HEARING LOSS IN AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE TECHNICIANS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

HEARING LOSS IN AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE TECHNICIANS

Description:

Title: PowerPoint Presentation Author: Rhys Palmer Last modified by: mg847 Created Date: 4/30/2003 12:54:11 AM Document presentation format: On-screen Show – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:345
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: Rhy81
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: HEARING LOSS IN AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE TECHNICIANS


1
HEARING LOSS IN AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE TECHNICIANS
Maya Guest1, May Boggess2 1 Faculty of Health,
University of Newcastle, Australia. 2 Department
of Statistics, Texas AM University, College
Station, USA
2
F111, a flying fuel tank
3
Deseal, then reseal a fuel tank
  • The fuel tanks were a confined space
  • They were very cramped, with tradespeople
    crawling around the braces

4
Health Concerns
  • Concerns about various symptoms experienced by
    workers were raised in early 1999 with symptoms
    including
  • memory loss
  • fatigue
  • neurological problems eg. colour vision
  • Deseal/reseal activities ceased in 2000
  • The SHOAMP Study

5
The SHOAMP Study
  • Aims
  • compare series of general health, medical and
    neurophysiological outcomes between F-111
    deseal/reseal personnel and appropriate
    comparisons
  • Research Question
  • Is there an association between adverse health
    status and an involvement in F-111 deseal/reseal
    activities?
  • Study Design
  • Retrospective cohort postal questionnaire exam

6
Study Group
  • Exposed group
  • in Deseal/Reseal program at Amberley
  • N 616
  • Two comparison groups
  • same time, but in non-technical at Amberley
  • N406
  • same time, but in technical at Richmond
  • N516
  • Total health exams
  • N1538

7
Measuring Hearing Thresholds
  • Pure-tone audiometry at the frequencies of 0.5,
    1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 kHz for air conduction
  • Australian Standard AS1269.4.1998 by trained
    nurses
  • Measures threshold dB (smaller is better)

8
Hearing Threshold result one person
9
Hearing Threshold result one person
10
How to compare groups?
  • Treat each frequency separately
  • Do 95 confidence intervals for each group
    overlap?

11
Mean (95 CI) Hearing Thresholds
12
Distribution of Hearing Thresholds lower
frequencies
13
Distribution of Hearing Thresholds higher
frequencies
14
Problems
  • 16 observations on single person will be
    correlated
  • Distribution heavily skewed
  • Multiple test correction (eg. Bonferroni) needed
    to control overall error rate
  • Other factors need to be controlled for
  • AGE!

15
The ISO-7029
  • The ISO-7029 statistical distribution of hearing
    thresholds as a function of age provides by
    gender the expected median value of hearing
    thresholds relative to the median threshold at
    the age of 18 years and the statistical
    distribution above and below the median value for
    the range of audiometric frequencies from 125 Hz
    to 8000 Hz for populations of otologically normal
    persons of given age between 18 and 70 years

16
ISO 7029 healthy pop. lower frequencies

17
ISO 7029 healthy pop. higher frequencies
18
Quantile model?
  • Mean regression coefficients estimated by
    minimizing the sum of the squares of the
    residuals
  • Quantile regression coefficients estimated by
    minimizing the sum of the absolute values of the
    residuals

19
Quantile model?
  • Mean regression 1821 Gauss showed it was ML,
    least variance IF residuals are normal.
  • Quantile regression 1818 Laplace showed it had
    smaller variance than mean for certain
    distributions with long tails.
  • Central Limit Theorem is not a cure all.

20
Statistical Analysis quantile model to compare
to normal population
  • Response hearing threshold (dB)
  • Explanatory variables
  • Frequency, Age
  • Posting category, Rank category
  • Alcohol consumption category, Smoking status
  • Diabetes status
  • SSRIs (anti-depressants), malaria medication
  • Ringing in the ears
  • Exposure group, civilian solvent exposure
  • Bootstrap standard errors correlation within
    person.

