IDENTIFYING, INVESTIGATING - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

IDENTIFYING, INVESTIGATING

Description:

Title: WardenWed330.ppt Author: James H. Anspach Last modified by: urow027 Created Date: 5/16/2005 6:36:44 PM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: Jame441
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: IDENTIFYING, INVESTIGATING


1
IDENTIFYING, INVESTIGATING CHARACTERIZING
UNKNOWNS
2
WHAT ARE UNKNOWNS HOW ARE THEY IDENTIFIED?
  • Unknowns are typically linear conductors or
    targets which can not be readily correlated to
    available record information, utility related
    structures or positively identified utility
    configurations.
  • Unknowns are typically identified through the
    employment of surface geophysical equipment
    during a Quality Level B (QL-B) subsurface
    utility engineering (SUE) investigation.
  • Unknowns may also be discovered during the
    excavation of Quality Level A (QL-A) test holes
    or while investigating utility related structures
    such as manholes, vaults, inlets, cabinets and
    pedestals.
  • In some cases, unknowns may first show up as
    unidentified facilities on plans, permits or
    record drawings.

3
UNKNOWN CONDUCTORS vs. UNKNOWN UTILITIES
  • NON-UTILITY CONDUCTORS
  • Old Fencing
  • Typically found near existing or old ROW lines.
  • Rebar
  • Typically found in curbs, sidewalks
  • concrete paving.
  • Railroad Trolley Tracks
  • Typically found in older urban,
  • metropolitan and industrial areas.
  • Construction/Demolition Debris
  • Occurs randomly on a small percentage of projects.
  • UNKNOWN UTILITIES
  • Undocumented Active Utilities
  • Found everywhere, they are most often
    communications, traffic control and privately
    owned facilities.
  • Abandoned Communications
  • Most often found in suburban and rural areas,
    their number are growing rapidly.
  • Abandoned Natural Gas Water
  • Most often found in older urban,
  • metropolitan and industrial areas.
  • Aban Gas Gathering Systems
  • Commonly found in regions with a history
  • of oil gas production.
  • Steam Pneumatic Systems
  • Casings and Culverts

4
WHAT ARE THE PRIMARY GOALS OF INVESTIGATING
UNKNOWNS?
  • ATTEMPT TO DETERMINE THE FOLLOWING
  • What is it?
  • Obtaining this information is critical because
    it is the only way to eliminate non-utility
    related targets. It also allows for the narrowing
    of search parameters aimed at determining
    ownership.
  • Who owns it?
  • The determination of ownership is critical
    because it establishes a direct contact for
    obtaining additional facility specific
    information. Direct contact with the owner also
    facilitates the timely negotiation, design and
    planning of relocations.
  • What is its operational status?
  • This information is critical regardless of the
    establishment of ownership. The time and costs
    associated with removing abandoned facilities
    are far less than those associated with the
    design and relocation of inactive or
    abandoned facilities.

5
HOW CAN WE DETERMINEWHAT IT IS?
  • Employ surface geophysical equipment to tie the
    target in to a utility related structure or
    positively identified utility configurations.
  • This may require investigation beyond the strict
    limits of the project.
  • Research additional sources of record and
    anecdotal information.
  • These sources may include archival utility
    records, permits, deeds, tax records, public
    libraries, county courthouses, regulatory
    agencies, property owners, the internet, etc.
  • Employ non-destructive excavating techniques to
    expose the target.
  • Exposure will allow for the elimination of
    non-utility unknowns. It also allows for the
    collection of important physical information such
    as the size, material type and general condition
    of unknown utilities.

6
HOW CAN WE DETERMINE OWNERSHIP?
  • Employ surface geophysical equipment to tie the
    target in to a utility related structure or
    positively identified utility configurations.
  • This may require investigation beyond the strict
    limits of the project.
  • Research additional sources of record and
    anecdotal information.
  • These sources may include archival utility
    records, permits, deeds, tax records, public
    libraries, county courthouses regulatory
    agencies, property owners, internet, etc.
  • Post public notices as required by state and
    local statutes.
  • Is there an owner?
  • Abandoned utilities are often not included in
    the sales, mergers, etc. of corporate interests.
    In these cases, ownership may have reverted to
    the surface owner.

