Intersections The Political Economy of Race and Class in the United States - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 70
About This Presentation
Title:

Intersections The Political Economy of Race and Class in the United States

Description:

Title: Discrimination and Crime Author: Jeff Created Date: 10/12/2002 9:19:10 AM Document presentation format: On-screen Show Company: Wright State University – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:314
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 71
Provided by: Jeff1220
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Intersections The Political Economy of Race and Class in the United States


1
IntersectionsThe Political Economy of Race and
Class in the United States
2
I. Defining Race and Class
  • A. Little genetic variance exists in humans
  • 1. Why? Bottleneck 100,000 200,000 years ago
  • 2. Migration The Urge to Merge
  • 3. Result We all have about the same set of
    ancestors in 1000 BC (everyone alive now is
    descended from everyone alive then, but in
    different proportions)
  • B. Race not biologically significant
  • On average Two random people of the SAME race
    have 90 as many genetic differences as two
    random people of DIFFERENT races

3
C. Race is a Social Category
  • 1. Nationality as Race How the Irish Became
    White
  • 2. Ancestry as Race One Drop
  • 3. Multiracial Classification Breaking Down
    Categories

4
D. What is Social Class?
  • Usual Criteria Income, Wealth, Power
  • Prestige occupations
  • They Pay More
  • They Require More Education
  • They Entail More Abstract Thought
  • They Offer Greater Autonomy

5
E. Intersectionality
  • This term refers to ways in which different types
    of divisions or discrimination may reinforce each
    other
  • Example Race and Class
  • Racial stereotyping denies economic opportunities
    ? lower incomes
  • People with lower incomes cant live in nice
    neighborhoods ? housing segregation
  • Poor neighborhoods have more crime ? racial
    stereotyping of their residents
  • Implication If race and class divisions
    reinforce each other, tackling one will be
    difficult without tackling the other

6
II. Explaining Income Inequality
Intersectionality or Something Else?
7
A. Unemployment What explains the racial gap?
8
(No Transcript)
9
1. Name Discrimination
White White Black Black
Male Female Male Female
Jake Molly DeShawn Tiara
Dustin Amy Tyrone Ebony
Brett Claire Jamal Shanice
Wyatt Emily Darnell Jasmine
Logan Katie Terrell Precious
  • White names about 50 more likely to be called
    for interviews than Black names
  • Sample stereotyped names

10
2. Interviewer Bias
  1. Identical qualifications ? Whites usually hired
  2. Identical statements ? Whites perceived as less
    aggressive
  3. Experiments Interviewer race affects evaluation
    of qualifications (circumstances vs. personal
    responsibility)

11
B. Education1. It matters, but cant explain
whole income gap
12
2. Domino Effect College Education Reinforces
Class Divisions
13
C. Perceived Workplace Racism A Problem for Free
Markets
14
D. Trends in Income Inequality
15
1. Recent Growth A rising tide that lifts some
boats faster than others. Why?
16
2. Comparison US vs. World
  • Gini coefficient (a measure of inequality)
    higher numbers mean more inequality

17
3. Increasing inequality is relatively new
little change for 35-year period
18
III. Wealth Inequality Obstacles to Social
Mobility
19
A. How Do Families Accumulate Wealth?
  • 1. Theory from Classical Economics
  • Savings, Wise Investment, Hard Work
  • Life Cycle
  • 2. Institutional Accumulation Wealth transferred
    through legal channels
  • 2/3 of Middle Class Wealth is Home Equity
    Homestead Acts, FHA, Home Mortgage Interest
    Deductions promote this form of wealth

20
(No Transcript)
21
A. How Do Families Accumulate Wealth?
  • 1. Theory from Classical Economics
  • Savings, Wise Investment, Hard Work
  • Life Cycle
  • 2. Institutional Accumulation Wealth transferred
    through legal channels
  • 2/3 of Middle Class Wealth is Home Equity
    Homestead Acts, FHA, Home Mortgage Interest
    Deductions promote this form of wealth
  • Education Land Grant Colleges, GI Bill,
    Subsidized Student Loans, In Vivo wealth
    transfers from parents
  • Retirement Accounts Federal programs, subsidies,
    and tax credits for pensions and savings

22
B. Inheritance and Sedimentation
  • Wealth transfers perpetuate sedimentation of
    inequality implies that historical
    discrimination creates inequalities that persist
    even after discrimination ends. Two primary
    mechanisms
  • 1. Inheritance
  • Whites 4 times as likely to Inherit
  • Typical Inheritance for Whites10,000
    African-Americans800
  • 2. In Vivo transfers (Down payments Education
    and College Tuition) -- Today, most people pass
    their disposable tangible wealth to their
    children during life by education expenditures
    (not by will or inheritance). Other in vivo
    transfers
  • Life insurance
  • Joint tenancy
  • Pensions

23
C. Fragility Small Assets Dissipate During
Recessions
  • Example During the 2001 recession and jobless
    recovery, Latino and African-American families
    lost over one-quarter of their wealth while the
    wealth of white families grew slowly, 2 percent.

