Evaluation of an E-Recruitment Portal Graphs of Responses to

1
Evaluation of an E-Recruitment PortalGraphs of
Responses to Cant Rate, Ratings, and
Images
2
Percentage of Enrolling HArCS Admits Who Can NOT
Rate UCD On Item Fall 1998 vs. Fall 2000
53
46
38
36
34
19
12
5
Significant at the .05 level. Significant at
the .01 level.
3
Percentage of Non-Enrolling HArCS Admits Who Can
NOT Rate UCD On Item Fall 1998 vs. Fall 2000
58
51
46
44
17
12
Significant at the .05 level.
4
Percentage of Fall 2001 Enrolling HArCS Admits
Who Can NOT Rate UCD Users vs. Non-Users
No differences significant at the .05 level.
5
Percentage of Fall 2001 Non-Enrolling HArCS
Admits Who Can NOT Rate UCD Users vs. Non-Users
62
41
Significant at the .01 level.
6
Enrolling HArCS Admits Mean Ratings of UC Davis
Fall 1998 vs. Fall 2000
Significant at the .05 level.
7
Non-Enrolling HArCS Admits Mean Ratings of UC
Davis Fall 1998 vs. Fall 2000
No differences significant at the .05 level.
8
Enrolling HArCS Admits Mean Ratings of UC Davis
Portal Users vs. Non-Users
Significant at the .05 level. Significant at
the .01 level.
9
Non-Enrolling HArCS Admits Mean Ratings of UC
Davis Users vs. Non-Users
Significant at the .05 level. Significant at
the .01 level.
10
Enrolling HArCS Admits Images of UC Davis Fall
1998 vs. Fall 2000
Significant at the .05 level.
11
Non-Enrolling HArCS Admits Images of UC Davis
Fall 1998 vs. Fall 2000
Significant at the .01 level.
12
Enrolling HArCS Admits Images of UC Davis Users
vs. Non-Users
Significant at the .05 level. Significant at
the .01 level.
13
Non-Enrolling HArCS Admits Images of UC Davis
Users vs. Non-Users
Significant at the .05 level. Significant at
the .01 level.
14
Logit Regression Results Odds of Enrolling