21
Statistical Analysis quantile model to compare
to normal population
  • Statistically significant explanatory variables
  • Frequency, Age
  • Smoking status, Diabetes status
  • SSRIs (anti-depressants)
  • Ringing in the ears
  • Exposure group
  • Clinically significant variables
  • Frequency
  • Age

22
Result table
  • --------------------------------------------------
    ----------------------------
  • Coef. Std. Err. z
    Pgtz 95 Conf. Interval
  • -------------------------------------------------
    ----------------------------
  • _Ifrequen10 -1.051308 .3152126 -3.34
    0.001 -1.669113 -.4335024
  • _Ifrequen15 -.6029429 .3331257 -1.81
    0.070 -1.255857 .0499715
  • _Ifrequen20 -1.881937 .3809262 -4.94
    0.000 -2.628539 -1.135336
  • _Ifrequen30 .8669362 .4485159 1.93
    0.053 -.0121388 1.746011
  • _Ifrequen40 7.536735 .4582282 16.45
    0.000 6.638624 8.434846
  • _Ifrequen60 8.997418 .3901236 23.06
    0.000 8.23279 9.762046
  • _IfreXg40_2 -2.720623 .9044762 -3.01
    0.003 -4.493363 -.9478817
  • _IfreXg60_2 -2.208105 .8227658 -2.68
    0.007 -3.820696 -.5955134
  • _IfreXg80_2 -3.32165 .7481134 -4.44
    0.000 -4.787925 -1.855374
  • age -.4541155 .2376783 -1.91
    0.056 -.9199565 .0117254
  • age2 .006715 .002729 2.46
    0.014 .0013662 .0120638
  • frequency .2533864 .1252859 2.02
    0.043 .0078305 .4989422
  • fa -.0225578 .0058333 -3.87
    0.000 -.0339908 -.0111248
  • fa2 .0004074 .000067 6.08
    0.000 .0002761 .0005387
  • _Ismoke_ca3 1.7394 .5696168 3.05
    0.002 .6229713 2.855828

23
Predicted hearing median threshold
24
Predicted hearing median threshold
25
Predicted hearing median threshold
26
Predicted hearing median threshold
27
Conclusion
  • Need to reconsider noise exposure limits if
    workers are additionally exposed to chemicals
  • Need to reconsider the efficacy of hearing
    protectors in combined exposures

28
Take home message
  • No one-size-fits all in statistics
  • Central Limit Theorem is not a cure-all

29
The TUNRA Study Team
  • Principal Investigators
  • Catherine DEste, Associate Professor in
    Biostatistics, Centre for Clinical Epidemiology
    Biostatistics, The University of Newcastle.
  • John Attia, Senior Lecturer in Epidemiology,
    Centre for Clinical Epidemiology Biostatistics,
    The University of Newcastle Academic Consultant,
    Hunter Area Health Service
  • Anthony Brown, Director of Primary Health Care
    and Population Health, Macquarie Area Health
    Service Conjoint Associate Professor,
    Environmental and Occupational Health, The
    University of Newcastle.
  • Julie Byles, B.Med, PhD, Professor and Director,
    Centre for Research and Education in Ageing
    (CREA), Faculty of Health, The University of
    Newcastle.
  • Associate Investigator
  • Robert Gibberd, Associate Professor, Centre for
    Clinical Epidemiology Biostatistics, The
    University of Newcastle.
  • CEO of TUNRA Ltd
  • Soozy Smith, PhD, TUNRA Ltd, The University of
    Newcastle.
  • Project Support
  • Meredith Tavener, Project Manager.
  • Richard Gibson, Associate Lecturer in
    Biostatistics (Research), Centre for Clinical
    Epidemiology Biostatistics, The University of
    Newcastle, Project Statistician.
  • Maya Guest,. Research Higher Degree candidate,
    PhD Fellow for SHOAMP.

30
Questions/Thank you etc.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com