7
FROM THE TxDOT UTILITY MANUAL
  • Section 9 Unknown Utility Ownership Policy
  • Determining the ownership and authorized agent of
    the utility can be accomplished by
  • ?? visiting with people being served by the
    facility
  • ?? checking with the owners or representatives
    of similar facilities in the area
  • ?? contacting the landowners where the utility
    is located
  • ?? reviewing TxDOT permits and Joint Use
    Agreements in the area
  • ?? investigate other adjacent roadway utilities
    or
  • ?? contacting county maintenance personnel or
    commissioners.

8
Cooperative facilities may be used by consumers
who are unaware that the facilities are consumer
owned, or that the original members of a
cooperative may no longer exist. Yet, the
cooperatives are responsible for the adjustment
of utilities. This situation may be remedied by
the following methods ?? Call the consumers
using the facilities to a meeting. Have the TxDOT
Utility Liaison explain the scope of the project
and potential impact on the facilities. ?? If
the cooperative is unable to fund their portion
of the required adjustment, inform them of
financing options. These include SIB and State's
Hardship Financing Fund and other than State
sources, e.g., bond.
9
  • When ownership cannot be determined and the
    utility is not abandoned or inoperative, TxDOT
    will exhibit a good faith effort by publishing
    its intention to abandon the utility according to
    State or industry standards using a citation by
    publication. This should be accomplished in the
    same manner as that for a right of way parcel
    refer to TxDOTs right of way Manual, Volume 4,
    Eminent Domain Guide, Sections 3 and 8. Another
    method of handling this situation could be
    leaving the utility in place through highway
    design mitigation.

10
GENERALLY RECOGNIZED OPERATIONAL STATUS
CHARACTERIZATIONS
  • ACTIVE Any or all of the following may apply
  • The utility owner has characterized the
    operational status of this facility as ACTIVE .
  • There is physical, electronic, record or
    anecdotal evidence found to suggest this facility
    is in regular use.

11
GENERALLY RECOGNIZED OPERATIONAL STATUS
CHARACTERIZATIONS
  • INACTIVE Any or all of the following may apply
  • The utility owner has characterized the
    operational status of this facility as INACTIVE .
  • There is physical, electronic, record or
    anecdotal evidence found to suggest this facility
    is not in regular use.
  • There is physical, electronic, record or
    anecdotal evidence found to suggest this facility
    is serviceable or, could be economically repaired
    and returned to ACTIVE status.

12
GENERALLY RECOGNIZED OPERATIONAL STATUS
CHARACTERIZATIONS
  • ABANDONED Any or all of the following may
    apply
  • The utility owner has characterized the
    operational status of this facility as ABANDONED
    .
  • There is physical, electronic, record or
    anecdotal evidence found to suggest this facility
    is not in regular use.
  • There is physical, electronic, record or
    anecdotal evidence found to suggest this facility
    is unserviceable and, could not be economically
    repaired and returned to ACTIVE or INACTIVE
    status.

13
GENERALLY RECOGNIZED OPERATIONAL STATUS
CHARACTERIZATIONS
  • UNKNOWN Any or all of the following may apply
  • The utility owner was unable or unwilling to
    characterize the operational status of this
    facility.
  • There was insufficient physical, electronic,
    record or anecdotal evidence found to warrant a
    more specific status.

14
HOW CAN WE DETERMINE OPERATIONAL STATUS?
  • Employ surface geophysical to search for EOIs.
  • EOIs can indicate the cut ends of pipes or
    cables.
  • Employ non-destructive excavating techniques to
    expose target utilities.
  • gt Physical exposure at an EOI can provide
    verification that a line has been cut.
  • gtPhysical exposure at points of poor electronic
    information may yield additional telling
    information such as holes or other conditions
    which are indicative of operational status.
  • gtPhysical exposure of pipes facilitates external
    testing for cathodic protection, pipe
    wall thickness, asbestos content and flowing
    liquid or gas.
  • As a last resort and provided a number of
    prerequisite criteria have been met, pipes can be
    cold tapped. This facilitates direct sampling
    inside of the pipe.

15
DOCUMENTING REPORTING INFORMATION
  • Provide QL-B information in the appropriate CADD
    platform using the clients standards for line
    styles, symbology, etc.
  • Add a unique non-embedded text label i.e., A-Z,
    2A-2Z, 3A-3Z to each line.
  • Provide a Utility Characterization Report which
    includes detailed information such as size,
    material type, depth, general condition,
    ownership, operational status, etc. for each line.