24
D. Class Mobility in America Is Inequality the
Future?
  • 1. The high cost of being poor. Without
    savings (wealth) or credit (related to wealth and
    income)
  • No deposit Funnels people to rent-by-the-week
    motels, more expensive than apartments (largely
    due to food costs)
  • Higher utility and other deposits
  • Bank scarcity Reliance on money orders,
    check-cashing facilities, payday lenders, pawn
    shops, rent-to-own furniture and appliances
  • Higher costs for groceries (no mega-stores),
    laundry, gas
  • Car purchases, loans, insurance much higher for
    poor, even controlling for driving record

25
2. Intergenerational Mobility
  • a. Definition Probability children will have
    different relative income than parents

26
(No Transcript)
27
  • b. Trend
  • Shrinking

28
(No Transcript)
29
E. Wealth Gap is Intersectional Both Class and
Race Matter
  • 1. Mobility higher for poor white children than
    poor African-American children

30
2. Net Worth Gap Unlikely to Close Soon
31
IV. Housing and Spatial Inequality
  • The spatial inequality thesis
  • Social and racial inequities are geographically
    inscribed (correlated with location)
  • Government policy helps determine geography of
    inequality (which is not necessarily natural or
    neutral)
  • Implication Political decisions about housing
    and land use can increase or decrease both racial
    and class inequality. As always, politics
    creates winners and losers

32
B. Home Ownership
  • 1. Present-Day Institutional Discrimination
    Homeownership and Assets
  • a. Mortgages Blacks have 60 higher Rejection
    Rate vs. income/asset-comparable Whites
  • b. Interest Rates Blacks Pay More (About 1/3 of
    1)
  • Translates into 12,000 More for Typical Home
    over 30 years

33
c. Subprime Loans
  • Racial gap in lending even wealthy
    African-American borrowers get high-risk loans

34
2. Lending Gap Widens Pre-Existing Wealth Gaps
35
3. Home Ownership Gap Persists
36
C. Spatial Racism -- De Facto Segregation
  • 1. Decreasing but still high
  • 2. More prevalent in North
  • 3. Causes
  • a. Fragmentation Smaller school districts and
    administrative units

Milwaukee, the most ? segregated city in
America
37
b. Government Policy
  • Spatial Racism reinforced by
  • Zoning laws prevent affordable housing in many
    suburbs
  • Housing policies concentrate subsidized housing
  • Municipalities subsidize the relocation of
    businesses out of the city
  • Transportation spending favors highways,
    metropolitan expansion and urban sprawl
  • Court decisions prevent metropolitan school
    desegregation
  • School funding is tied to property taxes

38
c. Ongoing Housing Discrimination for Renters
39
Evidence HDS 2000 Report
  • 4,600 paired testers, one minority and the other
    white
  • Pose as otherwise identical homeseekers and
    inquire about availability of advertised housing
    units
  • Identifying discrimination
  • White testers told of available units when
    African-Americans not told 12.3 of the time
  • African-American testers told of available units
    when Whites not told 8.3 of the time
  • Inference If sample size is large enough,
    discrimination rate of 4 against
    African-Americans on this dimension
  • Many dimensions aggregated together to provide
    total rate of housing discrimination whether
    allowed to inspect apartment/house, quoted
    rent/price, rent incentives, etc.

40
(No Transcript)
41
Other findings
  • Systematic steering found Whites likely to be
    recommended houses in white neighborhoods,
    minorities in minority neighborhoods (remember,
    income/employment etc is identical)
  • Effect is strongest when older agents encountered
    consistent with prejudice hypothesis
  • Interesting Austin singled out as unusually
    likely to generate discrimination against both
    Latinos and African-Americans (only metro area
    with this distinction)

42
d. Personal Choice?
43
(No Transcript)
44
4. Effects of Segregation
  • Educational inequality Inter-district busing
    prohibited
  • Also reinforces other spatial inequalities (maps
    them to racial boundaries)

45
D. Sprawl, Fragmentation and Housing Opportunity
for the Poor
  • Zoning Suburban regulations drive up the cost of
    housing and limit rental housing
  • New housing becomes unaffordable to low income
    residents
  • Disinvestment in the inner city reduces the asset
    value (wealth) of homeowners in inner city
    neighborhoods

46
Example Zoning and Housing Opportunity in
Columbus, OH
  • Suburban lot size requirements in the Columbus
    suburbs drive up the cost of housing
  • Result gt90 of new single-family homes built
    2000-2002 not affordable to gt75 of African
    American and Latino households

47
2. Job Sprawl
  • Jobs have moved away from the labor pool in many
    metropolitan areas, making connecting job-seekers
    with jobs a challenge which is compounded by poor
    public transportation
  • 40 of all suburban jobs cannot be reached by
    public transportation
  • Public investment disproportionately favors
    highways over public transportation

