patient
    received appropriate quality of care divided by
    the total number of visits.

24
Diabetes Quality Outcome
  • Ambulatory care management of diabetes measure
  • Diabetes
  • Process
  • of patients who received a HA1c test
  • Should be taken every 3 months, especially in
    those with poor glycemic control

25
Analytic Strategy
26
Analytic Strategy Aim 1
  • Chi-square tests using Stata survey procedures
    were employed to examine the relationship between
    race/ethnicity and care setting characteristics

27
Analytic Strategy Aim 2
  • Logistic regression analyses were employed to
    examine the relationship between race, provider
    and facility characteristics and quality
    indicator controlling for patient demographic and
    health status indicators
  • Sample/design weights were incorporated
  • GEE for parameter estimation
  • Assessed moderation-within race/ethnicity models
  • Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons
  • Modeled the probability of receiving HGBA

28
Results
29
Sample Characteristics
  • Sample represents a total of 15858 patient
    encounters among those over 40,
  • of patient encounters among those with diabetes
    (weighted)
  • N3078 diabetics
  • White 11.5
  • Black 18.9
  • Latino/a 16.8

30
Race and Outcome Measures
31
Diabetes
  • Among those who have diabetes, approximately at
    any encounter
  • 13.9 of whites receive an HA1c screening
  • 7.4 of blacks receive an HA1c screening
  • 8.4 of Latino/as receive an HA1c screening
  • Significant at Plt0.001

32
Results Aim 1
33
Results Aim 2-Whites
  • More that 50 or revenue from Medicare-
  • OR 0.24 ( 0.1, 0.5)
  • Difficulty Referring to Medicaid
  • OR0.35 ( 0.2, 0.7)

34
Results Aim 2-Blacks
  • Seen in a solo practice
  • OR 1.8(1.7,2.1)
  • More that 50 or revenue from Medicare-
  • OR 0.4(0.1,0.7)
  • On Site Lab
  • OR 5.7(1.5,7.2)

35
Results Aim 2-Latinos
  • Seen in a solo practice
  • OR 2.1(1.6,2.7)
  • On Site Lab
  • OR 1.5(1.5,7.2)

36
Limitations
  • Cross-sectional data
  • Lack of financial data to accurately asses level
    of resources
  • Need of composite score or better interpretation
    of what facility characteristics mean
  • Patient preferences for care setting
  • Combine several years to increase N for minority
    groups and to allow for more comparisons

37
Conclusions
  • Future health services and quality initiatives
    may benefit from focusing on improving resources
    in care settings in order to improve quality and
    treatment of chronic conditions in racial and
    ethnic minorities

38
Acknowledgements
  • The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, New
    Connections Program
  • Dr. Debra J. Perez
  • Dr. Margarita Alegria
  • Junior Investigator Forum Colleagues
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com