16
TYPICAL QL-B WORK PRODUCT
17
TYPICAL QL-B/UC WORK PRODUCT
18
(No Transcript)
19
C/I ASCE 38-02Standard Guidelines for the
Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface
Utility Data
  • National engineering standard published in Dec.
    2002.
  • Utility ownership or type should be noted when
    known.
  • 38-02 is silent on how much investigation should
    go into determining utility ownership or type.

20
SCOPES OF WORK
  • Most scopes of work, whether generated by the SUE
    consultant or the client, fail to specifically
    address the issue of unknowns.
  • Therefore, individual SUE consultants will
    address these issues in different ways, based
    upon their perception of the owners
    expectations, pricing mechanisms, project due
    dates, and other factors.
  • However, lacking a scope of work to the contrary,
    a majority of SUE consultants will take a
    relatively minimalist approach and simply label
    unidentified conductors as an UNKNOWNS and
    leave it at that.

21
Range of Practices Consultant 1
  • Research records of the major known utilities.
  • Employ surface geophysical equipment to confirm
    only these utilities of record.
  • If they happen across an unidentified conductor
    it is traced to the project limits, mapped and
    labeled whatever the technician thinks it might
    be or simply left as an UNKNOWN.

22
Range of Practices Consultant 2
  • Research records of the major known utilities.
  • Employ surface geophysical equipment to confirm
    only these utilities of record.
  • If they happen across an unidentified conductor
    and it is traced to the project limits, it is
    mapped and labeled whatever the technician thinks
    it might be or simply left as an UNKNOWN.
  • If it is traced to a utility related structure
    (e.g. a telephone pedestal), it is labeled based
    upon it association with that structure (e.g.
    telephone).

23
Range of Practices Consultant 3
  • Research records of the major known utilities.
  • Employ surface geophysical equipment to confirm
    the utilities of record and, actively sweep the
    projects to search for others.
  • If unidentified conductors are found, they are
    traced to the project limits and mapped. If no
    structures are found within the project limits,
    they labeled as an UNKNOWNS.
  • If an unknown conductor is traced to a utility
    related structure (e.g. a telephone pedestal), it
    is labeled based upon it association with that
    structure (e.g. telephone).

24
Range of Practices Consultant 4
  • Research records of the major known utilities.
  • Employ surface geophysical equipment to confirm
    the utilities of record and, actively sweep the
    projects to search for others.
  • If unidentified conductors are found, they are
    traced to the project limits and mapped. If no
    structures are found within the project limits,
    they labeled as an UNKNOWNS.
  • If an unknown conductor is traced to a utility
    related structure (e.g. a telephone pedestal), it
    is labeled based upon it association with that
    structure (e.g. telephone).
  • Perform additional records research and meet or
    correspond with owners of known utilities in an
    attempt to obtain additional anecdotal
    information leading the identification of
    unknowns and their ownership.

25
Range of Practices Consultant 5
  • Research records of the major known utilities.
  • Employ surface geophysical equipment to confirm
    the utilities of record and, actively sweep the
    projects to search for others.
  • If unidentified conductors are found, they are
    traced for some distance beyond the project
    limits and mapped within the limits. If no
    structures are found within the project limits,
    they labeled as an UNKNOWNS.
  • If an unknown conductor is traced to a utility
    related structure (e.g. a telephone pedestal), it
    is labeled based upon it association with that
    structure (e.g. telephone).
  • Perform additional records research and meet or
    correspond with owners of known utilities in an
    attempt to obtain additional anecdotal
    information leading the identification of
    unknowns and their ownership.
  • If unknown is thought to be relatively shallow, a
    hand excavation is performed in an attempt to at
    least identify its size and material type.

26
SUMMARY
  • Unknown conductors can end up being almost
    anything from buried railroad tracks, to scraps
    of abandoned phone cables, to active petroleum or
    natural gas pipelines.
  • The amount of effort required to determine what
    they are, who owns them and whether or not they
    are active covers a large spectrum
  • Some courses of action are simple, inexpensive,
    and can be relatively effective
  • Other actions may be quite costly and time
    consuming, with liability issues regarding
    environmental releases or property damage (e.g.
    to a line being tapped).
  • Good communications and a clear scope of work are
    critical to controlling costs, mitigating risks,
    and ensuring adherence to project timelines.
  • Project owners may perceive a conflict of
    interest between the normal utility mapping scope
    and the costly measures necessary to identify
    some unknowns they may desire separate contracts
    to eliminate this perceived conflict of interest.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com