48
Spatial MismatchJob Growth PublicTransit in
Baltimore
  • Job Sprawl also correlates with greater
    segregation for African Americans from employment

49
E. Opportunity Segregation Cumulative Impact of
Sprawl, Fragmentation and Spatial Racism
  • Low income residents segregated from
    opportunities such as
  • Good schools, meaningful employment, safe and
    stable neighborhoods
  • This is opportunity segregation
  • Also reinforces mapping of class and race

50
V. Political Economy of Criminal Justice Who
Commits the Crime and Who Does the Time?
  • Juveniles
  • Drug dealing
  • Use Hard Drugs

51
3. Other Destructive Behavior
Self-reported behavior in interviews
52
4. Who Does the Juvenile Time?
53
(No Transcript)
54
Juveniles in Adult Prisons
55
B. Who Does the Adult Time?1. Whites Less
Likely to Be Arrested if Reported Graph of Of
African-Americans
56
2. Is There Police Bias?
  • Increases in minority police ? Increases in
    arrest rate for whites, no decrease in arrest
    rates for minorities

57
3. Trials
  • Television viewers were so accustomed to seeing
    African-American crime suspects on the local news
    that even when the race of a suspect was not
    specified, viewers tended to remember seeing an
    Africa-American suspect.

58
Result Conviction More Likely
59
4. Sentencing Disparity
60
5. Racial consequences of the war on drugs
  • a. Drug Use Rates for Adults ( using past month)

Source 2000 National Household Survey on Drug
Abuse
61
b. Disparate Treatment Based on Race
  • African Americans constitute about 13 of drug
    users BUT
  • 36.8 of those arrested for drug violations
  • 42 of those in federal prisons for drug
    violations
  • 59 of those in state prisons

62
6. Lifetime likelihood of imprisonment
  • Among men
  • 28.5 African-Americans
  • 16 Latinos
  • 4.4 Non-Latino Whites
  • Among women
  • 3.6 African-Americans
  • 1.5 Latinos
  • 0.5 Non-Latino Whites

63
C. Class Bias in the Courts?
  • Money matters Wealthy litigants more likely to
    win
  • Amicus Curae briefs affect decisions
  • State Supreme Courts Repeat players (Haves) Beat
    One-Shot Appellants (Have-Nots)
  • Relationship decreases when outside amici favor
    have-nots

64
VI. What should we do?
  • Simulation results
  • Who won?
  • What does the starting level of money represent
    in real life?
  • What does the Passing GO bonus represent?
  • What does the Thimble rule represent?
  • Losers What could you have done to become a
    winner?
  • Other players Why should you bother playing at
    all?

65
B. Structured Life ChancesPlaying the Hand You
are Dealt
  • Monopoly is an analogy for the social world we
    live in
  • Rules of the Game Structures choices
  • People play the game Agency
  • Perception vs. Reality
  • Perception Everyone starts with same
  • Reality People start with varying amounts
  • Individual life chances are largely (but not
    entirely) structured by the hand one is dealt
  • Social design Rawls and the Veil of Ignorance

66
C. Responses to Income Inequality
  • Leave it alone
  • Argument Inequality creates incentives to
    succeed
  • Problem Inequality produces social conflict,
    which can lower economic growth. Inequality can
    reduce incentives if perceived as entrenched
  • Income redistribution
  • Argument Progressive taxes combined with social
    welfare programs reduce inequality
  • Problem Social support encourages inefficiency
    and free-riding behavior
  • Reduce effects of inequality better-funded
    public defenders, Robin Hood school funding,
    etc.
  • Argument Allows incentives created by inequality
    and perception of class mobility
  • Problem Best outcome is to reduce effects, not
    eliminate them (family support, etc) may be
    sufficient to reduce incentives but insufficient
    to overcome perception of entrenchment

67
D. Race Affirmative Action?
  • Problem Discrimination (Not Just Disparity)
    Exists
  • Housing ? Education and Wealth
  • Employment ? Income
  • Law Enforcement ? Socioeconomic Outcomes and
    Rights
  • Dilemma How to Solve? Assume agreement that
    government shouldnt discriminate
  • Government allows discrimination Cannot avoid
    moral choices!
  • Government bans discrimination Leads to
    buck-passing, enforcement problems.
  • Affirmative Action Race-based programs to remedy
    effects of ongoing discrimination

68
3. Rationales and Counter-Arguments
Focus Argument For Argument Against
Past Racism Reparations Individualism Identification
Present Inequality Unequal Outcomes by Race Race-Blind Equality of Opportunity
Present Prejudice Check on Discrimination Bureaucratic Expansion/Crudity
Future Diversity Dependence Resentment
69
4. Polls Inconsistent
  • Does this reflect cognitive dissonance?

70
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com